I pride myself on my ability to make some of the most accurate political prognostications in the game, but I have a feeling that this year’s midterms are going to make a fool out of almost all prognosticators, me included. I’ve never seen an election remotely like this one, and the weirdness is coming from many quarters.
Let’s start with the media environment. I’ve actually been watching almost no politically related television for the simple reason that almost none of it has anything to do with the upcoming elections, let alone actual issues that might be taken up by the next Congress. The media has been keeping the country almost in an election blackout, with coverage mostly related to conflict in the Middle East and the Ebola virus (see, for example, current front-page of CNN.com). I don’t know how to account for this fear-heavy media coverage, but I do know that it cannot help the Democrats that they have not been able to get any kind of aspirational message in front of the electorate. I’m tempted to blast the party for incompetence, but the media simply isn’t covering any political messages at the moment. If the Democrats had a compelling message, I can’t honestly say that things would be appreciably better because the electorate would never hear it on the news.
So, this election about nothing is a new thing, and while I can anticipate that this favors the Republicans, I can’t figure out how disastrous this media environment is on, say, a scale of one to ten.
The second weird thing is the gigantic sample of senatorial and gubernatorial elections which are showing either contradictory polls or polling that is consistently within the margin of error. The Democrats seem to be doing better in North Carolina than they are in Arkansas, but I can’t really be sure that that is true. The polls are so tight in so many places, that the possibility exists for a bloodbath for either party (despite the apparent closeness of the races) or for an election which is totally muddled, with each party carrying off roughly half of the contentious contests.
The third weirdness is the prevalence of strong third-party challengers. We’re seeing this in Maine and Alaska’s gubernatorial races, as well as in the Senate races in Kansas and South Dakota. In fact, in Kansas (Senate) and Alaska (governor), the Democrats aren’t even running official candidates.
Finally, while the media is largely ignoring any substantive aspects of these elections, they are delivering a steady drumbeat of analysis that predicts giant Republican gains and a heavy repudiation of the president. But that outcome is not only much in doubt, the very closeness of these contests undermines the validity of the repudiation narrative. In the Senate, at least, almost all of these close races are in states that Mitt Romney and John McCain carried in their campaigns against the Barack Obama, yet they have not been able to put any of them away. In fact, the Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell is in real trouble and just threw millions more into his campaign in an effort to ward off defeat. This is not what would be happening if red state America was in a mood to deliver a knock-out blow to the president and his party.
When I add all this strangeness up, I’m left in unfamiliar territory. I struggle to avoid letting my mood determine my predictions. Sometimes I feel gloomy and think that we are going to lose across the board in almost every close election, and other times I feel optimistic and think that the pollsters are being much too pessimistic about Democratic turnout in the battleground states.
Before too long, we’ll have some results, although the final verdict on this election may not be made until all the recounts and runoffs and caucusing decisions are completed sometime in January. We’re going to have a bunch of losers who lost despite getting 47%, 48%, or even 49% of the vote. Are those politicians really such losers? Does losing by a point or two or three mean that the public has delivered a massive repudiation? What if you lose by such a narrow margin in a state that the president lost by double digits when turnout was at its highest?
I will suck it up an make my final predictions before the polls open on November 4th, but I’ve never been less confident in my ability to get my predictions right.
I expect to look like a dumbass this year, although I expect the same for most everyone else, too.
General rule of thumb regarding a couple percentage point win or loss, at least as far as Republicans are concerned.
Lose by 1-8 points means that the public really prefers your cadidate but the Dems cheated.
Win by .5 or more points means you have been given a mandate.
Thus, if the GOP wins the Senate, even if each race is won by .5%, and these are all fairly red states, that means a massive repudiation of Obama and the Dems and shows just how conservative the country is.
If GOP doesn’t win the Senate, it shows that voter fraud still exists and we need stricter voter ID requirements.
We’re not a 50-50 nation — we’d be about a 53-47 nation in the Democrats’ favor if Democrats voted in every election, but that doesn’t happen. So in non-presidential years, we’re a 53-47 D-advantage nation with a 53-47 R-advantage electorate.
(And I’m not even sure if that’s a factor of the presidency or just exciting presidential candidates. Gore couldn’t put it away. Kerry couldn’t win. God help us if Hillary doesn’t run, or stumbles, and we have to motivate Democratic voters with Martin freaking O’Malley.)
