Am I seriously supposed to care who runs Goldman Sachs?
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
. . . to care whether either ever donated to Hitlery.
Consider this article as descriptions of future secretaries of the treasury.
beat me to the joke
Yeah. Who isn’t concerned about who their next overlord will be?
Who are the Russians backing?
While we’re waiting to learn who will be the architect of the next global economic collapse – ever wonder what the stress of spending a whole freaking day with people you couldn’t stand from the time you were old enough to chronically misbehave, aka your family?
Despite the surge, we can be re-assured that there are very few future mass shooting perps in the crowd. NRA experts believe “probably no more than a dozen or so.”
If those are the choices, you’re excused–but perhaps you’d like to nominate someone else.
Honestly they’re a big employer in NY. The local rag would be expected to carry news about it. People forget that the NYT is still the “New York” times.
I’m much more incensed about the lavish tongue bath of nazis in Ohio…
Why would you not care, Booman?
They…and people like them…control much of the fate of this country, just for starters.
AG
That might depend on whether you see any reason to care about Goldman Sachs. Many people do, you know.
Or are you just doing a Chomsky and saying it doesn’t matter who is the head of Goldman Sachs, it’s still Goldman Sachs?
Or are you being even more Chomskyan and saying, who cares, if it wasn’t Goldman Sachs, it would be somebody else.
Or are you saying, like, why does anything matter? it’s all an illusion.
Chomsky has a new book out:
Requiem for the American Dream
Thanks. I didn’t know about it. I’m not really a big Chomsky fan, but he has his moments, and this definitely looks like it might be worth reading.