(Succuri is now being totally paranoid about links in almost any form. Go to the original for links from the article. (https:/www.counterpunch.org/2019/03/12/its-time))
Emphases mine:
It’s Time.-by Randall A. Shields
I’ve lost all patience with moderates, centrists, incrementalists and mainstream establishment Democrats who think the status quo is not so bad, just needs a little tweaking around the edges. They’d be satisfied just getting rid of Trump – which is fine as far as that goes, it just doesn’t go nearly far enough.
Anybody with a clear-eyed view of the status quo understands the horror of US foreign policy and the shameful neglect of US domestic policy. The system has failed us. The duopoly has frustrated all serious efforts to change things for the better. The owners of the USA, the billionaire class, like things just the way they are. There is no profit in peace or taking care of the needy or delivering justice to the masses. America is owned and dominated by greed monsters who don’t care that their money comes drenched in the blood of patriots and innocent victims of US war crimes.
I’m still furious with the DNC for ripping off Bernie and his millions of supporters and ushering in the Trump presidency.
Mainstream Democrats have failed us. They like to claim to be progressives, liberals and/or part of `the left’ but in truth they are none of those things.
I’m done with those who think war is okay or that the Military Industrial Complex is just a conspiracy theory or that the wildly unfair distribution of wealth in this country is remotely okay. I’m sick and tired of those who insist that the Main Stream Media is equivalent to the “free press,” and NOT the propaganda organs that lied us into Vietnam, Iraq, Libya and Syria (among others) and now Venezuela and Iran while helping to undermine anything smacking of true change or real reform of our screwed up and hopelessly corrupted system. That is not to say that they don’t occasionally say something that is true, just that they can’t be trusted not to lie for the oligarchy, as that is their top priority.
Read on…if you can handle it.
And if you can’t?
Skip to the reply section and leave some kind of pissy comment.
I don’t really give a shit.
MSNBC Yet Again Broadcasts Blatant Lies, This Time About Bernie Sanders’s Opening Speech, and Refuses to Correct Them
MSNBC IS A dishonest political operation, not a news outlet. It systematically and deliberately refuses to adopt a defining attribute of a news outlet: a willingness to acknowledge factual errors, correct them, and apologize. That they not only allow their lies to stand uncorrected but reward their employees who do it most frequently — especially when those lies are directed at adversaries of the Democratic Party — proves that they are, first and foremost, a political arm of the Democratic establishment.
—snip—
Who Owns the Media?
The trend of media conglomeration has been steady. In 1983, 50 corporations controlled most of the American media, including magazines, books, music, news feeds, newspapers, movies, radio and television. By 1992 that number had dropped by half. By 2000, six corporations had ownership of most media, and today five dominate the industry: Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom.
Mega-Corporations controlled by the super-rich determine what information is broadcast to the world and how it is framed. Sandwiched in-between the straight news are poison pills of rank propaganda meant to shape the thinking of the entire culture – such as the present daily drumbeat for war on Venezuela so our rich guys can take their oil, or how they’re all attacking and smearing Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar. The corporate-owned media consciously manipulates the public mind to get people to think and believe what the elite wants them to – which all ends up supporting and enabling their robbing, raping and pillaging of the world. The worst thing about all of this is how appallingly effective it is.
—snip—
“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” ~ Jiddu Krishnamurti
Those who support the status quo are complicit in the crimes against humanity that the global elite have committed. You don’t get to call yourself “progressive” if you have propped up the status quo and worked against any meaningful change. Having some moderately liberal social ideas doesn’t make up for all the rest. The lesser evil is still evil. The Establishment is still the Establishment.
Establishment dems are only superficially better than establishment Republicans. At the deepest level they are functional equivalents. Both groups serve the empire and the wealthy elite. They all take the dirty money. They are all okay with war and corruption as long as they get theirs. Anyone who doesn’t understand that by now, understands very little.
“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.” ~ Albert Camus
The type of society we live in has a huge bearing on our happiness and well-being. The following article goes back to 2015 but is still valid and relevant.
