With Booman off on his holidays to consider his future, I thought I might contribute an outside perspective which he may, or may not, find of interest. All of us have benefited greatly from his analyses here, and the platform he provides for further discussion and debate. For me his is the go to site for insights on US political developments. But maybe the time has come for Booman to consider entering the fray directly, rather than just being an informed commentator and bystander.
By chance I recently found myself waiting in a surgery idly looking through the first few pages of Barack Obama’s “The Audacity of Hope”. In it he describes his somewhat crazy decision to run for the Senate as a more or less no hope outsider. He justified it to his long suffering wife as a one last shot at making a difference in politics. She reluctantly agreed but didn’t promise him her vote. She wanted a greater contribution from him towards family life and raising their kids.
However the dysfunctionality he describes in US public life has been amplified many times since the election of Donald Trump. If ever there was a time to take responsibility and attempt to lead the US out of the swamp it has entered, it is now. The long odds really aren’t the issue. It is the principle that matters. So why should Booman run for office?
Looked at from afar, the political crisis in the US has manifold causes, but a few stand out. First of all, globalisation has been good for many in the US economy, but many have also lost out and have little hope of redemption.
Secondly, the rising tide of minority population growth and immigration has led to the traditionally relatively secure white working class voters feeling beleaguered and unrepresented by the two main parties.
Thirdly the dominance of big money, big corporations and media organisations has resulted in the political system basically being hijacked by the ruling class.
Fourthly, the neo-liberal dream of making the world safe for American “democratic” rule has gone badly off the rails. Many people feel that the system no longer works for them and that the USA has lost at least some of its leadership in the world.
Hillary didn’t seem like a solution to any of these problems, and so in desperation, many voters turned to Trump, a political outsider, in the hope he might be able to replicate his apparent business success in politics. Many are not even yet prepared to admit they got it wrong. Generally, telling voters they got it wrong last time out is not a good political strategy. You have to offer them something new.
At the moment the Democratic party is still riven by “we told you so” blame games between the Hillary and Sanders camps with the establishment focusing on the Russian collusion story almost to the exclusion of all else. This strategy is useful insofar as it divides and weakens the Trump/Republican administration and prevents them implementing much of their agenda. But it can also get in the way of a deeper analysis of what Hillary got wrong and what needs to be addressed if Democrats are to start winning elections again.
It must also not be forgotten that Republicans won both Houses of Congress, often taking seats in areas not won by Trump. Democrats therefore have much deeper structural issues to address.
In fairness to Booman he has been at the forefront of attempts to craft a political strategy which can attract parts of the disaffected Trump/Republican base without compromising core Democratic values: Chiefly an emphasis on the importance of re-enacting anti-trust laws to prevent global commercial monopolies crushing all local enterprise. I don’t think that that strategy, on it’s own, will be sufficient to swing political momentum back to Democrats, but perhaps it can in combination with the sheer incompetence of the Trump/Republican regime and the disasters it has not yet visited on the American people.
Chief among these are the impending debt crises where a failure to raise the debt ceiling, leading to a default, could crash to US economy to the point where most Republicans, of all stripes, become unelectable. A miss-calculation leading to a serious war in Korea would be another possibility. Attempting to impose sanctions on European firms trading with Russia could also set up a very damaging US/EU confrontation.
But that would be to rely on Republican’s losing the election for you. First the Democrats need to address their own divisions between the Clinton and Sanders wings of the party. As both Principals are unlikely to run again due to advancing years, that task may fall to a new generation of leaders. In the meantime, Booman is trying to figure out what to do with the rest of his life. I think he should run for Office. He supported Hillary as the more likely to win the general election, but wasn’t overly invested in her. His time may now come.
Excellent! Thx Frank … lots of positive feedback and energy. 🙂
Wholeheartedly agree with your arguments.
I am sure that it has crossed his mind.
But…would he want to get his hands that dirty?
I wonder…
AG
P.S. Like they say about other pursuits:
As a general rule I tend to refrain from criticising people doing a job I wouldn’t be prepared to do myself. It’s easy to criticise from the cheap seats. In Ireland we refer to such people as hurlers on the ditch…
That was not a criticism, Frank. I don’t think Booman wants to get down and dirty in the trenches of the DC political war swamp, nor do I. Would you?
So many compromises must be made to even get a chance to fail at the game as it stands now. I actually respect Bernie Sanders even more than I did before the last election cycle, because…although he has certainly made compromises…he at least drew the line somewhere!!! As opposed to the “public and private” posturings of say Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Even if Sanders lost, he won. At least he’s still current, while HRC is only the punchline to jokes and Obama makes his post-presidential rounds of the .01 percenter’s clubs, sopping up the bucks by the carload.
Y’gotta make hard, moral decisions and stand by them to be a real winner. We’ll soon see if this current crop of Dem pretenders to the presidential throne have the magic touch of say FDR.
Very soon.
