You wanna know what fries me about the draft-dodger, chickenshit chickenhawk Dick Cheney’s self-serving speech yesterday to the Wyoming legislature, whose members probably spent last night gargling straight bourbon after all that over-the-top histrionic screaming and cheering as Cheney stepped to the roster? (To replicate the sound, mix 500 Britney Spears screamin’ fans with those annual phony, pseudo-military SOTU hurrahs.)
Here’s what fried me: Dick waxing fondly about his cozy, early-married days while tens of thousands of other young men his age were dying in Vietnam.
The first years of our marriage were spent at Laramie in student housing, while Lynne taught in the English Department and I was a graduate student … [it’s] more than four decades since the first time I stepped foot into this chamber, back in 1965 …[…]
It was a very different time. In those days there was no legislative staff to speak of, one attorney, as I recall, who served both chambers, and a few secretaries; and two interns, one for each chamber. I was the Senate intern and also a first-year graduate student at the University of Wyoming. In addition, I was a newlywed — so you can bet I drove home to Laramie every night. (Laughter.)
Those 40 days in 1965 constituted the entire session of the Wyoming 38th Legislature, and for me the experience was one of life’s turning points. … (From the Wyoming speech, with its nifty title — “Vice President’s Remarks at the 2006 Wyoming Legislature Budget Session” — White House V.P. site)
What a sweet life, eh? Cheney got five deferments to keep that sweet life goin’ and his political career blossoming.
He gets to brag about having a hot sex life with Lynne every night (while she got through it by fantasizing about Lesbian lovers, no doubt). While other young men and women never got to get married or — if they were — see their spouses or their children again. Or even have children.
The modus operandi? “Let the other guys die and get shot up; Dick’s stayin’ alive. Let the schmoozing and networking begin. And, at times like this (after shooting a liberal Republican), boy aren’t those old buddies handy for a fuzzy wuzzy pump-me-up! session?”
Some observers were surprised — but we aren’t, are we — that Cheney’s canned speech mentioned his shooting victim, Harry Whittington, only once, almost in passing.
Keith Olbermann noted last night (no transcript yet) that Dick Cheney’s approval ratings have sunk to 29%. BooMan wrote that Peggy Noonan put up a WSJ trial balloon to see if this’d be a good time to dump the chickenshit chickenhawk. For certain, it’s a mess:
Vice President Dick Cheney said he didn’t immediately disclose his hunting accident because he wanted the confusing details to come out right. Instead, authorized accounts came out slowly ā and often still wrong.
The result: a week of shifting blame, belatedly acknowledged beer consumption (not “zero” drinking after all) and evolving discrepancies in how the shooting happened, its aftermath and the way it was told to the nation. … “VP Accident Tale Filled With Discrepancies,” A.P./Yahoo, 25 minutes ago
Taylor Marsh has interviewed many hunting experts and gives great credit to Alex Jones and others at INFOWARS.com who conducted a scientific ballistics test, available via video. Among their preliminary findings:
- “Cheney claims that he shot Whittington at 90 feet” … “As Alex Jones says and illustrates in the video, most of the bbs go around the victim at 90 yards. In our own Dick Cheney field test, we discerned the same pattern …”
- “”The pieces of shot didn’t even penetrate” the rubber dummy Alex Jones was using in his simulation video, shooting at 30 yards. Whittington had on three layers of clothing, an undershirt, a jacket and a safety vest, but Jones only used two layers of clothing. The pellets ‘simply bounced off.’ Some went in 1/10th of a millimeter, some went into the dummy 1 millimeter. The rubber dummy simulates human skin rather closely.”
- “Jones reminds us that Cheney says he wheeled 180 degrees around, which is a real break in hunting rules. You never shoot anywhere but in front of you …” (There’s more)
Taylor Marsh, at the end of her piece, does offer this caveat: “Alex Jones has put forth many a conspiracy theories in his time, no doubt. You will have to consider that as well as you view the video. I certainly did.”
Also, a conservative blogger at Riehl World View Blog wrote a detailed description of his own scientific analyses, and comes up with an entirely different conclusion:
Either way, there’s absolutely no reason to conclude reports as regards the distance being 30 yards are inaccurate . It’s simply more wishful thinking by the Cheney hunting left. Frankly, given their accuracy, I think I’d prefer to hunt with the VP.