—snip—
Mainstream establishment-supporting democrats are a fine example of people who don’t want to understand what is actually true. They are willing to settle for that which confirms their own biases and that which makes them feel good: Democrats, team blue, those with Ds next to their name. They reduce governmental and social policy to a simplistic team sport and juvenile popularity contest, never noticing that the outcome is always the same: Democrat or Republican, it’s all war all the time, austerity for the people, tax cuts for the rich, bonuses for banksters and crimes against humanity dressed up in pretty rhetoric and a big fat NO to any effort to reform this despicable system.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citzenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. ~ Dwight D. Eisenhower
—snip—
We’ve become now an oligarchy instead of a democracy. And I think that’s been the worst damage to the basic moral and ethical standards of the American political system that I’ve ever seen in my life.” ~ Jimmy Carter
We’ve descended into oligarchy and fascism. The billionaires and millionaires at the top don’t care about us. To them we are merely pawns to be manipulated and preyed upon. Everything else about our government is sheer kabuki, slight of hand and rank bullshit.
—snip—
Establishment Democrats are every bit as corrupt as Republicans. They are not serving the public interest, only their own. Corruption is rife from the bottom to the top.
Democrats in Congress who oppose Medicare for All have taken vast sums of money from the pharmaceutical and medical industries. Pelosi took over a million dollars.
Nancy Pelosi is worth $16 million and Dianne Feinstein is worth 58.5 million. (According to Wikipedia.)
American politicians in the modern era invariably get rich while in office.
“You can’t get rich in politics unless you’re a crook.” ~ Harry S. Truman
Now the mainstream Dems want us to all pull together, which would be fine but what they want is for us to unite behind some neoliberal, war-mongering, elitist millionaire who will only betray us to Wall Street and the great American war machine on day one while they cheat any real change agent out of the opportunity to serve the people and history. We’ve seen this movie before.
It didn’t work in 2016 and it won’t work in 2020. Even some of the dead-enders get it now.
A Clinton-era centrist Democrat explains why it’s time to give democratic socialists a chance.
The baton rightly passes to our colleagues on our left.
The result, he argues, is the nature of the Democratic Party needs to shift. Rather than being a center-left coalition dominated by market-friendly ideas designed to attract conservative support, the energy of the coalition should come from the left and its broad, sweeping ideas. Market-friendly neoliberals, rather than pushing their own ideology, should work to improve ideas on the left. This, he believes, is the most effective and sustainable basis for Democratic politics and policy for the foreseeable future.
IMHO, we shouldn’t be trying to unite or make nice with those who still don’t get it. We should be uniting with all of those who DO get it and who have been ignored, belittled, preyed upon and shut out of the process for forever. It’s time for a new deal – and a great big giant new deal. All those people who have been sitting at home on election day need to be given real reasons to come out and choose a new and better destiny. The same old tired crap wrapped in a shiny new box won’t get it. We need a new deal.
I’ve long believed that nothing short of a bold departure from the conventional wisdom will change anything – and most people, when they aren’t being freaked out by propaganda boogymen, want change: better living conditions, greater opportunity, a brighter future for posterity, a viable ecosystem, less violence, more peace, greater equality, less hate, a more benevolent and less corrupt government, a friendlier and more supportive society, etc.
A world of hate and war, fear and loathing, resentment and strife are not what people want and not what they deserve.
The tide of history seems to be turning at long last.
It’s time to get radical and force the changes that are needed – and we should have less than zero patience for anyone who stands in the way – whether it be through ignorance, incompetence, misplaced loyalty, gullibility or malevolence. Too many of these people are impervious to education or reason, they simply need to be defeated or left behind.
It’s time.
It’s time to reform our society from the prisons to the presidency. Don’t listen to the status quo defenders who will tell you that the only thing that matters is beating Trump. That’s the tune the establishment Dems will be singing. We need to be rid of Trump to be sure, but getting rid of the present establishment is paramount. If we shed ourselves of Trump but are still saddled by the same old establishment, we’ll still be just as screwed.
Remember that things have been screwed up in this country since long before Trump came along. His ridiculous reign has simply brought it all into sharp focus – but Trump is a symptom of a much older disease, the logical end result of a corrupt and hateful rightwing government that serves only the myopic, greedy, selfish mega-rich. We are all out of time for putting up with this greed, corruption and madness.
It’s time.
Time to do the right thing.
Randall A. Shields is a well-known blogger posting as One Pissed Off Liberal or OPOL at DailyKos for over a decade, before leaving over their mistreatment of Bernie Sanders and the site’s inexplicable support for Hillary Clinton. He is a 60’s survivor, Woodstock alumnus, a human rights/anti-death penalty/anti-war/prison reform/anti-drug war activist, an artist/poet/writer, a dharma bum, a freedom-fighter and an original Southern hippie.
I repeat:
…we should have less than zero patience for anyone who stands in the way – whether it be through ignorance, incompetence, misplaced loyalty, gullibility or malevolence. Too many of these people are impervious to education or reason, they simply need to be defeated or left behind.
My sentiments exactly.
On this blog as, well as everywhere else.
…ignorance, incompetence, misplaced loyalty, gullibility or malevolence.
A precise definition of the possible reasons…if the word “reason” has any place whatsoever in defining this group of fools…make it “excuses,” I suppose.
A precise definition of the possible excuses being used by the neocentrists here and elsewhere for their mulish refusal to welcome the new.
Welcome or not…
It’s TIME, folks.
Get used to it.
Out with the old, in with the new.
The old became so…so stupid, so plainly criminal with the ascension of Donald Trump to top dog and the mean-spirited dogfight beneath him to maintain at least some position of power in the greed-controlled duopoly…that all pretenses of “truth” were dropped in favor of a false news-promoted he said/she said big lie contest.
And the marks…a supermajority of them, apparently..have finally begun to catch on.
Have a nice day.
I am.
Later…
AG
P.S. Update [2019-3-12 16:53:47 by Arthur Gilroy]: By the way…The Washingtoon Post is already shifting its editorial feet to combat the New Democrats…who in many respects are a more serious threat to the Neocentrist Dems than is Trump. He’s gonna be gone…one way or another…soon enough. They’re here to stay. Bet on it. I will pay the the NY Times, because:
1-It is not under the direct and total control of the Deep State, it’s more of an outlier…and an out(ed) liar when necessary, of course. (See the buildup to the invasion of Iraq for more on that account…Judy Miller at al.)
and
2-It’s my local “paper of record.”
God help me.
However, I have been watching WAPO’s slide rightward with great glee. All you really need is the headlines, most times.
Here’s one that struck me from today:
Ocasio-Cortez’s misleading complaint: Trump did not transfer funds for the opioid emergency.
NICE!!!
Injure two opponents with one headline.
Priceless.
The WAPOctopus squirming sideways with both ends towards the middle at the behest of its controllers.
Gotta love it.
You?
It’s Arthur’s abuse of fair use du jour.
Thank you, JDW!!!
You never disappoint.
As I said above.
(Emphasis mine.):
Have a nice day.
AG
Why does Arthur insist on being so thoroughly and frequently disrespectful of fair use doctrines? It doesn’t seem necessary for him to make his points. He’s shown himself perfectly capable of writing his own original 50-paragraph diatribes.
Blogwhoring by proxy is another offensive habit he indulges.
Once again…
Please define for me…precisely…what the term “fair use doctrines” really means.
I will be perfectly happy to abide that definition…once it is truly defined by law, of course…however it might exist.
Until then?
Fuck off.
Thank you… and have a happy next few days finding other jiveass complaints about my posts.
Live long and prosper…
AG
You’re perfectly capable of discovering the answer to your question here. You disrespect this community, so you pretend you can’t learn.
i spent about an hour on the internet one day when this “fair use” criticism first came up. I found any number of pages that dealt with it, but no real consensus about what it is and/or is not.
I am making no profit from what i am doing, just for starters.
And…everything I quote is easily available online.
Then why do I post the way I do?
Because I think that the people on this blog who really need to to hear what I’m posting are…lazy, for want of a better word. And hostile as well. Not everybody, just the few neocentrist stick-in-the-muds. Like you. For whatever reasons, I do not trust them to click a link after a teaser or two. But I do think that…since the arguments I am favoring are right there in front of them and they seem to enjoy getting all riled up, they will torture themselves and at least skim my blockquotes.
In a just world, something might leak through their defenses.
It’s pro bono work.
Sorry…that’s all I’ve got to offer.
Have a nice day…
AG
As mentioned, you broadly disrespect this community. This follow-up is just a further articulation and confirmation of your disrespect.
You write:
And…as I stated in the post to which you are replying:
AG
As mentioned, you broadly disrespect this community. You disagree with BooMan’s posts more often than not. The number of community members who avoid your bullshit labels now fit in a thimble. You’re not persuading people here. Trolls rarely do.
You write:
Of which “community” are you speaking, centristfield?
I just skimmed through Booman’s most recent “Serious Question” post. (http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2019/3/15/231925/417).
There were 87comments last I looked. Some were from Booman, responding to questions about when people joined. The others?
I recognized 6 names from the neocentrist troll group that so regularly and viciously disses me personally and what I have to say and well.
Is that the “community” that you are referencing?
Oh.
The others?
Roughly 55 and counting.
So far, your visible “community” comprises about 10% of the audience here. I suspect it’s an even smaller percentage.
You also write:
No
I do not.
If I am ambivalent or otherwise undecided, I usually do not comment. If I disagree, I do comment. And often I might disagree with one part of his post and not the other parts. When that happens, I almost always say something about the value of that particular post. Something along the lines of “In Booman’s fine recent post, he…etc., etc., etc.” Again…I would say 10% or less of his posts elicit any negative comment from me whatsoever.”
I suppose I ought to start calling you “The Ten Percent Gang.”
Instead, I’m going to wait until the percentages to go down even further.
And…as always…have a nice day.
Later…
AG
You bring to the diaries near-entire posts from other sites. You do this knowing that the points of view expressed in those pieces are not the sort of content that BooMan’s audience seeks. You personally disparage community members who offer disagreements with you in and around your blogwhoring by proxy, often offering extremely bad faith argumentations in the doing.
No one else at the Frog Pond engages in pitched battles with, by your count, a half-dozen community members. None of us have frequent, personally expressed disagreements with any other community member these days. You’re the common denominator there.
You become unresponsive to the community when we question your extremely regressive policy and social beliefs and the horrible outcomes which would result if your radical right wing policy beliefs were implemented. Many of your policy beliefs are ones which literally no community members agree with, such as your desire to “BREAK UP THE U.S.!!!”.
Much more problematically, the plan you announced here earlier this year to campaign against Democratic Party candidates during the 2020 general election cycle, as you campaigned against Democratic Party candidates during the 2016 and 2018 general election campaigns, is an explicit rejection of the guidance provided to the community by BooMan in his FAQ’s, most specifically Martin’s explanation that “…this site is committed to building the Democratic Party, raising money for the Democratic Party and its candidates, finding and promoting promising candidates for state and local offices, helping to shape the Democratic Party’s agenda, and holding Democratic office holders to account for their votes and their ethics.”
You want to attack the Democratic Party, not build it. The only way you could be characterized as wanting to shape the Democratic Party’s agenda would be to say that you want to shift the Party’s agenda far to the right. These facts make your “neoliberal centrist” criticisms and your attempts to associate yourself with leaders on the Left side of the Party tiresome lies.
You lie again:
Where is this mythical “BooMan’s audience,” centristfield?
I can’t quite find it.
I see no new names of the neocentrist group on Booman’s recent post “Serious Question,” just the same ol’ same ol’.
Meanwhile, another 10+ posters have chimed in.
Lurkers, mostly.
Casual readers but real progressives, seems like.
You’re down to what?
6 out of 76?
7%?
Go post on Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s blog.
Oh.
I forgot.
She’s laying low after her shameful tenure during the HRC-directed political assassination of Bernie Sanders in 2016.
You are now a minority without even a viable candidate.
Go sign up for Biden’s campaign.
Your “AG” problems would simply disappear.
As would you.
AG
No one else provokes nasty, personal arguments with community members these days.
Literally no other community members campaigned against Democratic Party candidates in 2018. Those who joined you in making the extremely poor choice of campaigning against Clinton in 2016 here from august to November 2016 have moved on.
Literally no other community member agrees with you on a raft of issues and social views, such as your explicit desire to allow States and Counties to deny the right to marriage for same sex, your opposition to unemplyment insurance, and your support for voter ID laws.
Biden is one of my least favorite potential candidates. That wouldn’t be surprising to you if you read and honestly responded to my policy views, not to mention my vote for Bernie Sanders during the 2016 Presidential primary, which I shared at the time and have mentioned since.
You write:
Cling to your life raft of lies, centristfield.
Back to Booman’s recent post, “Serious Question.”
Another two posters have weighed in during the short time since my last post to you. Neither are habitual anti-AG posters. Your so-called “community” is now rapidly headed to a minus 6% of the available/habitual members-if-not-posters of this blog.
When will you fall below 3%?
Soon, I hope.
And what will be be your response?
More lies, probably.
So it goes…
AG
Please link a post from a community member who shares your explicit desire to allow States and Counties to deny the right to marriage for same sex couples.
Feel free to link a post from another community member who shares your opposition to unemployment insurance.
You’re welcome to find a post from another community member who shares your your support for voter ID laws.
Why does Arthur insist on being so thoroughly and frequently disrespectful of fair use doctrines? It doesn’t seem necessary for him to make his points. He’s shown himself perfectly capable of writing his own original 50-paragraph diatribes.
Blogwhoring by proxy is another offensive habit he indulges.
Plus…
An English language grammatical error in which so many of you neocentrist fools seem to indulge…
No!!!
It goes like this!!!
Get your grammar straight. Just for starters!!! You iIlliterate neocentrist motherfuckers!!!
Y’all can’t even write the long-gone “King’s/Queen’s” English, let alone the various dialects spoken by people who actually live in the streets of mainstream America!!!
Wake the fuck up!!!
Get outta the house and go visit some neighborhoods!!!
You cosseted/closeted assholes!!
Sincerely…
AG
AG, the neighborhoods don’t care about your pedantic response to common parlance. Not my neighborhoods, and not your neighborhoods.
Go correct the language usage of the Trump supporters whose adventures you lovingly describe here in your diaries. Oh, no, I forgot about your repeated descriptions of them- they’re Godfearing gun users who might shoot you if you question their political beliefs or language! You can’t fraudulently lecture them as you lecture progressives, no, that would be scary!! Because they have guns and might murder you!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
. . . a “pedantic response to common parlance.”
There’s nothing whatsoever wrong — either grammatically or as usage — with “Blogwhoring by proxy is another offensive habit he indulges.”
He has a blogwhoring-by-proxy habit. He indulges that habit. Perfectly grammatical on top of making clear and perfect sense.
Wonderful, Ouaguabonita!!!
Always critical of the smaller things…never answering the larger things.
You remind me of my high school Civics teacher, the long-and-bitterly unmarried Miss Blakely. Her answer to every serious question was a squawking, parrot-like “Bragdon and McCutcheon!!!,” followed by a threat to send the offending student…usually me…to the principal’s office.
You could look it up.
Are you her?
Not likely…she’d be about 103 now.
But you certainly carry on the tradition.
Thank you so much!!!
Later…
AG
. . . pedantry, by deploying the preposterously counter-factual and bald-faced lie that I’m
for pointing the failure of your pathetically small-minded pedantry.
The irony oozes out through every crack and crevice!
. . . [first reviewing your breathtakingly bald-faced lie]:
Quite recent example of me “answering the larger things” in direct reply to you!!!
And gosh, golly, gee, willya look at your . . . um . . . “response” to someone “answering the larger things” in factually accurate, substantive detail!
No, it couldn’t be, could it? [crickets]??? Really??? You didn’t respond at all??? You turned tail and ran away, just as you always do from confrontation with substantive factual information refuting your endless bullshit?
Gosh, who coulda ever predicted that?