Back in 2019, I became internet famous in India for a piece on fascism I wrote on January 31, 2017. That was only eleven days into Donald Trump’s presidency. The article was called The 12 Early Warning Signs of Fascism. Here is the list I used:
EARLY WARNING SIGNS OF FASCISM
- Powerful and continuing nationalism
- Disdain for human rights
- Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
- Rampant sexism
- Controlled mass media
- Obsession with national security
- Religion and government intertwined
- Corporate power protected
- Labor power suppressed
- Disdain for intellectual and the arts
- Obsession with crime and punishment
- Rampant cronyism and corruption
I asked how many items on the list Trump had already ticked off. I acknowledged that, while he was violating the Emoluments Clause to the Constitution “by using his position as president to attract foreign patronage to his hotels,” is was too early to accuse his cronyism and corruption of being rampant. Still, even at that early stage of his presidency, the answer was “all of them.”
So, I’ve been at the forefront of warning that Trumpism would lead to fascism.
As we enter the final two weeks of the 2024 presidential campaign, the biggest story in the news is that one of Trump’s former chiefs of staff has his own definition of fascism.
The former general [John Kelly] held nothing back, arguing that Trump could fit the bill of a “fascist.”
“Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It’s a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy,” he told The Times.
“So, certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that he thinks would work better in terms of running America,” he added.
He’s joined by Mark Milley, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the military under Trump:
“[Trump] is the most dangerous person ever. I had suspicions when I talked to you about his mental decline and so forth, but now I realize he’s a total fascist. He is now the most dangerous person to this country,” he said.
Milley reportedly told Watergate reporter Bob Woodward that Trump “fascist to the core.”
Concerns about Trump’s autocratic inclinations have also been shared by James Mattis and Mark Esper who both served as Secretary of Defense during Trump’s presidency. Esper, in particular, believes Trump is telling the truth when he threatens to use the military to attack Americans citizens who voice opposition to him.
Maybe these warnings will resonate with enough people to help Kamala Harris win the presidency. If not, we’re going to find out what it’s like to live in a fascist state. But even if Harris wins, it won’t change that her political opposition, which will constitute nearly half the voting public, now wants fascism.
In the event that Trump loses and Harris assumes office, his active political career will probably be over. I don’t see him running again in four years, although it’s certainly a possibility. He’ll be in his 80’s by then, and possibly in prison. And maybe the thirst for fascism will abate somewhat without a charismatic leader to galvanize it. But my suspicion is that this fascist impulse won’t go away on the right, at least in the opposition to a Harris administration.
The thing is, and I’ve written this many times over the last eight years, that right-wing populism always takes the form of fascism. It flourishes especially when left-wing populism is weak. And I’m no fan of left-wing populism when it takes the form of Marxism or petulant socialism. But there needs to be a hard left that makes demands on the center-left, and serves as a pressure outlet for the frustrations and deprivations of the underclasses and struggling working classes of the country. This used to the province of labor unions, which when effective always straddled the line between radicalism and pragmatism. As they’ve weakened, right-wing populism has filled the vacuum. This is how oligarchs get their way, and it’s why Trump’s only major accomplishment in office was a giant tax cut for the super wealthy.
My point is that we can’t diffuse the fascist impulse of half the country without a left-wing populist alternative, and if that isn’t going to be done by labor unions, or labor unions alone, then there needs to be something else.
Left-wing populism shares some commonalities with right-wing populism, chiefly the “identification of enemies as a unifying cause.” Traditionally, this has been Wall Street or capitalists or bankers. At the extremes it can threaten people’s civil or human rights. But the point isn’t to give power to the far left. The point is to provide a non-fascist alternative to fascism so we don’t lose our country’s commitment to representative governance and its commitment to a pluralism and inclusivity or its protections for the weak and oppressed.
Do we want an all-powerful executive ordering millions into camps, suppressing the free press, and attacking dissent with the military?
That’s what Trump promises, but it’s also apparently what half the country is ready to sign up for. If Trump wins, dissent is going to be hard and much of it may have to go underground. But if he loses, governing is going to be hard, and eventually we will lose. The biggest part of the job is going to be preparing the country to survive when it happens. And that means that somehow, people need to be peeled away from Trumpism as the only alternative to center-left rule.
With respect to warnings about fascism, I’m not a Johnny-come-lately. Hopefully, I have some credibility on this issue. It may arrive in full flower in under two weeks, or it may come in four years. But if nothing changes, it will come.
To what degree do Trump’s voters acknowledge that they want what Trump says he is going to do? And how many of them actually want Fascism? As Klein pointed out in his big piece, much of Trump’s support is fueled by a selective memory of his time in office. A lot of that selective memory is probably honest.
“Oh, that guy is all talk” is the sentiment of at least some of his voters. “But he’ll do some good things.” Certainly, a healthy chunk of his support fantasizes about putting the opposition in camps, and some would want to see those fantasies become reality. Others just deny that that is what will happen. I’m thinking of guys like Glenn Loury or some of my relatives who will argue that it won’t be that bad – Trump Derangement Syndrome and other such nonsense.
