I think something we need to work on in the next election cycle is figuring out to make it clear to the American electorate that the Republican Party isn’t just in denial about climate change, they actually oppose anything that would reduce our consumption of fossil fuel products. That’s why, for example, Rep. Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is going to investigate the negotiations between automakers and the administration that resulted in new strict fuel economy standards.
Issa sent out letters to executives of the country’s major automakers Friday alerting them to the investigation and requesting that they keep all documents related to meetings with administration officials on the standards.
In the letters, which were obtained by The Hill, Issa says the administration’s efforts to negotiate the fuel economy standards “raise serious concerns.” The new rules, which were announced Friday by President Obama, will also limit consumer choice, Issa says.
“I am concerned about the agreements lack of transparency, the failure to conduct an open rulemaking process, as well as the potential for vehicle cost increases on consumers, and negative impact on American jobs,” the letters say.
Mind you, this is an agreement the automakers signed off on. It would require vehicles to average 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. That would save consumers almost 2 trillion dollars in gasoline costs, preserve 12 billion barrels of oil, and reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 6 billion metric tons. The average consumer would save over $8,000 on a new car bought in 2025 compared to a car bought today.
But, for Republicans, this means less profit for oil companies and so we must have investigations.
Or it’ll be good theater:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/28/999967/-Darrell-Issa-wants-to-investigate-President-Obama-b
ecause-itll-be-good%C2%A0theater?via=blog_1
The highest possible praise from a party that values good theater far more than good governance.
Then there is Rand Paul who fights for mining companies rights to crush the mountains in Kentucky and dump the spoils in river valleys, poisoning the water for the rest of the State.
He says regulation would violate the rights pf property and the companies create jobs.
I was SOOOOO happy to hear about these new fuel efficiency standards. Dad and I were talking about it and we agreed that if we can accomplish these standards, as well as move Big Freight Trucks to Compressed Natural Gas (instead of diesel,) like our city buses use, we could probably source all of our oil from The Americas and have nothing to do with OPEC anymore.
Imagine that. No more dependence on OPEC. Let the rest of the world fuck with them. No more wars in the mid-east that we need be involved in, hopefully.
And isn’t it time to end all oil subsidies? They are the most profitable industry in the history of the world. WTF do they need subsidies for anymore?
Electric high-speed-rail. Electric cars. High fuel efficiency cars. CNG Trucks and buses (and some cars,) hydrogen-(made from renewable energy) powered cars That’s the way to go.
Right now in Nevada, We The Public are demanding all electricity ultimately come from renewable sources (wind, solar, geothermal) and we’ve even got the big power company on our side. BTW, we’ve got massive hot-spots in the soil to get geothermal from all over the place along the Sierra Nevada mountain range. So much free energy to cheaply tap into…
But we’ve got Republican politicians working their asses off to defend the market for coal and nuclear-based electricity. They are actually arguing that the power company should not be allowed to do this, and become a major electric exporter of renewable energy in order to protect the fossil fuel markets. And they have penetrated the Public Utilities Commission so they will likely slow down the energy production plans that EVERYONE wants to see fulfilled.
If we don’t make sure all that oil gets used up but quick, the terrible sacrifice (which is all spic and span now) of BP’s Deepwater Horizon will have been in vain. Plus, simply look at the quantity of oil from one gusher. We could see it from space. That’s a lot of scratch at your local Petrostation.
Pay no attention to these odious analysts and scientists with their satellite pictures and complex numeric manipulation. We all know God gave us an infinite supply of oil and the actions of some combustion engines isn’t going alter in the slightest his perfect world.
Seems like Issa’s only raisin dettra is frivolous made-up investigations. If he didn’t have those he’d probably fall through the cracks and never be heard from again.
I’ll keep on repeating this:
ISSA IS FUCKING CRAZY AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS SUCH.
on top of that, his ass should be sitting IN JAIL, not in Congress.
There is an obvious solution. A Democratic candidate who can beat Darrell Issa.
But the deeper issue is what I call the muscle-car Hummer owners rebellion. If money is speech and we are arguing over which medium to use, their medium is the exhaust pipe. They’re just red-blooded Americans exercising their freedom and they will not pollute when you tear their Hummer from the cold dead hands. Or their 1975 Dodge with the cutout mufflers either.
I appreciate the pro oil line of attack.
But it would be far more effective and visceral to point out how gas dollars end up financing terrorism.