The Republicans in Congress really just don’t want to do anything to help our government work to solve problems for people. They;d rather kill the country than see Obama (a fairly conservative President by any measure) re-elected. Here is just one more little bit of evidence:
WASHINGTON — Freshman Rep. Jeff Denham, a Republican from Atwater, Calif., will briefly sit in a very special chair Tuesday for a several-minute skirmish in a long-running war.
By presiding over a ridiculously short House session, Denham is helping his fellow Republicans block President Barack Obama from making appointments while Congress is in recess. […]
The whole maneuver won’t take long. The House wrapped up its Aug. 19 session in under seven minutes. On Aug. 16, the Congressional Record shows, the House session lasted four minutes.
“It could last four minutes,” Denham’s press secretary, Allie Brandenburger, said Monday, “but those four minutes are critical for the next four years. … Rep. Denham believes we must do all we can to stop these recess appointments.”
All this to stop Obama from making recess appointments, But didn’t other Congresses stop Presidents from making recess appointments. Not like the Republicans have:
President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, made 139 recess appointments during his eight years in office, according to the Congressional Research Service. President George W. Bush, a Republican, made 171 recess appointments.
Bush, for instance, used his recess appointment powers to name a member of the Federal Election Commission, a deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration and an ambassador to the United Nations.
“This post is too important to leave vacant any longer,” Bush said in August 2005, when he named John Bolton to the U.N. post.
In March 2010, Obama named 15 recess appointments, including a member of the National Labor Relations Board who was being blocked by Senate Republicans. Obama noted that the appointees, who included California’s former secretary of education, Alan Bersin, had been waiting an average of 214 days for their confirmation votes.
Whatever it takes to make people suffer more and the government run worse while Obama is President, the Republicans will do. Bet on it.
This week, Peter Diamond withdrew his nomination to serve on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Though he was a recent recipient of a Nobel Prize in economics, Republicans in the Senate blocked Diamond’s nomination because he was “an old-fashioned, big government Keynesian,” in the words of Senator Richard Shelby. A few weeks ago, Goodwin Liu withdrew his nomination to a federal appeals court after Republican senators refused him a vote, possibly because he testified for Democrats during the Samuel Alito confirmation hearings.
This is part of a larger confirmation crisis in the Senate: Republicans have blocked 223 of President Obama’s 1,132 executive and judicial appointees—over 20 percent. Republican senators have enforced a strict sixty-vote threshold for most nominations, and sometimes holds are placed on nominees anyhow. This hobbles crucial federal agencies and is yet another successful prong of the Republican war against effective government.
The times they are a changing. Check below the fold for critical appointments the Republicans are holding up:
(1) Jim Cole is already serving in the No. 2 spot at the Department of Justice after President Obama gave him a recess appointment last year, because Senate Republicans held up his nomination. He can serve only through the end of this calendar year, however, and last month Senate majority leader Harry Reid tried once again to confirm Cole permanently. He came up eleven votes short, with every Republican except Senator Richard Lugar voting against confirmation. Cole’s sin, according to Republican senators, is that he supports all available tools for prosecuting terrorists—including federal trials.
(2) After months of lockstep Republican opposition in the Senate, Joseph Smith withdrew his nomination to lead the Federal Housing Finance Agency in January. FHFA oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and Obama has not named another appointment following Smith’s withdrawal. According to the Wall Street Journal, Republicans opposed the nomination because they “feared Mr. Smith would heighten pressure on Fannie and Freddie to slash mortgage balances for troubled homeowners.”
(3) The US Fish and Wildlife Service has no permanent director, though Obama nominated Dan Ashe to lead the bureau months ago. But Sen. David Vitter put a hold on Ashe and said he’d keep it there until the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement issued fifteen offshore oil drilling permits. (BOEMRE, like Fish and Wildlife, is overseen by the Interior Department). The fifteenth permit was issued last week and Vitter withdrew his hold—but Senator Mike Lee is going to place a hold on Ashe over the Interior Department’s “wild lands” policy, which protects unused land from energy exploration.
(4) The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms hasn’t had a director since 2006 because the National Rifle Association has pressured senators to hold up every single nomination—even those by George W. Bush. Obama nominated Andrew Traver, a Navy veteran and longtime ATF special agent, to head the agency last year. But the NRA immediately came out against Traver because they connected him to promotion of “a variety of gun control schemes.” That might seem like natural experience for someone who hopes to lead a large federal agency charged with cracking down on illegal gun violence and trafficking, but apparently Republicans disagree—Traver’s nomination has been languishing in the Senate for months.