Since I know zilch about guns – and have no desire to learn – I’ll stay open-minded.
Taylor Marsh analyzes the scientific info further:
The evidence is amassing so that the mainstream media will have to eventually pick this fact up, hopefully with other gun and bird experts weighing in.
One thing Jones also talks about is a one-foot area of birdshot. But as Dr. Bernadine Healy said earlier this week, reports also show that Mr. Whittington was hit in his lungs and liver, making the area closer to a two-foot pattern of birdshot. This actually makes Jones’ and our case stronger. In fact, Dr. Healy said that Whittington was actually “shot in the heart,” throwing question on the “mild heart attack” report, which others have also questioned.
As Jones also points out, as have doctors, it’s impossible to imagine the birdshot going through Whittington’s three layers of clothing, his skin, his muscle, ribcage, gristle, bones, the muscles around the heart, to lodge in his heart. It just doesn’t add up. We know the pellet couldn’t have drifted into the heart because the bbs were too large.
It’s obvious that the reason Dick Cheney refused to talk to authorities is he was covering something up. No other American could get away with ignoring authorities after a shooting accident. … (Read all, and get embedded links.)
Hey, I know this’ll probably go nowhere fast. But, as we’ve discussed here this last week, it’s part of the pattern. Most egegriously, a lack of responsibility. Then there’s the carelessness, the lack of consideration or even consciousness of other human beings’ lives, the self-serving lies and cover-ups, and the callousness:
Today, as you know, Whittington was kicked out of the hospital. I say it that way because there can be no doubt that Dick Cheney and George W. Bush needed Mr. Whittington out before the start of the weekend. (Taylor Marsh)
Keith Olbermann did a fine skeptic’s analysis Thursday night and Friday night (no transcript yet).
And, actor Alec Baldwin asks, “Will They Go to Court?” over at Huffington Post:
Cheney is a terrorist. He terrorizes our enemies abroad and innocent citizens here at home indiscriminately. Who ever thought Harry Whittington would be the answer to America’s prayers. Finally, someone who might get that lying, thieving Cheney into a courtroom to answer some direct questions.
I doubt that Harry’ll ever go after Dick and expose more of his lies. After all, Whittington made an overt apology to Cheney yesterday, as if to brush the entire matter under the rug. (The ruling class takes care of each other too well to let petty lawsuits mess things up.)
I mean: Whittington’s so decent he actually cares about things like prison reform and treatment. What a loser.
To live peacefully within a system means to not challenge apparent injustice because the temporary compliance doesn’t actually betray integrity.
The contradictions in the story, all the way down to Harry’s mention of the accident happening on Friday, likely has a greater goal we have no need to know. If our awareness was required, the elected officials in positions of power to reveal that truth, would do so. Sometimes the benefit of a secret society is the lack of responsibility for others’ actions.
Your comment lives!
I’m just gettin’ with the program. I am curious though about Harry’s reference to the incident happening on Friday when the other accounts say Saturday. Maybe it’s due to a different calender š
I took his signal and explored the history of some long held rituals of the quail hunt. No wonder he apologized.
Frankly I’m still waiting for the Quail’s press conference. If there’s anyone who needs to apologize . . .
That’s very funny, Steven!
Last night, Keith interviewed that famous defense attorney in Texas — the one who defended Andrea Yates — and he said that Whittington probably misspoke. It’s an easy mistake to make / and he’s almost 80 and has been traumatized.
No transcript available for Keith, sigh, until Monday afternoon.
C-posted yonder.
My ‘puter was on Yahoo when I opened it up this AM…and there was that headline. I just about spat out my coffee.
The story isn’t going away.
This is exactly what I’ve been looking for in the past 12 hours or so, answers to whether or not the spray pattern of the weapon in question, a .410 Perazzi at 30 yards, was consistent with Whittington’s wounds.
I’m going to have to watch the video again and reread for details of whether or not a choke was being used on Cheney’s shotgun, and what kind of shot was loaded, and how that would have affected the pattern/range issue.
These ballistics issues will be pretty much incontrovertible and should be front and center in all future reports on the Cheney shooting.
Oh great!
Taylor put up a copy of the video on her site beause Alex was getting hit too much, and his server couldn’t cope.
