Media criticism is a huge part of my job and I’ll always find things to fault in how the media covers our politics and our politicians. I do not believe, however, that the media went easy on Donald Trump during the campaign. I’ve actually never seen any politician get so savaged day after day as Trump was in the last election. Pretty much everything we know about Trump’s shortcomings came from articles written either by bigfoot reporters at our major newspapers or by longtime Trump-watching journalists in the New York area.
Trump lost the endorsement of dozens of newspapers that have endorsed Republicans in the past. In the end, in the entire country, he only won the endorsement of a single handful of metro newspapers. Even the right-wing media turned on him, including the National Review which opposed him with real fury. I could write a separate article about how Clinton was treated, but I want to stay on my topic.
Donald Trump was exposed by the media and people had access to all the information they needed to know about his fraudulent business practices, his dishonest and bullying litigiousness, his failure to honor contracts, his sordid personal life, his connections to prominent organized crime figures, his business failures, his record of racism, his foreign entanglements, and his almost unbelievable personal narcissism. Maybe the media actually helped Trump despite giving us all this information because they gave him so much attention and chased his every shocking move, but they didn’t give him a pass or fail to treat him with appropriate skepticism.
We all learned something about the standing of the media when enough of the public shrugged it all off and supported him to make him our president. I think it’s clear that the media lost their credibility with much of the electorate, and we can debate how much they earned that loss of credibility. Yet, it’s clear to me, at least, that they lost more than they deserved to lose.
Now, when I open up the Washington Post and an article begins with the following paragraph, I know things are messed up.
The way President Trump tells it, the meandering, falsehood-filled, self-involved speech that he gave at the Central Intelligence Agency headquarters was one of the greatest addresses ever given.
Even after more than a half a decade in office, a failing war based on falsified intelligence, a drowned New Orleans, and a global collapse of the economy, no major newspaper ran straight news articles this hostile and disrespectful about President George W. Bush. Donald Trump has been in office less than a week, and his word is already an open joke and so lacking in credibility that our major newspapers have no compunction about dismissing his utterances out of hand.
Reading the transcript of his first big presidential interview with ABC News, I was something close to paralyzed with fear. Watching it made things worse.
This is the definition of a situation where I don’t know where to begin. But I guess we could go to the Mayo Clinic and look at how they define the symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
DSM-5 criteria for narcissistic personality disorder include these features:
- Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance
- Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it
- Exaggerating your achievements and talents
- Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate
- Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people
- Requiring constant admiration
- Having a sense of entitlement
- Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations
- Taking advantage of others to get what you want
- Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others
- Being envious of others and believing others envy you
- Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner
If you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may come across as conceited, boastful or pretentious. You often monopolize conversations. You may belittle or look down on people you perceive as inferior. You may feel a sense of entitlement — and when you don’t receive special treatment, you may become impatient or angry. You may insist on having “the best” of everything — for instance, the best car, athletic club or medical care.
At the same time, you have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism. You may have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation. To feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make yourself appear superior. Or you may feel depressed and moody because you fall short of perfection.
I am aware that it is considered unethical by psychologists and psychiatrists to diagnose someone’s mental disorder without the proper training and without actually having the opportunity to deal with them as a patient. In this case, however, I just don’t think there is any question that our new president is a textbook case. Read the transcript of that interview or watch the video of it and run down the checklist of symptoms.
Let’s just look at the part about feeling insecurity and humiliation and being moody and depressed. Here’s what White House press secretary Sean Spicer said about how the president felt when he saw the coverage about how lightly attended his inaugural was in comparison with President Obama’s two inaugurals. Admittedly, Spicer deflected the reaction onto the staff, but you can tell that he’s echoing Trump’s complaints.
SPICER: …But I will tell you that it’s not — it’s not just about a crowd size. It’s about this constant — you know, he’s not going to run. Then if he runs, he’s going to drop out. Then if he runs, he can’t win, there’s no way he can win Pennsylvania, there’s no way he can win Michigan.
