I ran into something last night while I was trying to research something else. But I found part of it interesting and I want to share it with you. It’s part of an article on “black flight” from Philadelphia. I think it gives some important perspective on what it’s like to be black, well-educated, and affluent in this country.
She is one of the few women color in the place where she lives, but she expects to be joined by others.
“I know more people moving out this way now, African-American families, trying to get used to it, wanting the best place they can find to raise their kids; wanting to fit in,” she explained. “They’re making it work…”Her husband likes to walk. Everywhere. When they lived in West Philadelphia, he walked. When they lived in a house in Overbrook Park, he walked. That’s who he is. He’s a walker.
“But, when he’s out late at night, walking everywhere; I remind him, ‘Look, Vino; there’s still a lot of little old ladies in this neighborhood who never met us; they don’t know that we live here, that we own this house. They aren’t expecting to run into you walking around after dark.”When she says that, she looks a little exasperated. Yet, that’s still the reality of race in America. People of color have long been expected to live in certain placers and white people in other places. The fact that statistical and sociological reality has now upset these preconceptions changes very little on the who’s-that-walking-in-my-neighborhood level.
Edwards-Alexander and her family live in Havertown, in Delaware County. She is the director of Multicultural Life at Saint Joseph’s University. She is also funny and down-to-earth and just as grounded in big city authenticity as you might expect a former social worker from the Bronx to be. Before settling on Havertown, they also looked at houses on Lincoln Drive in Philadelphia, and in other suburbs like Ardmore, Glen Mills and Yeadon. In Philadelphia, they lived in different places in West Philly and Overbrook.Now, they have a pretty single-family home, great backyard, nice neighbors, a neat driveway with off-street parking, a solid, slyly under-rated public school system, and a family of rambunctious foxes who decided to take up squatting rights in and near that backyard shortly after they moved in a few years ago. In other words, they are enjoying the hard-earned fruits of suburbia’s serene upward mobility.
They also represent one of the most socially significant trend from the last decade, one that has come to clearly define the early years of the 21st century in ways that are still being studied and understood: Edwards-Alexander and her family are highly-educated and quintessentially upper middle class people of color. To evoke that old marketing cliché – they could live and thrive anywhere, but they are choosing to live in the very same inner and (in some cases) outer ring suburbs that welcomed the millions of middle-class Americans who comprised the “white” flight of 40 years ago.
This middle-class flight is still taking place, but it is now significantly composed of high-earning African-American families who are also rejecting the diversity, the social ills, the high crime, the scarce jobs and the second-rate public schools of the big cities.
As Edwards-Alexander put it: “I can’t ever see living in the city again,” she said. “This works too well for us.”
Thoughts?
That’s me – living in suburban Louisville, 6-figure income, walking at 6:30 am, unintentionally scaring little white ladies $#!^less with my 240 lbs walking swiftly in the AM. I’m from the city (Detroit) and go to church in the hood, and I want my (hopefully soon to come) children to be raised with an acute awareness of and sensitivity to the hood experience, but I have no intention of ever living in the hood again or raising children in the hood. I have learned that I can be for the hood without being in the hood. If that makes me a hypocrite or sell-out in the eyes of some then I’m comfortable with wearing those labels – this is how I square the circle, how I manage my own cognitive dissonance.
You can’t be Black and survive in America without being able to manage your cognitive dissonance – the only other options are prison or the graveyard, and I choose life.
clearly she’s an over-sensitive reverse-racist.
-signed, average white liberal
I see you can’t give up being an asshole.
I say social and physical mobility is a huge part of what America is all about. Anyone who wants to move to the burbs…good on ya. I’m loving watching the burbs become more diverse and screw those little old ladies who think differently.
There are pros and cons to living in the big city. But one over-riding thing that will make any middle-class parent want to move is shitty schools. The main reason we moved to our neighborhood was its superior public schools.
So, my question is, what makes the public schools in urban phillie second rate?
I think we’d need the perspective of someone who taught or went to school in the inner city.
I went to public school in a suburb an hour away from Chicago. I didn’t realize that there was a movement to demonize and destroy public education until college when I first tuned in to politics and public policy.
Part of the reason why some Democrats promote charter schools is the public schools are quite often shitty. It’s not that charter schools are a better option but it does seem that is how they are being portrayed.
In the end, responsible parents in the inner city and the suburbs pretty much want the same thing. The best education for their kids.
Why are they shitty? One reason is money. When your tax base moves out, and you give big business unwarranted tax breaks to stay in Philly or Chicago, as examples, what do you think will happen?
Sure, but then this is more than 30 years in the making. It has already happened. We’ve seen it in city after city.
What’s the solution? I don’t know.
“Solution?”
There is only one possible solution, but it will not happen as long as the conservative/reactionary corporate-owned media elect…select at the very least…our rulers.
The “solution” is to redirect a great deal of the massive monies now spent on overt and covert armed forces …and on their foreign adventures in economic imperialism…back into the society. Yes, there would initially be shortages…of fuel particularly…but the trillions of dollars saved and spent on the social and physical infrastructures of the United States would “solve” so many problems here that this country would turn itself around in less than a decade.
This is a great and gifted country. It has a severely under-utilized population of recent immigrants and the children of the slave trade, a population which if given even half a chance would by itself lift this country back into prosperity and health. A massive effort to reform and regroup the now almost totallly rotted out public school system would not only help poorer people, it would also help the children of the middle and upper-middle classes.
Human ecology.
It’s what should be for dinner.
Without this kind of effort…an effort against which the corporate interests fight tooth and nail because it would mean a (probably temporary) decline in their profits…without this kind of redirection of the massive wealth of the United States, ain’t shit happening here. We’ll elect another in a string of corporate puppets…some of whom are admittedly worse than others…but as I have said here so often “The lesser of two evils is still an evil.”
WTFU.
The most “progressive,” “revolutionary” phrase that has been uttered by a major public official in the last several decades? It was this one:
Bet on it.
But y’all cooperated in his demonization.
Wake the fuck up.
Please.
Before it’s too late.
AG
Ron Paul doesn’t give two shits about the plight of inner city youth.
Bullshit.
Prove it.
Here is what Ron Paul says about racism. From any direction. Spoken openly and publicly, on the floor of the House of Representatives.
More revolutionary thought.
Do you really think that a group that produced people like Frederick Douglass, Duke Ellington, Langston Hughes, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X (among millions upon millions of other heroes and heroines) needs anything more than an even shot to get its shit together?
Please.
AG
You’re the one that needs to prove it, my friend. The kind of people who espouse Paul’s worldview are generally not looking to serve the interests of poor folks. This “revolutionary thought” they spout and you regurgitate oddly enough favors the interests of folks who look very much like them and not so much like the folks in the inner city. But then you brought up race and not me.
In any case, if you lot ever get your shit together and manage to achieve something that benefits society then I’ll applaud you for managing to do something other than derailing threads on the internet.
“…achieve something that benefits society…???”
I have attempted to make great music at the highest levels of the NYC music scene …and succeeded more days than not…every day of my life for 40+ years. Benefit society? You bet your ass I do, even though “society” as it stands in the U.S. today is so warped by the corporate media that it can’t tell the difference between a badly overdubbed American Idol-level performance and Billie Holiday.
You also write:
#1-Do you have any real idea of what Ron Paul’s “worldview” actually entails? Have you gone to the source and read what he has written and said or are you second, third and fourth-handing information spewed on you by the massive corporate media system that is so threatened by his care for the individual no matter what race that individual might be?
#2-You write the words “you lot” and “the kind of people who espouse…”
What?
I post a quite clear critique by Ron Paul regarding collectivism, “the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals,” and you respond with the totally collectivist words “you lot” and “the kind of people…” These very same words that were used by racists…”you lot” is a distinct southernism, and an older one at that…to collectivize and thus demean black people and other minorities for hundreds of years. Get real.
#3-You also write “…not looking to serve the interests of poor folks.” More collectivism. If a concept or approach to a given problem “serves the interests” of all folks then it most certainly serves the interests of the poor as well as those of the rich. I thoroughly believe that reward based on merit does just that and if anything real merit and talent exists in higher percentages in the heretofore totally mistreated races that you label under the collectivist rubric of “poor folks” than it does in the over-protected middle and upper-middle classes. Fighting to survive in the Kafkaesque world of racial prejudice tends to sharpen the mind quite effectively, even given the awful inner-city school systems of the U.S. Those who have survived for generations under this prejudicial system are generally better than their oppressors. I first realized this at 14 years of age when I began to understand the depth of the jazz revolution here in the U.S. during the 20th century and all of my experiences since then…mostly in what you call “the inner city” and often with people of these races and cultures that have been so oppressed in the United Staes since the first European settlements…have only deepened my understanding of what has gone down. When Jesus Christ…or whoever/whatever produced the New Testament…preached his Sermon On The Mount, among other things He said:
Even having been translated, retranslated and often used for rotten purposes be devolved church systems, these remain political and economic statements. And I repeat…in my own experience, they are totally accurate. In the convection current of society, the heat is always at the bottom and as people ride that current to the top through generations that heat dissipates and is lost.
