I’ve often wondered what would have happened if John McCain had ignored his advisors and gone with Joe Lieberman as his running mate. I know, I know — you’re having a hard time suppressing your gag reflex as a result of that sentence, but, alas, I’m not sure America would have felt the same way. People across the spectrum were sick of the Iraq War, but they’d also had Friedmanesque centrism propaganda pounded into them for years (and Barack Obama was reinforcing that propaganda), so the ticket might have seemed like the precise cure for America’s disease, at least to a lot of naive people who believe everything they read. I’m not sure McCain could have done worse with Joe as his running mate, and he might have done better — and most of the base probably would have come home.
So I’m looking at Mitt Romney right now and I’m thinking he’s on the verge of breaking from the pack and could theoretically tack to the center relatively soon, and, really, if you look at the polls, he wouldn’t have all that much ground to make up if he did it successfully. But I don’t think he’s going to do it successfully.
Let’s look at the new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll:
… a new national NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows that the combative and heavily scrutinized primary season so far has damaged the party and its candidates.
… perhaps most significantly, the GOP primary process has taken a toll on the Republican presidential candidates, including front-runner Mitt Romney….
In January’s NBC/WSJ poll, Romney’s favorable/unfavorable rating stood at 31 percent to 36 percent among all respondents (and 22/42 percent among independents).
But in this latest survey, it’s now 28 percent favorable and 39 percent unfavorable (and 22/38 percent among independents).
… In a hypothetical general-election contest, [President Obama] leads Romney by six points, 50 to 44 percent, winning independents (46-39 percent), women (55-37 percent) and those in the Midwest (52-42 percent)….
See, Obama’s lead is still a mere 6 points — and if the primary campaign is making Romney look worse in voters’ eyes, you’d think the end of the primary campaign will make him look better.
In fact, he could break out by distinguishing himself from the clownish zealots and culture warriors he’s been running against, and from other clowns on the right — people like, oh, say, Rush Limbaugh. The press would love him for it. All would be forgiven. We’d be told that, after a season of ugly ideological squabbles, a nominee had emerged who really, really isn’t like those horrible people — thank goodness! Oh, and thankfully he’s also not like that strident liberal ideologue Barack Obama.
But I don’t think Romney’s going to do that. He’s even more of a coward than John McCain. Admittedly, he has some reason to fear that a zero-budget far-right party could go viral and hurt him in key states in a Naderesque way, and he certainly has reason to fear diminished enthusiasm from the base — but I think these folks hate Obama so much that they’ll turn out for the GOP no matter what. But Romney will keep trying to please them, out of his usual fear and timidity, and he’ll keep screwing it up, while being enough of a right-wing culture warrior (in addition to being a Thurston Howell III clone) to continue alienating the center as well.
He needs to seem like someone distinguishable from Santorum and Gingrich (and Perry and Bachmann and Cain), but he’s not going to try hard enough. He needs not to pick a Palin as a running mate, but he’ll probably pick someone who’s ideologically indistinguishable, like Bob McDonnell. He needs to seem different from people like Rush Limbaugh, but he’s too timid to go Sister Souljah on Rush, and he bet he’ll stay that way through the fall, out of a desperate wish to keep pleasing the base. (I predict he’ll be on Limbaugh’s show kissing his ring by fall, even if the damage to Limbaugh from this past week never really subsides.)
Romney could win. But I don’t think he’ll do what it would take to win.
(X-posted at No More Mister Nice Blog.)
Lugar loses primary to Tea Party nutbag and then gets put on Romney ticket.
BAM!!
Romney stood up to his base!!
He picked a real ‘moderate.’
A ‘realist’ on foreign policy.
The president’s favorite Republican!!
Feel the power of the Mustache!!
Mmm but that’s the takeaway. Romney has shown us his underbelly and he is a coward and all that that infers.
Why not Ryan? He’s a reasonable numbers-based pragmatist, you know, a real policy wonk.
Sarah Palin was a freakish anomaly. Vice-presidential candidates normally have no discernible effect on the outcome of the race.
The selection could be an interesting tactical move, that could be played for positive press coverage for a few days, but that’s about it. There just isn’t really the upside to making a VP pick that you’re attributing to a theoretic maverick pick. Yes, the press might give him the stories you’re saying, but it just wouldn’t matter that much.
Far too much is made of the selection of a running mate, in terms of its effect on the race.
