Jon Lovett can be uneven, but he has some magical flashes, like this one:
It happened slowly, didn’t it? The change in the Republican Party? I don’t know. Maybe it’s nostalgia. There have always been the wild, vicious voices of the right. The devil on the shoulder of the conservative movement that whispers in its ear, “burn it down, burn it down.” But those voices were to be ignored, humored, tolerated, placated, or just deceived. That was the way of things, and we were protected by the obvious: people who believe foolish things tend to be easy to fool.
Then it all changed. The Republican elite caught a ride on the tiger. But the tiger got sick of waiting for the gazelles it was promised, the gazelles that were always one election away. The tiger was hungry and angry and tired of being used and the longer it waited the more appetizing the elite on its back became. So the tiger got a radio station and a news channel. The tiger got organized and mobilized. And finally the tiger realized it didn’t need someone kicking its sides telling it which way to run and who to eat and when to eat and why it wasn’t time to eat and the time to eat would come, don’t worry, you’ll eat soon enough.
So the tiger ate its master and now here we are.
I love the writing here. But I don’t really think of it as a slow, almost imperceptible process. Certainly, you can trace the long, slow progress from Goldwater to Gohmert. But there have been sudden tectonic slips that have jolted the crazy forward.
I think one of the less appreciated legacies of the Bush administration is that they made Republican ideology incoherent. One moment the GOP was calling for the liquidation of the Department of Education and planning to let Medicare “wither on the vine,” and the next moment they were giving us No Child Left Behind and Medicare Part D. One moment they were closing down the government because they wanted spending cuts, and the next moment the vice-president was telling us that Ronald Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter. One moment Bush was campaigning on a more humble foreign policy and the next moment, if you weren’t with us, you were against us. The Bush administration was awful from every perspective you might wish to view it, and that includes the movement conservative’s perspective.
But movement conservatives were nonetheless willing to go along with the Bush administration and defend it with the harshest, coarsest, most vituperative language and rhetoric. As they unlearned logical consistency, they also lost the ability to think clearly. Logic became a kind of threat.
So, that was the first real tectonic slip. The next came in late August and September of 2008 when, first, Sarah Palin was selected as John McCain’s running mate, and then the economy completely collapsed. It became almost immediately clear that Sarah Palin was a colossal moron who had absolutely no business on a presidential ticket. It also became clear that John McCain had no idea how to deal with the financial crisis, as he suspended his campaign, unsuccessfully tried to skip a presidential debate, and called for an emergency meeting at the White House where he had nothing to say.
This forced the conservative movement to defend both McCain and Palin is ways that no sentient human being should ever defend other human beings. I believe the experience caused permanent collective brain damage to the entire Republican community. Arguing that Sarah Palin should be a stroke away from the nuclear football will do that to a brain, and a political party.
The final straw, however, was the decision to oppose every single thing the president tried to do. They turned him into a monster when he was never a monster. He became the Kenyan socialist usurper. That was a decision that Mitch McConnell made before the president was even sworn into office. And the result was that the Republican Party started rejecting their own ideas and labeling them communist plots to destroy the country. At that point, with all the bad habits already ingrained, the party just lost control of its base.
They hadn’t governed according to their “principles,” and they had ramped up the fear of the Democrats to such a height that the base decided that they were facing some existential crisis.
Basically, the big steps were ideological inconsistency followed by epic failure which both required people to defend the indefensible which broke people’s logical brains and respect for the truth which then caused them to respond to manufactured fear with rebellion against their own puppet masters.
Or, you know, the tiger ate the Republican elite.
Good summary of how the crazy became normal and the Bachamann-Goehmert-Cruz show became the face of the GOP.
I go back to when normal politics ceased to exist, and that was with the Arkansas Project and the Gingrich Revolution and then with the theft of the 2000 election through the use of the Supreme Court. That was what gave the GOP the illusion that they could create their own reality and — it would become real just through maneuvering and will.
Your story begins when with the Terri Schiavo case, the failure to bring relief after Hurricane Katrina, the failure in Iraq, and the collapse of the economy, it was patently the case that the Republican could not create their own reality through strategy, tactics, propaganda, and will.
The first move was away from legitimate political process, and we are still stuck there. The second move was away from any rational reference to what actually was going on in the world.
Paradoxically, it was President Obama’s behaving as if there was absolutely legitimate process going on (and driving his supporters nuts when they could see that patently there was not) that drove the Republicans into obstruction and finally drove them over the edge.
Obama didn’t drive them nuts. They decided to obstruct everything before he was sworn in. It might be partly who he is, but it wasn’t what he did.
At least, not in the way you portrayed it.
If he did anything to drive them nuts, it was by winning over the sane center-right in the 2008 election.
That left the Republican coalition smaller and more radical.
