I’m not a big fan of the Washington Post editorial board, but I credit them with not flinching from the threat of fascism. In a short-and-sweet posting on Wednesday, they deplored the Republicans’ reaction to the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, and gave absolutely no credence to their talking points. More importantly, they didn’t fret that the raid might lead to violence or civil war. Instead, they reasonable projected that the Department of Justice will have to explain themselves, and that Attorney General Merrick Garland will find that challenging if the raid doesn’t lead to criminal charges.

Of course, criminal investigations of presidents shouldn’t be undertaken lightly. The warrant in this case isn’t public; even if it were, only a sealed affidavit could tell the full story about the evidentiary basis for the search. The improper retention of records is a serious offense that shouldn’t be dismissed, but it is so far unclear whether Mr. Trump’s retention of these records constituted a violation of national security, a threat to democracy, or any other grave abuse. Attorney General Merrick Garland, then, finds himself in a tricky position: He may eventually be summoned before GOP-controlled congressional committees and ordered to explain himself for allowing the FBI’s actions — a job that will prove more difficult if the inquiry doesn’t lead to criminal charges or evidence of major wrongdoing.

The editorial board could have been much tougher, as well as more thorough. But they checked all the important boxes, from the “no-duh” point of Republican hypocrisy in light of their “Lock Her Up!” chants about Hillary Clinton, to the observation that blindly defending Trump and attacking the FBI is “disturbing and dangerous.”

A key point here is that GOP doesn’t even know what exactly they are defending. They don’t care, at all, what Trump might have done or that it could later be a big liability to have assumed he was an innocent victim of a politicized Justice Department. They are just doing their utmost to destroy faith in federal law enforcement and the federal system of justice.

It’s this act that I characterize as fascism, because the goal is to disempower the DOJ and FBI to hold conservative criminals accountable. When they seize control of these institutions again (and they eventually will), they will destroy their independence and use them exclusively for their own political ends. The remedy is not to preemptively do this job for them by making the DOJ stand down, but to address the threat head-on and to roll up the conspiracy to end our form of government and destroy our institutions.

If that leads to a civil war or some sort, at least it will begin with the defenders of democracy in charge rather than in a position of weakness. I’m glad to see the editorial board take a position that is both principled and unflinching. I’m marking my scorecard for those who show weakness and fear.