I knew it would happen. I knew that when Sen. Bernie Sanders took possession of the Senate Veteran’s Affairs Committee gavel, that he would soon ingratiate himself with millions of our country’s retired soldiers. I knew he would bring forth worthy legislation, and I wondered what the cultural impact would be once it became clear that a Vermont Socialist was the best advocate that veterans have on Capitol Hill. Sen. Sanders has probably opposed virtually every mission that our soldiers have been sent on over the last sixty years (although he did approve using military force in Afghanistan). On the covert side, at least, many of those missions have been aimed at crushing socialism. In our country, where straightforward Democrats like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are routinely denounced as communists, Sen. Sanders must strike a lot of veterans as a radical. But he’s not among the radicals who just screwed over our vets.
Yesterday, all but two Senate Republicans voted against a motion to take up Sanders’ bill. They didn’t do it, for the most part, because they opposed the bill, but because they wanted to slap sanctions on Iran. The administration is in delicate talks with the Iranian government and does not want Congress to make aggressive moves that could undermine their negotiations and potentially lead to an unnecessary war. Even AIPAC has urged Congress to show restraint.
America’s main pro-Israel lobby came out against an immediate vote on Iran sanctions Thursday, just hours after 42 Republican senators demanded a vote.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) issued its statement after the bill’s author, Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), took to the Senate floor and obliquely criticized the GOP push.
“We agree with the Chairman that stopping the Iranian nuclear program should rest on bipartisan support,” AIPAC said in an emailed statement, “and that there should not be a vote at this time on the measure.”
An AIPAC official confirmed the email’s validity and said the organization has never pushed for an immediate vote.
“We have not and are not calling for [an] immediate vote,” the official told The Hill.
Despite this, the Republicans demanded an immediate vote, and they used the veterans’ bill as a hostage.
Here’s Charles Pierce’s observation on this development:
It’s not until you watch it happen close up that the way things do not get done in the World’s Legislative Body becomes well and truly nauseating. This afternoon, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont brought forth a carefully crafted bill to provide $21 billion in new veterans benefits over the next decade. These included medical benefits, education benefits, and job-training. It contained 26 provisions that came from the Republican members of the Veterans Affairs Committee, which Sanders chairs. It was so wide-ranging that it contained a provision that would eliminate a rule prohibiting the Veterans Administration from covering in vitro fertilization on behalf of veterans whose wounds prevent them from conceiving a child in the usual manner. There was a time, and not so long ago, when both parties would fall all over themselves to help America’s veterans. How many platitudes are we going to hear on the stump between now and November about America’s Heroes and Our Wounded Warriors? This bill was a put up or shut up moment.
It failed.
The Republicans (for the most part) sent them off to war but it is the Socialist who is trying to take care of them. Some not insignificant number of soldiers are going to notice this and draw some new conclusions about what this country ought to be fighting for.
Some not insignificant number of soldiers are going to notice this and draw some new conclusions about what this country ought to be fighting for.
This is what should happen. Whether it will, for a variety of factors, remains to be seen.
No doubt close to half of US soldiers and veterans are already there. The military is neither as white or as conservative at the rank-and-file level as the media has led people to believe. And the Allen Wests are the exception not the rule for black soldiers.
The GOP no longer can trust Vietnam-era attitudes to carry them forward. All you have to do is look at how members of Congress in districts dominated by the uniformed military have trended. A classic one is Walter Jones (Rep. – Camp Lejeune). Senators are less dominated by the military vote in their state and consequently feel they can get away with screwing veterans.
It’s the Brass that is old, white, and conservative…
Well, if they don’t want veterans benefits, that can be arranged.
Top brass? Maybe.
But officers are usually pretty “liberal” whatever that means.
I know, but what I was specifically alluding to was a tweet by IAVA right after the vote that blamed a dysfunctional Senate. Is the Senate a mess? Yes!!!! But the proper blame should be put where it belongs. On the GOP.
