I’m in no position to complain about it, but I don’t like it when my heroes do commercials. I didn’t like it when Bob Dylan did a Chrysler ad during the Super Bowl in 2014 and I didn’t like that Bruce Springsteen did an ad for Jeep during the Super Bowl on Sunday. In both cases, it was a dramatic shift away from their reputations for anti-commercialism.

The ad is inspiring, to be sure, but also certain to raise eyebrows. Springsteen is not known for taking part in commercials. Indeed, the only example one Springsteen expert could find is of the artist jokingly reading a promotion for wine while visiting Philadelphia radio station WMMR in 1974 before his landmark album, “Born To Run,” became a cultural phenomenon. “Since that moment, I don’t think he’s ever endorsed a commercial or a product,” says Louis Masur, a professor of American studies and history at New Jersey’s Rutgers University who teaches a course called “Springsteen’s American Vision.”

In Springsteen’s case, it appears that he simply liked the message.  Olivier Francois, the chief marketing officer of Stellantis, the new conglomerate that owns Jeep, had been pursuing The Boss to do a commercial for a decade. Springsteen only relented in this case because he saw the ad as “a prayer.”

That might seem far-fetched until you watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2XYH-IEvhI

The musician known as “The Boss” will command two minutes of commercial time in Super Bowl LV Sunday night, all part of a mammoth Jeep ad meant to reflect a national mood of coming together after four years of politics and polarization…

…The commercial is designed to spur viewers to mend the various rifts that have erupted in the nation in recent years.  “We just have to remember the very soil we stand on is common ground,” Springsteen says as he holds forth from a small chapel in Lebanon, Kansas, with his own 1980 Jeep CJ-5 in the picture. He adds: “Our light has always found its way through the darkness. And there’s hope up on the road ahead.” The ad ends with the tagline, “To The ReUnited States of America.”

The message is pure Bruce, and some of the complaints show an obvious lack of familiarity with his work. For example, Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist, finds it a bit phony that an artist “who is extremely well known for being from New Jersey” is “wearing a cowboy hat and boots.” I’d refer her to Nebraska and The Ghost of Tom Joad to disabuse her of the idea that Springsteen limits himself to songs about the Jersey Shore. It’s also notable that he lives on a 400-acre horse farm in Colts Neck, which is about the most stereotypically Republican thing you can do in the Garden State.

But Hemingway is correct when she says that Springsteen is no fan of Republicans. His long record of supporting Democrats certainly makes it a challenge for him to be an effective messenger for national unity. On the other hand, it’s significant that he’s making an explicit case for finding common ground and meeting in the middle. My wife had a negative reaction to this message precisely because we just witnessed a white nationalist coup attempt a month ago and it seems a little too soon to be talking about reconciliation. How about some accountability first?

Hemingway recoiled for a different reason. For her, the conceit of the ad is “when Republicans win a national election, that’s divisive, but when Democrats win one, that’s unifying.” And, it’s true, the ad ends with the “To The ReUnited States of America” tagline, which clearly implies that Joe Biden’s presidency is the agent of reunification. Obviously, the division occurred during the presidency of Biden’s predecessor.

Clearly, the corporate world sees things much like my wife does, and not at all from Hemingway’s perspective. Trump’s presidency and particularly the January 6 insurrection have created deep wounds that need mending. That precludes any view that Trump was a good or unifying leader. Yet, even if you liked Trump’s style and agreed with his policies, the insurrection should compel you to concede that our divisions reached a dangerous point.

In the end, this ad is about selling Jeeps, even if that probably has nothing to do with why Springsteen agreed to participate. Some people are not going to react by buying a Jeep. Some people will be less inclined to buy a Jeep. No advertisement has universal appeal.

In this case, Jeep went with an explicitly anti-Trump pitch so Trump supporters are going to complain. But if you listen to Springsteen’s message, it’s an olive branch to the other side. Maybe they don’t deserve an olive branch, at least not yet. Maybe the olive branch won’t be received in the spirit in which is was offered.

For me, this is really just Bruce being Bruce. I just wish he could have had two minutes during the Super Bowl to make his case without it being about selling Jeeps, but I guess that’s just not how things work.

I admire what Springsteen is trying to do here, but I’m on the side of accountability first and reconciliation later.