Nate Silver has expressed skepticism as to whether Hurricane Sandy will have any significant effect on the election one way or the other. I think he is a great numbers guy, but sometimes he just misses the big picture. I expect Hurricane Sandy to have a major positive effect on President Obama’s reelection prospects for the following reasons:
- The storm drowns out the electoral narrative Mitt needs to sustain his “mittmentum” and reduces his campaign appearances to a few school halls.
- It allows Obama to look Presidential whilst Mitt desperately tries to insert himself into the story with ridiculous attempts to hold sparsely attended election rallies re-branded as Storm relief events collecting laughable amounts of “relief supplies” no one wants.
- It draws attention to Mitts earlier statements that federal disaster relief is immoral and his pledges to abolish FEMA – not to mention his poor track record of handling disaster relief as Governor in Massachusetts.
- It draws a stark contrast between Obama’s competent handling of Sandy with Bush’s handling of Katrina.
- It reminds people of what good government is all about and cuts through the Republican ideology that Government serves almost no useful purpose.
- It draws attention to Republican congressional attempts to defund disaster relief.
- Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey, long time tea party favorite, potential Presidential candidate, and Romney’s keynote speaker at the GOP convention has praised Obama’s handling of the Crisis to high heaven and refused Romney a picture opportunity “helping the distressed” in New Jersey whilst extending an invitation to the President.
- It emphasizes the Democratic values of social solidarity rather than the Republican values of “you’re on your own” and underscores and validates Democratic concerns about global climate change.
- The timing disrupts the (partisan) campaigns whilst not necessarily effecting election day itself. Most of the states in the storm path are solidly Democratic in any case, and those that aren’t – Va, NC and FL – have much reason to be grateful for Federal Disaster relief.
- It MAY damage the Democratic attempts to build a big lead in early voting in some states – for example in NC, but there is little sign of that yet.
- There is a psychological phenomenon whereby people who have been through a stressful situation with someone come to bond with them in a very emotional way. We are not talking rationality here, but of unconscious processes which apply even in very negative situations such as kidnappings – see Stockholm syndrome. The best recent political example is perhaps President Bush’s bump in popularity post 9/11, despite mounting evidence of his incompetence and inattention in the lead up to that tragedy.
Sandy may yet turn out to be a positive October surprise in political terms at least even if it has caused a lot of hardship on the ground. There’s rarely a cloud without a silver lining…
.
God Almighty!!
I’m just off the rec list at Daily Kos, so any recs there would be much appreciated.
I fully agree.
My gut feeling the last 24 hrs has been that this will become an advantage, and increasingly so. Thanks for analyzing this and spelling out in plain language why I feel this way.
If undecided and swing voters were rational, this event would push Obama back up to where he ended up four years ago. But they aren’t and Sandy didn’t seriously impact any swing states.
Obama and FEMA has competently responded to numerous tornadoes in many “red states” and it’s likely that he’ll do worse this time in those states than he did in 2008. He only lost MO by 0.1% in 2008, but conceded the state to Romney long ago. However, effective disaster management by Governor Jay Nixon is expected to help him get a second term. But he did win in 2008 with 58% of the vote.
Romney’s Chrysler/Jeep lie will likely have a larger impact on the race by putting him too far behind in OH for Rover’s to steal it.
Frank, I don’t really want to outright dismiss your point,
But the average American is too stupid to connect successful FEMA operations with a particular administration. Only an idiot (in other words, the average American) would not realized all of your points months ago. It’s obvious beyond belief that Obama would be better running FEMA than Romney. Romney would break it up and sell the pieces to his rich friends for pennies on the dollar.
Obama already has the votes of the people who live in the real world. So Silver is essentially correct. Obama has no chance with the ones yelling ‘get the Government out of my disaster relief!’
nalbar
Christie just complimented Obama, and Christie knows Romney so he also knows Romney would shit on New Jersey in the same circumstances.
Do you think Christie is now going to vote for Obama? Even though he KNOWS his state will be worse of with Romney?
That is the depth of stupid, uncaring people we are dealing with.
nalbar
If I were Romney, I would want to shoot Christie right now. He has completely undercut the standard default “another Obama Screw-up” and “the Government can’t do anything efficiently” lines of attack.
I agree it’s mostly about low information voters right now – most others have already made up their minds. But I think that Sandy is the sort of issue that does get their attention.
It’s also all about turnout. There’s nothing like a crisis to mobilize people…
Don’t pay any attention to me Frank. This is a good diary.
I am just disgusted with my fellow American’s right now. In a thinking, realistic country, Obama would be up 15-20 points right now. It would be a 42 state wipe out. Poor southern whites would vote for Obama on health care alone.
But we don’t live in that world. Our world is filled with the stupid.
nalbar