SPICER: Then, if won, it’s oh, well he(ph) — there is this constant theme to undercut the enormous support that he has. And I think that it’s just unbelievably frustrating when you’re continually told it’s not big enough, it’s not good enough, you can’t win.
QUESTION: And — and if I may —
SPICER: Hold on — because I — I think it’s important. He’s gone out there and defied the odds over and over and over again. And he keeps getting told what he can’t do by this narrative that’s out there. And he exceeds it every single time. And I think there’s an overall frustration when you — when you turn on the television over and over again and get told that there’s this narrative that you didn’t win. You weren’t going to run. You can’t pick up this state…
…But when you’re constantly getting told that can’t be true, we doubt that you can do this, this won’t happen, and that’s the narrative when you turn on television every single day, it’s a little frustrating.
And I think that for those people around him, his senior team especially, but so many of the other folks that are either here in the administration, that gave up their time during the transition, they left a job to work for three or four weeks because they are so committed to having his nominees get through, it’s a little demoralizing to turn on the TV day after day and hear, can’t do this, this guy’s not going to get confirmed, no way they’re going to go through.
I can understand not liking negative press coverage or coverage that seems to downplay your accomplishments, but Trump should be secure in knowing that he defied his doubters. He’s sitting in the Oval Office, which is all the proof he needs. Yet, he’s in flat out denial about the fact that his speech at the CIA was not “a home run” or one of “the greatest speeches ever.” He’s in denial about his small inaugural and his popular vote drubbing.
But it’s not just that he’s delusional and has a textbook mental disorder. He also justifies lying by saying it’s what his fans want to hear.
For example, in the interview with ABC News, he was informed that the author of a Pew report he’s been citing to justify his claims of voter fraud has said that his study found no evidence of voter fraud. Trump wondered why, in that case, he wrote the report at all. Then he said:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: According to Pew report, then he’s — then he’s groveling again. You know, I always talk about the reporters that grovel when they wanna write something that you wanna hear but not necessarily millions of people wanna hear or have to hear.
Here he is no longer concerned about the truth at all, but only with reporters writing what his supporters want or need to hear. And he follows that up with this:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Let me just tell you, you know what’s important, millions of people agree with me when I say that if you would’ve looked on one of the other networks and all of the people that were calling in they’re saying, “We agree with Mr. Trump. We agree.” They’re very smart people.
The people that voted for me — lots of people are saying they saw things happen. I heard stories also. But you’re not talking about millions. But it’s a small little segment. I will tell you, it’s a good thing that we’re doing because at the end we’re gonna have an idea as to what’s going on. Now, you’re telling me Pew report has all of a sudden changed. But you have other reports and you have other statements.
Here, what’s important is that millions of people are watching “alternative facts” on Fox News and agree with President Trump. It doesn’t matter that they’re all wrong or misguided. As for the stories that Trump has heard, there are huge problems with those, too. If fact, the problems are so big that I just don’t know how to characterize it. You’re just going to have to read it for yourself.
On Monday, President Trump gathered House and Senate leaders in the State Dining Room for a get-to-know-you reception, served them tiny meatballs and pigs-in-a-blanket, and quickly launched into a story meant to illustrate what he believes to be rampant, unchecked voter fraud.
Mr. Trump kicked off the meeting, participants said, by retelling his debunked claim that he would have won the popular vote if not for the three million to five million ballots cast by “illegals.” He followed it up with a Twitter post early Wednesday calling for a major investigation into voter fraud.
When one of the Democrats protested, Mr. Trump said he was told a story by “the very famous golfer, Bernhard Langer,” whom he described as a friend, according to three staff members who were in the room for the meeting…
..The three witnesses recalled Mr. Langer being the protagonist of the story, although a White House official claimed the president had been telling a story relayed to the golfer by one of Mr. Langer’s friends.
