A new study in the journal PNAS, “Surface exposure to sunlight stimulates CO2 release from permafrost soil carbon in the Arctic,” indicates that the elimination of permafrost in the Arctic is happening at a faster rate than expected. The following excerpt is from the press release about the study issued by University of Michigan News Service, which explains the findings for those of us who are not specialists in the field of climate science:
“Until now, we didn’t really know how reactive this ancient permafrost carbon would be — whether it would be converted into heat-trapping gases quickly or not,” said Kling, a professor in the U-M Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. EEB graduate student Jason Dobkowski is a co-author of the paper.
“What we can say now is that regardless of how fast the thawing of the Arctic permafrost occurs, the conversion of this soil carbon to carbon dioxide and its release into the atmosphere will be faster than we previously thought,” Kling said. “That means permafrost carbon is potentially a huge factor that will help determine how fast the Earth warms.”
Tremendous stores of organic carbon have been frozen in Arctic permafrost soils for thousands of years. If thawed and released as carbon dioxide gas, this vast carbon repository has the potential to double the amount of the heat-trapping greenhouse gas in the atmosphere on a timescale similar to humanity’s inputs of carbon dioxide due to the burning of fossil fuels. [emphasis added]
The authors are affiliated with the University of Maryland, the University of Michigan and the University of North Carolina. In effect, if their conclusions are correct, the thawed soils in the Arctic will release vast quantities of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere that have been previously locked up beneath the ice and in the frozen ground. This will undoubtedly accelerate warming in the Arctic first, with undetermined consequences. However, we can reasonably speculate that the impacts will be felt first and hardest in the northern hemisphere, i.e., North America, Europe and Northern Asia. Considering the wild and unusual weather we have already experienced over the last decade due to rapid warming in the Arctic, I am more than a little concerned about the effect on the climate in the United States, both short term and long term, to which these additional releases of greenhouse gases will contribute.
Makes you wonder what the planet will be like in a century or two, doesn’t it?
Scares the hell out of me for my children’s sake
I have this recurring, waking dream that Jim Inhofe and all of his denier pals will at some point be forced to walk down a street and be scourged by their children and grandchildren for destroying their future and the future for all mankind’s generations.
It is cold comfort.
I think this is the scary part – a positive feedback loop. A produces more of B which in turn produces more of A.
In two centuries we’ll have had another great die-off … probably 95% of species going extinct … as last happened 65 million years ago. Then, of course, it was a meteor strike that triggered the event. This time the trigger is human caused, but will result in a similar drastic shift in temperatures.
What will be difficult is the process of getting there – in just a few decades the planet will already be massively transformed.
It’s been creeping into my consiousness that what started out as an alarming call to recognition for a 3 degree rise, what seems like a lifetime ago, is now exploding.
I can’t help but wonder whether the assumption that there is a finite number to the excess the warming will shoot to is nothing more than the worst kind of denial. Will Earth become Mars?
No, because once we have eliminated ourselves from the equation, the earth will eventually return to some kind of balance.
The last time the planet warmed up like it is expected to with all the CO2 and CH4 released took around 1,000,000 years. The P-T boundry 280 million years ago had a very similar extreme warming event that included the release of thousands of tons of CH4.
Here is a very good article about that event and how it relates to what we have done to the planets climate in the last 150 years.
http://www.killerinourmidst.com/
The future this article suggests is not one any large mammal can survive.
2015. It’s going to take until 2015 for it to be clear to everyone that there is a problem. James Burke said so on PBS in 1989. That was when everyone was sure that the politicians would start working on it right then.
His future-fictional account has Japan being the government that wrangles everyone into action. Not sure if that one still holds.
But 2015 looks very hopeful now for the global awakening that includes the oil patches. Just in time for the 2016 election.