It’s unfortunate that it’s impossible to fully nail down how subsidized time corresponds to real time. I think I’ll go with the theory that 2011 is the Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment. That means that last year was Year of Dairy Products from the American Heartland, and next year will be the Year of Glad (heavyweight trashbags). Someone will probably show up to argue with me, but I don’t care because it doesn’t really matter. I just think it’s bullshit to accuse David Foster Wallace of debasing the blogosphere’s respect for the written word. I mean, it’s like, in the Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment, people ought to show a little more respect. Ya know?
About The Author

BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
I guess I must have gotten pulled out of the main current of bloggerdom by some serious riptide, or something, from my very earliest days online. I have been on thousands and thousands and thousand of blogs over the last 15 or so years. And I can honestly say that I don’t remember a single one that used the type language she describes. But my guess is that if I did, by chance, land somewhere and found someone writing in such a way on a consistent basis, I would have quickly exited and not returned. Am I out of the mainstream in this regard? Or do I just appreciate intelligent thoughts, ideas and prose more than most of the general population?
Newton can’t be serious, can she? Where was she hanging out and reading on the internet to come to such a conclusion? The comment section an teenage MySpace pages?
Sounds about right.
huh?
david whois whosits?
this is a serious question. who? what?
sorry man, lost. i don’t care much for my contemporaries, as I assume this wallace person is.
Don’t worry, this post was written in Infinite Jest.
Also, as a long-time Atriot, you really should be familiar with the inspiration for Eschaton.
[4] The game of Eschaton is played every year on Interdependence Day by 12-15 year old students from ETA. The section about Eschaton is covered on pages 321-342. The game is played with tennis balls that are no longer deemed in playable. The tennis balls represent powerful nuclear warheads. The students are organized into militaristic groups such as AMNAT (American Nations?), REDCHI (Red China?), SOUTHAF(South Africa?), and many more. Eschaton is played on a few tennis courts and the players are positioned on the courts in what is estimated to be their location on the globe. The tennis courts are supposed to be a map of the globe. The winner of the game is the team that has the best ratio of points of INDDIR (Infliction of Death, Destruction, and Incapacitation of Response) to SUFDDIR (on the receiving end of INDDIR).
The game involves one person who is designated the game master. The game master has a computer on a cart and runs around crunching numbers for the players. He uses all sorts of different formulae and calculation to determine points and resolve disputes between combatants. The fact that this game is extremely complicated and complex is greatly intensified by Eschaton’s necessity for a game master.
Interesting ideas include SACPOP (Series of Punishing Against Civilian Populations), which described as being a last resort method of play that usually “end[s] up costing both Combatants so many points they’re eliminated from further cntention.” (pg 324) The game also continued for a while without disbanding, which is impressive considering the complexity of the game and the fact that the players were so young.
One of the issues that came up during the game is that during game play, it began to snow in real life. This introduced the question of whether snowing on the representative game map (the tennis courts) meant that the game play was actually affected, i.e. should blast radius of warheads is decreased due to the falling snow?
Also, too
[5] es·cha·tol·o·gy noun ˌes-kə-ˈtä-lə-jē
plural es·cha·tol·o·gies
Definition of ESCHATOLOGY
1
: a branch of theology concerned with the final events in the history of the world or of humankind
2
: a belief concerning death, the end of the world, or the ultimate destiny of humankind; specifically : any of various Christian doctrines concerning the Second Coming, the resurrection of the dead, or the Last Judgment
Origin of ESCHATOLOGY
Greek eschatos last, farthest
First Known Use: 1844