(And I’m not even sure if that’s a factor of the presidency or just exciting presidential candidates. Gore couldn’t put it away. Kerry couldn’t win. God help us if Hillary doesn’t run, or stumbles, and we have to motivate Democratic voters with Martin freaking O’Malley.)
I don’t know why everything in ’16 is pinned on Hillary. I remember there was a time when people who supposedly know things said Democrats had a super deep bench and the GOP had nothing but the clown car at the circus. The GOP has nothing but said clown car but we all know the TradMed loves fluffing the GOP but what bench does the Democrats have? Cuomo cooked himself, and he sucks anyway. What Democratic governor isn’t “Mehhhh!!”?
Massachussetts Gov Patrick is pretty impressive.
That means we are a 50-50 nation of people who actually care. Those who say they are Democrats but can’t be bothered to get off the sofa and stand in line (except at the race track and the movie theater and, for the young people, Black Friday) don’t actually give a shit who wins.
This is fascinating and timely. I was just discussing on twitter the MSM in general and MSNBC specifically having little to no influence on people voting this cycle. Local media has a greater impact, as does the ground game.
I wonder if the media’s silence on election coverage is in any way related to the R strategy of going on an extended vacation from the House to keep themselves out of the public eye to counter their historically low approval rating.
Should be interesting to see the results of this strategy.
Voted. Number 3382 in my early voting center. Forty minute wait at 11am on a Tuesday. Mostly senior citizens of all stripes. Saw folks I knew to be Republican voting. Long line for curbside voting for disabled and feeble.
That’s the view from one part of one of the blue strongholds of North Carolina.
If the early voting center had been staffed at levels from 2012, it would have gone much faster. Heavy midterm levels but not quite to Presidential year levels yet.
There’s one anectdotal account for you.
Also saw only other other seniors last week at 10:00AM Wednesday. But I work Saturday and Sunday and have off Tuesday and Wednesday. Most people are the other way around. So mid-morning on a week day you see only seniors and young mothers. Our early voting site is in the basement of Village Hall and is so jammed with voting machines one can hardly turn around. I wouldn’t take a baby stroller down there and there’s really not room for one. Two handicapped in small wheelchairs did make it down. We all helped. The election judges even helped my wife who only has a cast on her foot. Our regular polling place is on the basketball court of the park district building and has lots of room. As an aside, the regular polling place has four booths for manual ballots. My wife and I seem to be the only people who use them. There is never a wait even when there are long lines for the machines. People are fascinated by the touch screens, I guess. Personally, with twenty five years of software development experience, I don’t trust them at all and would stand in line for the paper ballot if I could. Only voted early because my wife has medical appointments (plural) on Election Day. Of course, I do always have Tuesdays off.
I’m feeling much the same way, but for what it’s worth, here is my prediction:
GOP takes house and Senate.
Senate by one seat
House by 10 seats
Dems take popular vote in both.
Hey Booman,
Why not try something new this election? How about waiting for all votes to be cast and report the winners. This way you do not have to rack your brain on who is going to win. Instead focus on the why the vote turned out that way.
Up to you but please do not over push yourself either way. See you are to valuable. 8)
Well, because I’d feel like a coward.
Sheesh, then why not say “I expect to look as smart as Nate Silver”? That’s going to be true too.
I agree that it is hard to predict. I would think that the most likely result would be that the electorate will punish democratic incumbents elected in 2008 and republican incumbents elected in 2010. So, Republicans take the Senate, but Democrats take back several of the governorships. But who knows? I would not be surprised if either party wins the majority of close races.
Personally, I would love if things break our way, and not just because it would be a lot better for the country. The media seems totally invested in the “Republican wave” story even though their chances of winning the Senate, based on the polls, is only 55-60%. If the coin comes up tails, a lot of people will have mud on their faces. On the other hand, if it comes up heads, they will all say “see, we were right!”
The media are corporate tools. In essence they are all Fox News now.
The media are corporate tools. In essence they are all Fox News now.
They always have been. Thankfully, more people are waking up to that fact.
I expect this to continue in future election cycles as long as the crazies are calling the shots in the GOP.
The whole thing feels kinda “cuspy”, doesn’t it?
Like the Repubs aren’t quite gone and the Dems aren’t quite here yet.