The witnesses described the story this way: Mr. Langer, a 59-year-old native of Bavaria, Germany — a winner of the Masters twice and of more than 100 events on major professional golf tours around the world — was standing in line at a polling place near his home in Florida on Election Day, the president explained, when an official informed Mr. Langer he would not be able to vote.
Ahead of and behind Mr. Langer were voters who did not look as if they should be allowed to vote, Mr. Trump said, according to the staff members — but they were nonetheless permitted to cast provisional ballots. The president threw out the names of Latin American countries that the voters might have come from.
Mr. Langer, whom he described as a supporter, left feeling frustrated, according to a version of events later contradicted by a White House official.
The anecdote, the aides said, was greeted with silence, and Mr. Trump was prodded to change the subject by Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, and Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas.
Just one problem: Mr. Langer, who lives in Boca Raton, Fla., is a German citizen with permanent residence status in the United States who is, by law, barred from voting, according to Mr. Langer’s daughter Christina.
“He is a citizen of Germany,” she said, when reached on her father’s cellphone. “He is not a friend of President Trump’s, and I don’t know why he would talk about him.”
Whatever this is, it’s not sanity. This isn’t some crazy like a fox cunning aimed at distracting us while Trump steals our lunch. It’s out-and-out racist-drunk-at-the-end-of-the-bar insanity. In fact, Cliff Clavin look reliable in comparison.
The media is treating this with appropriate astonishment. They’re really not sugarcoating it except that they’re not willing, like me, to come out and call this man exactly what he is, which is critically, urgently, unfit for office.
He must go soon.
Saw a video of the interview earlier
Yep he nuts
Please explain. By what mechanism, by whom? The Repubs have captured (almost) the entire Fed Govt. They won’t do anything. Do you think the likes of John McCain will step up out of patriotism? That old fuck probably can’t wipe himself.
Again, please explain.
7 days in may, except this time Burt Lancaster is the good guy.
It’s called for.
That isnt going to happen. At least not yet, Trump commands the almost total loyalty of the GOP now.
No he doesn’t and he never had much support on Capitol Hill. Close to none, actually.
That’s changed somewhat.
Senators like Blount here in Misery quite frankly owe their reelection to Twitler. A national reporter in MO election night with the Blount campaign stated they frankly thought they were gonna lose. When returns came in, they were astounded and attributed the close win to the difference Trump made. Thus, don’t underestimate the support he has up on the hill.
Again, he’s a useful idiot to the GOP legislative stragety of killing all the 20th century liberal legislation while he grifts and loots the treasury.
Hear Hear !
Yes, but even there, Trump has already done everything he’ll ever do for Sen. Blunt.
From Charlie Pierce:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a52588/trump-interview-abc-david-muir/
About as likely as Trump electors were to vote for Clinton.
Plenty of ways. It’s been discussed elsewhere; do a Google.
Yes, he meets all the criteria of narcissistic personality disorder, the research diagnosis immature personality disorder, as well as fits the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity.
Often when there are multiple very easily made diagnoses, there is an underlying diagnosis that explains all the obvious ones.
I do not know what that diagnosis might be
Entire State Dept. senior management team resigns .
Not good. Sane people leaving state increases concentration of crazies.
Well, if you are in Mexico and you loose your passport, is there anyone left that can get you a new one? Since there is a gag order for everyone in the government, how do find out such a possibility does not exist?
I’m here anticipating the punishment the donald is going to issue because Mexico refuses to pay for his wall. That will be the negotiated end of NAFTA.
The crazy has already started. Any more crazy and the Mexicans will set up toll booths on the boarder…$25 a car. $100 per bus, $500 per semi, $2000 a plane…..and we won’t be past the first 100 days.
Guess who else sees it
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/entire-state-department-management-team-resigns-unexpectedly
The entire senior level management team at the State Department collectively resigned on Wednesday, according to the Washington Post.
They were fired. Their standing resignation letters were accepted. So by design.
