This is a truly bad idea:
In a closed-door GOP conference meeting Friday morning, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said all 12 appropriations bills will be finished in committee by the end of next week. Starting Monday, leadership will begin a tentative whip count on whether lawmakers would vote for a package before the August recess that combines all of those bills into one $1 trillion government funding bill.
These are appropriations bills that have no prospect of becoming law for the simple reason that they must be melded with Senate versions, and the Senate versions need to gain the approval of at least eight Democratic senators.
The House Appropriations bills are more aspirational. They’re almost like a budget bill that lays out priorities and principles for the party but don’t have the force of law. They obviously include crippling cuts to popular programs, and asking lawmakers to vote for these bills and on all the accompanying Democratic troublemaking amendments will just needlessly imperil their reelection efforts.
But it’s dumber that just this. Part of the idea is that it will let rank-and-file conservatives let off a little pent-up steam.
The idea, first proposed by Rep. Tom Graves, a senior appropriator, is to give House Republicans a chance to pass a red-meat spending bill that will lay out GOP priorities. Though the bill would never pass the Senate in the face of Democratic opposition, the process would allow House Republicans to offer potentially hundreds of amendments, an exercise that excites members who are frustrated that they’ve had no input on how to fund the government.
These amendments will mean nothing. They’ll mostly be deeply unpopular. It’s as if the Republican leadership is signing off on a plan for the backbenchers to troll their vulnerable members.
And it get’s even worse:
Perhaps more worrisome: The bill might fail on the floor, which would provoke another flood of damaging headlines about the GOP’s deep divisions and inability govern…
…That’s why GOP leaders want the conference to commit to passing the final bill — whatever it looks like — before they move down this path. McCarthy asked members to read the various spending bills over the weekend and be ready to give leadership feedback next week.
Leadership has reminded members that they won’t get everything they want, and if their amendments or ideas fail on the floor, they should be ready to support the final version anyway.
Getting such a commitment from members, however, could be difficult since they will want to see the final product before committing to vote for it.
They want their members to spend the weekend reading 12 massive appropriations bills and then commit to a vote on all of them regardless of what may be introduced during the amendment process.
Think about this. A lot of these members are upset that they’ve had no say in the crafting of these spending bills so they’ll be allowed to offer endless amendments. But then they’ll be asked to give up all their leverage on the front-end, basically ensuring that they have no say. And all for a bill that may not even pass the House let alone become the law.
Even moderate leader Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania is acting like he’s not getting enough oxygen to his brain:
Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa), a centrist Republican on the Appropriations committee, expressed concern that some of the bills called for unrealistically low spending levels, which would run into opposition in the Senate.
But he said he would support a bundled funding package, in part because it would include the bill funding military construction and veterans programs that his subcommittee wrote.
“I’m in the bus,” he joked. “I’m the leadoff hitter.”
Dent also lamented that many of the hard-line Republicans who back this spending package will ultimately oppose the final plan that can pass both chambers of Congress.
“If this gets me to an agreement in the end, to the real numbers, I can deal with it,” Dent said. “But the point is … my frustration is, there are people who will vote for the takeoff, for the initial launch, but they’ll be nowhere to be found for the landing, for the real bill that matters.”
He knows that this is all theater but he’s signing up for it anyway even though he knows that in the end the conservatives won’t be there to vote for their own spending bills.
And when that happens, Paul Ryan has to rip it all up and go crawling to Nancy Pelosi to avoid a government shutdown.
In the end, all that is accomplished is a demonstration of ineptitude and lack of unity combined with dozens of damaging roll call votes.
This is what passes for strategy with the Republicans as they do everything they can think to delay the moment when they have to ask the Democrats to help them govern.
Bon Appetit, House GOP!
Does anybody here know how to play this game?
Mike, DerFarm, you’re slaying me!
Ya throw the ball. Ya hit the ball. Ya catch the ball.
Bull Durham – 1988
They’re Republicans, they can’t help themselves.
Charlie Dent is a Republican, too.
The End.
You call somebody a “moderate Republican”? Are we facing the reincarnation of George Romney or something here.
If I was comfortable that the Democrats could contest the election in 2018, I would be quite willing to holler, “Jump, lemmings, jump!”
No chance of another CR?
Most likely, a CR will be the end result. Of course, that will require the Democrats to bail out the relatively “sane” wing of the GOP, as has been the case in previous years.
How many people thought the sequester would last this long? Or that we’d be glad it did?
Seemed like an unsavory idea at the time I suspect to many (myself included). Now, in hindsight, it appears to be as good as it gets – at least until the partisan balance shifts back to Democratic majorities and a Democratic White House.
I think the sequester is horrible public policy and has hurt millions of Americans.
However, the budget deal which established the sequester played a large part in cutting the Department of Defense budget, in an era when it seemed nothing could accomplish that.
The topline DoD expenditures went from $760 billion in the 2008 budget year to $585 billion in the 2016 budget year. The annual toplines are set to continue to reduce in future budget years without a subsequent policy change. The draw-downs of ground troops in multiple Middle Eastern nations played a part in these reductions as well.
One of the chief Department budget items has seen substantial expenditure growth in recent years: Veterans health services. This fact reveals that other expenditures by the Department have been reduced disproportionately sharply since 2008 to help maintain VA funding.
We have further work to do to reduce our bloated Defense budget, but the success here is real.
The language of the budget law which fixed the sequester rules is sufficiently strong to give the Democratic Congressional caucuses real leverage to require non-defense spending to increase in a termination or modifications of the sequester rules. Thankfully, the Dem Caucuses appear to be using that leverage.
If we weren’t fighting so many wars all the time, we wouldn’t need as much spending on the VA and, frankly, better medical care on the battlefield means more long-term VA care. I have no problem with this, in principle, but it is far better to not go to war unnecessarily in the first place. GOP doesn’t get this.
No argument there. Will add that not only are we looking at long-term VA care in general, but long-term mental health care in particular. My little circle of veteran friends (from Desert Storm onward) is probably an unrepresentative sample, but too many are dealing with long-term mental health issues (especially PTSD) brought on by the extreme stress that goes with being on the battlefield.
willingness to use them as cannon (now updated to IED) fodder in criminal aggressions like the War Crime of invading Iraq under false pretenses . . . then toss them aside with inadequate resources for long-term care and treatment . . . all while pretending to revere them and their service . . . and while simultaneously throwing trillions at the rest of the military . . . while both chronically underfunding veterans’ programs and devastatingly cutting/gutting multiple other domestic and safety-net programs . . .
. . . well, words seldom fail me, but they do for describing my response to that.
Cut the patriots some slack.
Sure. I’ll cut ’em enough to fashion a noose.
They seem to be doing that all on their own with this dumb gambit.
The Kabuki is a vain attempt to pretend that there actually is a Republican Party rather than a group of warring factions.
This is yet another demonstration that Paul Ryan is a lightweight, “policy wonk”, the biggest fake in politics (h/t Charlie Pierce) and has proven to be a colossal incompetent at developing and passing legislation. In addition, we are seeing the results of years of electing extremist Republicans representing highly unrepresentative districts that effectively comprise a small fraction of total Americans. And now they finally get to impose totally unrealistic, crazily unpopular and economically destructive policies and legislation. Meanwhile, the GOP Senate is a bunch of peacocks strutting around as stupid poseurs: Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Kornyn, McCain, Graham, Mike Lee and others. Everything is done in secret because it is all deeply unpopular except with the billionaires who pay the bills for their servants. With the White House essentially irrelevant and actually a damaging distraction, I am expecting massive failure, frankly. We’ll see.