(I originally wrote this as a reply to Steggies’s recent post BooMan Bait: A WalMart Closes. It grew. Here it is in final form.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Besides the Walmart article, The Guardian is offering another frightening piece of news:
Earth’s sixth mass extinction event under way, scientists warn
A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.
Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.
The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.
Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”
Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.
The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.
Billions of animals have been lost as their habitats have become smaller with each passing year.
The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”
They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”
—snip—
Wildlife is dying out due to habitat destruction, overhunting, toxic pollution, invasion by alien species and climate change. But the ultimate cause of all of these factors is “human overpopulation and continued population growth, and overconsumption, especially by the rich”, say the scientists, who include Prof Paul Ehrlich, at Stanford University in the US, whose 1968 book The Population Bomb is a seminal, if controversial, work.
“The serious warning in our paper needs to be heeded because civilisation depends utterly on the plants, animals, and microorganisms of Earth that supply it with essential ecosystem services ranging from crop pollination and protection to supplying food from the sea and maintaining a livable climate,” Ehrlich told the Guardian. Other ecosystem services include clean air and water.
“The time to act is very short,” he said. “It will, sadly, take a long time to humanely begin the population shrinkage required if civilisation is to long survive, but much could be done on the consumption front and with `band aids’ – wildlife reserves, diversity protection laws – in the meantime.” Ceballos said an international institution was needed to fund global wildlife conservation.
—snip—
Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.
Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”
—snip—
A picture is worth a thousand words.
Read on.
From the Walmart article:
Chilling words from the extinction article:
The time to act is very short. It will, sadly, take a long time to humanely begin the population shrinkage required if civilisation is to long survive…
The kicker here is the word “humanely.” A mass die-off of offending humans will not be humane. The reaction has already started as the luckier segments of the world’s population quite inhumanely start to react to the population shifts that are being caused by overpopulation and its concomitant social and ecological disasters.
Fuck ’em. We got ours. Fuck ’em.
And there we are, folks. Hoist by our own petard. The petard of an over-successful species. The population bomb.
The evidence is everywhere, not just in rural West Virginia or the teeming slums of the Third World. It is plain in the streets of New York.
It is plain in the blank faces of the young and the working classes, hooked into an imaginary, digitized world by their cellphones while their transportation system collapses beneath them.
It is plain in the bloated bodies and minds of the badly nourished masses, fattened on the chemically produced, empty caloried fruits of McDonald’s World.
Is there a “humane” solution?
I no longer think so.
Sorry, but there it is.
All of the globalist, neocentrist’s horses and men
Couldn’t put Humpty Dumpty together again.
Why couldn’t they?
Because words no longer have any permanent meaning.
They mean whatever our controllers say they mean.
The post-factual world is now upon us.
Dream on.
A post-human world is nigh.
Watch.
Later…
AG
I am trying to make sense of your diary, there seem to be many puzzle pieces that suggest a picture, but its ambiguous what it actually is, or whether its got pieces that just arent part of it.
Our world is rife with problems, and putting all those problems together paints a dire picture indeed.
Is one of the points you are making that we are doomed, and there is no hope left? I sure hope not.
It sounds like you have quite a low opinion of people when you talk about them like this.
Obviously there are many who reject certain realities, like climate change, often for no other reason than political tribalism, especially the US seems pretty bad right now, as polarization seems really high. And ofcourse Trump, pretty much every sensible choice he rejects and goes with the opposite.
The other way around happens too ofcourse, enviromental activists often reject reasonable objections to things they believe, which ties into:
The meaning of words, expressions, ideas have never been permanent, it evolves with our culture, the context where,when,how it is used, who interprets it.
People with power have more influence on the meaning of it all, and they are all too happy to try to change meaning to serve their interests. But in essence we as a whole determine what things mean, what we as a collective agree on what things mean.
But thats just where i dont agree with you, if i am interpreting what you said wrong, if we attach different meaning to words, please let me know.
What really confuses me is the overpopulation you talk about, it seems based on ideas that may be past their expiration date, but the meaning of your words dont seem clear at all to me.
It sure doesnt sound hopeful.
Are you warning us for the consequences of overpopulation, like famine, refugees, wars for resources?