Nope — see below.
Yup. From TPM
That’s not being fired.
The Hill
What do you think, Marie? CNN says they “were fired” (and that this is a de rigueur changing of the guard) but the initial reaction — that it’s stunning, unprecedented etc. — seems more plausible. Is someone trying to paper over what happened? Or what?
WaPo says resigned.
WaPo gets a lot of things wrong, often very wrong, but institutionally it knows that difference between State Dept presidential appointees and career employees. The former submit resignation letters every four years before a new administration is installed. So, technically, “fired” is inapplicable. Those career employees that serve in an appointed position (the vast majority of senior level State Dept appointed postions are held by career State employees), only automatically lose their current appointed position with each new administration. Any federal government career employee can be fired or demoted, but those individuals do have rights. (Bunnatine Greenhouse was awarded $970,000 for being demoted.) Looks to me as if WaPo reported this accurately — undefined as to whether Kennedy was pushed out or resigned of his own volition, but the others are resignations:
Thanks. I think of you as being pretty hard to fake out, so that sounds right to me, too.
Appreciate the vote of confidence. I was reasonably sure The Hill was correct because I’d read up on the State Dept SOP during the “OMG, Trump’s firing all the ambassadors” nothingburger. The SOPs are rational, for example, what FSO would accept an ambassadorial appointment if at the end of the President’s term, his/her State Dept career could over unless she/he planned to retire at that point anyway?
but but but RatPermagov
The business about not remotely diagnosing. I think it’s reasonable to be careful about such things, because
That said, in my amateur opinion, personality disorders are among the most subjective and interpretive of all disorders. I’m not aware of any clear evidence about physical/quantitative markers for them. The classifications of personality disorders have undergone a lot of change in recent decades and the DSM, in my opinion, gives the impression of something settled that isn’t really the case.
I also think that it’s important, in this case to see that the DSM criteria for personality disorders are sort of the beginning and end of the disorder as officially defined. There is not some more complex technical diagnostic process as their might be for more organically defined disorders. It’s a matter of interpretation for them.
In my opinion, the value of these definitions is not so much for the individual-in many cases these problems seem to be almost untreatable-as for other people who have to deal with them-or rather, protect themselves from them. I read a book about them once and the author said most psychological disorders cause the person with it to suffer. They see themselves as the problem. Personality disorders cause other people to suffer. They see other people as the problem, always. And so it is very difficult if not impossible for them to even begin the long and difficult work of changing themselves. And that being the case, I think there is some value in a “remote” diagnosis.
I’m sorry, but I feel like he needs to be the face of the GOP for the next four years. Pence is sane, likeable (allegedly), and would implement the same radical agenda far more effectively. As bad as Trump is, it would be even worse if Pence were actually fully in charge (I realize that he’s probably about 95% in charge now, but Trump is still out front making an ass of himself and disrupting their strategies).
I see your point and agree that a President Pence, while apparently sane, is probably far more extreme and it’s he and his fellow Republicans who are behind all the “policy” moves thus far.
Nevertheless, I’m in Booman’s corner. Trump’s manifest instability is causing irreparable harm to the country and to the world. Pence’s tenure as President won’t be forever. This is a case of wanting to do what’s best for the country and our allies and the rest of the world.
Pence is horrible. But Trump is a danger to us all
He’s crazy.
Like in that interview he takes the reporter and shows him pictures….FRAMED pictures, to ‘prove’ he had huge crowds. Who fucking does that?
Sad to say…but Pence is preferable.
.
Holy shit! That unguarded phone….
…but her emails….
This is giving me flashbacks to the unraveling craziness in The Caine Mutiny. Next we’ll be having him measuring out sugar to prove that someone stole his strawberry ice cream. Jeezuz.
What a great analogy!
.
Where is Al “I am in control here” Haig when you need him?