Don’t underestimate the extent to which President Obama’s continued dignified demeanor and bipartisan offerings, which held the center-right who crossed over to vote for him, intensified the visceral reaction and the craziness of the Republican tactics. Over again they thought they had him in a corner even as they painted themselves tighter and tighter into their corner. Obstruction of the sort that appeared in 2009 was a rational strategy under the circumstances. What the Republican House pulled with the 2011 debt ceiling crisis really was not a rational strategy. What they pulled this year was over the edge.
Further to your point: Remember that point in the New Hampshire newspaper interview (“I will crush them”) where Obama notes how he stays calm even during arguments with Michelle, and how that makes her even madder? I see the same dynamic (minus, of course, the underlying respect and affection between the two sides) at work in how his political opponents react to the President’s continuing refusal to descend to their level.
In my experience, while remaining calm during a conflict may heighten the intensity of the other person’s anger, that is short-lived and the conflict runs it course in a much shorter period of time.
True, which leaves us with other explanations for the ongoing refusal of the right to drop their enraged absolutism and seek any sort of compromise resolution.
Me, I’m going with an unholy stew of racism, hubris, and Oppositional Defiant Disorder.
Agree but would add that temper tantrums follow the withdrawal of the toys that self-centered and selfish brats have been accustomed to getting.
Guess when this was penned:
A whole generation has been born and grown up nothing but crazy.
Pete Hamill End Game – December 1994.
I always found Lincoln’s words to be quite appropriate.
Anyhow I think Booman missed one thing. They really ARE facing an existential crisis. Everything they believe and the traditions they preserved are in fact under assault by science, by the evolution of society, by people whose experience differs in significant ways from their own.
Now obviously the white male conservative is not about to die out, but it is undeniable that his power to impose his will on the country is being curtailed in every sphere.
That this can be a good thing (especially if they embrace it and learn from it) however, does not enter their minds.
What is bugging me is for all the nutball crazies on the right doing crazy things, the press focus is now switching (and not wrongly) to the ACA website problems, offering them a fig leaf of ammo. I hope the issues get resolved soon so these nuts, after getting beat, don’t get a big fat I-told-you-so kiss in the press.
Bill McInturff is one of the top pollsters for the GOP. He spoke to a gathering of AHIP leaders today. He said that this month’s cratering of Republican poll numbers is historical, only being matched by events like the Tet offensive, Nixon’s descent, and the Clinton impeachment. While McInturff said that such dramatic dips, unlike more routine approval drops, have the potential to have an effect that may last many months, he also said that the incentives for Congressional Republicans in the upcoming budget negotiations will not be significantly different.
In addition to pointing out that many of the hard-core TEA Partiers did not see their poll numbers drop as sharply, McInturff added that since the GOP has already been punished, many of them will feel that it is even more necessary to get wins out of this round. He summarized their probable viewpoint with this metaphor: “If you’ve already done the time, do the crime.”
I think you get two important turning points: the belief inculcated by the Bush admin that reality didn’t matter, and the line that a center-left compromiser was a Muslim/Atheist/Socialist/Kenyan/Mastermind/EmptySuit. But it didn’t start there. Certainly by the Clinton impeachment they had already started taking leave of reality and even “moderates” were being dragged into the vortex of unreality.
Lovett’s tiger analogy isn’t the right one though. Once you’re not riding the tiger you’re going to get eaten right away. But I think the Establishment lost control by the election of 2010 – and arguably even in the immigration battles of 2006, yet they still haven’t been eaten, just wounded some. It’s more like a dog bred for dogfighting going out of control. Once they lost control it starts attacking whatever is around. Only now that the purported owner has to stop it is it really starting to turn on them.
They wouldn’t always have to embrace contradictory ideas and defend the indefensible if they didn’t also have the attitude that they are never wrong and their political enemies are never right. It’s like their brains have no reverse gear.
I’d make the argument that their brain is always in reverse and lacks a forward gear.
Interesting analysis.
But, the inconsistency and incoherency really started under Nixon and Reagan.
Nixon reluctantly signed OSHA and the EPA. He had the “Wage-price Freeze.” The most anti-Communist politician, went to China.
Reagan ran on one set of things, did another. Just ask the “Pro-life” morons, who’ve been waiting for over 30 years for the (ever) promised over-turning of Roe v. Wade.
From whom do you think W and his band of incompetent renowns “learned?”
But yes, the inconsistency and incoherency was magnified under W.
And McCain/Palin was the pinnacle – The Gimp & The Simp.
I was going to comment about Reagan as well; his ability to convince people that disliking government is somehow patriotic was a major catalyst for our current brand of crazy in the GOP.
As was their successfully turning middle-class workers against the very programs and safeguards that were instrumental to building the middle-class in the first place.
I still don’t fully understand how the GOP was able to become the party of Police, Firefighters, and factory workers, while simultaneously destroying unions and sending jobs oversees.