Are you telling us that its beyond solving, because words mean what we are told they mean?
You write:
OK.
I will.
Let’s take the word “guilt.”
It is certainly perfectly evident that the mass media of the U.S. has been on a massive tear to prove that Trump and his associates are “guilty” of something.
Bad taste?
Foolish statements?
Too many tweets?
Collusion with the so-called “enemies” of the U.S.?
Hiring prostitutes to piss on the bed Obama and his wife occupied in Russia?
Whatever…if they can find even a shred of a suggestion of ‘evidence,” they are all over him.
And so on.
Why?
Read up on Operation Mockingbird and the CIA.
The mass media have been infiltrated and pretty much controlled by intelligence interests since the mid-’50s.
Have they proven this Trumpist guilt?
In a prosecutable way?
Not so far, even after months and months of trying.
That doesn’t mean that he and his cohorts are not guilty, it just means that they cannot/have not been proven guilty.
This with all the vast means of surveillance available to intelligence interests.
So…lets go back a few years.
To say…the murderous reign of Henry Kissinger as an ongoing diplomatic assassin.
Read this article:
The Case Against Henry Kissinger:
Now look at the following images from the recent HRC campaign to become neocentrist President of the United States of America:
Has there been an equal uproar from the media about the sins of Kissinger? Proven sins, to say the least. If there has ever been a U.S. citizen who could proven to be guilty of truly horrific war crimes, it would be ol’ Henry K. But not a word about him in the mass media for almost 50 years. Still palling around with that good ol’ gal Hillary Clinton. Free as a bird.
So…what does the word “guilt” really mean ?
Is it what we can see through the prism of history with our own eyes, or is it what the media is spewing about Trump?
And that’s just a starter.
I repeat:
Do not believe proven, systematic, habitual liars.
Their words are not true.
The meanings of their words are not true, and neither are the conclusions that they want us to draw from them.
Bet on it.
Later…
AG
You dont seem to react to anything i said, i suppose you arent interested in understanding, or being understood.
Sure there are some things in your reaction that makes sense, but in the context its rather silly.
Dont you want to clarify what you mean?
Guilt, means responsible for something.
The world is a horrible unfair place, where power determines how you are treated.
Trump is guilty of upsetting a lot of powerful people, and not respecting the boundaries set by other powers.He tries to set people up against each other, and profiteer from the chaos. He is dangerous, unreliable, and unrespectable, and he is the leader of the most powerful nation of the world, something he says he cares about, but seemingly cannot lead, as it takes convincing people, rather than barking orders at them.
So nu?
Trying to go past media propaganda…
Is he that much different from previous rulers?
I think not, myself.
You?
AG
He seems to be different from previous rulers to the rest of the world.
At a minimum previous rulers had more common sense and knew how to behave and how not to behave.
Most of them have more sense of duty, or are better at coordinating their actions to their words.
He lies more than any president i have known, all politicians lie, all people lie, but there is clearly a difference in intensity, frequency, and a total lack of veracity.
He seemingly accepts any idea thats useful to him at the time, whether its an outright lie, distorted truth, paranoid conspiracy, or something he conjures out of thin air.
For a start, thats all quite out of the ordinary, at a different level than what i have seen from any respectable leader.
You initially wrote:
And then you wrote:
Like who?
Like Genghis Khan?
Mussolini?
Hitler?
Idi Amin?
Stalin?
Henry VIII?
The list of rulers…successful rulers for long periods of time, many of them…who had no apparent common sense and whose behavior was to say the least vicious and violent…is long and bloody.
Trump is in power now…mainly due to the actions of the Democratic Party during its own primaries, it seems to me…and he is going to stay in power by any means within his grasp.
Get used to it.
So far the whole Deep State effort to rid itself of him without totally crashing the sociopolitical system that exists here in these “United States”…increasingly tenuously united, especially socially…has failed to do much more than further separate the already fairly well separated social groups within this country.
Watch.
It’s going to get worse before it gets better…if “better” is even the right word for where we are now headed.
Fasten your seat belts. It’s going to be an increasingly rougher ride.
Bet on it.
Later…
AG
Forgot to add Kim Il-Sung.
