- Cross-posted from EuroTrib
Introduction:
Dutch politicians want EU anti-fake news watchdog scrapped
The Tweede Kamer, the lower house of Dutch parliament, wants to get rid of the European Commission’s task force against spreading fake news, the so-called EUvsDisinfo. This follows the task force naming a number of Dutch news services as spreaders of fake news, Het Parool reports.
EUvsDisinfo “misses its target” and “meddles with the free press in the Netherlands.”
The Dutch news services involved are NPO Radio 1, the Gelderlander, GeenStijl and The Post Online. According to the task force, pro-Russian propaganda gained the upper hand in a few reports from these organizations.
The VVD and SP call on the government to advocate disbanding this task force in Brussels. The PVV, GroenLinks and SGP also want the office scrapped.
More below the fold …
Minister under pressure over EU fake news debunkers, MPs call for abolition
A majority of Dutch MPs want home affairs minister Kasja Ollongren to put pressure on Brussels to disband its fake news debunking service EU vs Disinfo.
A parliamentary motion, drawn up by the ruling VVD and the Socialists, says the service is missing its target and interfering with the free Dutch press. The anti-EU PVV, GroenLinks and fundamentalist Protestant SGP also support the plan, which will be voted on in parliament on Tuesday afternoon.
EU vs Disinfo is currently the subject of a court case involving three Dutch publishing companies after they were branded spreaders of fake news.
Shock blog GeenStijl, populist website The Post Online and De Persgroep want the Commission’s anti-disinformation task force to rectify claims that they spread fake news, or face a fine of €20,000 a day.
EU vs Disinfo is part of the EU’s external action service East Stratcom Task Force, which falls under the responsibility of foreign affairs chief Federica Mogherini and was set up to challenge Russia’s ongoing disinformation campaigns in March 2015.
Removal of three cases further to complaints by Dutch media | EUvsDisInfo |
8 March 2018 | News and analysis, Top Story
Following a detailed review of certain articles in the Dutch media, the East Stratcom Task Force has taken the measures set out below.
An article published on the website of De Gelderlander was wrongly included in the list of disinformation cases on this website. The article has been removed from the EU vs Disinfo Database. This followed from a complaint by De Persgroep Nederland regarding this article.
Two other Dutch articles that were wrongly included in the EU vs Disinfo Database were removed from this database earlier, following a complaint by GS Media regarding an article published on the website of GeenStijl, and following a complaint by The Post Online and Mr Christiaan Aalberts, a freelance journalist, regarding an article published on the website of The Post Online.
We continuously endeavour to ensure the accuracy of the EU vs Disinfo Database. With this in mind, we are currently taking steps to further improve our internal procedures. We welcome feedback and an online form is available to report any mistakes.
Questions and Answers about the East StratCom Task Force
Why was the East StratCom Task Force created?
The Task Force was set up to address Russia’s ongoing disinformation campaigns. In March 2015, the European Council tasked the High Representative in cooperation with EU institutions and Member States to submit an action plan on strategic communication.
What are the EU’s objectives concerning strategic communications in its Eastern neighbourhood?The Action Plan on Strategic Communication, presented in June 2015, has three main objectives:
- Effective communication and promotion of EU policies towards the Eastern Neighbourhood
- Strengthening the overall media environment in the Eastern Neighbourhood and in EU Member States,
including support for media freedom and strengthening independent media- Improved EU capacity to forecast, address and respond to disinformation activities by external actors
What does the East StratCom Task Force do?
The Task Force develops communication products and campaigns focused on better explaining EU policies in the Eastern Partnership countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine). It works closely with the EU institutions and with EU Delegations in the Eastern Partnership countries.
The Task Force supports wider EU efforts aimed at strengthening the media environment in the Eastern Partnership region, in close collaboration with other EU actors.
The Task Force reports on and analyses disinformation trends, explains and corrects disinformation narratives, and raises awareness of disinformation.
One of the many “DisInfo” watchdogs created by right-wing groups to agitate. Agents of provoking a state of war – Cold War 2.0 in a digital age of propaganda and misinformation. The RFE-RL wasn’t sufficient in a modern age, so the tech corporations of Silicon Valley are helping the corrupt politicians in Washington DC.
In the past months I have written about a number of these Western propaganda sites which appears more to censor free speech on articles critical of the West. Trying to keep some balance in news analysis … tough times, even on “progressive” blogs.
From my earlier diary – During Yeltsin Era, UK and US Stripped Assets Off Russia
○ J’Accuse Rupert Murdoch On Stalinism and Sheeple – His WSJ
○ Tackling propaganda: “It’s a continuation of methods used during the Cold War” | EU Observer | my diary on PropOrNot right-wing conspiracy
○ Lunacy of US Politics and International Law
More recent my diary @EuroTrib …
False news.
This is currently a burning issue, right?
But…what is the real definition of the term “false news?”
Can an anti-false news site actually be propagating false news itself?
UH oh!!! There’s a dangerous geometric progression if ever I saw one.
The Liar’s Paradox
Can false news really be false news if it comes from so-called “trusted” media like the Wall Street Journal and the NY Times, or must it be the kind of false news that can be traced to foreign powers that are trying to dictate opinions in other sovereign states through the use of social media? Can a given sovereign state propagate false news to dictate the opinions of its own citizens? Or is that simply a different kind of false news?
Propaganda news.
Is it “false news” when an important functionary of a given government lies through his teeth to that government’s power centers and escapes criminal punishment? Does it become “true news” if he is pinned for it?
Is news necessarily “false” if it does not reveal its sources? (A knotty question, that one.) Maybe we need a new term. Say…”semi-false news” or “possible news.”
If the so-called “false news” discovery channels like Snopes and the “Fact Check” part of Google News seem to have political biases…and they do, to my eyes…do we then need a “Fact Check” that investigates Google’s Fact Check. A Snopes for Snopes? A Snopes for the Snopes that fact checks Snopes?
Lord!!!
Where does this geometric series end?
Damned if I know.
I mean…I know where it ends for me. I only believe what my eyes, ears and intuition tell me is true. I automatically believe no information, no matter from what source it emanates. I began to lose my own kneejerk belief system during the Assassination/Vietnam years, and further events have consistently supported my own observations.
How about you, my dear readers?
Where does your own trust in the media end?
Or are some of you false readers?
UH oh!!!
A false reader turns true news into false news and then propagates that result.
And down the rabbit hole we tumble.
there’s a novel in there, somewhere.
Oh.
Wait a minute!!!
Orwell already wrote it.
My bad.
Nevermind.
Yore freind…
Emily Litella (aka as “Winston Smith” in some circles.)
Now a standalone post. False News. An Attempt at Defining It. And Down the Rabbit Hole We Go.
Please comment there.
Thank you…
AG