(5) Obama nominated John Bryson to lead the Commerce Department last week, and Republicans are already preparing for war on his nomination. Bryson helped start the National Resources Defense Council—or if you prefer the words of Senator James Inhofe, Bryson is “the founder of a radical environmental organization.” Inhofe has pledged to “work actively to defeat his nomination.” Other Republicans say they won’t vote to confirm Bryson until the Obama administration agrees to three free-trade agreements without including labor and environmental protections.
(6) Anybody who heads the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Senate Republicans took their obstruction to new levels last month, when forty-four senators signed a pre-emptive letter to President Obama saying they would oppose anyone that he nominated to lead the CFPB. Republicans are demanding a long list of changes that would reduce the agency’s power, including the creation of a five-member commission to run the CFPB instead of a single director. It’s a new low—Republicans aren’t just blocking the nomination of a particular person, but the existence of their intended position.
Well, again, Obama simply goes along with this shit. What he needs to do is simply break precedent. The Constitution allows him to appoint people during a recess. So, he should declare a recess, appoint EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ONE, and let them take him to court. Or, allow them to have their little play session, and then as soon as the adjourn for the day, appoint them anyway.
LET’S SEE SOME FUCKING ACTION!!!
He is just this passive passive guy. What does it take to get him riled up?
Or another idea: Simply get Federal marshalls to lock the doors. Then they can’t convene, he can recess appoint, and they can impeach him.
MAKE THEM IMPEACH HIM. GET THE IMPEACHMENT GOING.
Congress is unconstitutional. Obama should do something, anything. GET OFF THE FUCKING DIME, FOR THE SAKE OF WHATTHEFUCKEVER.
maybe the president could force half the Senate to give him their estates and then insist that they commit suicide in a bathtub to save their children’s lives.
That tactic was used by Cornelius Sulla in BC 77.
to be in session so locking the doors would accomplish nothing
action:Obama
blood:stone
I thought it was
blood:turnip
Unfortunately the Obama Administration is inadvertantly supporting the GOP’s racialist driven “Get Obama out of Power” campaign. The Obama White House is complicit simply through their stubborn refusal to acknowledge that every Republican move against the President is driven only by racial hatred.
Obama, a product of a conservative Harvard University, prefers to ignore the obvious racialist pattern in the actions of Congressional Republicans since he became president. Virtual every Republican in Congress has supported Limbaugh’s famous call (upon hearing that Obama had won the prewsidential election), “I hope that he fails!” Congressional Republicans have been doing everything in their power to make Limbaugh’s wish a reality.
As a matter of fact the Congressional Republicans have been demonstrating the exact same behavior as would be expected from the night riders of the southern post-Civil War Klan if they were seated in a Congress with a black man as president.
These Congressional Republicans are “died in the wool” fanatic dixiecrats when it comes to any issue concerning race. From their perspective “they are at WAR with the NEGRO who somehow fraudulently got himself put into the position of President of the United States, and any tactic that will get him out of this honored position is justified and necessary”. They consider that any damage inflicted on the nation in the process of removing this NEGRO to be regrettable but necessary collateral damage criticaal to achieving this goal.
Also in respect to the collateral damage issue all Republicans have clearly shown that in every instance they intend to inflict pain on those institutions within the national structure that generally have a solid representation of black folks within their ranks, such as unions and government employees.
The game plan of the Republicans, formulated upon Obama’s election, was to create a pseudo national emergency based on the huge fiscal debt created and left behind by George W. Bush. This required a huge relentless PR campaign by the Congressional Republicans to create fear and panic in the American population over the immediate demise of the federal government due to the astronomical level of debt. Meanwhile the timid Democrats got their asses kicked in the 2010 state level elections thereby producing Republican controlled governments in over 27 states. This provided an opportunity for these state governments to implement Draconian anti-union, anti-voting rights legislation as designed and crafted by ALEC on the state level. Whereas the Republicans in Congress were cutting all forms of aid to the states, this gave these Republican controlled state governments a reason to implement even harser cuts to the minority communities within their respective states.
We have been blitzed and blindsided by the Republican remove Obama plan which is working to absolute perfection. Yes the GOP hates Obama and yes they don’t give a damn about America beyond the gates of their respective country clubs. However, the statement of the problem is incomplete and likewise the Republican strategy is way beyond MASSIVE in its scope. Therefore the complement to the title statement “the GOP hates America”, is how much do you LOVE America?