I don’t see any of them…with the exception of Sanders, who is simply too old to be a practical electoral choice…with the gravitas to make it to the final round in 2020.
Not yet.
Warren has a harsh, hectoring steak to her act that is going to turn off many voters. Biden is too old and probably too compromised by his long career as the Senator from MBNA. (You could look it up.) Booker is a politcal ambulance chaser who will be eliminated early if there is any justice in the world, and Kamala Harris is an unproven element to say the least. That leaves Deval Patrick as the only unblemished contender so far, and despite the wonderful idea that a president of the United States grew from infancy listening to John Coltrane and Miles Davis, I don’t know if he has much of a chance.
Who’s left?
But then again…what do I know? Other than being about the only person on this blog, in my private life and in the media to pin the results of the latest Republican presidential primaries and the subsequent winner of the election about a year and a half before this awful election came to pass!!!
Nothing?
Maybe.
Maybe it was a lucky set of guesses.
We shall se.
Soon.
Watch.
Later…
AG
To answer your question, yes, I would run for office if there was a reasonable chance of getting elected. I don’t pursue lost causes. However I also wouldn’t lose too much sleep over losing office again provided it was for the right reasons, i.e. doing the right thing for the people I am elected to serve. Once you make obtaining and staying in office an end in itself, you are on the slippery slope of being no better than any other self-serving apparatchik, and might as well be replaced…
You write:
Well…i suppose I would too. Except for your kicker, of course. “If there was a reasonable chance of getting elected.”
I don’t think that a fairly radical unknown like myself would have a snowball’s chance in Foggy Bottom of getting elected anywhere in the U.S. on almost any level…right on down through local school boards…without compromising my positions (and thus my ability to pursue them if I did win) to the point that I might as well not make the effort. I actually got involved in NYC bedroom suburb school politics for a quick minute about 25 years ago…I was living in the suburbs, raising a child…and even back then what I had to say didn’t go over so well with the squares.
And getting elected is an effort, on all levels. I would personally have to cut way back on my work and practice schedules, something that would harm my effectiveness and employment for at least a year or two thereafter. Maybe longer. Being a high-level professional musician is much like being a high-level athlete. You must be on it every day…practicing, saying yes to job offers, etc. Even a few weeks can harm a career, because there are (and have been for 20 years or more) so many at the very least professionally qualified musicians pouring out of the music schools that there is a line around the block waiting for successful musicians to mess up somehow.
Bet on it.
I don’t l know about you, but I do not have enough in the bank to take that kind of a chance.
If you do?
Mazeltov!!!
Go get those suckers!!!
Me?
I gotta go practice now.
Later…
AG
There’s an argument for the rich noblesse oblige candidates like the Roosevelt family. If you must live off your salary then yes, keeping in office is your first priority. The problem is being rich yet still understanding your constituents.
Most office holders don’t seem to have too much difficulty picking up work on leaving office, albeit it may only be in lobbying or otherwise not necessarily very progressive activities. However the initial cost of getting elected seems to be the bigger problem in the USA unless you can pick up sponsorship from wealthy/powerful organisations and individuals. We have the Supreme Court to thank for equating money with free speech. What a wonderful world view conservatives have…
There are also offices at all different levels. Local offices often don’t have quite the commitment in terms of fundraising and time (they are genuinely part time endeavors) – thinking quorum court, town council, school board, etc. Some of these are partisan offices, some are nominally nonpartisan. Of course those are also offices where one really does it out of the goodness of one’s heart. Maybe there’s some pocket change for one’s services and so on. These are officeholders who have the most direct impact on their constituents. Those are also offices from which a bench of potential candidates for higher offices can be developed. Our local party is really focusing on getting young or youngish candidates for these sorts of positions as we rebuild. Thinking toward the near to medium term future.
Looked like this diary didn’t get a particularly friendly reception over at EuroTrib. A shame. It’s an interesting thought piece. I do think relitigating 2016 is unhelpful, as you seem to suggest.
Right now the Democratic Party is at an interesting crossroads. In special elections, we are outperforming historical averages or even last year’s results almost across the board, and are picking up seats in state legislative districts that should have been easy GOP holds. That’s positive. Where things get tricky is with addressing divisions. My guess is that at the end of the day, whatever gets resolved will require an acknowledgement that a significant portion of the party’s base wants the system to work better for them, and are not in favor of some massive revolutionary overhaul. We’re also going to have to live with the reality that until awful decisions like Citizens United are overturned, corporate money is going to dominate campaigns. Expecting candidates to take a vow of poverty as it were on the campaign trail will put them at a disadvantage against better funded opponents. It may seem odd to have candidates receive large corporate donations arguing against large corporate donations, but I can live with the contradiction insofar as said candidates do what they realistically can once in office. We also have to bear in mind that the US is a large territory with diverse regional cultures, and hence messages that may play well in one region won’t elsewhere. So some devolution of control of how the party is defined is necessary (e.g., any talk of gun control in my region is a non-starter, and I would be expecting candidates in my area to be fairly pro-gun as a given). Rebuilding local party infrastructure is a must, especially in areas where it has gone fallow – something I’ve made reference to in the past.
