[Promoted by susanhu. Edited only for format. This is a must-read, as is Rumi’s first comment.]
While not a surprise, given all that has transpired in Bush’s term, it still was a shocker to read that bloggers are now “terrorists.” The nature of blogger terrorist acts should be a concern for both liberal and conservative bloggers: “Deliberate misinformation campaigns” may well describe actions taken by right-wingers and “activist calls” describes actions by bloggers regardless of political affiliation.
Homeland Security completed its “Cyber Storm” wargame to test how our government “would respond to devastating attacks over the Internet from anti-globalization activists, underground hackers and bloggers.” Given that homeland security ran the “wargame,” one may infer that the nature of the attacks by bloggers must be national security related. And, given that the major national security fear of our government is terrorists, then it looks like bloggers have made our government’s hit list of potential terrorists. But, what is the nature of this “terrorist crime” that was the subject of these wargames?
“Participants confirmed parts of the worldwide simulation challenged government officials and industry executives to respond to deliberate misinformation campaigns and activist calls by Internet bloggers, online diarists whose “Web logs” include political rantings and musings about current events.”
There are other indications that the Bush administration deems bloggers well within the reach of any definition of terrorist, if for no other reason than the crime of dissent and criticism. There are also indicators that relevant parties would be somewhat prepared to assist in the nabbing of terrorist bloggers:
(1) In what may have been a precursor to US bloggers, the US military and government apparently were not offended (at least did not take any publicly disclosed action to free the blogger) when an Iraqi blogger was arrested, interrogated and imprisoned for the crime of reading comments on another blogger’s website at a public café:
“Then finally I understood why I was there, after few hours. Security guards at the university had printed out all the websites I was reading while I was online there. They were accusing me of “reading terrorism sites” and “having communications with foreign terrorists”.
“Do you know what these pages are?”
I looked at them and figured out they were the comment section of Raed in the Middle!!
I opened the comments section while browsing in the university, read some comments, and didn’t even post anything. But these people don’t seem to know what the internet is, and they don’t speak English, so I was a major suspect of being an assistant of al Zarqawi maybe! Or that I have a terrorist group of my own, with foreign connections!
I was accused of terrorism, and sent to jail after they decided that I’m not helping myself because I am not helping them!!!
“The U.S. government is developing a massive computer system that can collect huge amounts of data and, by linking far-flung information from blogs and e-mail to government records and intelligence reports, search for patterns of terrorist activity.”
(3) “The CIA is quietly funding federal research into surveillance of Internet chat rooms as part of an effort to identify possible terrorists, newly released documents reveal.”
“Last December, Microsoft shut down the Web site of a dissident Chinese blogger. A few months earlier, Yahoo gave Beijing the name of a dissident Chinese journalist. He got ten years in jail for his Web postings. Ironically, Google’s Chinese kowtow comes as the company is resisting efforts by the U.S. government for access to its records.”
(5) Indymedia was a subject of a secret, international terrorism investigation in which US government seized its hard drives. A Texas Internet company turned over hard drives pursuant to a court order under an international treaty governing crimes of terrorism, kidnapping and money laundering.
(6) The MSM has shown its willingness to paint bloggers and any lefty journalists as the domestic evil axis of treasonists so that the American people will understand the need to arrest bloggers to make this country safe from terrorists.
(7) The CIA now has its own bloggers and a government website that are part of a revised CIA office for monitoring, translating and analyzing publicly available information. It is good news that the CIA is evaluating publicly available information in the fight against terrorism. The problem is we now know that when our government says “monitoring,” it’s not just al-Qaeda.
Continued BELOW:
(8) The Bush administration refused to turn over control of the Internet to an international body, preferring to maintain unilateral control over the Internet. The fear is that “policy decisions could at a stroke make all Web sites ending in a specific suffix essentially unreachable.”
It should be noted that some of these indicators on their face are equivocal, but perhaps should be considered in the context of actions and policies of this administration. In this context, the Bush wagons are circling bloggers. And, once the perception is created that bloggers are a danger to national security, that perception is hard to unravel. The danger is that the American people will continue to follow Bush’s lead like sheep frightened by the terrorist wolf.
