That is the question.
Trump now gets more coverage when peaceful, silent protesters are removed, forcibly or otherwise,by Trump’s security/hired goons, than when no one protests his hateful, white supremacist rallies. It’s a strange dynamic, that benefits Trump, as he gets free publicity, as well as shoring up the enthusiasm of his supporters, who have become practically gleeful in their willingness to express their anger and loathing at “people not like them” in the worst possible ways.
Obviously, I question no one’s right to make a political statement at his rallies. In any sane country, his actions in dealing with hecklers and/or silent protesters would be viewed as inciting hate speech and even physical violence by his supporters at those rallies. In any sane country, he would have long ago slipped off the national radar as a viable candidate, regardless of party affiliation.
But we are not a sane country, and the Republican Party no longer even tries that hard to mask their racist, xenophobic agenda. Why? Because their strongest most loyal supporters – primarily older, primarily white, often fundamentalist Christians – have been conditioned by decades of propaganda in which various groups – Blacks, Muslims, “Liberals,” Feminists, Latinos, LGBT people, and even less extreme Republicans (can’t call them moderates anymore) – have been scapegoated by Fox News and Right Wing hate radio as the root causes of the real problems our society faces.
Which leads us to Trump, the man who can say anything, no matter how vile, dishonest or outright stupid, and not suffer any consequences for his behavior. Initially, his outrageous comments were deemed to have doomed his campaign to a mere vanity project. Except they didn’t. His support grew. Then the incidents of his supporters attacking those who peacefully protested his campaign events began being roughed up and removed, often with the clear, vocal encouragement of Trump himself, and that was deemed to be the bridge too far. And, again, the political pundits in both parties were shown to have seriously misjudged his appeal, for his support increased after each such incident.
The other Republican candidates went from mocking and criticizing him, to giving him a free pass, because any criticism, even from other extremely conservative GOP figures resulted in a backlash against those who went public with bashing Trump. Jeb! is a prime example of a candidate who has been essentially neutered by Trump’s popularity among the GOP base, but he’s far from the only one. Indeed, the candidates who rose in the polls (if only briefly) were the ones that best embraced the same attitude and tone of Trump himself. Carly Fiona, Ben Carson and now Ted Cruz.
The media itself has been cowed by Trump. We now see many leading media figures parroting Trump’s lies and his ridiculous statements as worthy of serious consideration. Fear among the media and political elites is rampant. Trump has spent far less on his campaign than practically anyone else in the Republican field, yet he leads the polls because his base supporters are so enthralled that his candidacy has enabled them to come out of the closet and openly show their true feelings, prejudices and hatreds toward their fellow American citizens.
At this point, White Supremacist groups, “militias” and others from the fringe of the far right are using Trump as a means to garner attention for their own crazed agenda and proselytize for new members. What was once considered beyond the pale of decency and morality has been moved to the center stage of America’s grand political theater – the Presidential campaign. Trump is responsible for that.
I would lie to you if I said I predicted this effect. As far as I know, no one did. Yet here we are, with the politics of fear and hate on display in all their full glory and infamy. So, what do decent, sane people do? Protest or not? It’s a tactic that has failed to dent The Donald’s support among the GOP faithful. I cannot and will not predict whether continued public defiance against the venomous, bilious rhetoric of Trump and his followers will hurt or help Candidate Trump in the general election should he becomes the Republican nominee. We live in a world turned upside down.
That said, I come down on the side of continued non-violent protests at Trump rallies. History needs to show that Trump and his “message” of anger and contempt for anyone not white, and for anyone who does not swear fealty to him and his racist, bigoted agenda, is not accepted as politics as usual by millions of Americans. Perhaps any such actions are counter-productive, but nonetheless, we need to continue to make them, in my opinion, if only to show the rest of the world that Trump is not the only face who represents America.
Those who choose to protest at Trump campaign events will be risking a great deal. Violence against them by Trump supporters that results in severe injury or even death I no longer consider highly improbable. Whoever follows the footsteps of those who previously stood up and defied Trump in front of his angry mobs will know this going forward. I wish them the best, and admire their courage, in advance.
You write:
Please…do me the favor of naming a “sane country.”
Thank you and good night.