Right now I am just throwing spitballs. In the meantime, it takes some serious guts to run a progressive campaign. Hats off to anyone who makes a go of it.
In the early days there were many bloggers who crossed the big pond and would participate at EuroTrib and cross-post or just place comments here at Booman Tribune. Many great articles would be posted and there was an open discussion on the issues. There were too many, but off hand I recall Jerome a Paris of course, ask, Sirocco, Londonbear, Colman, Migeru, afew, DoDo, …
That has dried up to just Frank and myself. The US has isolated itself due to ascertion of “global power” with disregard to International law. America has become boring because of its great diversion within US politics and partisanship. A permanent clash within of liberal and conservative principles. The EU has managed to enter a new century where compromise and diversity is accepted [except for the ‘Old Europe’ states]. There should be only a singular Global War: on climate change. A term which the Trump & Koch administration has banned.
Perhaps the only bridge between “us” and “them” on the other side is the “Atlantic Bridge“.
○ The Trump administration’s solution to climate change: ban the term
Personally I believe there is a lot of room for the Democratic Party to embrace environmetal issues, clean energy and toxic waste issues. There should be no room left for a “Green Party.” That’s why I spoke of “sustainability”and “endurance” in my reply to BooMan’s front page piece.
Came across this thoughtful piece by Jerome …
○ Global Warming and Energy Policy on Collision Course (2006)
It would certainly be helpful to have a variety of European voices once more. Whether or not that is feasible is perhaps debatable. The conditions in the UK and on the European Continent are certainly not identical to what we face in the US (and North America more broadly), but we do share some common challenges with regard to economic stagnation, income inequality, the challenges posed by climate change, etc. I’d certainly love some varied insights into how European nations have dealt with the challenge of right-wing nationalism since late last year, as the successes of those efforts may be instructive for those of us who are in the proverbial trenches here in the US. To the extent that there are some commonalities (e.g., divisions between urban/rural, among different age groups, education and income levels) I think we would really benefit from what some of you all are doing in the trenches in your respective nations. Just a thought. Bringing back some of the early Euro voices may be a nonstarter, but perhaps there are some newer folks who would be open to dealing with a bunch of Americans?
European blogging seems to be dying, replaced by social media, career pressures, and family responsibilities. New younger bloggers aren’t coming through, either disinterested in politics, or discouraged by the disparagement of their elders and betters. It is a crying shame, but we seem to swimming against the tide.
It doesn’t seem that long ago when blogging was mostly a young person’s endeavor. I was still barely a 30-something when I first heard of blogs. Yeah, a lot has changed. A lot does seem to happen on social media of various sorts, but it inevitably seems unsatisfactory to me (perhaps betraying my own middle-age status). Twitter is not particularly conducive to thought pieces. Tumblr is just a hot mess. I have a difficult time imagine serious analysis occurring on Snapchat. The average Facebook user is getting a bit long in the tooth as well – a shame as a well-run FB page could allow for thought-provoking conversation. So it goes. The other point you raise is very discouraging. The last thing I ever want to see is younger contributors get shouted down or discouraged in any forum (blogging or otherwise).
” The last thing I ever want to see is younger contributors get shouted down or discouraged in any forum (blogging or otherwise).
“
Yep it drove me close to despair seeing younger (or female) contributors being sneered at and chased away by v. intelligent bloggers who should have known better.
I don’t know if things can be turned around at EuroTrib. I do lurk there. Hate to see the contributions decline. What I can do here is say this: I will commit to keeping up some relatively mellow cafe diaries for as long as this blog exists. Anyone feeling a bit unsure about posting in other stories and diaries can do on those – they will be safe havens. The folks who usually hang out in those will, along with me, see to that. Perhaps that will encourage a bit more new blood here as well. May be too little too late, but I am one who is won’t give up without trying.
” The last thing I ever want to see is younger contributors get shouted down or discouraged in any forum (blogging or otherwise).
“
Yep it drove me close to despair seeing younger (or female) contributors being sneered at and chased away by v. intelligent bloggers who should have known better.
There’s an idea to scare Booman when he reads it. It makes his head hurt to write about politics, so you advise him to leave the frying pan for the fire.
Sometimes it is the sense of impotence and powerlessness which can make your head hurt. Actually diving into the fray can be energising. But it is a very personal choice, and only Booman can make it. Some pundits are frustrated participants. Others wouldn’t dream of getting involved themselves and prefer the role of observer and scribe. Booman’s history as a community organiser led me to surmise he might belong to the former camp, in which case it is the frustration that is causing the headache…
Some old champs here @BooMan … man was that paradise compared to today!
Remember KNUCKLEHEAD:
His blogspot White Knuckles with links to other members of a forlong era of blogging … Family Man – Man Eegee – Katiebird – Olivia