Do you ever ask yourself “How Big a Success Is the Democratic Revolution in Burma?” Well, maybe you should. That’s the question Joshua Kurlantzick tackles in a review of three books that focus or touch on the Obama administration’s effort to democratize the formerly isolated southeast Asian country.
Hillary Clinton presided over the effort and discusses some of the details in her autobiography Hard Choices. And it turns out that it’s not easy to judge how much things have improved or what, if anything, Americans can expect to get out of the deal. There are still insurgencies raging, and the Muslim community may be suffering from genocide.
In Myanmar’s west, the end of authoritarian rule unleashed a fury of new inter-ethnic and inter-religious violence, primarily targeting the Muslim Rohingya population. According to a recent report by Yale Law School’s Lowenstein International Human Rights Law Clinic, the situation with the Rohingya provides “strong evidence of genocide.” Many of the attacks on the Rohingya appear to have been committed by hard-line Buddhist nationalist paramilitaries with links to or at least the tacit acceptance of the armed forces.
Some 130,000 Rohingya are now internally displaced, living in squalid camps that are more like concentration camps than harbors for refugees. Despite the NLD’s big victory in November, in western Myanmar’s Arakan State a hard-line anti-Muslim party took control of the provincial parliament, setting the stage for more anti-Rohingya legislation and violence…
…Aid workers with experience in western Myanmar expect new waves of anti-Rohingya violence this spring, and another exodus of the ethnic minority from their homes, with many trying to flee the country for Malaysia and Indonesia on rickety boats. The boats put out to sea with few provisions; according to reports in Reuters, many Rohingya die of dehydration onboard, or are picked up and sold into human slavery in Thailand and other countries in the region.
On the joyous November election day when NLD supporters thronged the party’s headquarters in Yangon, most Rohingya had little to celebrate: hundreds of thousands of them reportedly had been stripped of their rights to vote before the elections took place.
This may be an unfortunate unintended consequence of American efforts to bring an accountable government to the people of Burma, but it’s part of the record.
It may be a remote part of the world that, at least for now, has little impact on American lives, but this piece is very educational and will get you up to speed on how events have played out since President Obama visited the country in 2014.
Read the whole thing.
Thanks, Booman. This is the stuff.
ffs —
Suu Kyi won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. HRC has had nothing to do with the decades of Suu Kyi’s struggles for her country and people. Is there a celebrity in the world to the left of Pol Pot that hasn’t attempted to rub shoulders with Suu Kyi? HRC also has a “personal bond” with Henry Kissinger and Lloyd Blankfein. Should we give her credit for all their work — “god’s work” according to Blankfein?
A chapter in her book! How daring! A real sacrifice!
But she modestly didn’t mention that she had to dodge Myanmar police authorities to have her bonding tete-a-tete with Suu Kyi who was under house arrest.
She and her daughter Chelsea also have a personal bond with the lead-poisoned children of Flint, Michigan. We must have different definitions of ‘personal’.
And The Donald and Ivanka.
Surprised that WaMo or Boo couldn’t work in an anti-Sanders rap wrt to Myanmar.
And Sanders can’t win.
There. Fixed it.
Sanders only wins in white states that don’t count. Ergo, a solid win for him in WI will be another nothingburger.
Where exactly has Booman made this claim? Other people have, but Booman? I don’t think so, but am always happy to have my errors corrected.
She also presided over the TPP negotiations.
Only the “good” parts. If it’s currently viewed as favorable, HRC appropriates credit for it. Doesn’t matter to her fans that she had nothing to do with it or had long been against it.
Cannot believe how under the radar this issue is for Dems. Shocking. Hope the Canadians and EU save us from our leaders…
Its fine, Obama is secretly going to make sure it fails.
He’s playing 11th dimensional chess.
That must be it, because Gawd only knows that the United States is and should be all powerful and able to bend other countries’ leaders to our will. This is the divinely ordained order, after all.
Some part of this has to be due to the ethnic cleansing of the Kayin/Karen people (2 million and counting) and the dissolution of the DKBA. No surprise, then, that other, smaller, minority groups are suffering the brunt of the junta’s attention.
Obviously Hillary Clinton’s role here compared to that of the actual people of Myanmar is small, but slamming Secretary Clinton here is petty bullshit. What a great illustration of the “progressive” version of Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
I suppose before long some commenters will be speculating on the dirt to be dug up on The Evil Clintons in those Panamanian law-firm documents. There are of course only two possibilities: (1) There actually are documents incriminating The Evil Clintons. (2) If there are no such documents, the only admissible explanation is that The Evil Clintons had their crack team of computer hackers remove the incriminating documents.
I’m not slamming Clinton. I’m asking you to read an article.
I think Joel may be referring to some of the comments upthread, not your article.
That’s how I took it also.
Yes. I was referring to the nonsense comments upthread about Chelsea Clinton etc. “Progressive” CLinton Derangemenr Syndrome.
I always appreciate Booman’s commentary and links.
We’re talking about a military junta that has likely been stoking ethnoreligious fears for a long time. Whether it was done to stoke fear in order to win votes for the military’s party or just part of their own jingoistic paranoia, I don’t know but I wouldn’t place much blame on the US pushing for democratization.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/10/26/evidence-links-myanmar-government-monks-ethnic-cleansing-rohingy
a/?utm_content=buffer7f2a4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
I, like many, am very disappointed in Suu Kyi but Myanmar is just now emerging from a closed society. It doesn’t excuse her and other’s non action but it’s worth noting. Societal ills in this country run so deep that it will likely limit the effectiveness of any internationally pressured action (if indeed that ever comes). Hopefully something will be done but I fear that Rohingya are likely huge losers whatever the outcome .
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/28/11306856/aung-san-suu-kyi-muslim-rohingya-bbc
I agree with your insights. Although I’m willing to push everyone out of the way to rush to the head of the line to diss a lot of US foreign policy – and I’m not a Clinton fan – I’m not sure how much blame can actually be placed on the USA (for a change) for the genocide of the Rohingya in Myanmar.
Suu Kyi has been a disappointment in this matter. I have to advise people who believe that ALL Buddhists are these super peaceful people that never ever wage war that this is quite simply not the case.
Back in 1965 in Indonesia we only wrote the lists of names. It wasn’t our fault that the coup plotters turned around and killed a half million (or more) of the ethnic Chinese. These things happen.
How does that relate to Myanmar?
Ethnic cleansing is endemic in Asia. Mixed race children are shunned or worse. Japan isn’t the only country concerned about ethnic purity. Maybe it’s a logical conclusion of population density, some primitive instinct run amok.
I actually do keep tabs on this situation in Burma for a few reasons so I was aware of this.
I do volunteer literacy tutoring with refugees here in Portland, Oregon, and refugees from Burma (AKA Myanmar) are among the mix. As far as I know, they’re not ethnic Burmans but rather from the various minority groups.
Another Asian refugee group here consists of so-called Bhutanese, who are apparently ethnic Nepali–or more likely descendants of ethnic Nepali–who settled in Bhutan at some point, and have fairly recently been expelled by Bhutan (you know, the happiest place on Earth, right?) back to Nepal. Thing is, Nepal doesn’t want them and has kept them in refugee camps. Some have managed to gain admission to the US.
Back to the original point of Booman’s commentary and link, the “democratic restoration” in Burma does not include civilian control of the military. It frankly makes no difference what Aung San Suu Kyi says about the Rohingya, the Karen, or any other ethnic minority in Burma–the military can persecute those people anyway. WHich is not to say that Suu Kyi should shut up….