That asks too much of those that sign up because it’s a job or beats any other job that they could get with their limited education and/or job skills. Doubt that too many would balk if told they fight for US world dominance and NSA global spying.
The Democrats have always been the friend to the lowly soldier.
ALWAYS.
it chafes me that the GOP skates on their ‘ defense of the military’, when that’s bullshyt. They only care about military contractors…not the soldier.
FDR and Truman were, but that was a unique time and unique war. Formal educational achievement wasn’t all that high at the beginning of WWII:
Post WWII education benefits for Vets had two objectives: 1) satisfy the business community needs for a more educated workforce and 2) Vets in school decreased the unemployment rate – a rational and expected result of the end of the war.
Consider their experience of the Bonus Army.
Hoover’s handling of The Bonus Army issue was instrumental in his defeat in 1932. And FDR managed it okay. However, must remember that this army had served in WWI that ended in 1918 — so, they weren’t treated all that well for many years.
This is the bill that Harry Reid can break the filibuster on legislation over. Let him run into the brick wall a couple times more with the same legislation. And he can legitimately force it through on majority vote.
There was a time, and not so long ago, when both parties would fall all over themselves to help America’s veterans.
I have to disagree – the Republicans are only interested in “the troops” as an abstract blunt instrument with which to bludgeon liberals. Just try to find Republicans spending any money on them or giving an actual shit.
“I wondered what the cultural impact would be once it became clear that a Vermont Socialist was the best advocate that veteran’s have on Capitol Hill.”
The cultural impact? I’m going with “nothing.”
The fact is that if we have learned anything about Americans its that they are stubbornly resolute in not changing their minds, no matter what mere facts might say.
“I like that Affordable Care Act. Hate Obamacare, though.”
“I sure what immigration reform with a path to citizenship, just no amnesty, damnit.”
“It sure is cold, global warming is a myth.”
As a 100 % disabled Gulf War veteran, any congress critter who voted for sending the troops into harms way then voted against helping them when they come home are traitors to what this country stands for, or used to stand for before the billionaires started spending the wealth others work and sweat all day, so they can skim most of the profit off the top, for buying off politicians so they can steal the country from the rest of us.
I’ve always wondered, what if a hypothetical congressscrum voted against deployment and then voted against helping returning soldiers?
Being surprised that socialist might care about veterans is like being surprised that an atheist might have moral principles. It says more about common American misconceptions than it does about socialism (or atheism).
So the bill that Mark Kirk (AIPAC’s most favored donation recipient) and Menendez authored for sanctions against Iraq is now something AIPAC doesn’t want to be blocking our favorite socialist’s bill to care for vets?
Booman, this is near bumper sticker material – pithy, precise, true:
The Republicans (for the most part) sent them off to war but it is the Socialist who is trying to take care of them.
Paralyzed GOP Lawmaker On Medicaid Opposes Medicaid Expansion
No, Virginia, they have no shame.
That’s because those on the left don’t get it that “those that have got theirs” know deep down that the more “have nots” added to the eligibility pool means that there will be less for the “haves.” It’s the “glass is half empty and OMG keep the still thirsty away from the glass” orientation of the right to the “glass is half full and welcome the still thirsty” orientation of the left.
lol no
The brass are conservative because of the south, and the rank and file are about equal to the country. Bernie Sanders and veterans bills are not going to change that.
Democrat Travis Childers is entering race for Sen. Thad Cochran’s seat
http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/weblogs/politics-blog/2014/feb/28/ap-democrat-travis-childers-is-ent
ering-race-for-s/
and
Former Democrat rep Gene Taylor registering to run as Republican in 4th district
https://www.facebook.com/jacksonfreepress/posts/10152223427333774
Childers supports a balanced budget amendment so he’s typical Blue Dog tool. He also only has a shot if Cochran loses in primary. Definitely will get my vote in general but money and time? Endorsed by NRA, anti-choice. I don’t know. Blue Dog tool better than teabagger, but…
Gene Taylor probably tilting a windmills, but again still probably better than the teabagger Palazzo. Can’t get my vote because I live in 1st.