The Republicans’ willingness and ability to use the budget process to offer another staggering redistribution of wealth from average Americans to the top two or three percent is pretty depressing. Let’s look at how things stood right before the onset of the Great Recession:
In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers). In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one’s home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%.
That was before millions of people had their homes seized by banks who couldn’t even be bothered to properly and legally maintain the paper trail. Things are much worse now.
Besides illustrating the significance of home ownership as a source of wealth, the graph also shows that Black and Latino households are faring significantly worse overall, whether we are talking about income or net worth. In 2007, the average white household had 15 times as much total wealth as the average African-American or Latino household. If we exclude home equity from the calculations and consider only financial wealth, the ratios are in the neighborhood of 100:1. Extrapolating from these figures, we see that 70% of white families’ wealth is in the form of their principal residence; for Blacks and Hispanics, the figures are 95% and 96%, respectively.
And for all Americans, things are getting worse: as the projections to July 2009 by Wolff (2010) make clear, the last few years have seen a huge loss in housing wealth for most families, making the gap between the rich and the rest of America even greater, and increasing the number of households with no marketable assets from 18.6% to 24.1%.
It’s amazing that American workers aren’t out in the streets demanding some justice, but they are so beaten down that the Republicans have no fear of proposing to take $6.2 trillion away from them over the next decade while extending for eternity the Bush’s tax cuts for the fabulously wealthy.
On CNBC, Tea Party Founding Father Rick Santelli was positively giddy that Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal to gut Medicaid and Medicare would change the conversation in this country. Santelli knows a thing or two about changing conversations. I think that the real threat of the GOP’s budget proposal isn’t that it will pass into law, but that it will shift the conversation even further to the right and make it harder for us get back to a fair system.
Expect to have to pay for your own bullet.
“It’s amazing that American workers aren’t out in the streets demanding some justice”
Well, funny you should mention that since YESTERDAY was a national day of action and there were rallies of workers in every state.
http://www.we-r-1.org/
It’s amazing to me that American progressive bloggers aren’t promoting rallies and aren’t in the streets with the workers demanding justice.
Shit, wake up and smell the coffee!
No shit, which is why it would have been nice for the president to reject the tax cut deal. We’re on their terms now, as I and many others have been saying for a while. It would also have been nice for him to offer his own ideological agenda, instead of his middle of the road “what I think passes for governance” agenda.
This makes Social Security privatization, which is part of the reason Republicans lost the House in 2006, look like a very modest proposal. And I’m not even certain we have a president who will fight back. I thought he was framing the debate about Ryan’s plan back during the health care summit just to poke and prod Ryan to actually convince the Republicans to propose it. I hope my thoughts were right, and that he hammers back at them instead of what Josh Marshall saw on the teevee yesterday:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/04/truly_pathetic_1.php?ref=fpblg
David Brooks is calling it “gutsy.” What is it with Village Idiots and picking on poor people? They’re nothing but bullies, going after the least privileged. Yet somehow in their reptilian brains it makes them feel manly.
this is who they are, and until folks are willing to
a) point it out
b) condemn them
c) fight
you just gotta keep on keeping on, pointing out their lunacy. but, it’s time to stop humoring people who have no business voting Republican, and give you dumb ass talking points. stop being nice to these people; call them the idiots that they are.