Apparently, “endorsing evolution” is a thing. But, where I come from, it’s called “speaking English.”
In other (English) words, one doesn’t “endorse” evolution when one talks about life coming from the sea. One doesn’t “endorse” heliocentrism when one checks the sunrise time on one’s iPhone. And one doesn’t “endorse” plate tectonics when one notes that fracking is shaking the shit out of Oklahoma.
But their own salty tears betray them.
To recognize scientific fact is apparently anti-Christian. Please count me amongst the anti-Christians.
Chick-Fil-A recently opened in my town. Wouldn’t eat there if it was free. Won’t go to Hobby lobby either.
The guy running the Creation Museum blasting someone for ludicrous beliefs. ROTFLMAO and can’t stop.
Maybe someone should suggest that Mr. ham shoot himself in the head so he can join his God sooner.
Our Dumb Country.
I still can’t get over how so many people seem to think that reality is optional and dependent upon popularity.
“Evolution–filling the atmosphere with oxygen for 450 million years! Try some today!”
“Evolution–it’s not your great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfather’s gene pool!”
“Four out of five doctors recommend sexual selection.”
Some endorse scalping when Uber calls it surge pricing.
Evangelicals have so code-worded English that they’ve created their own dialect. Replicating, drifting, and mutating DNA doesn’t care whether it’s endorsed or not. Same with the revolving of the earth and its rotation around the sun or the deformation of space between masses.
Likely originated as shorthand for “endorse the theory…” but still terribly cloying.
OT: Nothing about the FCC and Net Neutrality?