AG
P.S. Even the most sane countries that I have ever experienced personally…Scandinavia, Canada, Holland, France to name a few…are falling out of emotional balance because of the insanity of Muslim fundamentalism coupled with the (separate but equal if not worse) insanity of U.S. policies in the Middle East. As long as ISIS/al Queda/Taliban-like groups continue to practice…and perfect, in terms of efficiency…media-hyped terror, people will be driven insane and Trumpist candidates will rise.
Everywhere.
Watch.
AG
Nice to see you still read me, Arthur. Congrats on your August clairvoyance.
Oh, hell yes, Trump’s rhetoric and policy positions need to be protested. Look at this from a couple of days ago:
This is not a campaign which can win a general election in the United States in 2016. No matter how enabling the media has been in Trump’s rise, they are reporting these sorts of encounters, and will certainly continue to do so- it’s “reporting the controversy”, after all.
Turnout from non-white voters would be maximized in a general election if Trump were a candidate. It could be very clarifying to the American public and press- explicit white supremacy is not a path to the White House any more.
Wishful thinking will get you nowhere, centerfielddj.
AG
It’s been interesting to see your consistent excitement about the Trump campaign, AG. It’s amusingly self-serving of you to claim that there will be no way for the Democratic nominees to prevent his election.
Ways that the Democratic nominee would crush Trump in the general election campaign are easily identified. Let’s just say that something else may be up in your Trump coronations.
And, let’s look back at these statements after the general election and see if your very, very low view of the American electorate is confirmed.
“You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan”
You insinuate that I am pro-Trump. On the contrary, I am seriously thinking of leaving the country if he wins.
My “very, very low view of the American electorate” has already been thoroughly confirmed by almost every national election since the JFK/RFK/MLK Jr. assassination years. I personally think that Jimmy Carter was the only honest man to be elected during that time, and he was so thoroughly surrounded by criminal elements that his tenure…a rare mistake on the part of the Permanent Government/Deep State…was doomed from the outset.
But Trump? In my estimation he is markedly worse than any of his predecessors because he is nakedly appealing to the most dangerous element of the electorate…the dissatisfied, white entitlement majority (still a majority although not for long if some version of a final solution is not found and rapidly implemented) that sees its rule collapsing right in front of its eyes…and he is winning!!! Not even offering lip service to the inclusive left. Nothing.
i fear that the cities will become occupied war zones within a year of his election and i do not want to be here when that happens.
AG
P.S. I welcome your comments with open arms. Your ongoing hostility to me…as evinced your regularly implied opinion that I am some kind of closet right-winger…is a perfect example of the leftiness kneejerkism that has rotted out the heart of the Democratic Party since FDR. These Trump followers? Their predecessors were the people who elected FDR and managed to weather the Great Depression. They no longer believe anything mainstream Dems or RatPubs say because of 50+ years of bipartisan, PermaGov bullshit and they are now being herded into the Trump camp while searching in sheer desperation for a leader.
Thanks a lot, and WTFU.
“You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan”
Refusing to consume media is not a plan. Holding a low opinion of Americans, including progressives, and lecturing them/us to WTFU is not a plan.
Leaving the United States is not a plan to create change anywhere. People who want to create real change need to stay in the arena.
You write:
Yes, it is “a plan.” Not a successful one, because I have never figured out how to get the word out to enough people without using the media. It is not in the medias’ interests to recommend that people cease to consume it, thus…
Catch 22.
All over again.
Even among people who ought to know better…like yourself, supposed “progressive” that I am sure you style yourself…even among those people, compulsive acceptance of what “the media” hustles is all too common. (The approved media, of course, depending upon which wing of the PermaGov you nest.)
And so on.
Wake the fuck up.
You been had.
From the rear.
Step away from the media with your brains in the air!!!
Please!!!
AG
A personally leveled rape analogy. Well, isn’t that sweet.
Meanwhile, in today’s campaign news:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-robocalls-white-nationalists-iowa
“Read the full text of the robocall below, and watch (listen to a) recording of the call:
“The American National Super PAC makes this call to support Donald Trump.
`My name is Reverend Ronald Tan, host of the Christian radio talk show program For God and Country. First Corinthians states: God chose the foolish things of this world to shame the wise and God chose the weak things of this world to shame the strong. For the Iowa caucuses, please support Donald Trump. He is courageous and he speaks his mind. God Bless.’