(Cross posted at Daily Kos, My Left Wing, MyDD and Patriot Daily)
I’ve tried to bring all of these points into discussion over the past 3 years but few people seemed interested. I hope you have better luck.
Thanks for the good vibes! It may be a thud, but I just cross posted at Daily Kos, My Left Wing, MyDD and Patriot Daily, maybe that will help get the word out and trigger some discussion.
The first sign of success of the administration/media campaign to label bloggers a threat will be a significant drop in ad revenues across the board.
One of the few growing parts of the economy will once again suffer under Bush and the bipartisan assistance.
indeed we’re ‘terrists’ because armed with our keyboards, we dare counter the deception, bare the lies. Democracy, freedom of expression are only for wingnuts, they own the truth. As for over there, freedom and democracy is on the march; that’s a fig leaf.
Reagan would have called us “freedom fighters against an evil empire” …erm, administration.
How the times have changed. But then, 9/11 changed everything as we’re told to give up our civil liberties as that will keep us safe.
Twice fooled.
Ya think?
I think the issue is what the govt defines as terrorist association and then prosecutes it according to their interperetation of the laws. I am not a terrorist nor would I support that activity. I am a pacifist, legalist or whatever term applies to enacting positive change through peaceful, lawful process. That doesn’t much matter if the gun wielding one(not me) says differently.
We need to identify the issues properly before they can be discussed. Is the issue the definition of a word or is the issue one of enabling the power to define all words?
Pardon me if you think I misunderstood the issue under discussion.
If you believe we ‘innocent’ bloggers can’t be ensnared and that our fourth amendment rights are not usurped, I suggest you read this very interesting piece by ReddHedd at FDL, firedoglake, on the recent decision of Judge Hogan – rendered on 02/02/06.
So as they sweep for terrorists blogging activity, desidents, political activists are culled, placed on the no fly lists?
desidents, sedition, terrorists what’s the difference? Given that Wapo’s Brady and other wingnuts have labelled bloggers on the left as angry. it’s not a far stretch engaging in email surveillance over the web and blogging surveillance.
do click on the link for specific link tothe CNET articleciting the judge’s decision. At FDL, scroll down to “Of Pen Registers and the Patriot Act”
http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2006_02_12_firedoglake_archive.html#113975879225971013
I must’ve just misunderstood your comment. Sorry about that if that’s the case.
I’ve traced down the routes on a few problem issues that are mentioned in that post. The govt and especially the private contractors have been involved in this for years and now the Bush administration is laying the last groundwork to make a move on a good bit of that ‘evidence’.
3 or 4 years ago, there was a common problem with Indymedia servers that had page requests redirected to another site. The sites involved and apparently responsible for the browser hijack traced back to registrations in specific locations, names and businesses that were common in other controversial but govt sanctioned issues.
They moved beyond legitimate surveillance to entrapment several years ago. That’s just one instance.
What I’m saying is that the discussion of who is a credible legitimate threat is moot. The threat is whatever the govt claims it is and the case is built around that and actually, under the claim of security, evidence can be weakly circumstantial and there’s nothing the accused can do about it.
Hi, can you embed your links so they don’t make the page too wide for those of us who set our monitors at 600×800?
E-mail me if you’d like instructions. It’s very easy. Thanks.
thanks, some others have already called me out. And one was most kind, gave me the heads up on how to. I’m not html literate but I’m a fast study.
manacles and waterboard says you’re a terrorist, you’re a terrorist.
It is not because you have enabled him to define the word. His guns have done that.
indeed the global absinthe market is in danger of collapse.
Yeah and it might hurt the book sales too.
Working on my book this morning, I’ve been writing on the Sedition Act of 1798 in relation to my contention that the “democratic-republican” societies of the time (targets of the law, along with others in opposition to the government) have a direct relationship to the political blog sites (dKos, BooMan, MyDD, MyLeftWing, and all the rest) of today. Taking a break, I look in on BooMan… and here you are, making my argument for me!
One note of hope: the Sedition Act did not work. Yes, it did lead to some 25 arrests and 10 convictions, but these people quickly became heroes… and the government backed off.
I hope our system is still as able to correct its course.
I don’t think there’s a happily ever after in store for the current state of the govt control.
You may be right. But I do retain faith that our system will be able to right itself.
I just hope it is soon!
They just finished conducting wargames against us and then advertising that fact. How much time do we have?
A newer, HUGE program to perform comprehensive analysis and build profiles of individuals based on archives of blogs and comments. Does that make it any more serious?
Oh, believe me, it is serious.
I do not belittle the importance of fighting this.
My point is simply that it is not a losing battle.
We can win this, if we fight.
The first thing that will happen, preceding the declaration of martial law by a few hours (hell, they may even present it as the proximate CAUSE of the declaration), will be the demise of the civilian internet due to some form of massive DDOS attack orchestrated by “terrorists intent on destroying the US way of life.”
Oddly enough, however, because these terrorists are so blinded by hate they can’t hack well, they will entirely miss their target, those portions of the network essential to US military command and control functions, and will instead render the entire network inaccessible except through government and military IPs… all of which will be dutifully reported via the MSM, along with heroic accounts of government geeks doing their heroic but ultimately inadequate best to thwart the attacks.
This game is a political distraction, no more. The bloggers and the dissenters have refused so far to be drawn off the Domestic Spying issue, so this is the next “hey, look over here.”
When they’re ready and it’s real, there will be no threats, there will simply be an end.
to also miss the major e-commerce sites.
I don’t think so. That’ll be one of the first parts Our Heroic Geeks will get restored, of course, but remember — They hate our way of life. They will, ineptly of course, accidentally take out anything that might allow the competent NonGovernmentalGeeks to be able to get into a position where they could conceivably hack servers themselves and communicate in that fashion. No, these guys are SO bad that they’re going to render all POSSIBILITY of non-official wide-reach communication a null until the NGGs can be neutralized.
Think of it as an ENFORCED one-week boycott. It won’t actually AFFECT things at the bottom line because, like the one-day gas boycotts, the day after there are lines at the pumps.
I could easily see that happening. Then once everything is “restored,” they could, as another poster suggested, set up “free speech cyber zones” where people could express their opinions, subject of course to careful moderation, to weed out pro-terror “trolls.”
You got it.
Buy time, get rid of the dangerous ones, let the whackos yap. It’ll take a little time to get all the reeducation centers set up, so we have a brief foray into the Roman Empire (worship who you want, bitch all you want, just pay your taxes and do as you’re told) before we get to 1984.
And of course it’s not a matter of shutting down free speech; we TOLD you, it’s the Terrorists that shut it all down, WE’RE the ones trying to get it fixed for you.
I think there is more than one possibility but a fast end is one of them. The blowback of total net control is the loss of revenue in several areas and the need for an illusion of freedom of speech. I think it’s more likely to be fractured into ‘approved’ areas where content and access are controlled but movement within AA is relatively free. Money will help decide who goes where.
doesn’t this relate specifically to the recent news that internet service providers (the big ones) are wanting to be able to control what content we access and possibly eradicating “questionable” activities like file sharing?
see: http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/3180
it’s getting scarier and scarier. if people here don’t read 2600 The Hacker Quarterly, they should. they have been fighting this fight for a long, long time and if you read their editorials they see these same problems. check http://www.2600.com and their radio shows/podcasts. the hacker community (the real one) is a natural ally of ours and one we may very well need in a real sense in the near future.
(or maybe I’ve just read one too many William Gibson novels)
hey, thanks for that link. I hadn’t seen that one yet.
Let me share this, from James Morton Smith and published first in 1952, during the height of the red scare:
Sound familiar?
The first view is the patriotic American one. The second is that of the Bush administration, contravening our most cherished traditions.
Which power is in control now?
The unAmerican one, quite clearly. The neo-con Bush one.
Yet another horror on top of horror, but also not at all surprising, considering that the Bush mal-administration exists as a governing entity almost solely in terms of perception.
Ergo, challenges to this perception are really the greatest threat to their ‘governance.’
So, “…why do you hate their freedom?”
😉
Something to keep in mind: Every group that has an agenda is out to label boggers…. not just the government/Bush.
The media have tried to label us as angry, insignificant, lacking facts, etc.
Certain extemists have tried to attack us, bash us — from both the far right and the far left, and both from outside blogs and inside blogs. They try to blast us for poor reporting, lack of facts, etc. They try to intimidate us by singling out certain blogs and bloggers for attack. They try to take advantage of the more naive liberal bloggers who think we can dialogue with rightwing and leftwing extemists.
So, the enemies of blogs are not just the Bush administration.
It’s more accurate to say that the attitude of govt is that all bloggers are an enemy of the govt and will be treated as such.
They’re mad because you keep exposing them as incompetent hacks furthering a right-wing agenda.
Peter Daou has a very good analytical story on this. Snippet:
And what about those trolls at Daily Kos? They’re either self-appointed, or assigned, agitprops. We’ve had some here too. Those DKos trolls have really disrupted conversations, and dividded members against members.
I think one of those most egregious examples of coordinated trolling at dKos involves what they’ve done to Chuck Pennacchio over there. And what that effort really tells me is that they know just what a HUGE sack of shit Casey is, but someone’s already given them their marching orders. And they follow them.
Furthering that whole “angry left” meme, lately it seems that there’s a lot more attacks on individual bloggers over there (soj and MSOC come to mind), as if they’ve forgotten that we’re all supposed to be on the same side. I guess people with progressive values need to get out, because the “big tent” is only big enough to make room for anti-choice DINOs.
And why wouldn’t we be angry? It’s feels like we’re screaming into the abyss lately. No matter what atrocities BushCo has committed, they are NEVER called on them by the traditional media.
Just like companies hire virals to talk up products on message boards, politicians are going to do the same thing.
You will see, as the “election campaign” gets underway, every candidate and his brother will have operatives on every blog they can find, including this one. And the parties themselves also put their people around.
That is just as predictable a phenomenon as people posting their own “rantings and musings” that disagree with US policies, and posting links to news stories that “make US look bad.”
I was really referring to them as 2 separate types of agitators. Groups with a defined political agenda, and groups with just a general intent to disrupt.
Didn’t know that, CG…. I’m sick they’ve done that to Chuck Pennacchio. is it mostly beause Kos has pronounced Casey a shoo-in, and they’re being “practical,” they think, in bashing Chuck?
I can “see” their argument re supporting Casey because we need to get a majority in Congress. But, ick. He’d be worse than Lieberman, it sounds. (At least Lieberman is great on environmental issues, sometimes, and is pro-choice.)
But Pennacchio has big appeal and, if Kos would just give him a spotlight, he could really pick up some steam! Dammit!
Here’s a recent sample, although that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
and what about the “data-miners” at DKos who sought out information about me, my place of employment (and my husband’s–actually, not even our place of employment–the place where we offer VOLUNTEER programs for inner city youth as a community service!!!!!), and used the information gleaned from their “investigative citizen journalism” efforts to suggest that we were “frauds”, that our whole operation (www.chidjembe.com) was a fraud, re-posting that information [none of which we have made publically available, ever; the information was viciously and maliciously sought out in a “connect the dots” process of meticulous google searches] here as well, with very little resistance, neither from site administrators nor from this community, thereby seeking to undermine the efforts of two people who really, really not only seek to, but actually succeed in giving back to their own community in ways that some of those 401K bloggers could never so much as imagine?
Were they rightwing trolls, or am I one of the “leftist extremists” whom the lukewarm left is best advised to disassociate itself from and/or eliminate?
I get the feeling that, if the gov were to come and slap 5-to-10 on me for expressing my views, it would be cause for great celebration in some sectors of the blogosphere, hopefully not here, definitely not on progressiveindependent, but on DKos? DU? PFC? You bet. Scarey shit.
My question again: what does the “liberal” “left” have in mind for those of us whose thinking is clearly situated to the “far left”, but who have no violent tendencies or “disruptive designs”–who just think and live pretty far outside the box?
Are we supposed to shut up? Where do our ideas fit in the blogosphere and where do we fit in the post-B*shCo world the bloggers are trying to bring about? When B*schCo comes knocking can we count on the lukewarm left to have our backs or will they turn on us? Call us traitors, disruptors, actively seek to defame, vilify, and destroy us, whatever, just because we think differently?
Personally, I’m more afraid of certain bloggers than I am of B*shCo.
(Es gilt, weiterzuschreiben. –Ingeborg Bachmann)
I remember reading on dKos quite some time ago how they knew that there were Republican trolls who were paid to spend time posting there during the run-up to the 2004 primaries and to cause as much trouble as they could. Personally, I’ve seen what looks like a similar tactic by centrist Dems on that site (and others) since then. The machine – both of its two heads – knows that we are a threat to their ingrained ways. They will fight us, and they will continue to use some shady tactics to keep us in line.
What’s amazing is that in my political readings and political activism, I know that there are far more “outside the box” lefties than one would think by reading the blogs yet those voices seem to be more marginalized in cyberspace than in meatspace. I mean, where are the blog voices that represent the Chomskys, the Zinns, the Ward Churchills, the indymedia/anti-globalists? (Yeah, I know, I should be one of those voices, but not everyone has the time/resources to devote to such things.)
My point is that even those voices are marginalized in the blogosphere, where they should run rampant. From my experience, alot of these types of people get tired of being accosted in comments sections of places like dKos and end up abandoning it altogether to further narrow the scope of debate.
My point is, I was accused of being a right-wing plant/troll.
Gimme a break: my work is all over the net and I’ve published controversial academic papers that are as radically left-wing as much of what I post on the net. (I also subsequently wrote about my concerns with this defamation of the far left by the lukewarm left here
I’ve been staunchly left wing since the day I was born, and there really isn’t a “mean-spirited” bone in my body. I have always been more politically active than your average joe–and frankly, I don’t think the left can afford to lose anymore “far left” intellectuals/activists/vote-the-lesser-evil folk like me. Apparently, administrators of some major liberal blogs seem to think they can. Fine.
I’m pretty sure the people who hounded me were “genuine” liberals, whether the people who did the “digging” up of information that had no business being out there were, I know not. That is scarey, because frankly, I expect to be trashed to the nines by right-wingers, I expect rightwingers to be digging around in my underwear drawer, let em; when the left does it….well, it’s not only disappointing.
It is scarey. Extremely.
Lordy, I remember that like it was yesterday. The folks involved sure seemed quite self-satisfied at their handiwork, and seemed to get the proverbial wink & nod from good ol’ Markos. In the same context in which you were accused of being fraudulent, I recall someone (my recall of names eludes me) who posted a time or two that you “claimed to be of American Indian descent” which I suppose could be taken one of two ways: 1) merely an objective avowal that indeed that is how you identify yourself or 2) code for smearing you as an alleged fraudster (after all, part of the treatment Ward Churchill received consisted of accusations regarding his ethnicity). Which ever way the person posting intended the message, there is little doubt in my mind that for many who read it, further ammo was added for their witch hunt.
Not only on blogs do we have liberals bashing liberals over the ‘freedom of the press issues.’ There is a lot of cross-preaching going on in the major newspapers as well. It keeps us distracted from the numbers of war dead, the civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, starvation in Africa, chaos in Haiti, the death toll from Katrina, the homeless in New Orleans and Mississippi, Bush scandals, the potential attack on Iran…
Without freedom of the press we would not know about those issues, we would have to rely on blogs to be informed, oh wait…
They try to blast us for poor reporting, lack of facts, etc.
Speaking of which, FoxNews is currently reporting that Saddam really did have weapons of mass destruction and hid them away presumably to embarrass Bush, according to a former Iraqi general.
I can’t think of a single legitimate news outlet that hasn’t reported blatant misinformation and lies within the last month. Blogs aren’t always great, but the current alternatives for news are uniformly horrible. Where else are we supposed to go if we want to know what is actually going on in our country?
occasions where blogs have brought out details or hightlighted aspects of a story that Washington would prefer to see less discussion of, thus committing acts of terror.
It is just logical, if one makes a real-time, 24-7 network of individuals and information available, these things will happen.
And as blogs have become more popular, even the corporate media has begun to mention them.
While shutting down the internet would not be business-friendly, in an abundance of caution the warlords are quite naturally casting about for solutions to the problem of a global collective system of individuals, many of whom oppose US policies, and are therefore terrorists.
occasions where blogs have brought out details or hightlighted aspects of a story that Washington would prefer to see less discussion of, thus committing acts of terror.
The problem with this is that too many bloggers still rely on the MSM for stories to break on, say, torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. To be fair, there ARE stories in the MSM that do reveal much, but they tend not to get much “play,” particularly on television and radio news.
Sy Hersh and Jane Mayer’s stories in The New Yorker come to mind. Where would those of us who wrote about Guantanamo/Camp Bucca/etc. be without those two writers? They led the way. They dug up the facts. They talked to the right people.
Then there are groups like the ACLU, Amnesty, CCR … they break news too … and we bloggers rely heavily on them. Heavily.
Now, if only the local TV stations led their evening news with those journalists’ and those groups’ revelations.
So, blogs provide a vital role in spotlighting the big stories by writers/groups like those.
And it’s great when consevative bloggers like Andrew Sullivan also speak out — vociferously — about the torture/detaionee/rendition issues. That’s as it should be because it’s not a political issue, basically. It’s a human rights issue.
Which idiots like Fred Barnes know nothing about. A couple weekends ago, I saw Barnes on Russert’s cable show, and he insisted that waterboarding is not torture.
I told BooMan that story on the phone, and we agreed that Barnes should try having people waterboard him, and then let us know if it’s torture. I digress … but here too, we bloggers can expose those kinds of insane comments that (OF COURSE!) went unchallenged by Russert.
With the incompetence and ineptitude of the Bush administration, they will be seizing computers left and right from school kids to grandmas. No one will be safe.
I’ll have to be careful what I write to my brother in Seattle. Guess I will phone him instead, oops NSA is spying on international phone conversations. The only thing left is to write him letters in code, or maybe I will send him some cartoons.
One of the first things Bush did after 9/11 was empower postal and utility workers to spy on citizens and report suspicious activities.
I use postcards mostly.
When I started online with my home computer in 1993, my computer guy told me, your emails are like postcards.
I can just imagine what we said about Micro$oft
🙂
Maybe we should hire Navajo Code Talkers as “ghost writers”. heheh.
I was going to make a joke about the NSA denying it was tapping and intercepting smoke signals but I didn’t want anyone to take it the wrong way
;)…no offense would be intended, toward innocent parties.
Actually, the tappers did the intercept but couldn’t figure out the encryption.
damn good thing smoke signals are uninterceptible–largely b/c imperceptible–!
Here, have one: poof! 😉
(I just came from sites on Anna Akhmatova, who do you think will get blacklisted first? me, for reading that commie pinko shit [even if it’s just part of my Job, perhaps esp then!), or boomantribune for being the next place I visited!
I developed a game for when I’m bored called Stop the Server. It’s not a denial of service or anything malicious at all. It’s similar to an old pasttime called googleslamming or something in which the goal was to compile a 2 word search that returned no results. It’s harder than it sounds. Anyway, my wide diversity of obscure search words and their combinations (in political research) could raise so many flags at one time it would completely seize up with indecision,….or something 😉
“googlewhacking” ;-).
Feels like ancient history almost doesn’t it?
Yrah! That’s the one, thanks.
Dick Cheney just shot someone while hunting in Texas. He seems to be taking this “war” thing a bit too seriously. I wonder how FoxNews is going to spin this.
some solid leads on the shooting victim’s Al Qaeda links by this evening.
He was quoted off the record as saying about if it looks like a duck and talks like a duck…