John Boehner keeps telling me that our country is broke. Who am I to disbelieve him? If we’re broke, we’re broke.
House Speaker John Boehner routinely offers this diagnosis of the U.S.’s fiscal condition: “We’re broke; Broke going on bankrupt,” he said in a Feb. 28 speech in Nashville.
Boehner’s assessment dominates a debate over the federal budget that could lead to a government shutdown. It is a widely shared view with just one flaw: It’s wrong.
“The U.S. government is not broke,” said Marc Chandler, global head of currency strategy for Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. in New York. “There’s no evidence that the market is treating the U.S. government like it’s broke.”
The U.S. today is able to borrow at historically low interest rates, paying 0.68 percent on a two-year note that it had to offer at 5.1 percent before the financial crisis began in 2007.
Now, I am just a simple unfrozen caveman lawyer. Your world frightens and confuses me. But the one thing I DO know is that it can’t be good for the image of the United States for the Speaker of the House to go around telling the world and all its potential investors that our country can’t pay its bills. That just seems like a really dumb and basically irresponsible thing for John Boehner to do considering that it isn’t even true. But, hell, it would probably be a stupid and reckless thing to say even if it were true. You know what I’m saying?
Now, I’ve noticed that Boehner is a little less of a jackass when it comes to defaulting on the country’s debt (not that it is doing him any favors with his rowdy caucus). It’s a bit of contradiction, actually. On the one hand, Boehner says it would be a disaster if we didn’t raise the debt ceiling and pay our bills on time…
“I think raising the debt limit is the responsible thing to do for our country, the responsible thing for our economy,” Mr. Boehner said. “If we were to fail to increase the debt limit, we would send our economy into a tailspin.”
…and on the other hand, he’s saying that we can’t pay our bills because “we’re broke, broke going on bankrupt.”
Look. We have to raise the debt ceiling. What does that tell you? It tells me that we’re still failing to raise enough revenue to support what the government wants to do. Either the government has to do less or it has to raise more revenue. Neither of those things would be helpful to the economy in the short-term, so no one rational wants to do either of those things this year. But the Republicans are trying to destroy the very structure of the federal government (except for the defense industry) in the midst of a down economy. The American people don’t support what the GOP wants to do. At least, they don’t support it in detail. In the abstract, if you tell them that we’re broke then maybe they’ll let you bend them over and screw them one more time for old time’s sake. That’s what Boehner is betting on. But it’s all based on lies. It’s bad policy. It’s policy that cannot be imposed on the Senate or the administration. And it’s not even a policy that has the uniform support of his crazy caucus.
It’s a sad spectacle. The country needs to stop borrowing money soon, but right now we need to make smart investments and put people to work. We can afford to do that. The only thing that’s broke is John Boehner’s conscience and the moral compass of his merry band of banksters.
. . John Boehner’s conscience . .
Boehner’s a prick, no doubt, but he’s not the cause of our grief. Blame for that goes in large part to lazy news orgs content with giving equal weight to fringe and ‘mainstream’ organizations, and a DLC + friends too self-absorbed to bother with the unwashed masses.
I mean really. Last week on the PBS Newshour Durbin was followed by the demonstrably insane tea-party idiot Rep. West. Some days it’s just not worth chewing through the restraints.
He’s definitely a prick, though.
WGN-TV, owned by the bankrupt Tribune Company, reported today that the annual deficit is now 65% of GDP. While this is maybe true of the total debt, they kept repeating the term “annual deficit. And used it as a lead in to saying that we can’t afford Social Security any more. Just more Republican lies.
We need to keep borrowing, though, if we want to maintain our system as it is. Not only the maintenance but the persistence of a national debt has been part and parcel of modern states since the Bank of England was formed. We need to end the two wars and develop a better health care system.
You know, lending isn’t a bad way to go. It’s called “investing.” Borrowing is supposed to allow you to make a profit so that you can pay back the loan and and feed your family. A country that thinks borrowing is a permanent feature is just enriching other nations at its own expense without ever getting the fruit of its own labors.
We don’t have to, and never will pay back the National Debt, but if we keep borrowing, the interest charges could become monstrous.
The National Debt was in the neighborhood of $250 billion in 1950, grew to just under a Trillion dollars by 1980 and is now about 13 Trillion.
Over the same period the ratio of Debt/GDP went from about 125%, to 30% and now about 70%…
All without making any serious payments towards it – just keeps rolling over.
When are we going to start?
I say never, we’ll just grow out of it, like we always have.
If we stop growing, we have much bigger problems than debt.
We need to TAX every Wall Street transition!!
And break up the banks.