`I’m Jared Taylor with American Renaissance. I urge you to vote for Donald Trump because he is the one candidate who points out that we should accept immigrants who are good for America. We don’t need Muslims. We need smart, well-educated white people who will assimilate to our culture. Vote Trump.’
`I am William Johnson, a farmer and a white nationalist. Support Donald Trump. I paid for this through the super PAC. [Telephone] (213) 718-3908. This call is not authorized by Donald Trump.'”
The voter outreach continues. A poor general election strategy, this.
Nothing about “rape” in my post. You’ve been had willingly. It’s easier that way.
AG
Oh, Arthur, that tack is one of the go-to moves of the modern conservative movement. You fit right in- congratulations!
Meanwhile, you find no comment in response to the fact that declared white supremacists are campaigning for Trump. You believe that will go over fine in the general election, apparently.
At the top of the power system this entire nation is…and has been since its inception…”white supremacist.” Witness the racial disparity in cop killings and the lack of prosecution for those crimes for all of the evidence you might need to understand the truth of that statement today.
Racial tensions are running very high right now, and much of the white population is scared shitless that its overall relatively high position in the economic pecking order is soon going to be seriously threatened by minorities of all kinds. These people are going to vote for Trump. Get used to it.
The only question that remains is a matter of numbers. Voting numbers. Who’s coming out to the polls and who isn’t. Plus of course good ol’ American vote fraud, tech age style. We got Bush II through two jiggered elections. If push comes to shove…if things seem close…we could get Trump I the same way. Bet on it.
Yer livin’ in a dream world if you think otherwise.
Of course…I’m living in one, too.
I’m living in da Bronx, in the Kingsbridge neighborhood…one of the few places in this good green nation where there is a real, functioning, working class, multiracial society. That’s why I live here. But I don’t imagine that this kind of society exists throughout the nation. Hell, it doesn’t even exist throughout NYC. Will it someday? I dunno. November is going to tell that tale for the present, and I believe that the majority of people who come out to vote this November are going to be white. What percentage of that white population will vote racist? I wish I knew. If i did know I’d be able to start leaving the country earlier if that was necessary. But I don’t.
We’ll see soon enough.
Won’t we.
AG
Given that you, Arthur, have been supportive of voter ID laws which disproportionately disenfranchise non-whites, and some Republican elected officials and campaign staffers have admitted that disenfranchising minorities is an intent of these laws, the concern you share here about vote fraud that is exercised with racist intent comes off as insincere.
You are…as usual…full of shit.
Go away, child.
You bother me.
AG
If you care to retract your past support for voter ID laws, that would be good for us to know. I note that your response does not retract your support for voter ID laws, however.
I neither support nor oppose so-called “voter identification laws.” All laws are subject to how they are used. I oppose any and all laws…no matter who makes them or what their supposed aims may be…that are used to disenfranchise lawful citizens of this country, and I also oppose any and all laws that are meant to deny citizenship to people who have lawful residence here and wish to be citizens.
Clear enough?
AG
P.S. Your kneejerk leftiness stances are appallingly stupid. You make the talking heads on MSNBC look like Socrates. Go away.
Progress, but still a puzzlement.
Name a single voter ID law created in the last decade by Republican-led State Legislatures which does not “…disenfranchise lawful citizens of this country…” in ways that disproportionately deny low-income people their voting rights.
If there are none, then this would seem to obligate you to say that you oppose all of these recent voter ID laws.
But then we would have to get into school districting and real estate hustles that disproportionately deny low-income people their living rights as well. And that would mean impeaching the entire political system. North, south, east, west and everywhere in between. Maine to Southern California, Florida to Washington State, DemRaticans and RatPublicans both.
Remember the old lick about keeping women barefoot and pregnant? Keeping people poor and ignorant is the non-sexist version of that lick. Voter ID laws? Just another lick in the beating. Stop the beat-down and “Voter ID laws” become what they were originally conceived as being…protection against vote fraud.
Your kneejerk “VOTER ID LAWS ARE BAD, BAD, BAD!!!” routine is just another example of media overdose, the leftiness version thereof. It’s all in how they are used, which is where I came in. I’ll shut the door on my way out with a quote from Wikipedia…as is to be expected from such a broad survey…comes to no particular conclusions at all.
