(Cross-posted at Daily Kos and MyDD)
Hi, everyone. I’m new here at Booman Tribune, but I’ve been an occasional lurker for months. I’m sorry that I’m jumping right in here with a campaign diary (I’ve noticed that this blog doesn’t care as much about campaign nitty-gritties as Daily Kos or MyDD), but the election’s just two months away, so now’s the time for me to hunker down and get serious about taking back the Senate. I hope you’ll hunker down with me.
My Dad is Jack Carter, who’s running for US Senate in Nevada. We had a big Labor Day weekend for two reasons: 1) my Dad’s first grandchild was born on Saturday to my brother Jason and his wife Kate; and 2) it marked the official beginning of the campaign season. Henry’s birth has given us a little extra motivation as we head into the final two months of this campaign, and we’re pretty excited.
The campaign is in great shape, but we’re going to need your help (you can contribute money here).
To kick off the campaign season, the Las Vegas Sun published an article in which they compare and contrast the candidates’ positions on Iraq. Here’s the section about my Dad’s race:
Democratic nominee Jack Carter, son of former President Jimmy Carter, says the Iraq war has not only cost the United States money and lives, but lowered its standing in the world and allowed terrorism to flourish.
“I think Iraq is the most visible example of the administration’s failed policies,” he said. “It took our eye off the ball, which was al-Qaida. Instead of extinguishing that terrorist organization, we put all of our chips into Iraq.”
Carter said U.S. forces should now lean on the fledgling Iraqi government by setting a timetable for troop redeployment. Under Carter’s preferred scenario, American troops would begin to withdraw to a “more defensible position” in the region within three to four months as part of a “quick-response” program that could respond to local flare-ups, he said. Further aid – economic and military – would be contingent on the stability of the Iraqi government.
Carter’s opponent, Republican incumbent John Ensign, an ardent supporter of the war, declined to be interviewed for this story, instead issuing a statement that echoed language used by Bush and his surrogates in speeches last week.
You can see more about my Dad’s stance on Iraq on his Issues page, and for more on John Ensign’s position . . . well, you can look at his Issues page, I guess, and not get much more.
It couldn’t be clearer that John Ensign represents more of the same, while Jack Carter is coming up with ideas for improving the situation. This is Ensign’s pattern: he has voted with the Bush Administration 96% of the time since he’s been in office (including a perfect score in 2004). He’s on shaky ground here in Nevada because of it. According to the most recent SUSA polling, Ensign only gets 50% approval rating (and has been stuck there for months), making him the 76th most popular Senator. Bush’s approval rating in Nevada is at a pathetic 36%.
The most recent polling in the Senate race shows that Ensign is indeed vulnerable. A Wall Street Journal/Zogby “interactive” poll came out last week showing my Dad within 3.5 points of Ensign:
Margin of Error: 4.3%
John Ensign: 48%
Jack Carter: 45%
I know that the “interactive” poll’s methodology is not well-established. But, it does back up the earlier Rasmussen poll that had my Dad within 7 points of Ensign:
Margin of Error: 4.5%
46% Ensign
39% Carter
4% some other candidate
11% not sure
Regardless of the numbers, all of the polling that’s been done recently (WSJ/Zogby, Rasmussen, and Mason-Dixon) has shown a large amount of movement in our direction. We’re in really good shape going into the official campaign season. For more on the polling, see jedinecny’s recent diary.
We’re going to do everything we can to link Ensign to Bush’s policies, but we need money. We’ve received some outside help: Barbara Boxer recently sent out a fundraising email on our behalf, and the DSCC has committed $250,000 dollars to the campaign. But, we’ll need every penny we can get to combat Ensign’s inevitable cash advantage. The election is now just two months away. If you’ve considered giving money, now is the time to do it. If you’ve already given some, but can afford to give more, please do so. This race could very well be the sixth seat that determines control of the Senate – you should be a part of it!
Thanks for reading!
Sarah
You can always find more at the Carter Blog
It’s only been a few weeks since I was so warmly welcomed to the Booman Tribune community and I hope you join me in welcoming Sarah!
And while you’re at check out Jack Carter’s campaign website if you haven’t already done so:
http://carterfornevada.com
Hi Sarah-
Congratulations on becoming an aunt. That must be very exciting. I was just discussing the Senate races last night with Atrios, Delaware Dem, PsiFighter and a few others. And I was arguing that Nevada was more likely than Arizona and that I really like the strategy you all are using out there.
I guess the biggest problem is that Ensign seems to keep such a low profile. He may vote with Bush 96% of the time but he doesn’t put his face on cable news too much. So, I think you will need quite a bit of money to raise awareness of Ensign’s voting record and why people should be unhappy about it.
Good luck and best wishes.
Thanks, Booman. We are definitely doing all we can to get Ensign’s voting record out there.
At the beginning of this campaign, I had no idea how hard it was to raise money. A lot of people assumed that having Jimmy Carter on our team would get us tons of money, but it’s still been like pulling teeth!