A DSM-5 checklist is not a description of a “textbook case” for any defined mental disorder. The DSM is not for use by those without education, experience, and expertise and even with all that, only used within a proper clinical setting.
Playing shrink to score political points exhibits poor journalistic instincts and ethics.
Perfectly okay to say, IMO DT is a narcissist, idiot, bully, or jackass. Or any other common language usage words.
It is not like we are lacking for descriptors, walling laypersons off from the DSM is bullshit.
I am not A CPA but I can read a Income Statement. And you don’t to be a JD to analyze legislation.
Knowledge is not and should not be limited to licensed practitioners
Nobody is walling anyone off from reading the DSM or Merck manual. But both contain information on how, why, and by whom they should be used. They aren’t toys or designed for entertainment like the daily horoscope.
“Reading” is not synonymous with knowledge. Reading doesn’t even exhibit comprehension. Knowledge is more than comprehension as it includes the ability to properly apply what one knows. Everybody here has the ability to read the Constitution. But everyone that has claimed that Hillary won the election and/or Trump is illegitimate either lacked comprehension or the knowledge to apply it.
When you say “read” an income statement, what do you mean? Income/revenue minus costs/expenses equals NIBT? Almost anyone can do that. But if one doesn’t know the accounting and business methods used to generate the income and cost figures, one hasn’t “read” that statement. How come all those professional and lay “readers” of Enron’s income statements got it so very wrong?
I’m a retired trial lawyer.
I once had a very good psychiatrist as an expert witness in a competency hearing to determine whether the defendant was sane enough to try. The psychiatrist was supposed to take the stand in the morning, testify for a few minutes and go back to his office. The judge screwed the case up so it dragged on into the afternoon and the psychiatrist, still not called, was regularly having to call his office to break appointments.
He finally turned to me in exasperation and blurted out, ” I don’t even know why I have to be here. The average person can tell you whether someone’s acting crazy. I just put labels on it!”
Res ipsa loquitur.
I am a former legal aid lawyer who has tried about 100 Civil Commitment motions.
Utter nonsense.
Marie3–We locked horns about this topic during the general election campaign when I described Trump as a sociopath and you went after me for not having credentials as a mental-health professional. You’re right, I don’t. I also pointed out to you at that time that my family and I had been victimized by someone who ticked all the sociopath boxes, and that that awful experience definitely informed my opinion of Trump. Now, I don’t expect you to back down–I pretty sure that backing down is something you never do!–and I’m not going to back down, either.
It’s interesting to me that you’re seemingly fine calling Trump all sorts of names, but anything that you judge to be a diagnostic term is unacceptable. Well, anything except “narcissist”, which you use. (Please don’t now try to argue that “narcissist” is everyday language, but “sociopath” is a diagnostic term.)
In my opinion, what you’re trying to do, Marie3, is control the discourse about Trump on this blog by delegitimizing certain lines of argument. In this thread, you’re trying to control the discourse regarding Trump’s mental state. Elsewhere, you’ve made a huge effort to delegitimize discussion of the role of Russian meddling in the election.
You’ve got lot of interesting material to share, and I appreciate that. I think it would be much better received if you weren’t seemingly so intent to tear down other commenters.
Irrespective of what Marie may or may not be doing, the fact is that actual psychologists and psychiatrists have been diagnosing Trump at a distance all year, and all of them agree he is a textbook case of NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) and sociopathy. I posted on this several times during the campaign. My personal favorite is this one :
“He’s so classic that I’m archiving video clips of him to use in workshops because there’s no better example of his characteristics,” said clinical psychologist George Simon, who conducts lectures and seminars on manipulative behavior. “Otherwise, I would have had to hire actors and write vignettes. He’s like a dream come true.”