VP picks aren’t usually game-changers because VP picks are usually incredibly safe (or the pick is an unknown quantity like Agnew in ’68). A Lieberman pick would have been significant for (nominal) bipartisanship, as well as for putting a social-issues liberal on the GOP ticket for the first time in a couple of generations. (Never mind that he’s to the right of Attila the Hun on foreign policy.)
A Romney pick of Chris Christie would matter because he’s so good at grabbing media attention. A Christian-fundie pick — well, I’m not sure. But if it’s McDonnell, he will be heavily vetted by Team Obama, by the lefty media, and by bloggers. He won’t be unknown by November. That’s just not possible anymore.
Susana Martinez — New Mexico
Pretty, Latina, Not nuts, but no one is calling her a liberal, practically unknown outside NM so won’t overshadow the RobotMan.
As a bonus, since (IMHO) the VP candidate is dead meat from now on, this will take out a potential 2016 campaign that will conflict with Rubio.
Win, Win, Win!!!
Romney has been running for five years. in that time, he hasn’t formulated WHY someone should vote FOR HIM.
he has spent MILLIONS this cycle -tearing down his opponents. but NOTHING about why people should vote FOR HIM.
and, I will remind folks…
the Obama campaign hasn’t even truly begun in earnest.
Barack Obama is one of the most skilled politicians ever to campaign.
Willard’s been lying against underfunded clowns who weren’t really running for PRESIDENT.
McDOnnell?
Governor Transvaginal Probe?
BWA HA HA HA HA HA
Well, precisely. I think Romney may pick him, saying, Well, he backed away from the transvaginal probes, so he’ll be acceptable to moderates.” And that may be a huge mistake.
“Admittedly, he has some reason to fear that a zero-budget far-right party could go viral and hurt him in key states in a Naderesque way … “
Plenty of reason to fear. The Koch Bros. have zero budget? Shelley Adelson has zero budget? On the contrary, Citizens United changes the dynamics. Unlimited campaign spending for your candidate makes a presidential campaign a vehicle for YOUR message. (All you need is money – $$$ = free speech.) Doesn’t necessarily matter if your guy can actually win the election or not. Certainly doesn’t matter what the Party leadership thinks of him or you. The GOP’s internecine war will go on.
Tell you what, if I had 10 million to throw away, there’d be a rightwinger on the ballot in every state that went red in ’08. Every. Single. One.
And each would be carefully selected to appeal to the crazies of that state:
ID: Probably someone with ties to the Aryan Nations
MO: Bircher country.
AR: Druggar, without a doubt, Druggar
AL: the Ten Commandments Judge, hisself — Roy Moore
and so forth.
so a Hawaii station has dropped Limbaugh…anymore stations to come?
Or how soon before Limbaugh slams Hawaii for being Obama’s home state.
http://thinkprogress.org/media…..-limbaugh/
That would require acknowledging that 1) Hawaii is a state; and 2) Obama wasn’t born in Kenya.
I still think Sarah Palin was a dog whistle to the social conservatives. They disliked McCain after the 2000 election and never changed that view. But having a well-known (among social conservatives) attractive young woman on the ticket with the old man McCain actually got the social conservatives out to vote for him. She had a reasonable chance to become President when he died in office. There is no possible way Joe Lieberman could have been the same draw to the social Republicans.
I had thought that Romney as a Mormon was going to have the same problem getting social conservatives out to vote that McCain faced, so I have been expecting him to announce another surprise social conservative as his Veep. But the bad economy and the fact that the social conservatives detest the African-American Obama may have replaced the need for a social conservative actually on the ticket. This time they’ll come out just to vote against the Black man.
Rick Santorum might be a possibility. With the new court ordered voting map for Texas came the strong probability that the Texas Republican primary will be held May 29th, and Rick Santorum right now would get a strong majority over Romney. He is the guy the evangelical college of cardinals in Texas chose to get behind, after all. But he may not be moderate enough for Romney. Romney may be looking to strengthen his attraction to independent voters by next August. Whoever it is, though, will be out of left field. That way the Obama White House will have minimal time to go after him.
Romney is an odious twit, but he has failed to put away the biggest Godbotherer to ever hold a Senate seat, a blowhard demagogue who resigned in disgrace and a garden gnome.
If anything, I think this campaign has made him look good BY COMPARISON.
Obama will filet this poor slob.