As far as I know, we haven’t had a serious domestic assassination attempt on a president since Newt Gingrich became Speaker of the House in 1995 (it is often forgotten that there was a serious attempt on Clinton’s life in 1994). It’s almost as if the Republicans regaining control of the people’s house calmed the crazies. After all, even Reagan was shot. There were was one semi-credible assassination plot against Carter and two actual attempts on Gerald Ford. Since 1995, however, the only reported attempts on a president’s life were a guy who sprayed bullets at the White House in early 2001 and, in 2005, a grenade that was thrown at Bush in Georgia (the country, not the state).
Could it be that there is something about the Republicans being in some degree of control that gives right-wing crazies an outlet for hope and activism, and leads them away from acts of violence?
Ever since the modern GOP started taking shape during the McCarthy Era, I cannot think of a time except the beginning of the Carter administration, when the Democrats have been control of everything and the right didn’t start acting crazy. Lee Harvey Oswald may indeed have been JFK’s assassin (or one of them) but the ensuing investigations have revealed that many people on the right were discussing murdering Kennedy. LBJ’s term in office led to a total schism in American society with both the left and the right resorting to violence and craziness. MLK and RFK were both assassinated. And, it’s hard to express how insane Bill Clinton’s presidency made the Right, to the point that they impeached him for lying about adultery.
Now that the Democrats are in control of the White House and Congress, we’re seeing the same kind of unhinged behavior that we’ve seen during similar situations in the past.
To be sure, there are always some crazy people around who are willing to make an attempt on the president’s life. The history of this is fairly bipartisan. I don’t know if John Hinckley Jr. was even opposed to Reagan’s policies, but he seemed to think Jodie Foster would be impressed if he killed him. Who can account for such reasoning?
But it isn’t all about the president. It’s also about random acts of violence, murder, and terrorism against ordinary, everyday Americans. I am unaware of any anti-abortion violence during the entire presidency of George W. Bush (although there were multiple arsons, and at least one bomb planted). It was quite a different story during Clinton’s presidency, which experienced multiple murder attempts of abortion providers. Now, just months into Obama’s presidency, we have witnessed a successful murder attempt.
One thing that I think is worth considering is that the lone domestic event that might be considered an assassination attempt on George W. Bush occurred early in 2001 (before 9/11) when he was still seen by more than half of the country as an illegitimate president who had come to power through a combination of fluky-luck (the butterfly ballot) and strong-armed power (the Supreme Court).
There might be something powerfully motivating in delegitimizing arguments. In other words, arguments that President Obama wasn’t really born in the United States, and therefore is ineligible to be president, could serve as a catalyst. We know that the Holocaust Museum shooter believed in that conspiracy theory? How important was that belief in motivating him to take action?
The same could probably be said for arguments that Obama is secretly a Muslim, or a tool of the Jews, or an enemy of the Jews, or bent on turning America into a socialist wasteland. People that absorb these arguments and believe them to be true may feel compelled to take action. I think that this is a legitimate concern. And, if they can’t take action against a hard target like the president, they may take action against soft targets like abortion providers, the Holocaust Museum, or Federal Buildings.
I don’t know exactly what drives people that are already crazy to do crazy acts, but I think it is interesting that they show a tendency to act up more frequently when the Left is on control of government in Washington. We must remain vigilant.
part of this right-wing propensity for violence can be attributed to the deeply-held and sincere belief that only conservatives are fit to lead (ie: “this is a christian nation”) and only an ill-informed public could ever vote otherwise. liberals are only second-class citizens and conservatives only ever lose their place at the helm through the treachery and outright thuggery of the left. any conservative seen helping liberals obviously was never really a true conservative to begin with and is only a traitor. it is therefore dangerous and unacceptable to allow the left to ever maintain any kind of grip on power and any means that can be used to break that grip becomes acceptable.
.
An acquaintance of Von Brunn …
In his car, officers found a notebook that had handwritten notations stating the following:
“You want my weapons — this is how you’ll get them. The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America’s money. The 1st Amendment is abrogated –henceforth. See: holywesternempire.org. JVB swore (LT USNR) to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Jews — Bolshevics — Zionists are America’s enemies. See: Talmud — Sanhedrin “Kill the Best Gentiles!”