‘Round and ’round it goes.
Try to stop that current and the whole society fails.
#4-“Derail?” Early on in this thread clearskies mentioned public schools and you responded. You wrote “What’s the solution? I don’t know.”
I offered a solution to your question. How did I “derail” this thread? By saying something with which you do not agree? Nice.
Wake the fuck up.
AG
You forgot Detroit. They gave GM a big tax break. Detroit should be declaring bankruptcy. Instead the GOP has given them a manager who will sell off all Detroit’s assets, fire all the city workers, and eliminate pensions. Detroit will not be allowed to go into bankruptcy where the bond holders/banks would have to take a cut in earnings.
charter schools, are for the most part, an anti-union scam and hustle.
for those that are doing good, the rest are just a means to get paid.
Also, it’s a way to re-segregate the schools.
That agenda was accomplished some time ago.
Often time, the trauma and stress of poverty creates long-term damage of the brains of children who experience that stress. By damage, I mean it wires the brain differently that if the early childhood had been relatively stress-free.
I have taught in a “failing” school for nearly 20 years. I, also, have an eight year-old adopted son. Before I adopted him, I read a book about attachment and I realized that I was reading the story of many of my students. If left untreated, this stress and trauma severely interferes with the learning process and with daily coping skills. I ma now seeing this with my son.
Yeah, 2 minutes of research yields the following simple answer to the phillie school district problems: more M.O.N.E.Y.
From wikipedia:
“The state takeover of the District had its roots in the chronic low test scores of district students and a history of inequitable financing which left the District with substantial and perpetual deficits.[14] In 1975, Pennsylvania provided 55 percent of school funding statewide, in 2001 it provided less than 36 percent.[15] An analysis determined that increased district spending was limited by a state system which relies heavily on property taxes for local school funding. As a result, wealthier school districts with proportionately more property owners and more expensive real estate have more funds for schools. The result is great disparities in school system expenditures per student. In 2000, the Philadelphia school district spent $6,969 a year per student. Seventy percent of Philadelphia’s students are at or near the poverty line. This contrasts with expenditures per student in wealthier suburban school districts: Jenkintown, $12,076; Radnor, $13,288; and Upper Merion, $13,139. “
7000 bucks per student? Really? That stinks! No wonder people who can are fleeing for the burbs.
And this is repeated all over the country. I grew up in Canada, in a country and an era when the schools were fairly well-funded. When I had kids here in the US I was amazed at the inequity between school districts. This sort of factor of 2 difference in school funding levels between districts is just nuts.
This the last blow in Detroit. After all the white flight following the 67 race riots, middle-class blacks started leaving the city as well. The city has lost half its population since the 50s. There aren’t enough people left in the city with jobs to support all the infrastructure that a city requires.
In the aggregate, city infrastructure has a lower resource cost than suburbs. Future generations will learn that cheap oil and seemingly abundant and inexhaustible natural resources along with public and tax policies favoring suburban home ownership have masked the high cost and wastefulness of suburbs.
Yes, exactly. That was my point in the comment below; didn’t see it was already made.
As a white family, we can choose to ignore our neighbors. A black family can’t safely do that. I hadn’t realized. Thank you for making me a bit more aware. There’s a family down the street I need to go meet.
I might wind up in the suburbs, but for now, I am an urban dweller. I also don’t have kids, so the education system isn’t uppermost in my mind.
I can’t see suburban living as a sustainable model. Maybe it will be one day, but not now or anytime soon.
Wanna fix the schools? Ban private education.
Private education with public funds or the whole concept. Home schooling too? I know liberals that prefer to home school to a certain point.
The whole concept. I’m not saying I support the idea necessarily, but it’s the only way to get the rich to care about public education. Home schooling is a whole other barrier; utilized mostly by fundamentalist Christians who have no business home schooling, but also favored by somewhat wealthy liberals…
Speaking as someone who bought his house from Miss Miller and heard her mutter “good riddance”, and who saw Miss Gates move away after 30 years, I can dig where they’re coming from.
No one likes crime ans violence.