Nigel Farage gesticulates in front of an anti-immigration poster entitled Breaking Point.
Well, Thomas Mair broke all right. The question is, was he incited?
Jo Cox: an attack on humanity, idealism and democracy
The slide from civilisation to barbarism is shorter than we might like to imagine. Every violent crime taints the ideal of an orderly society, but when that crime is committed against the people who are peacefully selected to write the rules, then the affront is that much more profound.
The killing, by stabbing and repeated shooting in the street, of Jo Cox is, in the first instance, an exceptionally heinous villainy. She was the mother of two very young children, who will now have to grow up without her. It is also, however, in a very real sense, an attack on democracy.
Jo Cox: an attack on humanity, idealism and democracy
Jo Cox, however, was not just any MP doing her duty. She was also an MP who was driven by an ideal. The former charity worker explained what that ideal was as eloquently as anyone could in her maiden speech last year. “Our communities have been deeply enhanced by immigration,” she insisted, “be it of Irish Catholics across the constituency or of Muslims from Gujarat in India or from Pakistan, principally from Kashmir. While we celebrate our diversity, what surprises me time and time again as I travel around the constituency is that we are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.”
The police are investigating reports that the assailant yelled “Britain First” during the attack. If those words were used, this would appear to be not merely a chauvinist taunt, but the name of a far-right political party, whose candidate for City Hall turned his back in disgust on Sadiq Khan at the count, in sectarian rage at a great cosmopolitan city’s decision to make a Muslim mayor.
How ironic is it that one of Britain’s leading campaigners for a more compassionate response to the Syrian refugee crisis should be killed, not in the midst of that conflict, but in the streets of her own home constituency, where she has just come from working on behalf of her constituents on the practical problems of their daily lives. This was not some starry eyed idealist, but someone acutely aware of the difficulties faced by communities with large immigrant populations.
Jo Cox: an attack on humanity, idealism and democracy
We are in the midst of what risks becoming a plebiscite on immigration and immigrants. The tone is divisive and nasty. Nigel Farage on Thursday unveiled a poster of unprecedented repugnance. The backdrop was a long and thronging line of displaced people in flight. The message: “The EU has failed us all.” The headline: “Breaking point.” The time for imagining that the Europhobes can be engaged on the basis of facts – such as the reality that a refugee crisis that started in Syria and north Africa can hardly be blamed on the EU, or the inconvenient detail that obligations under the refugee convention do not depend on EU membership – has passed. One might have still hoped, however, that even merchants of post-truth politics might hold back from the sort of entirely post-moral politics that is involved in taking the great humanitarian crisis of our time, and then whipping up hostility to the victims as a means of chivvying voters into turning their backs on the world.
And that is what the Brexit campaign has become. A plebiscite on turning back refugees and immigrants that are coming for reasons largely removed from the EU, and if anything, more due to the aggressive middle eastern policies pursued by Tony Blair and successive British governments. Perhaps more than anyone, she was the embodiment of resistance to the xenophobia sweeping the land. As a European, I am ashamed that she was killed for her beliefs. I hope the vast majority of British citizens feel the same.
It is far to early to tell whether her killing will have any effect, one way or the other, on the outcome of the Brexit referendum. What it does highlight, however, is just how low the Brexit campaign has come to tapping into people’s deepest and most atavistic fears. This isn’t just about politics now, or the macro-economics of staying part of a larger Union – or not. It is about basic human values, and about a determination to remain on good terms with people very different from you. Before the EU ever became a single market, it was a humanitarian project to end xenophobia and war between European peoples. If Brexiteers want to leave the EU to undermine those basic principles even further, then the EU is better off without them.
It wasn’t UKIP that took the initiative for the EU referendum. It was an arrogant David Cameron who wanted to cut a share of British money flowing into the EU. Cameron wanted to pull a Maggie Thatcher an look tough for his party and the Brits. There was no immigration crisis through Greece until Erdogan opened the gates of migrants crossing the sea. The British being part of Europe and NATO can be equally blamed on agressive military policy intervening in Libya and Syria. Also Obama and in particular HRC pushed for military intervention making use of R2P policy. Another term for regime change by any means.
… if anything, more due to the aggressive middle eastern policies pursued by Tony Blair and successive British governments.
Jo Cox was a person deeply involved and concerned with displaced persons as an executive of Oxfam where she met her husband Brendan. Jo Cox was also opposed to the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn and wanted the British to bomb in Syria and establish and enforce a no-fly zone. This makes her foreign policy view much closer to the British conservatives and HRC.
It was Tony Blair who just a few days ago threw a joker in the Brexit discussion by casting doubt on the Northern Ireland peace agreement undoubtedly pushing a number of buttons of hate between the republican IRA and the protestant Unionists.
