Back on June 14th, I made a brief post that said only, “Suffice to say, if Jon Ossoff loses the election in Georgia, we’ll have plenty of reason to doubt the result.” That was my coercive way of trying to force you to follow the link to a Politico Magazine article called: “Will the Georgia Special Election Get Hacked?”
The short summary of that article is that Georgia’s election system was sitting insecure on the internet for months and was easily accessible by hackers. The problem was discovered ahead of time and the state was taken to court in an effort to prevent them from using the unprotected system for the special election between Karen Handel and Jon Ossoff. But the election was held anyway and now we’ll never know if the results were legitimate.
One reason I spent the small amount of time it took to write that brief post before the election is that I wanted to be able to point to it later on in case someone accused me of advancing some conspiracy theory I couldn’t prove when I questioned the validity of an Ossoff loss.
Because the whole point is that no one can prove it. And that’s especially true now that the evidence has been destroyed. Although, to be fair, hackers wouldn’t have much difficulty erasing their own tracks without this kind of ham-handed assistance:
A computer server crucial to a lawsuit against Georgia election officials was quietly wiped clean by its custodians just after the suit was filed, The Associated Press has learned.
The server’s data was destroyed July 7 by technicians at the Center for Elections Systems at Kennesaw State University, which runs the state’s election system. The data wipe was revealed in an email sent last week from an assistant state attorney general to plaintiffs in the case that was later obtained by the AP. More emails obtained in a public records request confirmed the wipe…
…Wiping the server “forestalls any forensic investigation at all,” said Richard DeMillo, a Georgia Tech computer scientist following the case. “People who have nothing to hide don’t behave this way.”
…The server data could have revealed whether Georgia’s most recent elections were compromised by hackers. The plaintiffs contend results of both last November’s election and a special June 20 congressional runoff— won by Kemp’s predecessor, Karen Handel — cannot be trusted…
…Kemp and his GOP allies insist Georgia’s elections system is secure. But Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance, a plaintiff, believes server data was erased precisely because the system isn’t secure.
“I don’t think you could find a voting systems expert who would think the deletion of the server data was anything less than insidious and highly suspicious,” she said.
Actually, data was removed from at least two backup servers as well. The FBI might have some data from back in March, but that wouldn’t be of much help to an investigation about a possible hack in June.
The FBI is known to have made an exact data image of the server in March when it investigated the security hole. The Oct. 18 email disclosing the server wipe said the state attorney general’s office was “reaching out to the FBI to determine whether they still have the image” and also disclosed that two backup servers were wiped clean Aug. 9, just as the lawsuit moved to federal court.
I want to be extra clear and reiterate that the concern was that a well-designed hack would not be detectable even if all this information had been preserved and turned over for forensic analysis. The fact that all the evidence was deliberately destroyed right before it was going to be requested by a federal court is more of an acknowledgment of guilt than a necessary step in this kind of conspiracy.
And here is the excuse:
After declining comment for more than 24 hours, Kennesaw State’s media office issued a statement late Thursday attributing the server wiping to “standard operating procedure.” It did not respond to the AP’s question on who ordered the action.
The defendant in the case is Georgia’s secretary of state, Brian Kemp, who is candidate for governor in 2018. He says he didn’t order the wiping of the servers and “had neither involvement nor advanced warning of the decision.”
I have little reason to believe him. I look forward to hearing what the judge thinks.
People spent millions of dollars and tons of energy on the special election in Georgia’s 6th congressional district, and we can have no confidence in the results. It wasn’t just predictable. I did predict it.
When I think of all the novelists and screenwriters who have slaved their entire careers to invent master manipulators whose dastardly deeds require the services of one genius hacker/political insider/Sherlock Holmes to detect (always someone no one suspected), I weep at the intellect and imaginations wasted.
The more prosaic truth is that, as was said about the Nixon crew, Republicans are just not “very bright guys.” They get caught because they have always been able to cheat before. Seriously, it never occurred to anyone that the fact Whitefish Energy is from Ryan Zinke’s tiny hometown might pique anyone’s curiosity? Or that Michael Flynn getting paid to give a speech in Moscow, where he praised Vladimir Putin, could be taken “the wrong way”? Or that James Comey might just have been a smart enough lawyer to immediately memorialize whatever Trump told him, like every competent attorney would do?
Truth. It’s so much more pathetic than fiction.
In no universe is TRIPLE DEGAUSSING SOP.
From Diebold in 2002 to this 15 years later. How much has this become GOP SOP that gets covered by the notion of their lock on the state?
How much is failure to put together a winning coalition for the Democratic candidate?
How much is campaigns taking their poll numbers as excuses for laziness or prematurely writing off a race?
The failure to demonstrate due diligence in the administration of what used to be a routine political function (administration of elections) should cause some serious questioning of results. The GOP Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell was all to eager to destroy the evidence of the 2004 election in Ohio. Who are the election administrators who take care to ensure that the results are provable without a doubt? Are there any anymore?
Are any of them GOPers? No.
That’s just my presumption, of course, no evidence to offer in support.
But given what we know unequivocally from the past several decades, how could it be otherwise?
If the election results can’t be overturned, then I hope at the very least the Secretary of State for Georgia goes to prison for a very long time.
Never going to happen. The SOS exposed the entire data base soon after he took office It might have been the result of a hack but no investigation was ever done. The SOS also lost thousands of voter registrations and again no investigation took place.
I have a hard time believing that real votes were actually counted in GA as there now exists no proof that there was no voter fraud. How will the donald’s voter fraud comm. prove voter fraud in GA? Oh, the SOS is now running for governor.
I am getting pretty sick and tired of the word ‘hack’ when used on n this context. Here is a brief history of this use when speaking about machines.
But the word in this context is a euphemism for ‘stealing’, ‘theft’, and ‘breaking and entering’, all of which are felonies. And like other breaking and entering, those that recieve what is stolen are, in fact, receiving stolen property…..another fucking felony.
The word ‘hack’ has become a cute little colloquialism that is used to make a blue collar crime seem less destructive than, for instance, robbing a bank. But even if a person robs a bank, the cops and FBI while prosecuting them don’t use some cute colloquialism. They call the person a robber, a thief, and a felon.
People complain that blue collar criminals don’t get prosecuted, that ‘the bankers’ did not pay a price. It starts right here, with the language we use.
They are thieves, that may have possible broken into someone’s property. And whoever erased the hard drive was possible covering up a felony.
.
To clarify…..they police would call a bank robber a thief and crook….even if they did not use a gun….but just passed a note. It’s still a felony.
.
I suppose, technically, this is election fraud.
Seems odd to refer to such individuals as “blue collar”.
From the context yeah, I’m pretty sure he meant white collar.
“Washington (CNN)A federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Friday approved the first charges in the investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller, according to sources briefed on the matter.”
Twitter should be hopping tomorrow. I’d also cancel any and all plans to travel anywhere near the Korean peninsula.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html?utm_source=far
k&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
Has Glenn Greenwald confirmed this? Because it does not exist unless GG says it does.
.
that’s some Friday afternoon news dump.
“Things should start to get interesting
right about now”
– a Nobel prize winner
There’s a conservative Trump guy from Georgia on my FB just now claiming you are nuts since those machines were never connected to the internet. ??