Have a nice day, and…
WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!
Please.
AG
Masterful and dishonest avoidance of the pertinent question.
It appears to me that none of the voter ID laws passed since 2005 by States in full Republican control had the implementations recommended by Carter and Baker.
Instead, those voter ID laws have been implemented in ways which maximized their disproportionate denials of voting access to citizens with low incomes, particularly those who live in neighborhoods with a high percentage of minorities.
For example, in the state of Texas:
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/state-politics/20150428-court-raises-tough-questions-on-texa
s-voter-id-law.ece
“Tuesday’s arguments also focused on the intent of Texas legislators who passed the ID law. The law’s opponents, and U.S. District Court Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos’ opinion, noted a statement by former state Rep. Todd Smith, R-Euless, during debate on the bill that it was “common sense” that those lacking the required IDs would likely be minority voters.”
The States which have been under full control by Democratic Party leaders have not passed these laws. In fact, many States under Democratic Party control have passed laws to make voting access easier.
The fact that the Democratic Party wants to increase the voting population and the Republican Party wants to decrease the voting population works rather vigorously against your unsubstantiated theory here.
If you disagree, then I ask you to name the State which has implemented their voter ID laws in a way you approve of. If there are none, then that speaks volumes, doesn’t it?
Leave the country?
I’ll cross you off my foxhole list.
I say that with a heavy heart, Booman. I come from working class/middle class ancestry that goes back to the 1630s in the NYC area on my father’s side of the family and the 1850s on my mother’s side. So many generations of my families have lived and died in this area. If Trump is elected president I believe that this country is shot, and just as my ancestors moved to avoid bad times, so will I.
Where? Someplace where I can walk down the street and look like a native, number one. Being a visual minority is always a hard road. Also, someplace where democratic and moral ideals still remain in place and there is a well-functioning jazz and latin music community. In my experience, that is still the case on many parts of Europe and also Canada. Maybe Australia and New Zealand too. All I need to do is find a way to make a living in a place that fits my needs, and my resume is pretty damned heavy.
I hope it doesn’t come to that, but if it does, I will be sure to reserve a foxhole for you if need be. I am tired of being born(e) into interesting times, myself. I’ve fought the good fight for almost 50 years here, and if after that time the U.S. still manages to elect someone like Trump, I am through. Let it fall apart with no further involvement from me.
Later…
AG
1980: Ronald Reagan elected. 1984: Reagan reelected. 2000: George W. Bush elected. 2004: Bush reelected.
You can quibble about whether or not Bush won his elections, but the fact is that enough Americans voted for him to make the elections close enough to be contested.
I’m second to none as a Beatles fan, but singing “Revolution” asking for a plan doesn’t really count as a plan either. I remember reading a contemporary column from Rolling Stone magazine about “Revolution” and the Stones’ “Street Fighting Man”, both released in August 1968. “Revolution” reverted to a let’s-all-be-friends approach, telling you not to carry pictures of Chairman Mao and promising, “Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right”. (And I forget which version of “Revolution” shows the Beatles were still teetering on an edge with the lyric, “Don’t you know that you can count me out (in)?”)
“Street Fighting Man” roars that “compromise solution” has failed and it’s time for “palace revolution”. The Stones are teetering on the edge, too, because a “sleepy London town” is no place for a “street fighting man.”
The Rolling Stones columnist wrote that the words and music of the Stones’ song forcefully called for revolution. The words of “Revolution” were a cop-out, but the music of “Revolution” told a different story, it’s hard-rock sound calling for revolution in its own way.
I know it’s a faux-pax to agree with Arthur, but I too would like to see a list of saner countries. Tribal(religion/political/etc.)-based bigotry of any sort is prone to break out in any country given the right conditions. The Beatles sang, tongue-in-cheek but reflecting British society at the time, “Don’t dig no Pakistanis … takin’ all the people’s jobs … Get Back!”. (Which later morphed into “Get Back” obviously!)
Given the right circumstances (rising gas prices, flagging economy, another direct ISIS or sort-of ISIS terror attack like San Bernandino, etc.), our country could well elect a Trump or a Cruz.