Thomas Mair was a Long Time neo-Nazi of National Alliance. I see no Brexit motive in the killers hand, just a loner … a person filled with hate from reading white supremacist bs and the pro-apartheid white minority rule of Rhodesia and South Africa. This incident is quite similar to the Charleston church shooting and many similar murders across the US and western Europe … think Breivik in Norway.
As far as a political assassination, the incident is similar to the murder by a animal rights activist of Pim Fortuyn in The Netherlands. His party won the parliamentary election in 2002 and caused years of turmoil. It set the stage for other right-wing populists in Dutch politics. Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Geert Wilders are international oriented Islamophones spreading hatred of Dutch citizens of Muslim faith.
I see no repercussions for next week’s Brexit vote as the impact of the two incidents are quite different. Jo Cox did not represent the face of the Remain vote and the suspected killer does not represent the Leave vote. Political discourse had already become poisonous after the 9/11 attacks on the US, is just keeps on rolling and has swept across Europe.
Btw, the UK has NOT taken part in accepting Syrian refugees but has a “immigration problem” with citizens of its former empire and with influx from EU nations due to the agreement of free movement. Blame the likes of Niall Ferguson and his book Empire and similar right-wing political figures hiding amongst the intelligentia.
With the Brexit referendum, the party of Cameron will be torn apart either way. Jo Cox had chosen to be part of the Labour group hostile to the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn.
I paid tribute to Jo Cox with a post in your previous diary.
Booman Tribune ~ The Killing of Jo Cox
I think the “mad loner” defence is disingenuous. Ideologically Mair is part of a political continuum from the right wing of the Tory pary through UKIP to the extreme nationalist and neo-nazi groups with which Mair identified. It is a matter of judgement where, within that continuum, reasoned opposition shades into irrational madness but their objectives are ultimately the same.
Equally Jo Cox is part of the political continuum stretching from Cameron through Blair, Brown and on to Corbyn. She started by nominating Corbyn and then moved towards the centre of that spectrum. It is a battle for power with the extremes increasingly irresponsible in their methods.
Booman Tribune ~ Comments ~ The Killing of Jo Cox
I wouldn’t worry too much about what Tony Blair says or does. Hardly anyone inN. Ireland will pay him any heed.
Why is it when a white Christian man commits an atrocity, it is the act of a mad loner. When a brown skinned Moslem does the same thing, it is an act of Islamic terrorism?
A loner meant in the sense of someone shut out from social interaction as many of the mass shootings occur globally and in greater numbers across the US. See my diary:
○ Lacking Social Life, Road to Radicalization In White Supremacy
You will never ever read from my hand that an individual terror attack by a muslim would put the blame on 1.4bn followers of Islam. Those are the Islamophobes I have talked and written about for a decade now and many hiding as bourgeoise [Niall Ferguson to name one], coming out recently as the populist politicians of the extreme-right gain tracking inside Europe. Racism and xenophobia is on the rise and will be part of our society for generations to come.
○ Peter King’s Anti-Muslim Jihad | Tikun Olam |
I appreciate you’re not one of the Islamophobes or one of the mainstream media which conflate Islam with terrorism, but it is a dangerous road to go down when every act of white Christian terrorism is excused as the act of a loner madman whilst no such leeway is granted to others. It is hard to imagine any act of terrorism being committed by a well adapted and socially well integrated person, so the mad loner defence should a priori be applied to all terrorists or not at all.
○ Chatham House: Countering Lone Actor Terrorism
○ RUSI: The EU and its Eurabia Anxieties: Can the EU Curtail Extreme Nationalism?
Posted earlier in my new diary – Far-right Extremists More Virulent Than Islamists In UK-US.
Coming into my camp but with the wrong argument. I want Britain out because of its veto power within NATO and its agressive military stance to intervene outside Europe’s interest causing decades of backlash and terror on the continent.
WHat in the world do you mean when you refer to British veto power within NATO? I was puzzled and did some reading about NATO’s inner workings. I never even found the word “veto”.
As for Britain’s military stance, that would have to do with NATO, not with the EU, which has no independent military, so how in the world would Britain’s exit from the EU affect its stance within NATO?
Thanks for your digging! I took the info at face value, however the veto power lies within the UN Charter and the Security Council when NATO operates outside it’s territory of member states as was the case in Kosovo, Iraq and recently Libya. A faint attempt to get the R2P doctrine to replace earlier triggers to use military force against a non-member sovereign state.
So you are right, a Brexit does not change this. Within the EU there are voices for a European military force and EU foreign policy. The British are strongly against this as this may undermine its sovereignty and NATO influence. A Brexit would cause the UK to lose it’s EU veto power to prevent such a decision.
Now I understand the force of the US to expand NATO outside of Europe and thus circumvent the UN and make the international institution irrelevant in matters of war and peace. The John Bolton doctrine déjà vu.
○ NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects by Bruno Simma
… and so the monster expands …
○ NATO’s Who Is Who
○ NATO Military Committee
Jo Cox was the embodiment of resistance to xenophobia – Independent.ie