.
Fully armed, US soldier leaves base at 3:00 am and enters succesively three homes killing/shooting all persons he found sleeping. Number of persons killed and wounded is not yet known. A report from Pakistan:
US serviceman detained in Afghanistan over civilian casualties
KANDAHAR (Dawn/Reuters) – A US soldier has been detained in Afghanistan in connection with an incident involving civilian casualties in the southern Kandahar province, the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) said on Sunday.
“US Forces-Afghanistan, in cooperation with Afghan authorities, will investigate this incident. This is a deeply regrettable incident and we extend our thoughts and concerns to the families involved,” in a statement by an ISAF spokesperson who did not elaborate.
“In my role as in-theatre commander of ISAF in Gen. Allen’s temporary absence on duty, I wish to convey my profound regrets and dismay at the actions apparently taken by one coalition member in Kandahar province. One of our soldiers is reported to have killed and injured a number of civilians in villages adjacent to his base. I cannot explain the motivation behind such callous acts, but they were in no way part of authorized ISAF military activity. An investigation is already underway and every effort will be made to establish the facts and hold anyone responsible to account. In the meantime, our thoughts and prayers are with those caught in this tragedy. I wish once again, on behalf of Gen. Allen and all members of ISAF, to convey our deep regrets and sorrow at this appalling incident.”
« click for story
Report: Afghan civilians caught in firing line of British troops (The Guardian)
Kandahar Governor Tooryalai Wisa told Reuters a US soldier left his base in Kandahar on Saturday and opened fire on civilians. He said initial reports indicated up to 16 civilians were killed. That could not be immediately confirmed.
Civilian casualties have been a major source of friction between President Hamid Karzai’s government and US-led Nato forces in Afghanistan. Anti-American sentiment had already been running high before news of the latest civilian casualties.
Anger gripped the country after US soldiers burned a large number of copies of the Quran at a Nato base last month. Nato said it was a tragic blunder. Thirty people were killed in protests and Afghan forces turned their weapons on US soldiers, killing six.
Ooops!!!
“Ops!!!”, to be a little more accurate.
Sometimes the operators get a little…confused.
And some of those times…not all of them, as the long history of Abu Ghraib before it was outted will attest…they get caught.
The advantage of drone warfare?
Non-accountability.
If some vicious son-of-a-bitch in an air-conditioned office hundreds or thousands of miles away from the crime scene gratuitously pushes a button that kills 16 people…no harm done. No one to blame. Jes’ another “accident”, like a bad car or bus accident.
The U.S. will be largely out of the personal war business very soon. They will leave that to the hirelings. Just as have media assassinations taken the place of good, old fashioned wetwork, soon the United Skynet of America and its allies will simply push buttons to get things done.
Wetwork?
Naaaahhhh…
Network instead.
It’s so much more…modern!!!
Oh yes.
That it is.
Cleaner.
Neater.
Until of the course the computerized chickens come home to roost.
i got yer angry birds.
Right here!!!
What goes around comes around. Always and forever.
Every time.
You can bet on it.
Every time.
AG
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
.
No one knows better than Connie Chapman that almost 150 years since troops came home with “soldier’s heart” after the Civil War, the U.S. military is still struggling to identify and treat what’s now called PTSD.
Wal-Mart Therapy Tried as Pentagon Copes With Traumatized Troops
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
What the hell do they expect when they intentionally systematically break down a person’s sense of self and natural human inhibitions against committing violence on their fellow man, turning them into trained killers, then send them to a foreign land brainwashed to believe that they are fighting an enemy that “hates their freedoms” and wants to destroy their way of life?
What do they expect? They expect an efficient, remorseless killer of human beings, Hurria. And in the vast majority of cases, that’s what they get. The ones who fall off the train? Hey…it’s just collateral damage.
This is true of any military system. You think there aren’t any crazy al Queda or Taliban fighters?
Please.
It is the idea…and practice…of war itself that is at fault here. There no “honorable” war, there is just slaughter, just winning and losing.
And yet…and yet…
Check out my sig.
The universe runs the game, Hurriah. Not the other way around.
Blame?
May as well blame the weather for all the good it will do you.
Yup.
So it goes.
Bet on it.
If as you and/or I sit wherever we are typing and reading a gas explosion blows us up real good…who would be at blame?
May as well blame the universe.
It’s too big to care.
Bet on that as well.
And the universe keeps on spinning.
Later…
AG
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
So, they are working overtime to portray this guy who murdered 16 human beings, including multiple children, as a victim. How come the Iraqis and Afghans who kill American soldiers who have violently invaded their country and are violently enforcing a lengthy occupation don’t get the same consideration?
.
