Recent events in Ukraine arguably justify some seemingly excessive American defense spending. But it’s still frustrating that our Congress is so willing to buy weapons and so reluctant to invest in bettering the human condition. But beyond the irritation I have with our priorities, I get pretty angry when money is spent on weapons that the White House didn’t request and does not want. And it’s a lot of money. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 includes $782 billion for the Pentagon– $30 billion more than the Biden Administration requested.
This is just the unwanted spending on naval ships.
The new bill would provide almost $27 billion for Navy ship construction, about $4.1 billion more than was requested. All or part of nine vessels that the president did not ask for are included in the final bill, such as:
— $1.9 billion for an Arleigh Burke class destroyer and associated parts for another one.
— $590 million for two Expeditionary Fast Transport ships built in Mobile, Ala.
— $250 million for parts of an amphibious ship made in nearby Mississippi.
— $577 million for an Expeditionary Sea Base program.
— $776 million for a fleet oiler refueling ship.
— $235 million for three so-called ship-to-shore connectors.
Want some more egregious examples? The White House asked for nine new C-130J transport planes for the Air National Guard and Reserve fleets. Congress just spent $3.1 billion to buy twenty-nine of them. They just bought $900 million worth of F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. The White House didn’t request any new funding for this program.
But this all part of a corrupt system and a weird employment program. It’s wasteful and inefficient, and I wish we could figure out a way to be more rational. I don’t want defense spending to crowd out everything else, but can’t we please at least stick to buying only what the executive branch says they need?
It’s not even the purchase price alone that makes this so appalling. Every new jet requires decades of maintenance and upgrades, every new ship requires a crew times the number of years it’s in service.
Perpetual war for a perpetual racket. Whenever I read stories about this topic I’m of two minds. Part of me thinks of this Haruki Murakami quote from Dance, Dance, Dance:
And then on the other hand… I worked as part of the military industrial complex doing supporting research on improved training systems (for the Burke class destroyer actually) and to teach foreign languages to soldiers based on the theory that if you can more directly communicate with people you won’t have to kill them.
There’s also been a lot of discussion in the news about how the Russian army has been less effective than it could have been due to various forms of corruption within their military. This is just our brand of corruption where only really really high level people (not colonels and majors) get to participate in the graft.
Perpetual war for a perpetual racket (Smedley Butler’s War is a Racket). Whenever I read stories about this topic I’m of two minds. Part of me thinks of this Haruki Murakami quote from Dance, Dance, Dance:
And then on the other hand… I worked as part of the military industrial complex doing supporting research on improved training systems (for the Burke class destroyer actually) and to teach foreign languages to soldiers based on the theory that if you can more directly communicate with people you won’t have to kill them.
There’s also been a lot of discussion in the news about how the Russian army has been less effective than it could have been due to various forms of corruption within their military. This is just our brand of corruption where only really really high level people (not colonels and majors) get to participate in the graft.
View military procurement as a make work program, then it makes more sense.
Russians and China have hypersonic missiles that go five times the speed of sound. We have none, to stop or use them/ WTF?