Sarah
I’d hope that Harry Reid might call in some chits. He does stand to benefit quite handsomely from a Carter victory.
I notice that Meet the Press is doing a series of Senate debates. Any chance Nevada could become one of them?
I don’t know if Nevada could be one of the featured debates. Since it’s not usually considered to be one of the most competitive races (despite the polling), it doesn’t get a lot of attention.
Obviously, my Dad would be very happy to have a debate on MTP.
Sarah
I never posited that Arizona was higher up than Nevada, Booman. It was a question of how viable the races are.
All the best to your father, Sarah. When I get some free change, I’ll send along a little dough. Rock on!
I try to read your diaries over at Dkos but spend more time here and am very glad you found us. A little less chaotic and less chatter here but belive me, we are paying to attention. Keep us posted Sarah. If I have a little left over this week I will send a small contibution to your Dad. Best wishes for a successful race.
I’ve never donated money to a political campaign in my life until this year. My first donation was to the Webb campaign in Virginia. The second was to the Carter campaign. I have adopted Jim Webb and Jack Carter as my personal commitment to changing our government for the better. I intend to do what I can to help send these two guys to the US Senate.
I have donated three times so far to the Carter campaign. Each time I have received a hand written thank you card. The latest one apologizes for taking a little longer to respond. Not like they’re busy running a campaign or anything.
Jack Carter is good people. He comes from good people. He will make a great Senator for Nevada and for America. He can beat Ensign, but he needs our help. Help him if you can.
Thank you so much for your support! We’re honored that you’ve adopted us as your “personal commitment.” We’ll try our best not to let you down!
Sarah
In the 2004 election, Republicans were registering Democrats, and then not filing their registrations. So hundreds, maybe thousands, thought they were registered and they were not.
Are the Carters or their supporters worried about similar dirty tricks this time around?
And what machines will voters be using? HAVA is kicking in and everyone is moving to electronic voting. Is there a potential nightmare lurking?
I’m not trying to be alarmist. Forewarned is forearmed, right?
We’re definitely concerned about those sorts of dirty tricks, so we’re keeping our eyes peeled. (And we’ll have some legal help come election day to document any problems we see.)
Electronic voting is already here in Nevada – we use Sequoia systems instead of Diebold, and we require a paper trail. You can see the original news story from 2003 here.
Parts of Las Vegas still has the older machines, I think — since that’s the most densely populated area, it cost the most to install the new ones. Here’s a description of the older machines (also from Sequoia) from Verified Voting.org.
There is always some possibility of fraud, and we’re definitely prepared to identify it and contest it if need be.
Sarah
Sarah, thank you so much for posting here at BooTrib. I love that you’re also present in the comments for any questions that people may have, usually it’s a hit & run type thing from some of the bigger campaigns.
I’m in your neighboring state to the south – Arizona – and am glad to see strong challenges by Democrats to the stranglehold the Republicans seem to have in our region. I’m curious to know what Jack’s stance is with respect to immigration reform. Thanks again for being here. Paz
You can find out more about my Dad’s issues on his Issues page. Here’s the section about immigration:
Thanks very much for your interest!
Sarah
hi Sarah,
way back when i posted a comment to one of your early diaries over at dkos, asking whether or not your father is in favor of unconstitutional acts like the Iraqi War Resolution. acts that transfer Congress’ war-making power to the President. you didn’t respond, which is understandable given how many comments there are typically on your dkos diaries. as your posting this diary here, i want to ask you that same question.
as i see it, being ‘for’ or ‘against’ a war after it’s already started is a relatively weak distinction. where opposition to a war matters most – a point democrats like to ignore for obvious reasons – is before it is ever launched. and as i see it, the most effective means of opposing war is simply to stick to the separation of powers as enumerated in the Constitution. i seriously doubt that we would be in Iraq had Congress actually had to declare war.
think about that: the most effective means to oppose a war is to demand that the declaration of war come from the Congress and not the President. the framers of the Constitution gave that power to Congress for excellent reasons. by surrendering that power to the President, Congress opened the door to Bush’s disasterous hubris.
my question is a simple one: does your father believe that the Constitution authorizes Congress to transfer its responsibility to decide upon the matter of whether or not to engage the nation in war?
thanks.
Thanks, Simon – that’s a great way to frame that question.
hi Lisa,
thanks for noticing! i guess the 53rd time really is the charm.
😉
Hm. I’m not sure about how my Dad feels about the legal aspects of that resolution, and I don’t want to put words in his mouth.
But I do know that he was really upset when they passed the resolution. He was very much against the so-called “Bush Doctrine” and the idea of pre-emptive war.
Sarah
thanks for the reply.
i’m not a resident of Nevada, but i’d support any candidate who took a clear stand on the issue. this is about more than an ill-conceived war and occupation. it’s about restoring a constitutional system designed to curtail the Executive power to create realities on the ground. realities that the rest of us are then obliged to contend with. so long as our politicians are against this war but not against the principle upon which it was waged they are dealing with the symptom and not the cause.
best of luck.