You mean the Afghan, Pakistan or
Saudi terrorist? Certainly not our friends from Israel.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
No, certainly not your “friends” from Israel.
You wrote:
And then you wrote:
Were you not portraying this guy as a victim in the first post?
Someone who was intentionally, systematically broken down in terms of his own sense of self and natural human inhibitions against committing violence on his fellow man, someone who was turned into a trained killer, and then sent to a foreign land brainwashed to believe that he is fighting an enemy that hates the freedoms of his society and wants to destroy it?
Sounds like a victim to me.
I’d say a few kind words at his post-execution funeral if they’d let me, because I doubt very much that he can be saved.
It’s the hustlers who run that game on him who should be blamed. He just didn’t have the mental and motional wherewithal to deal with it effectively.
So it goes.
AG
Arthur, apparently I failed to make my point clear. I was not arguing whether or not he is a victim, I was suggesting that it is deeply inconsistent, not to say blatantly hypocritical to work so damned hard making excuses for this guy while at the same time refusing to recognize that the people whose countries and homes and families and lives have been systematically and violently destroyed by people just like him are suffering horrors we cannot even imagine at his hands and the hands of tens of thousands of others just like him.
The reality is that guys like him have choices every step along the way. They can say no to joining up, they can say no to being sent to foreign lands to kill and destroy. They can even say no to the brainwashing, as many have and do. The Afghans, the Iraqis, the Pakistanis, the Yemenis, and all the others whose countries have been subjected to massive and unrelenting U.S. military violence do not have a choice, have never had a choice, and never will have a choice.
As for who is responsible for the carnage and the horror, at the end of the day we are all responsible for our own behavior, and I do not let “the troops” off the hook. Not for a moment. Lest you forget, “following orders” is not a defense.
I agree wholeheartedly.
But here is where I disagree:
The reality is that “guys like him” do not have choices, any more than the stage hypnotist’s weak-willed subject has a choice about whether he will make a fool of himself in front of a theater full of people. “Guys like him” have been almost totally brainwashed by their families, their schooling and the media before they even enlist, and then the military finishes the job. Luckily, there really aren’t that many people like him…even the most gung-ho soldiers usually do not make a practice of walking out into whatever town they are occupying and murdering random civilians. It takes a special kind of insanity to do that on any side of a conflict…suicide-bent terror bombers or uniformed troops with automatic weapons.
Again, I disagree. As nasty as the job appears to anyone with a clear head, if they could say no they would say no. Just like the people who voted for G.W. Bush. It was perfectly obvious what a viciously stupid ass he was, but people voted for him because they had no choice. Lots of people. Miseducated and media-tranced, they clomp-clomp-clomped into the voting booths and put a mass murderer into the White House.
Twice.
True. They have been brainwashed the old-fashioned way, many of them. Tribal ties, fundamentalist religious proscriptions, the works. “Clomp clomp clomp” is the history of mankind.
Hurria, there are people who do not believe that anyone really has much of a “choice,” and they have a point. Do people born into vicious poverty and permanent war have a choice? Obviously not. Not many ever escape such a fate. But…do people born into more pleasant circumstances who then turn around and participate in brutal crackdowns like what happened in Nazi Germany have a choice? They can be considered quantifiably insane. Did they “choose” to go insane? How did it happen? How does a country go crazy? Is there a “choice?”
Further…does someone like me I have a choice? Murder affronts and appalls me, and I will not be involved in it unless there is clearly a danger to my immediate family and society. Did I “choose” to be that way? If so, then I suppose that I could “choose” not to be that way, right? But of course…I cannot choose that. It’s simply not natural to my nature. There’s no reason to be proud of it…it’s just who I am.
Ditto for you and for every other human being on the planet.
Who “chooses” to be who they are?
Who?
Not very damned many, for sure.
So if some poor, drunken, murdering fool like this nutcase goes off like he did…in Topeka, Kansas or Afghanistan, same same…where’s the choice? And if he had no choice, how can he be blamed? He might need to be eliminated or at least imprisoned because he is permanently damaged and thus a threat to his surroundings, but blame? As I said above, you might as well blame the weather when there’s a nasty storm.
No. Things don’t go wrong…they just happen.
Blame the controllers who sent him over the edge with an automatic weapon in his hand?
Again…did they actually “choose” to be who they are? Who would choose to be as viciously unhappy as is plainly the case with someone like Dick Cheney?
If there is no choice then there is no blame.
There is only self-protection.
Sometimes called “justice.”
A threatening presence?
Eliminate it if necessary and then go on with your business.
But blame it?
Nope.
Not me, anyway.
You?
OK.
But…didja “choose” to be that way?
Hmmmm….
AG
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."