At the end of the above writings appears the signature: “James W. Von Brunn” according to a court affidavit (pdf).
Civil rights groups were familiar with his virulent history. “We’ve been tracking this guy for decades,” said Heidi Beirich, director of research for the Southern Poverty Law Center‘s Intelligence Project, which tracks hate crimes. “He thinks the Jews control the Federal Reserve, the banking system, that basically all Jews are evil,” she said. “He’s an extreme anti-Semite.”
Acquaintance John de Nugent
≈ Posted earlier in my diary — White Supremacist and Anti-Government ≈
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
I guess the old-time anti-semites have now split into two camps: the traditional conspiracy believers like this loony, and the apocalypse lovers who have flipped 180 and now idolize Zionism as the way to bring it on. The world just keeps getting stranger.
I drove yesterday from Altoona, PA back to NJ.
Two things I noticed were how many empty/blank billboards there were. Second was how many billboards had conservative/political/religious themes to them.
One that stuck out for me was on West of Allentown that simply said “Where’s the Birth Certificate”
I had to wonder in these tough economic times when advertisers can’t afford advertising, who has the money and concern enough to buy billboards questioning our presidents nationality? Who cares that much?
what farah conveniently neglects to remind people as he flogs his pet nontroversy is that his own scandal sheet already examined the birth certificate in aug 2008:
his billboard campaign is going a little slower than expected, however:
When you’re crazy enough, having Dems in control is indistinguishable from an attack by space aliens, a commie coup, a collision with an asteroid, or an ongoing Jewish/Muslim/liberal/UN conspiracy. All constraints are null. In terms of perception, random acts of violence = looting.
It could be that this is just a legacy of 60’s pacifism. It’s not as if we don’t have plenty of crazies of our own; they are just less likely to view violence as a legitimate policy tool. Early 20th century leftism involved rather more violence.
I don’t think there’s any inherent property of leftism that makes it less violent. The past century saw no shortage of armed leftist groups in other countries. I think it’s mainly that the militarism and general obsession with violence on the American right has provoked a natural counter-reaction against violence on the left.
During a time of right wing monsters, it may be tempting to pat ourselves on the back, but it hasn’t been that long since the left spawned the Weather Underground, and given the right conditions, I’m sure we could again. People are people, and a certain proportion of them will always be angry and misguided.
Fear of diversity, equality. With Bushco admin the white supremacists thought their faction was still in control. Now they’re more scared than usual. IMO one of the scariest things to the white supremacists about both Carter and Clinton was that their wives were stronger and possibly smarter than they were and the best friend of each was AA (Andrew Young, Vernon Jordan).
What I mean is, whatever their policies, Carter and Clinton lived equality. Doesn’t matter how much Condi Rice and Colin Powell appeared to have authority, they were always just “the help” for Bushco.
There’s a considerably less flattering term that applies to those two, though I decline to use it.
The GOP has developed tokenism into a fine art. It fools no one but those willing to be fooled, but that’s enough for their purposes. They’re not going to convert us; they’re going after bigots who prefer not to think of themselves as bigots, and the bigots who have no problem with being bigots know a token when they see one.
indeed, the less flattering term does come to mind!!! Also, my point about equality re: race and gender, imo same can be said of Clinton and also Obama re: LGBT friends. (contrast w. the self-hating closeted Bushco types). I’ll be very interested to read Booman’s take on Obama admin DOJ brief defending DOMA, written by a Mormo holdover from Bushco (discussed at length on Americablog ). Is it more Obama sneakiness? I’m inclined to think so, but I have a very high opinion of the Obama team’s strategic smarts and support for equality. But for now Booman should be tending to his ocular crisis.
Your post is brings up a good issue. When a Republican is in the White House all our enemies are external. When a Democrat is in the White House our problems in internal extremist. Interesting, no. Republican’s seem to have to focus our problems externally as they rob and plunder the USA under the excuse of “free market”
Regan = Savings And Loan debacle, (Cold War)
Bush I = 1992 recession given to Clinton (Panama, Grenada
Clinton = 8 years of economic growth (Oklahoma City, bombing)(Atlanta Olympic Park bombing)
Bush II = false president, 9/11, re(drp)ession, Iraq,Afghanistan…
Obama..extremist/terrorist home-grown…