Much has happened in the wake of the first Justice Sunday, a national rally for theocracy led by Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council and James Dobson of Focus on the Family in April. The showdown over the nuclear option came and went. Several judges the theocrats liked were confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate. Religious progressives have begun to organize. And now, with more federal judgeships up for consideration, including at least one opening on the Supreme Court, Justice Sunday II is planned for August 14th in Nashville.
I wrote a bit about all this yesterday. And today I found an analysis of the first Justice Sunday, titled “On the Brink of Theocracy,” written by Reverend Carlton W. Veazey, president of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. The Religious Coalition “is an alliance of national organizations from major faiths, affiliates throughout the country, and the national Clergy for Choice Network, Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom, and The Black Church Initiative. While our members are religiously and theologically diverse, they are unified in the commitment to preserve reproductive choice as a basic part of religious liberty.”
Here are a few excerpts from Veazy’s analysis, but it is worth reading the whole thing — and spreading it widely. This is a time when some democrats are making noises about abandoning Roe vs. Wade. It is a view not shared by thousands of mainstream religious leaders who are prochoice, prosexuality education, and certain theocratic demagogues not withstanding, obviously pro-faith.
“Progressives who think warnings about ‘theocracy’ are an exaggeration should take a closer look at ‘Justice Sunday: Filibustering People of Faith,’ Veazy wrote. The event was “beamed into conservative churches across the country: a political rally from a large, comfortable mega-church in Louisville, with a middle-class audience listening with rapt attention to political operatives who self-identify as religious leaders-and at the bottom of the screen, streaming video with the photos, names and phone numbers of targeted U.S. senators. The visual message was clear: the church is dominant over the state and senators should toe the line on eliminating the filibuster and confirming Bush judges or pay the price.”
“There is a right way and a wrong way to engage religious voices in the public square. I believe “Justice Sunday” reflects the latter and highlights several disturbing trends… As a Baptist minister for more than 40 years with a profound respect for religious freedom and pluralism, I fear it will get worse. In fact, I think we are teetering on the brink of theocracy and the Christian Right could conceivably use the battle over the judiciary and weakening support for reproductive rights to push us over the edge….”
“One of the “Justice Sunday” speakers, Dr. Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary… believes there is only one correct interpretation of the Bible — his — and he equated the inerrancy of his interpretation of the Bible with the inerrancy of the Constitution, based on his biblical beliefs. In bringing the Bible and the Constitution together, fundamentalists like Mohler are moving toward mainstreaming their biblically based interpretation of the Constitution. Judges would be held to the standard of biblical teachings, as interpreted by fundamentalists. I don’t doubt the sincerity of Mohler and other fundamentalist ministers who share this view that the Bible is literally true and they alone know what it means, but they are on dangerous ground when they then suggest that they alone also know what the Constitution means-and that anyone who thinks differently is anti-Christian. Christians have strong differences of opinion on the meaning of scriptures and most of us don’t want to see a particular brand of Christianity held up as the only real Christianity. We certainly don’t want a particular brand of Christianity enacted as the law of the land.”
“Reproductive justice is an issue on which they hope to divide and conquer progressives.”
“In my view, the intensifying battle over the courts has brought progressives face-to-face with the need to take a firm stand on the morality of reproductive rights. Not only must we overcome the polarization generated by the Christian Right, we also must find a way to come together in compassionate concern for women and families. Speaking as a minister, I believe that the realities of women’s lives must be included in any vision of a moral society that honors individual dignity and worth. I believe that women, and men, cannot live in dignity and equality if they cannot render for themselves their most intimate family decisions.”
[Crossposted at Talk to Action]
is coming right up. Will we be ready?
I’ve said it before — elsewhere — and I’ll say it again: reproductive choice is not a negotiable issue for Democrats. The theocratic fifth column has chosen Roe v. Wade as the final battleground in the war against a free society, and if we surrender that battle, we lose the war.
There are a couple of reasons for this. One is that it will set a precedent for the Bible as the foundation of secular law. The other, and perhaps most important and — for certain factions in the left — hardest to grasp, is that Roe v. Wade isn’t about abortion. It’s about the fundamental equality and freedom of human beings. It’s about the freedom to say that two plus two equals four, as Orwell might say.
If women, who are after all the majority of the population, are returned to chattel status — and that is what the pro-life movement is really about — then the rest of us, liberals, non-Christians, gays, ethnic minorities, are all just smaller fish waiting to be devoured by the theocratic leviathan. Women’s rights are the dam that holds back the flood of neo-medievalism. When it bursts, everything else will be carried away, and it will not happen slowly. This is not a long, slippery slope; it is a tipping point for the collapse of a secular, pluralistic, free society.
You don’t have to look far for historical examples. In the rise of every major totalitarian state, whether the Nazi, Soviet, or Communist Chinese empires, there was a critical point when one major opposition faction was overcome, and everyone else either fell into line or was carted away. In Nazi Germany, it was Kristallnacht. In the Soviet Union, it was the purge of the Mensheviks. In Red China, it was the Cultural Revolution.
In America, it is Roe v. Wade. We either hold the line here or face an irrecoverable rout. And the enemy knows it. I’d feel some hope if more liberals knew it instead of thinking that it was just a bargaining chip. That’s what the ayatollahs of the religious right want us to think. This is no time for appeasement.
That was the response from the spouse when I read this to him.
As we saw in the Schiavo case, the supposed “pro-life” movement is more “pro-control” than anything else.
The Religious Reich wants to put GOD in charge…but since GOD is busy elsewhere, they’ve appointed themselves as HIS personal representatives. Anyone who doesn’t toe the line with Their personal expressions of GOD, well, they’re unbelievers who deserve no part of the Grace of GOD in HIS nation.
We on the side of choice have made a major error…we’ve allowed the Right to equate “pro-choice” with “pro-abortion”. We need to take back the framing, turn it somehow into a medical issue rather than a political/religious one, and show how the “pro-life” side wants to have a say in every part of our lives, from what our kids learn in school, what we get to watch on TV or listen to on the radio, all the way to when and how we get to die.
It concerns me that far too many people are getting too distracted about far too many other things and losing sight of this.
The Rove feeding frenzy was, I think, inevitable, but removing or jailing him, or even just tarring Bush and the Republicans, is a major victory. He appears to be one of the prime strategists pushing this repulsive agenda.
Also, I’d note that Roe V Wade is a major issue, but not the major issue. The theocrats are focused on it, yes, but they’re still attacking on other fronts, and if we lose any, we lose it all. Evolution in the classroom, public prayer, free culture, gay rights… Basically, their objective is to get their foot in the door. Set a precedent acknowledging the supremacy of Church over State. They do that, they’ve won. And they can do that by institutionalizing discrimination on religious grounds (Roe and Gays), by controlling culture (content cartels, big software companies), or by corrupting the education system.