Rather than torture yourself with fruitless speculations about next Tuesday, I, for one, would like to see you speculate on the politics of the next two years (or even longer!) based on three scenarios:
BTW, I listed the scenarios in what I see as order of likelihood.
http://www.motherjones.com/files/blog_abc_poll_generic_congressional_2014.jpg
I’m going with ‘boned.’
Yup. Precisely.
I am sorry to have to say this, but that feeling of “dumbassness” of which you speak is not being caused by being right or wrong in terms of political predictions. It is being caused by retaining any faith or hope whatsoever that the corporate-owned media are going to get “better.” They are great at what they are doing now; it’s just that you think that they should want to do something else…tell the truth, make the country more democratic (small “d”), etc. They don’t, because that’s not their job. Their job is to sustain the plutocracy by any means necessary. Dassit. That’s all she wrote. Once you truly understand that, your dumbassness will fly away to Cloud Cuckoo Land to join all of the other poor dumbasses in media
bog…errr, ahhh, hog heaven.Case in point? My own analysis of what is happening now.
The media is primarily engaged in one thing and one thing only.
Making money.
How do they make money?
They sell advertising. The more people that can be shown to pay attention to a certain media outlet, the more money they make. What sells to the largest number of people is what is covered. Violence and fear are historically big sellers; politcal and sociopolitical analysis not so much. Couple that plain fact with a couple of other plain facts, that the system as it stands today is rigged to keep itself in power any which way it can and that said system…the corporately-owned political system…is controlled by the same forces that own the media complex.
Now another fact:
Non-personing a dissenting and thus dangerous politician by the media has proven itself to be a powerful weapon. It worked on Ross Perot; it worked on Howard Dean and it worked on Ron Paul. The political situation here is in free fall, really. No one seems to have any faith in either party…well, not “no one” but not very damned many. So now the media are effectively “non-personing” the political process itself.
Duh.
Plus the alternate topics make money, so why not?
Put a better lure in the water and the fish will flock to it.
Hook, line and s(
t)inker.Bet on it.
Meanwhile, back at the Fix Ranch…who’s paying attention to how they’re branding their
chattel…errr, ahh, cattle?And more.
So much more!!!
I repeat:
“Of the top ten brands for each party, seven appear on both lists.”
Of the avowed members of the two parties, roughly 70% of them are both prone to obey advertising and are consuming media…and thus in an overall sense “obeying” media because they are in a trance state while in the act of consumption…that make money off of the same brands.
Hmmmm…
So…at least you don’t have to feel like you are alone in the Great State of Dumbassness, Booman. Instead y’all are in the majority.
Rejoice.
WTFU
AG
P.S. I started this reply here, but it grew. It is now also available as a stand-alone post. Booman has that sinking feeling. “I Feel Like a Dumbass,” he says. Hmmmmm…
If you have any comments, please post them there.
That’s the meta-narrative that the MSM is presenting as to where the US electorate is. But wasn’t that also the one that was presented in 2012? And with mixed results from not great polling, convinced Romney and the GOP that they were going to win. Like in 2012, the 2014 polls aren’t conforming to that meta-narrative. Because it doesn’t exist. That’s when incumbents are favored.
From the Demoines Register report on latest LORAS polling
King’s not winning this year because crazy Republicans are favored, but because he’s an incumbent (crazy GOP). That’s going to favor McConnell and Roberts come election day even if they’re equally loathsome. (KS tossing its GOP governor should work against Roberts.)
I ran into a gentleman at the Hardy County, WV courthouse today, an eminent WV Dem, once a delegate, always in demand as a speaker, a leader. I expected him to be really unset with me for leaving the Dem county committee – instead he agreed wholeheartedly. He was very upset with behavior of Dems running in WV, angry at the way Natalie Tenant (running for Senate against the republican Capito) chose to run her campaign by running away from the President. Like me he thinks highly of Obama and really upset at the racist attitudes about him in WV. I think Dems have so shat on their base here there could be a debacle next week.
Rachel Maddow will be broadcasting from Denver tonight. Should be interesting.
Dumbass.
One of my favorite words.
That, and alacrity.
also weird, no yard signs in multiple states electing senators; Indianadem suggested they’ve been replaced by social media. could be, but today I finally found the yard signs, they’re in Eastern Washington State, downticket, senators, lots and lots.