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/11/donald-trump-narcissism-therapists
I could easily post ten more such articles, but there’s a lot of overlap so I’ll just link to two:
http://www.inquisitr.com/2595334/clinical-psychologists-diagnose-donald-trump-and-it-isnt-pretty-esp
ecially-for-his-supporters/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-berger/trump-profile-of-a-sociopath_b_11318128.html
This is nothing new. What’s new is that he is president and his usual shtick is a particularly bad fit for that position, given that he has no idea how the government actually works. and also that he gets publicity for everything he does or says, which is always the ruling incentive with him. So he’s particularly uncomfortable and acting out, but it’s got nothing to do with actually being president.
So yeah, this is not working.
I’ve read that Orwell’s 1984 has recently rocketed up to the NY Times best seller list. But there’s another novel that actually explains what’s going on better than 1984. That book is Herman Melville’s The Confidence Man, which in my view IS the Great American Novel.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/philip-roth-e-mails-on-trump
Very interesting. Thanks for the Melville rec.
Well, if it was out of the bounds for the electoral college to even consider performing its supposed function because of fear of a revolt of the (heavily armed) incompetent white electorate, then I feel safe in saying it’s equally outside the bounds of the GOoP Congress (and Dimwit Pence and Crackpot Cabinet) to exercise the 25th Amendment. The idea that any of our failed US institutions (from Congress to media) will have the ability to somehow remove Trumper against his will is a pipe dream.
A civil war (with actual casualties) is looking increasingly more likely, and something Commander-in-Chief Trumper and his minions would enjoy. The archaic constitution has once again failed. At this point no one can confidently predict exactly what we will have four years of….
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
A people’s Republic, and an economy based on production for use, not profit, will, must, arise from the ashes.
It’s in the Grundrisse.
Hi there! Just got up from a nap. Did I miss anything? 😁 😁 😁
simply as an objective description of Trump (rather than as symptomatic criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder), would find nothing disputable or even controversial in it as applied to Trump.
It’s like the Mayo Clinic’s author wrote it with Trump firmly and consistently in mind as the type-specimen s/he was describing to define the disorder . . . “Patient Zero” for it.
Fits him (so to speak) to a T.
*”anyone” meaning, obviously, any sentient being inhabiting the Reality-Based Community, that is. Can’t vouch for what loons would conclude.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/26/1625550/-Carl-Bernstein-Republicans-are-openly-discussing-
Trump-s-emotional-maturity-stability
Veteran Beltway journalist Carl Bernstein told CNN Wednesday that discussions in Washington this week have been, “unlike anything I have seen in 50 years as a reporter.” Adam Withnall writes:
“I am hearing from Republicans, and other reporters are as well, that there is open discussion by members of the President of the United States’ own party about his emotional maturity, stability,” he said.
“People are saying that his psyche is driving the news cycle.
“We are in uncharted territory here and we ought to talk to some of our colleagues about what they are hearing. [I think it’s a really fruitful area because] I’ve never heard [people] talking about a president… the way this subtext is now a talking point
no one in the states that determined the election voted specifically for Pence. I hope dem progressives are already out there preparing for when “Washington” removes the prez ppl voted for, and puts in a radical right winger whose principal agenda is tax cuts for the .1%ers and controlling women’s bodies and letting the climate and the middle class continue to flounder
I always thought the scenario driving the 25th Amendment was the fear that the president could become incapacitated by, say, a stroke or another illness or injury, or by being unconscious. The amendment was invoked (by Reagan and Dubya) at the time of undergoing surgery or other procedures requiring anesthesia or sedation (Wikipedia entry summarizes this.)
I doubt the drafters of the amendment envisaged the president being removed from office because people thought he was crazy.
Especially when the people had all the evidence that he was crazy beforehand and elected him regardless. Very torn between he is unacceptable as a president vs we are unacceptable as a polity.
Succinct and regrettably true. I am frequently angry at those who voted for Trump who really did know better, but whose inclination to vote tribally and always against the “other” party won the day. Scares me, truly.
one of the things I find weirdest and creepiest in the interview is that T is living alone in that house [contrast Obama’s who invited grandma to live with them]. But good on Melania that she made her escape