What some people miss when they’re bemoaning the new tendency of opposition parties to vote against Supreme Court nominees is that the Supreme Court has become another branch of Congress. What can’t be done in Congress is now done by the Court. It was the inability of Congress to end Jim Crow that started this trend, but the Roe v. Wade decision put it on steroids. Republicans know they can’t ban abortion so long as the Court says it is a constitutional right, so they are laser-focused on filling the Court with anti-choice conservatives. They’ve already succeeded in getting a court conservative enough to gut the McCain-Feingold bill, to rule against equal pay for equal work, and so on. The Court is “activist” because it’s now set up to legislate on issues where Congress either cannot act or is unwilling to act. If we got rid of the filibuster, we could resolve most of these issues.
About The Author

BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
This post is dumb on so many levels, it’s not even funny.
Makes sense to me, do you care to elaborate? Maybe I am the ‘dumb’ one.
Yeah, I echo Mac G.
That makes three of us. I completely agree with Booman.
You really think they want to get rid of Roe v Wade? They’ve had almost 40 years, during most of which we had Republican presidents appointing justices. The inmates may someday take over the gop asylum and overturn it, but do you think maybe the establishment types wouldn’t much rather keep the issue?
Poppy proved your point with Souter.
Of course they would, but at what point does it become like “the boy who cried wolf”?