One last note in the form of a prediction. Past history has taught us that when a powerful nation becomes intangled with internal matters that it cannot solve, the solution always appears in the form of some sort of global military conflict. In other words “War is a temporary distractive solution for all intractable problems at home”. Class warfare has broken out across America and it will either become an internal civil conflict or it will manifest itself as a global conflict. In either case such conflict will be most destructive for America. This has nothing to with Obama, except for the fact that his presidency has brought this simmering class warfare question out into the open. This is the quiet time before the actual bloodspilling chaos. This is the time for us as a nation to solve this, or nature will surely take its course.
President let alone by any measure. He passed more progressive legislation than any President since LBJ.
As for recess appointments we can call foul on it but the Democrats in the Senate did the same thing to Bush, Jr. in the last two years of his presidency. Unfortunately it appears to be the new normal when at least one house of congress is of an opposing party than the President.
No, wrong. Yes, they did it. But they were NOT anywhere near as obstructive. So, your comment is again the tedious and boring false equivalence.
And the main issue that many of us have with Obama is NOT where he gets but how he gets there.
facts. As soon as the Democrats gained a majority of one of the houses in congress under Bush they stopped allowing Congress to go into recess. Yes they weren’t as obstructive with the filibuster but we weren’t talking about that in this diary. We are discussing recess politics and given that it has happened over two Presidencies and two different congressional scenarios I would say this is the new normal. It has left both Bush and Obama powerless to do recess appointments. That isn’t on Obama (since again it happened under Bush as well). That is on the constitution.
Yeah, too bad we have a “fairly conservative predident”. Not like that “real liberal” FDR.
Now there was a Liberal. A Liberal who had 80 of 96 seats in the senate, and 347 seats in the House from 1937-1939.
And with those insanely huge margins FDR never even attempted comprehensive health care. Obama, with a 60 vote requirement in the senate got health care done, minus a public option. If that makes Obama “fairly conservative”, then there has never been a Liberal in the White House and FDR was a conservative as well.
Seriously, these child-like complaints are laughable. With 57 functioning Democrats, and needing 60 votes, he somehow got a nearly 800 billion dollar stimulus, with half a trillion in spending.
Russ Feingold, and Bernie Sanders vote with Republicans against Obama on GITMO, but it’s the President’s fault it’s still open.
Complaining about extending the Bush tax cuts is just bizarre. Obama passed the “New Start Treaty, the 9/11 Zadroga Health Care Bill, got unemployment benefits extended, got a complete overhaul of our food safety laws, AND repealed “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”.
But according to the left the “Liberal” position should have been to say the hell with all that and instead fight to raise the top marginal income tax rate from 35 to 39 %. Yeah, I don’t understand that logic either.
And by the way Obama took out another bad guy:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/28/world/asia/28qaeda.html?_r=2&hp
WASHINGTON — A drone operated by the Central Intelligence Agency killed Al Qaeda’s second-ranking figure in the mountains of Pakistan on Monday, American and Pakistani officials said Saturday, further damaging a terrorism network that appears significantly weakened since the death of Osama bin Laden in May.
An American official said that the drone strike killed Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, a Libyan who in the last year had taken over as Al Qaeda’s top operational planner. Mr. Rahman was in frequent contact with Bin Laden in the months before the terrorist leader was killed on May 2 by a Navy Seals team, intelligence officials have said.
American officials described Mr. Rahman’s death as particularly significant as compared with other high-ranking Qaeda operatives who have been killed, because he was one of a new generation of leaders that the network hoped would assume greater control after Bin Laden’s death.
Aside from his race, let’s be clear what is driving the GOP nuts. Obama has “in the name of bipartisanship” taken Republican policies and laid them on the table for negotiation with the implication that they are his preferred policies. Instead of accepting them, the GOP has savaged their own policies as “socialist”. Even Mitt Romney has flip-flopped on Romneycare. Now, what’s good for Massachusetts is not good for all states when enacted by the federal government. So they keep tacking right trying to find some policy that Obama won’t co-opt.
Yes, the government has been hampered in the short term by Obama not going forcefully after GOP policies, crimes, and misdemeanors. But….now the public has switched from “Obama is doing too much…” to “Obama is not doing enough…”
The next three months will set the political environment for the 2012 election. And the key players are the six Democrats on the Joint Deficit Committee, not the President. What they are willing to do or not do will set the limits to what the President can do about the economy. Even before any formal committee decisions.
Right now, it looks like the GOP has been bruised enough in the debt ceiling battle not to pull a shutdown in October. Beyond that, we don’t know what stunt they will pull.
The 100% opposition of one political party using scorched earth tactics is unprecedented in American political history. Parties usually cannot muster that much political unity–even the GOP.