During the early portion of the Bush/Cheney administration, progressives got organized online to fight back because the Democrats in Congress were showing no fight. We revitalized the party, even if we didn’t fundamentally change it. Something similar is happening on the right with the Tea Party movement, but it isn’t quite the same. No one could plausibly accuse the Republicans in Washington of backing down from a fight with the Obama administration. Even before the president was sworn in, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell decided on a scorched-earth opposition, using every procedural hurdle in the book. That the president has compiled an astonishing record of legislative achievement (in historical terms) despite this opposition doesn’t change the fact that McConnell and the Republicans have stymied the president on closing Guantanamo, on addressing climate change, on tackling immigration reform, and held up so many judicial nominees that there are now a higher percentage of Republican judges than when Obama took office. If you are a conservative who opposes the president’s agenda, you can’t fairly say that the Republicans have failed to fight for you.
So, why are rank-and-file Republicans throwing their bums out in primaries all over the country?
I think, obviously, the starting point in explaining this has to be the trauma of George W. Bush’s failure both on policy and politically. Whatever ‘compassionate conservatism’ was supposed to mean, it wound up meaning a bigger role for the federal government in education, a much bigger Medicare entitlement that now includes prescription drugs, and yawning economy-killing deficits. That might have been easier to swallow if Bush had delivered more for conservative causes, but his main contribution was simple cronyism and corruption and lax regulation. It might have been good for some high donors in the short-term, but it was no model for the future. The Republican voter isn’t asking for a return to the Bush years. They’re looking for a party that actually follows through on its rhetoric about the government being the problem, not the solution. They seem to have wised up to the fact that the GOP fat cats have been feeding them a line of shit.
Which leads me to the second explanation. The rank-and-file have been indoctrinated, literally. They’ve consumed so much of this shit from Fox News and hate radio that they actually believe in it. And one of the things they believe is that our institutions are not trustworthy and they’re not worth a damn. It’s hard to argue with them about that; it’s just that everything they’re doing is making things worse. By making it harder for the government to function and making it harder to do the things that need to be done, the right-wing creates a self-fulfilling prophesy. We ought to close Guantanamo Bay, but the people are too frightened and, so, no one has the president’s back to make that decision. Congress denies him the funds. The same is true on a host of other issues, most notably stimulus spending, climate change, and immigration reform.
Does anyone think our immigration policy doesn’t need reforming? Making that impossible doesn’t help anyone.
Republicans are getting thrown out of office because they aren’t crazy. But that’s because they’ve been teaching their base to be crazy for so long that they’ve finally started to demand that their representatives be crazy, too.
And no one can get control of this beast.
Exactly. Bush delivered precisely what the institutional, not the rank-and-file, GOP wanted. The combination to the safe. The location of the alarms. And a police escort for the getaway car.
I’m not sure no one can control the beast. The teabaggers’ movement was, after all, basically spawned and funded by the same TheftCo crowd (America’s First Name in White-Collar Crime™) that first spawned, and got rewarded by, Bush. I suspect it can be tamed successfully by shutting off the money spigot.
But it can’t be shut off just yet. The enthusiasm gap needs to stay all over on the Democratic side, and the collateral damage done so far to the institutional GOP has been manageable.
I’m partial to that view too, with the wrinkle that the reactionary “grass-roots” flourishing is instrumentally required by the moneymen because of the vacuum of visible cadres on the right subsequent to the foundering of the GW administration.
Lurking teabaggers: how is the government hurting you?
Are they imprisoning your group at a high rate? No, that’s african-americans. Are they questioning your citizenship and legally marginalizing your life here? No, that’s hispanics. Are they making war on co-religionists abroad? No, that’s the muslims. It seems rather you applaud these perversions of government power.
How is government harming you? Unless it, or rather the total historic failure of conservative economic theory, is harming your randroid fantasy of a “free market”. You’re welcome to that fantasy, but it has never characterized america or any other state.
So other than hurting your fee fees by making you feel like your accidental ethnic group isn’t the most specialest ever, because the government grants some rights to other ethnic configurations, what is your beef?
Many of them probably were unemployed, now employed by the Koch brothers.
It’s existential.
They grow old. They get sick. They will someday die. And that’s intolerable, because they’re unique. There’s no one like them.
So someone must pay.
It won’t change any of that, but it will make them forget it for a while, as they charge around on their crusade.
It would be better, better for them, better for us, if they all took up gardening, as Voltaire figured out yonks ago.
Looks like the Delaware Momma Bear isn’t quite ready for prime time (or the sunday talk shows)..
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39246797/ns/politics/
Refresh my memory, where the hell did Perot’s movement come from? Where are those people now? Mostly independents?
Perot’s people were just about:
1/3 Republicans (millionaire worship, hostage rescue, run-the-government-like-a-bidness),
1/3 independents (“Look, Lois, a not-politician!” novelty narrative), and
1/3 Democrats (non-racist Dixiecrats, anti-NAFTA union folks, even a few progressives dreaming of a politics without politicians).
Wikipedia:
Buchanan took over, and drove the remnants far, far right in 2000
Well this I know.
Perot’s movement had enough Republicans in it to put Bill Clinton in office for two terms.
Deep recessions tend to bring out the best and worst of us – look at the 30’s and see Father Coughlin, Huey Long, Bootleggers, etc. We certainly have the crazies today and if they ever gained power they would lead us right over the cliff. I still have faith that Obama and his administration are trying to do a credible balancing act. What worries me more than the politicians are the financial and corporate leaders that seem to feel that they are entitled to those outrageous salaries. On the other hand when Castro starts worrying about nuclear weapons I’m encouraged that maybe some of us are coming around to seeing our past mistakes.