If Trump wins, this is just so much talk of angels dancing on needles. But it has implications for the future of these voters if he loses. Currently, the conservative movement operates under the Führerprzinzip. What Donald Trump wants is right, no matter what that is. But who would have succeeded at taking the place of the Führer? If the Reich weren’t prostrate before the allies, would Himmler or Goebbels have been able to take Hitler’s place and keep things going? Something would’ve been lost.
Just as something was lost between Stalin and Kruschchev, even if de-Stalinization didn’t really take, a certain normalcy (not to mention stagnation) set in post-war Soviet life. Maybe the GOP can have a Deng Xiaoping after their Mao goes away.
It is of utmost importance that Trump not return to the White House for the obvious reasons, but also because I think it does mean that the GOP will have to turn into something else… Maybe Kruschchev wasn’t Kennedy, but he wasn’t Stalin either.
things don’t have to go full Stalin to be unacceptably and catastrophically bad. You want to live in Hungary?
I’m only thinking about the nature of Trump’s support vs. the nature of Trump’s reality and what that might indicate for the future. It’s not about what I want.
There’s an issue I feel we are all dodging right now and we need to confront. Multi ethnic/cultural/religious democracy does not work. In fact it cannot work.
Human nature is what it is. Which means roughly 40% of the population is biologically not capable of living in a society where other religions and cultures exist. It causes them intense psychological and emotional stress and pain. Which means there is no way to actually deal with issues related to the economy, class, foreign policy, science, climate, or rights unless there is a strict mono culture. The moment you have a multi cultural/religious/ethnic society you must toss out democracy. Because then the race is on to either a right wing fascist authoritarian society or a left wing authoritarian society. There is no happy ending.
“The West” is imploding because immigration, loss of Christian dominance, and advancement of rights for non Christians hit that critical point. So democracy and freedom are no longer on the table. We are in a cold civil war and one side is going to win. It will be the first to setup a brutal authoritarian regime to enforce their world view and stomp out the cultural, religion, values, and rights of the other side. There is no way to avoid this now.
David Frum called this years ago. If conservatives can’t win democratically they won’t give up conservatism they will give up democracy. From Leonard Leo to The Heritage Foundation to SCOTUS they are all in a religious civil war. Either we are getting wiped out and our view points criminalized with jail or they are. We cannot vote our way out of this, debate our way out of this, or anything like that. Someone is going into camps and prisons for speaking and existing and it is us or them.
That’s the reality we need to face. The other reality as that as a capitalist society the fastest way to obliterate the other side and make sure we aren’t the ones in the camp is to give the uber wealthy everything they want. We are getting an autocracy and an oligarchy no matter what our diversity has sealed that fate. The questions is who gets to keep their culture and social values and who is dead or in camps. Choose now. Because choosing not to go after them and be even more brutal than they are is loading yourselves onto the trains.
And yes, stopping this also means de Christianization through both legal and violent means.
I’ve been all over the world due to work and I know exactly where we are. It’s over. Even if Harris wins if we don’t race to crush them eventually they will win and they will wipe us out.
If the solution is that we have to holocaust midwestern whites then… huh… I’m not sure how we’d go about doing that.
That’s not what I’m advocating for. My point is that liberal democracy has proven not only unable to work once a society is diverse but will ultimately usher in either rightwing fascist authoritarianism or left wing authoritarianism. Many western nations have crossed that threshold. Defending democracy is now futile and anyone doing it might as well be loading themselves into the cattle cars along with the rest of us. We are off to the races and the first side to establish their own autocracy is going to win. As liberals aren’t willing to do that we need to accept that we are going to get fascism and it’s our own damn fault.
So your solution is to give up and embrace some form of authoritarianism. Sigh.
It’s not my solution it’s accepting reality. Liberal democracy is only possible in a mono culture that glues it together. This is because a certain portion of humans due to their inherent nature are not capable of functioning in a diverse society. It causes them emotional pain, stress, fear, and anger and there is no way to change that because it’s just part of us as a species.
Once you pass that critical point, and “The West” has, liberal democracy can’t work. It will give way to the first group to install an authoritarian regime.
Democracy does not work. If Harris wins and does not move quickly to create a liberal autocracy she’s failed. Because it’s only a matter of time till the right will win and install theirs. So anybody who’s advocating to keep democracy might as well be voting for Trump because they are at best simply delaying fascism or at worst actively aiding it by refusing to accept reality.
If you aren’t willing to install a liberal autocracy you aren’t serious about civil rights, women’s rights, LGBTQA+ rights, or diversity. And if you are trying to stop a liberal autocracy you are actively working to destroy all those things.
That is the reality of where the US and western Europe is right now. I don’t like it. But I also realize that all of those who are screaming liberal diverse democracy can work might as well be loading us all, me and them included, into the cattle cars to be gassed. And if you can’t see that than you’ve earned whatever is coming.
Where are you getting your information? What sources are you reading to inform your comments? You are making some assumptions that I really feel merit double-checking the sources of your assumptions. The idea that the only choices are autocracy or autocracy strikes me as far from obvious to me and probably to many who still frequent this blog.