Goldman only paid 2% in taxes last year??
“The country needs to stop borrowing money soon”
The US does not need to, nor has it ever had to borrow money to finance it’s spending.
The US is the sole manufacturer of dollars. We call it a printing press but it’s actually just a pair of cells in a spreadsheet at the Treasury.
Question. Why do we borrow money to finance spending?
By doing that we are essentially treating a fiat monetary system like a Gold Standard.
We issue debt through private banks so they can charge us interest on the use of our own money.
Lincoln financed the Civil War with Greenbacks.
Pissed of the bankers who wanted 37% interest to finance the war.
Inflation was hellatious (something like 1300%) but that was because production capacity was severely hampered because of the war.
Right now production is hampered by lack of spending, so it follows…
And Kennedy wanted to take control of the printing presses….
Excellent – MMT at Booman.
We’re not borrowing money to finance the deficit. The deficit comes first. Investors are simply moving funds from a non-interest bearing account to an interest bearing account. And there the funds stay until they tell Bernanke what to do with them next.
We don’t “owe” China anything. The Chinese have sent us boatloads of stuff, for which, in return, they have accepted US dollars in payment. They have been paid. Now what to do with those dollars…well, they’re free to use them for whatever transaction they would care to make with any other party that also accepts US dollars in return. Or, they could move them from one account to another at the Fed.
This is all laid out very well by Warren Mosler, L. Randall Wray, Jamie Galbraith, and many other economists who support the Modern Monetary Theory. Warren has an excellent e-book available (for free!) on his website. Linky: http://moslereconomics.com/wp-content/powerpoints/7DIF.pdf (PDF warning and make sure you scroll down.)
Barclays banker accrues £33m in shares as Bob Diamond get £6.5m
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/mar/07/bob-diamond-bonus-barclays
(Bank Of England Governor) Mervyn King: Bankers Exploit Gullible Borrowers To Pay For Their Bonuses
Banks must be broken up, King insists
Notice, King says indirectly, the US will continue to have to bail out American banks every few years!!!
I wrote a piece here about 8 months ago saying the same thing…from personal observation.
“RECESSION!!!???” Whadda you, kiddin’ me or what?
I got my ass handed to me by a couple of people for having the temerity to say this.
Silly wabbits!!!
Silly sleeple!!!
Gee…now that Michael Moore says the same thing…and it’s covered by the national media because the PermaGov is scared shitless of the far right as personified by Scott Walker (Suddenly Moore’s the good guy? Wake the fuck up.)…I guess it’s OK to look around and smell the truffles.
So I am re-posting this article now.
Here it is again.
Enjoy.
And wake the fuck up.
AG
P.S. I’m really beginning to worry. I used to think that I was two or three years ahead of y’all. Now it’s down to eight or nine months. Gotta get on my bike and start pedaling again.
When Obama stops acting as if they have something in common, maybe I’ll be able to focus on Big Bad John Boehner.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/03/05/state/n030521S46.DTL#ixzz1FqnskQlG
By not fighting with the Republicans, Obama has taken away the ability of the Repubs to stand proud on the deficit stage.
They can’t run around calling Obmam a tax and spend Democrat. It makes them have to keep coming up with other stands to take and they fail at it.
Yes, that’s true. To ensure his own easy reelection, he’s guaranteeing that tens of billions of discretionary cuts will now be seen as a “reasonable compromise” to the public. And they’ll celebrate the hell out of it, I’m sure. Bipartisany goodness. Just like the December tax cut orgy.
Of course, that still means that not a single major Western government is running sensible fiscal policy this year, but fuck it. It’s a mad, mad, mad world.
Yes, that’s true. To ensure his own easy reelection, he’s guaranteeing that tens of billions of discretionary cuts will now be seen as a “reasonable compromise” to the public. And they’ll celebrate the hell out of it, I’m sure. Bipartisany goodness. Just like the December tax cut orgy.
Of course, that still means that not a single major Western government is running sensible fiscal policy this year, but fuck it. It’s a mad, mad, mad world.
I’m just a dumb old hick, but why in the hell isn’t John Boehner’s seat being attacked and turned to democratic?
Why aren’t I seeing attack ads 24/7 on just what he says in his district? Isn’t there any way to get one damned political person to start attacking and attacking and attacking.
Is there anyone in the US that doesn’t understand that getting a single asshole targeted is more effective than the BS that I see daily?
Hell, crucify the bastard and give him a little distraction and convince the rest of his jackass supporters in congress that their seats are exactly one election from unemployment.
Show the voters 24/7 videos of him on the golf course while his statements of irrational assholism are bannered across the screen.