Also: do read the conservative blogger’s rebuttal.
Since you know about such stuff, it’d be great if you would weigh in on who you agree with.
Consider writing it up as a diary. Then e-mail me as soon as you write it.
I’m not a hunter, but I’ve been after the “scientific” end of this for the last half-day. Check this article that talks about chokes on the .410 Perazzi, 28 gauge, and how it affects spray pattern.
The only issue I have with the Jones video is that there is only one test done with what he calls a “modified” barrel. I’ve been looking at Wikipedia information on Pattern and Choke (see the section header at this link). The one test Jones did with a “modified barrel” at 30 yards did have a tighter spray pattern but it did not seem consistent with the apparent wounds in Whittington’s face and the story that he had a pellet lodged near his heart.
Jones did use the same type of birdshot that Cheney used for his test.
I would like to see a test done with a 28-gauge, .410 Perazzi, just like Jones did, but with and without choke.
I have not found any information anywhere on whether or not Cheney was using a choke. The incident report only reports a “28 gauge with 7 1/2 shot”. There is no place on the form to indicate whether or not there was a choke used, and it was not added in the officer’s comments.
It is a question that needs to be put forth to Cheney so that we can come to a definitive conclusion. If he was using a choke, the spray pattern would be tighter, which would lead to questions on how many times Whittington was shot (perhaps twice) or if it was at a range closer than 30 yards as Cheney has reported.
HALLIBURTON WINS CONTRACT TO RECONSTRUCT CHENEY’S REPUTATION:
Ok, just for the sake of conversation, where are the lines for privacy drawn? Let’s say that this might have been part of an unusual custom or ritual of a secret society, like S&B or something. Nobody would ever violate that oath. If a citizen’s right to privacy is compromised and they are forced to lie to uphold a secret oath, would that still give us the right to pass judgement on their lies?
I was surprised to see an AP topline story By Calvin Woodward and Nancy Benac headed “VP Accident Tale Filled With Discrepancies”. It provides a long list of contradictions and “misspeaking” that’s come to characterize what should have been a minor incident but is escalating into a genuine scandal. Still more evidence that this administration can’t do ANYTHING without lying, covering up, and trying to control the news.
And there’s more. Well worth reading and passing around as widely as possible.
Somehow didn’t notice that Susan’s last quotebox was the same story. Well, it bears repeating as often as possible.
Those accidental mistakes are interesting. Quite a few of them altogether.
No, I’m glad you did … write it up? and, since i didn’t do this, you could go to Keith’s Thurs. night transcript and find more. And, if you need it, i can find you the Fri. night transcript … i have my ways.
This is only my opinion, but I think Mr. W’s medical fate is yet not over. This is just my opinion. Too much left undone for the shot left inthe body. MInd y ou, this is just my opinion lnly.
.
CORPUS CHRISTI – Feb. 18
Accidents happen, that’s why they are called accidents. Car accidents happen too, unless when the driver causing the accident is under influence DUI, that it has become an offence and to be judged a felony by the courts. Was Dick Cheney HUI?
BLAME
Blame put on Harry Whittington by Katharine Armstrong, Scott McClellan and the MSM at the offset. Armstrong was a witness, sitting in the parked vehicles a long distance from where the shooting occurred. Whittington, 78 years old, shot two birds at the first covey. An experienced hunter Dick Cheney with a Perazzi shotgun, a masterpiece of craftmanship, did not hit a single bird.
After retrieving his two birds and dropping them off by Armstrong, Whittington tried to catch up with the hunting party of Dick Cheney, Pam Willeford, Oscar Medellin and Michael “Bo” Hubert at the second covey when at 30 yards, the quail were flushed. Apparently, Cheney did not get the birds early, but swung around counterclockwise to hit the bird from the back. Instead he was looking into the setting sun due West, fired the shotgun in the direction of the three parked vehicles and hit Harry Whittington on the left side (police sketch and report) and the right side according to doctor’s report and from photos as Harry Whittington left the hospital yesterday.