Reagan and W. Bush each had been elected and re-elected to their State executive offices. These are very different histories than Trump’s, a man who has never won an electoral vote anywhere, and Cruz’s, a man who has won one non-executive election in a place and time where ultrapartisanship was a rational path to victory, unlike the Presidency in 2016. Reagan and W. Bush also did not busy themselves severely alienating multiple large and growing voting blocs, as Trump and Cruz have done.
Reagan and Bush Sr. certainly did;
Ask Lee Atwater
You also write:
I did, in late August. Trump. Still Rising. How…And By Whom…Can He Be Stopped?
‘Nuf said.
Mockery has not only not worked, it has boomeranged!!!
Protests?
As this Trump force continues to grow…it is already at near critical mass…”protestors” will be about as useful as they would have been at Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies.
I repeat what I have been saying for almost 6 months…once an insanity of this magnitude finds a powerful front man, counter-movements that are “sane” become relatively useless. Waiting for “the usual” so-called sane thing to happen is like sitting in front of the fireplace waiting for Sanity Clause. Groucho and Chico knew.
Ain’t no Sanity Clause!!!
Not anymore there isn’t.
It’s just going to get…crazier…one way or another. Or possibly a third.
Watch.
Critical mass is only about one Trump mass meeting away.
Watch.
AG
Again…
Not an effective general election strategy.
Not an effective general election strategy.?
We shall see.
Soon enough.
November is only 8 months away.
Watch.
AG
November is 8 months away?
I sincerely hope the Trump campaign believes as you do. As you are running the Trump Will Be President campaign over here, perhaps the Donald’s campaign staff gave you that incorrect belief.
I am to some degree dysnumeric. If I’m not careful, numbers swim around in my brain. Sue me.
If, however, after having supposedly read what I have been saying here you think that I am running some sort of Trump campaign, you are seriously dyslexic.
Or simply dishonest.
Or both, of course.
Have a nice day…
AG
I guess it depends on what you mean by predicting this effect.
Here’s me on a “conservative” blog, predicting on July 22 that Trump would remain “valid” in the polls until the day after the 2016 election. Of course, I chose the day after because I have been assuming he’d be the nominee. In fact, I even thought a Trump/Cruz or Cruz/Trump ticket was possible, but that seems substantially less likely now that Trump has decided to kill off Cruz. I’m fairly sure I’ve made that prediction here, too. Mostly because Trump and Cruz are going to be sharing right-wing authoritarian voters, as each has a similar flavor but different amounts of spice.
http://goplifer.com/2015/07/22/guess-when-trumps-campaign-collapses/comment-page-1/#comment-50922
That blog is good, by the way, although the blogger would definitely be considered a RINO/center-left Republican by today’s standards. Hell, most of his commenters are liberals. To put it another way, if he was the Republican party, this country would be in terrific shape.
Anyway…Trump is a social dominator, and he has found his right-wing authoritarian audience in the Republican base that has been used for the past 50+ years without getting a single thing out of it. They’re poorer, and all of the minorities that they hate are starting to do as well or better than they are. Double f-you to the establishment, in other words.
So, what to do? Well, perhaps it’s akin to playing chicken, but I’d say get Trump nominated, so that we can hasten the destruction of the GOP as a national party, at least for an election cycle or two. Especially if we can get the House in time for 2020’s redistricting.
But that’s just me. I’ve been predicting Trump as the GOP nominee and it’s ultimate destruction for awhile now. He clearly owns the Republican base, which is tired of establishment candidates using dog whistles.
The reason why Trump can spread hatred and not lose the base is because they’re fucking tired of being embarrassed by their hatred, and Trump smirks and says it’s A-OK to let out your hate.
I’m still conflicted on whether to vote for him in the Georgia primary or not, to be honest. So, yeah, it’s a little like playing chicken. Some people think Trump could win, like AG, and that I’d be very stupid to vote for him in the primary, and I understand that. But, I just don’t see Trump winning.
The actual campaign of HRC v. Trump/Whomever has not began yet. They’re taking potshots at each other, but that’s pretty much it.
Trump may bring out some idiots and morons who don’t otherwise vote, but if HRC can capture most of the 2012 electorate and the anti-Trump vote, I see her crushing Trump like the gnat he really is, and I hope progressives are getting downticket races set up for it.
@Billmon1 and @HeetJeer predicted Trump’s rise and the arc of his rise (specifically using the word herrenvolk) way back in August.
In particular, Billmon said something that stuck with me to this day. And I agree with it. ‘The number one taboo of the MSM is to acknowledge how mean-spirited and bigoted much of America really is.’
It’s simultaneously amusing and horrifying. The MSM has thrown pretty much everything they can at Trump, including going full-Godwin. Yet their attacks continue to fall flat, because they haven’t advanced an inch towards the crucial step of recognizing the reason why Trump is doing so well is because a large portion of Pure, Holy, Traditional Real America are only one Reichstag fire away from donning white hoods.
It’s apparent that America didn’t reject fascism because people disagreed with social darwinism, ethnic purity, and authoritarianism. They rejected fascists because they wore blue shirts and this is a red-shirt only neighborhood.
The audacious and ignorant GOP debates will continue. Few candidates will bother to drop out because cash is still rolling in and everyone is playing their part. Of course, it is just a sham. But nobody can figure out what else can happen-who else can jump on stage.
But, perhaps, this is what might be happening:
The GOP Powers That Be Big Plan.
Outside the Cleveland convention hall, American Protestors will be attacked by CLE police & GOP private security all week.
Crazy but possible.
Brilliant future fiction even if it doesn’t come true.
I have been wondering the last few weeks…why the sudden rehabilitation of Ryan in the media?
Hmmmm…
UH oh!!!
Thank you.
AG
I read here and elsewhere that a Trump candidacy will mean the implosion of the Republican Party, maybe its end. That’s startling. Who can really imagine how that would play out? The consequences for the Democratic Party will be fateful, it wouldn’t be able to survive on its own. The symbiotic relationship between the two parties is what keeps it operational. If the Republicans, fold the Democratic Party will split in two, a Clinton party, drawing lots of former Republicans, and a more truly progressive party. Maybe even more parties will emerge. That might sound desirable but maybe not if coalition governments have to be formed, a process the USA has no experience with. Trump might lead us into much more confusion than he already has.
http://www.cafepress.com/+fuck-this-shit+bumper-stickers
Thanks for this post. One thing for Trump protesters to consider—and experiment with—is which tactics will work well against Trump.
I suspect a growing number of observant Muslims protesting in a determinedly nonviolent and dignified fashion would ultimately have an effect on Trump and/or his supporters.
I also suspect that if Trump opponents were as numerous, organized and clever as the Czech(?) students who gave an invading general a standing ovation…for 45 minutes before he gave up his attempt to deliver a speech at their university. How would Trump and his supporters react to a crowd of hundreds or thousands of outwardly supportive and enthusiastic people who wouldn’t stop cheering and applauding their “hero”?
Folks have the right to protest him, and if it moves them, they should.
OT:
Latest polls send shudders through Republican establishment
01/11/16 08:40 AM
By Steve Benen
The Iowa caucuses are just three weeks from today, and the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll, released over the weekend, offers little hope to the Republican establishment, waiting for its presidential nominating race to change. Here are the latest preferences from Hawkeye State Republicans:
The remaining candidates are each at 5% or lower. The results are very similar to the findings from the latest Fox News poll, released late Friday, which found Cruz leading Trump in Iowa, 27% to 23%, followed by Rubio at 15%.
To be sure, conditions can change over the course of three weeks – the GOP candidates will participate in two more debates between now and Feb. 1 – but the polling in Iowa has been fairly steady since early December, and Republican insiders eager to see Cruz and/or Trump falter have reason to feel anxious. Indeed, both major polls show the top two with at least 50% of the vote.
The picture in New Hampshire is noticably different:
As with Iowa, the remaining candidates are each at 5% or lower.
In particular, the Muslim woman who tried the provocative maneuver of standing silently was badly treated.
But many of the other protesters seem to be . . . a bit rote. Almost as if they’re playing a role. Rehearsed, you know what I mean? They stand up, yell something unintelligible, and Trump gives an airy wave of the hand and barks “Get ’em out of here!” The crowd goes crazy for his authoritarian stand. The protesters, who somehow slipped through security (even when the venue is limited to 1,400 heavily screened individuals and 20,000 tickets were distributed), go docilely out of the auditorium.
Then Hulk Hogan jumps in the ring to the strains of “I Am A Real American” tears off his shirt and . . .