It started with a belief that the “Reagan Revolution” was permanent and that the Repubs would enjoy a “Government is the Problem” rollback all the way to that Halcyon time when Herbert Hoover was in the White House. [Sarcasm? Yes!] But seriously, I remember El Rushbo pontificating during the Clarence Thomas foodfight that “liberalism” was dead and the entire Democratic Party doomed to the dustbin of history. And the Koch Brothers-type billionaires and mouth breathers believed him.
Clinton disturbed this “reality” and perverse sense of [dis]entitlement, and we got the first shutdown. The clown circus felt the the natural order of things was restored after that with Bush, and they still haven’t come to terms with what an utter disaster he was. I mean, they were supposed to be in power forever. That’s where a lot of the Tea Party revolutionary rhetoric and rage comes from. They thought a new regime had been installed, permanently, elections be damned. What we are seeing is the reverberating shock of disbelief that their “revolution” lasted about as long as the Third Reich.
I admit to the obvious godwinism in this last, but tell me why the Tea Party fever isn’t like Das Volk during the Thirties. There is something profoundly undemocratic in their tactics and mindset. The second shutdown shows it: unhappy with electoral results? Attack the machinery of Government and “win” by other means.
I think it has more to do with the fact that most tea party-types do not remember anything they learned in history beyond the 4th grade.
“Dude, where’s our permanent majority?”
Of course they thought they had a permanent majority. They had just stolen an election and captured both Houses in the mid-term after a Presidential victory by drumming up a war right before the election. They had money and media and had silenced the universities and labor. And the churches were right-wing. What in that would lead them to believe that they wouldn’t have a permanent majority in a conservative country, as they described it?
Had they had someone other than W and his capable cronies running things, they might have pulled it off. If the financial elites were not so greedy and stupid, they might have pulled it off.
But their story that the pubic was conservative and theirs did not bend to the reality that the public still made its own idiosyncratic decisions in response to events in their lives.
“So the tiger ate its master and now here we are.”
Well, now I’ve seen it all. Usually you blame it on the dog eating your homework, not on the dog eating YOU!
when the GOP CHOSE..
on January 20, 2009…
to meet and decided to obstruct ANYTHING this President did..
They CHOSE to commit ECONOMIC TREASON AGAINST THIS COUNTRY.
in the midst of the greatest economic trials this country has seen since the Great Depression..
it was more important to them to oppose this President than to HELP THIS COUNTRY.
AND, they haven’t stopped.
THIS is the underreported story of the MSM since 2009.
it’s been nothing less than ECONOMIC TREASON.
Also, it was their CHOICE to disregard this President’s basic ‘humanity’ that also kept the President’s base with him, even if they were going to get ‘disappointed’ in him.
Denying, on the most basic of levels, that Barack and Michelle Obama’s story was the epitome of ‘ American Exceptionalism’.
Barack Obama…
born to a teenaged mother….father gone by the time he was two…raised for a good chunk of his life by his grandparents..
using EDUCATION to lift him up.
starting at the bottom, from whatever campaign he began and built all his campaign apparatus from the ground up…..
Michelle Obama…
raised in the attic apartment above a typical Chicago bungalow (having been raised in a bungalow, I know how small that apartment was)…..parents only high school graduates…
In one generation went from high school graduates to two Ivy League educated children, one of whom lives in the White House…
How is that NOT the ‘American Success Story’?
Barack Obama, for all appearances, a loving and devoted father and husband..
Outside of Country Last, not one of those muthafuckas ever gone on television saying ‘I politically disagree with the President, but he’s a decent man, a good father and husband, and of course, a good American, and of course he loves this country.’
Not a one..
And, they think that non-White folks lived on Mars for the Previous 43 White Presidents and don’t notice the difference in the treatment of Barack Obama?
G-T-F-O-H
Oddly, the republican who came the closest to acknowledging Obama’s decency was John McCain, when he chided that woman during the 2008 campaign.
billmon @billmon1
Pretty clear Boehner planned all along to keep gov shut right up to debt ceiling deadline: http://politi.co/15Q4oFM He has a lot to answer for
10:31 PM – 18 Oct 2013
Lovett has a great article there. The more obvious public layers (such Bush’s claims about uranium or Palin being selected as VP) of crazy, “psychotic breaks”, are there. But the lower, deeper dynamic of the shift toward crazy is very real also. As he made clear, “there are two types of public insanity”.
And those pervasive Teahadist growth trends are observable by political scientists such as Mann and Ornstein or the folks who put this together:
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/polar_house_means.jpg
( from article: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/10/09/2730651/how-racism-caused-the-shutdown/ )
It really began with fundamentalist denial of evolutionary science. The scientific consensus on evolution is pretty absolute and gets more and more so with each passing years. If your belief structure require you to believe one thing that is ever more demonstrably counter-factual, the moving on to the next—-global warming denialism—-and the next and the next becomes easier and easier.
And you didn’t even mention Fox News and right-wing talk radio.
You didn’t mention the longstanding roll of religious fundamentalism, which encourages faith and unquestioning loyalty at the expense of thinking.