FIRST POLICE REPORT FLAWED
The most important account of the period from 17:30 to 18:15 p.m. was the report written by Sheriff Ramon Salinas, as he got the telephone calls at home from Captain Charles Kirk and SS agent Martinez. Salinas had called Constable Ramiro Medellin Jr., former Sheriff of Kenedy County, at the Armstrong ranch and talked to a witness. No information in his report about a casualty or injury of Harry Whittington, and the ambulance that was on stand-by or called to respond to the shooting incident.
Salinas essence of his report: it was an accident, it was an accident, yes it was an accident. Captain Charles Kirk was held up at the gate to the Armstrong ranch by a Border Patrol agent (and Secret Service agents?) at approximately 17:45 and turned away, or Sheriff Salinas called him back? The report doesn’t mention the specifics.
Tue Feb 14th, 2006 at 12:35:14 AM PST
A lot of times people joke about Cheney being the “real president” or the “shadow president” but yesterday’s White House press conference makes this startlingly clear.
A lot of people have been focusing on how long it took to notify the press about Cheney shooting a man in the face, or why he let the property owner be the one to release the story. Those are interesting angles to pursue, but what I want to focus on is how long it took Bush and Bush’s people to learn about the event.
Fri Feb 17th, 2006 at 08:46:30 AM PST
Cheney mentions him as being in the hunting party (he found the second covey), but there is no further mention of him being interviewed or providing an affadavit.
From here:
Mr. Cheney told me that on Saturday, February 11, 2006 at approximately 5:30 pm on the Armstrong Ranch that there was a three vehicle hunting party that consisted of himself, Bo Hubert, Pam Willeford, Jerry Medellin, Katharine Armstrong, Sarita Armstrong Hixon, Harry Whittington, and Oscar Medellin.
So there were eight people in the hunting party (well, eight people at the scene anyway…)
So, there are 3 Medellin’s involved …
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
On February 11, 2006 at approximately 5:30 p.m., I, Ramon Salinas III, and Sheriff of Kenedy County …
17:30 Received a call at home from Captain Charles Kirk, he was on his way to the Armstrong Ranch.
17:38 Received a call from SS agent (Martinez) with official notification of a hunting accident on the Armstrong Ranch that involved VP Cheney.
17:45? Captain Kirk called back and said he had made contact with a Border Patrol agent at the Armstrong gate and he didn’t know anything about the accident. I then told Captain Kirk that it was fine and that I would contact someone on the ranch.
17:50? I contacted Constable Ramiro Medellin Jr., former Sheriff of Kenedy County and asked him if he had any information about the accident. Constable Medellin stated that he would call me right back.
???? Constable Medellin returned my call and said,
“This in fact is an accident.” He stated that he had spoken with some of the people in the hunting party who were eyewitnesses and that they all said it was definitely a hunting accident. I also spoke with another eyewitness and he said the same thing, that it was an accident.
… it was at this time that I decided to send my Chief Deputy first thing Sunday morning to interview the VP and other witnesses.
[What happened to Captain Kirk at the Armstrong gate with the Border Patrol agent? – Oui]
«« click on pic for story
Armstrong gate with post office entry.
???? A few minutes later, I received another call from the SS asking if I was going to send someone to the Ranch. I told him that someone would be there first thing in the morning. The SS said they would be at the gate waiting.
18:15 I contacted Chief Deputy San Miguel and advised him of the incident and to be at the gate at approx. 08:00 a.m.
Events as they unfolded, there is no mention of any casualty in the period from 17:30 thru 18:15 hours in the report made up by Sheriff Ramon Salinas III of Kenedy County (Report Number 06020136 Date: February 15, 2006)
Where was the hunting party, the eight persons with three vehicles, the ambulance for transport of the badly injured Harry Whittington? How did Constable Medellin interview members of the hunting party in such a short period of time? How did Sheriff Salinas interview a witness himself in the same period?
Nothing was mentioned about the casualty of Harry Whittington and his transport to the hospital in Corpus Christi. Sounds like a Secret Service mission à la Cheney.
What happened to Captain Kirk and the Border Patrol agent at the Armstrong gate?
Secret Service agents who were with Cheney did not file an incident report about the shooting because other law enforcement agencies were conducting the investigation, said Jim Mackin, the agency’s deputy assistant director.
He also said it was the Kenedy County sheriff who decided not to interview Cheney on Saturday, but to wait until Sunday morning. “If they had said we’re coming out now (Saturday evening), we would have facilitated it,” Mackin said.