Wrong Kim. I meant Kim Jong-un
And Kim Novak, too.
AG
Always liked her.
Oh, i didnt knew we were comparing the worst excesses of the worlds worst despots to the current situation, i was more thinking of comparing normal human beings, and normal morals and ethical standards.
I guess you cannot do this for some reasons, i guess reason in itself is one.
But why the fuck to you think he isnt beyond the ordinary?
I gave you my honest thoughts, and you react- “BUT WHAT ABOUT HITLER HUH?”
Is that the way to make yourself better understood?
Are you even honestly trying to communicate with me, or are you just as dishonest as any other hack out there, ignoring what is said and shouting over your opponent?
Have you lost all sense and hope to at least interpret your opponents words not in the worst way possible?
Or maybe thats your way of doing business, behave in a way that makes most people ignore you, then act really sad and embrace the victinhood.Or maybe your ADD is much worse than mine.
Who the fuck knows, all i know for sure trying to communicate with you is completely fucking frustrating. Every “answer” dodges any question.
But lets not put all the blame on you, ignore my reaction so far for a second, and answer one thing-
Were do i fall short in communicating with you, and is there a way, or a need to improve this?
You write:
“Oh, i didnt knew we were comparing the worst excesses of the worlds worst despots to the current situation, i was more thinking of comparing normal human beings, and normal morals and ethical standards.”
The “current situation?”
I think that the “current situation” extends back to the intelligence-run takeover of the U.S. government after WWII, The total number of killed and maimed in the Korean War, Vietnam and surrounding countries, the many and various U.S.-led takeovers of sovereign countries, the carnage that has gone on in the Middle East and North Africa over the past 30 years or so, the ongoing racially-contructed permanent poverty class in the U.S. with all of the suffering that has caused? It equals the criminality of any of the people I listed.
“…normal human beings, and normal morals and ethical standards!!!???”
I got one image for ya:
American “normality” at its most poisonous.
You also write:
“Were do i fall short in communicating with you, and is there a way, or a need to improve this?”
I fear that here is not a way to improve this. You have actually communicated quite plainly with me, and I totally reject your conclusions. If you do not want to hear what I have to say, feel free not to post comments on my posts.
Be well…believe it or not, I am sorry for your problems.
AG
Seriously? Sure there are many things wrong with many things the US does, I am pretty sure i can match what you can name on the top of my head. Why limit it to the us?
Does that makes the “evil empire” of the us worse than all despots in history?
If thats what you are saying, and there is no way you can ever be convinced of it being differently, i guess there is no point in trying to get you to be more thourough in your explanation, you are a believer, and you will never doubt what you believe.
Shouldnt we look at it through the prism of colonization? That makes the US look relatively tame in comparison, still totally fucked up ofcourse. My little country was happy to trade lives of unfortunate people for a few pieces of silver profit.
Or should we look at it trough technology? technology made it possible to start this whole thing, when we figured out to make pointed sticks, right after we found out its very effective to get rid of the guys who didnt know how to make pointed sticks. Those with the best technology were best at taking over others, controlling them. So it sounds silly to me to say the us is the worst. Or are they the worst ever because they are the most dangerous right now?
If the US is the worst because of its technological and military capacity, wouldnt there be a difference who represents it? Is president Trump really no bigger risk factor? Are there not some curious things about him that makes you nervous about him controlling the most powerful weapons in the world? He talks about using them regularly, right? Ofcourse all presidents do that, its all normal, right?
You still havent answered any of my first reaction though, with all this offtopic distraction.
Are you on purpose dodging me asking to clarify the overpopulation remarks, or was i really unclear in the way i posed them?
True, excepting obvious wackos like Caligula. And who was that Hapsburg Emperor who was playing with his toy soldiers while his armies (under control of the ministers) were conquering Europe? The product of several generations of uncle-niece inbreeding.
Yup, if there is a need to go to the worst excesses in history to find worse examples, while ignoring the normal situation there is something wrong.
Obviously Trump is not Hiltler or Caligula, and unless anyone wants to make the point that trump is not as bad as Hitler or Caligula, which is a strange way to go about adressing an answer to what makes trump different from previous rulers, i fail to see it as a reasonable argument.