Elizabeth Dias covers religion for the New York Times, and I spent a half hour this morning reading through her latest piece, which focuses on the bond between white evangelical Christians and Donald Trump. I know a lot of people are sick of these types of articles, but this one is rewarding. The setting is Sioux Center, Iowa, a rural community of white Protestants and, increasingly, Hispanic meat-packers and agricultural workers. The two groups keep mainly to themselves, but it mildly annoys the white folks that the newcomers work and shop on Sunday. They seem to blame it on their Catholicism.
Everything in Sioux Center is insular, and that’s how they like it. Even the coronavirus stays away, for the most part. If not for the news they receive on their televisions and phones, they’d be as comfortable as a bug in a rug. At least, that’s the impression you’ll get from reading this profile of their lives. The economy is not discussed. There is no mention of opioids.
The outside world, however, frightens them and insults their sensibilities. And it is encroaching in the form of those Hispanics, whose children are now filling their public schools. The main thing, though, is a strong sense that their beliefs are not respected. Nothing about them is respected, really, and they feel like they can be insulted by anyone without the slightest consequence.
They’re pretty much right about that. Even many “woke” people on the left feel no pang of conscience about blasting white people or evangelical Christians in terms they would never use against any other race or religion. Dismiss a black man’s opinion by calling him a ‘Tyrone,’ and you could be out of a job by lunchtime, but call a white woman a ‘Karen’ and you can expect applause.
Micah Schouten works at a cattle reproduction company. His wife, Caryn, doesn’t feel like the beneficiary of systemic privilege.
After the election of President Barack Obama, the country seemed to undergo a cultural shift, she said. “It was dangerous to voice your Christianity,” she said. “Because we were viewed as bigots, as racists — we were labeled as the haters and the ones who are causing all the derision and all of the problems in America. Blame it on the white believers.”
None of them said they had wanted to vote for Mr. Trump, but they did — “When he was the last option,” Heather Hoogendoorn said. The group laughed.
There are seemingly no black people in Sioux Center, so the Black Lives Matter protests are hard to comprehend. It seems like one more example where whites are taking criticism and others’ grievances are being put before their own.
“We are making this huge issue of white versus Black, Black Lives Matter. All lives matter,” she said. “There are more deaths from abortion than there are from corona, but we are not fighting that battle.”
“We are picking and choosing who matters and who doesn’t,” she said. “They say they are being picked on, when we are all being picked on in one shape or form.”
I agree with Caryn Schouten that most of us are getting “picked on” in this country, to one degree or another. I also think she and her husband should be able to raise their family in peace in their calm and traditional little community. She can hold her opinions about abortion and homosexuality, she can send her kids to a nice Christian school, and she can live out her days doing her best to find the American Dream. If that means she’s going to support politicians I abhor, that’s her right as an American citizen.
In this sense, I don’t really care one way or the other about Caryn or her husband Micah, or the other people who make up their small town. I’m happy to respect their choices and leave them alone. If I think people are picking on them, I’m likely to offer some form of defense. Yet, if they want to debate the issues, I am more than willing to do that too
The Schoutens are representative of the evangelical community in general, which gave 81 percent of its vote to Donald Trump in 2016 and looks primed to give numbers almost as good in 2020. Their basic position is that Trump is a terribly flawed human being who is also the only person around willing to be their champion. And the important thing, I think, is to take this perspective out for a ride rather than staying locked in the perspective that focuses only their racism and intolerance.
The key point is that they feel belittled and threatened. They feel this way even when they never leave their little towns. Sioux Center has 7,500 people and 19 churches. Their cultural anxieties are not coming from within. They have the same right as anyone else to have representatives who respect them. They have the right to reject anyone who doesn’t.
I think it’s time to stop focusing so much on the white evangelical support for Trump. It’s not mysterious, but it’s also not as dangerous as it might seem.
What I mean is that while Trump is an extremely dangerous political actor, his success comes from leading these evangelical voters astray. He fills a vacuum for them, but there are alternative ways to satisfy this demand. They rally behind Trump because they don’t see other politicians who will defend them, but it’s a deal with the devil. You can respect and defend their traditional beliefs without being supportive of business fraud, sexual assault, election tampering, and habitual dishonesty. Everytime someone sticks with Trump after he commits some new outrage or demonstrates some novel level of incompetency, they lower their standards and lower themselves. At this point, Trump is leading his followers away from support for the basic institutions of our country, from the balance of powers, and from the rule of law. Evangelicals have always been at odds with the larger culture on a host of issues, but not on these bedrock American norms.
So, what happens if Trump loses the election? The evangelicals always saw this relationship in mostly practical terms. Trump had power and he would use that power to protect them and advance their interests. Trump without power is a mostly useless figure for them. They will seek a new champion, and that champion can lead them in a better direction. The new champion can stop feeding off and bolstering their insecurities and instead feed and bolster their better angels. These folks actually believe in honesty. They’re patriotic Americans, proud of our heritage which includes our system of government. They used to support William Jennings Bryan, a man as different from Trump as it is possible to be. Teddy Roosevelt thought they were dangerous fanatics, but he won a good deal of their support, too, because he had his own form of appeal and offered his own form of defense.
Trump demonstrated that a lot is negotiable with evangelicals, including many things most thought were not, like cavorting with porn stars. They’re pretty locked in their ways on some things, though, like opposition to abortion and lack of acceptance of the LGBTQ community. Small town evangelicals are uneasy about racial change, and that’s a pattern that repeats itself throughout American history with each new wave of immigration. The Republican Party has fed off these issues for a long time, and they’re not things that will simply go away.
But we don’t need some magic trick that will dissolve people’s differences. We need someone who will represent evangelicals in a way that emphasizes their virtues and call them to be the best people they can be. For the foreseeable future, they’re going to support the political right in this country, but that still leaves a huge amount of variation on the direction things can go. Preferably, they will become a more politically diverse bloc, but I’d settle for them getting the respect they deserve and leadership that tamps down their insecurities rather than depends on them.
I’ve long thought it a mistake for Democratic politicians not to go out and try to speak to evangelical communities. We’ll continue to differ on issues like abortion but the truth is that they didn’t much care about abortion until it was exploited as a wedge issue by Republicans and early evangelical leaders who saw there was profit to be made by aligning with Republicans.
I doubt their leaders can be won over but the respect one shows by engaging in frank dialog would go a distance toward closing the current gulf in support. I don’t see Democrats getting anywhere close to 50% support from evangelicals in the foreseeable future. But we shouldn’t be getting overwhelmed. 80% support for Trump and other Republicans, no matter how horrid, is obscene.
I believe it’s possible to drive his numbers down. Perhaps to 60% or 70%. Long term, someone like him might struggle to get above 50% in an environment where the supposed disrespect of the left couldn’t be exploited.
Bernie Sanders did that. He never gets credit for that.
I agree with you that there is a disdain in the voice of many in the left when referring to evangelicals voters. If we are trying to build a bigger community, we do need to stop doing that. But it goes both ways. If they want respect, maybe they should stop being such hypocritical single issue voters. There is nothing Christian about Trump. The honorable thing to do from their point of view would have been to abstain from voting in 2016. But I truly believe they lack morals. They try to force others to believe in their religion and create misery by exporting their form of fundamentalism around the world. I loathe their actions. Their xenophobia, righteousness and holier than thou attitude is tearing this country apart. They gave us Bush and Trump. That’s unforgivable in my book and I don’t see the need to placate them in any sense other than saying, “we don’t hate you. Here’s some things that our policies do that can help people, and that includes people of your community”.
They are not patriots Booman. They are traitors who support a traitor as president. I am SOOO happy they revealed their ugly selves in support for trump. All those years Democrats would throw liberals under the bus in order to garner favor with these morally elastic fake religious types.
After trump goes down, we will NEVER have to listen or cater to those bastards and their fake values again. There is nothing I dislike more than hypocrites. And the evangelicals are the biggest ones on the planet. “Values Voters”. What a bunch of bullshit that was.
…. I think I will watch some George Carlin today…
>>The main thing, though, is a strong sense that their beliefs are not respected. Nothing about them is respected, really, and they feel like they can be insulted by anyone without the slightest consequence.
nobody can do the “help I’m being opressed!” schtick better than American rightwing “christians”. Hint: I don’t respect them because they don’t respect me. They feel they can insult me without the slightest consequence, and their whole world view is based on hating liberals and liberalism and being convinced that their sick twisted god hates us too. I’d respect the hate more if they weren’t hating in the name of Jesus.
>>These folks actually believe in honesty.
I see no reason to believe that. They will vote for any lying liar with an R next to its name. Barack Obama was honest, how far did that get him? They believe in Trump’s “say the quiet part out loud” nastiness and call it honesty.
>>They’re patriotic Americans, proud of our heritage which includes our system of government.
Another hard-to-believe statement that you offer no proof of. They absolutely do not believe in the freedom of religion that is written in our Constitution, nor do they believe in the amendments that established that black Americans also have rights
These people are America’s most deplorable, and they were that way before Donald Trump ever ran for office. He didn’t corrupt them, he merely took full advantage. .
Precisely. The giveaway is that they claim the Democrats don’t respect Christians, yet the Christian African American community is basically entirely Democrats. Something tells me it’s not the theology driving this.
I like this piece, but you circle around “parochialism” without landing on it. Because that’s what you describe. People only seeing the world as it exists within very narrowly defined borders. Isolation from neighboring communities, particularly those with different outlooks, racial background, or religious practices.
I think it’s a good idea not to antagonize people, even (or perhaps especially) people with such a radically different outlook, but that’s just a matter of principle. I don’t know how if any political inroads can be made, though. I sincerely doubt it.
Short story. My son had this friend who used to visit us often, and we attended his wedding. He married a young lady from the local evangelical community. That was pretty much the last we saw him. He was a manager at a local coffee house but began preaching non stop at work. He had a large store and they moved him to a small one and warned him about his preaching at work. He continued to preach until he lost his job. He became intolerable to the point where our family has now moved on. He is impossible to talk to. I just don’t get it.
Theology and politics aside, in the Covid-19 context, church kills.
Also synagogue & mosque.