Mackin said a local officer had come to the ranch gate Saturday night to offer help after about the ambulance responding there, but left when officers at the gate said they were unaware of any emergency. The Secret Service says early reports that agents turned away deputies wanting to interview Cheney were wrong.
Cheney said he had had a beer at lunch that day but nobody was drinking when they went back out to hunt a couple hours later. Law enforcement officials have ruled out alcohol as a factor, but have not explained how they determined it was not involved.
Salinas and San Miguel said the Secret Service has the utmost respect for their department, a relationship that has been refined through the years, through the vice president’s visits to the area.
“They don’t treat us like a backdoor police department, like someone under them,” Salinas said.
San Miguel said the case was not investigated as a criminal incident. He also noted that there were no 911 calls or radio transmissions between dispatchers and deputies because the calls went to the sheriff’s home.
San Miguel and Lt. Juan Guzman interviewed Whittington at Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial on Monday, San Miguel said.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
The report, written by Chief Deputy Gilbert San Miguel Jr., quotes Cheney and Whittington as saying the shooting was an accident. They said no one was drinking alcohol during the hunt, according to the report. Interviewed in his hospital room in Corpus Christi, Whittington expressed concern only that the incident would hurt hunting’s image in Texas, the report said.
“Mr. Whittington did speak of the incident and explained foremost that there was no alcohol during the hunt and everyone was wearing the proper hunting attire of blaze orange,” the report said.
[…]
The sheriff’s 2 1/2-page report says that San Miguel began his investigation at the Armstrong Ranch at 8 a.m. Sunday, 14 1/2 hours after the shooting occurred. Cheney told San Miguel that a hunting party of seven, riding in three vehicles, was looking for quail in a pasture when dogs located a covey. Whittington, interviewed in his hospital room, told San Miguel that he hit two birds in that covey. Then a hunting guide, Bo Hubert, discovered a second covey. Cheney, who had not shot any birds in the first covey, walked 100 yards with Pamela Pitzer Willeford, the U.S. ambassador to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, to try his luck with the second. He carried a 28-gauge Italian-made shotgun.
Whittington told the sheriff’s department that he looked for his downed birds and then walked over to the hunting vehicles. Armstrong, the report said, then told him to join Cheney and Willeford in their hunt for the second covey. So Whittington followed after them.
Katharine Armstrong had told reporters earlier this week that Whittington “came up from behind the vice president and the other hunter and didn’t signal them or indicate to them or announce himself.”
Meanwhile, quail had been scared from the second covey. Cheney told the sheriff’s department that a single bird flew behind him and he followed the bird by line of sight in a counter-clockwise direction, not realizing Whittington had walked up from behind and had positioned himself approximately 30 yards away. Standing on a small hill, Cheney fired down, spraying Whittington’s face, neck and chest with birdshot. “Cheney told me the reason Harry Whittington sustained the injuries to his face and upper body,” the report said, “was that Mr. Whittington was standing on ground that was lower than the one he was standing on.”
Dick Cheney, U.S. Vice President, hunting
quail in Gettysburg, South Dakota. (AP)
After interviewing Cheney on Sunday, San Miguel returned to the ranch on Tuesday to see the pasture where the shooting occurred.
The incident has been a big topic among the many hunters and gun enthusiasts in this region. Ken Tuggle, manager of the Corpus Christi Pistol & Rifle Club, said he could not believe that a blast at 30 yards from a 28-gauge shotgun, which shoots fewer pellets and has a smaller shot pattern than a 12-gauge shotgun, could pass through a hunting jacket and a shirt and that the pellets could become embedded near a victim’s heart. “It’s hard to fathom,” he said.
But George Gongora, a photographer for the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, conducted a test earlier this week, firing pellets similar to the ones Cheney used at a target. He said he was convinced that the pellets, which he estimated were moving at 1,400 feet a second, could tear through clothing and skin.
Other hunters questioned why Cheney was shooting down at a flying bird. “The idea behind quail hunting is that you have to hit the quail when it’s about five to 10 feet in the air,” said Wade Wilson, a South Texas hunting guide. “Quail don’t fly very high. But nobody should be shooting down.”
● Harry Whittington – Texas Funeral Service Commission
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY