The Bush surge is not about “Mission Creep”, it is “Mission Leap”. Every justification for going to war in Iraq has been exhausted and repudiated. Finally, with the execution of Saddam Hussein, we have jumped the shark. Yes we have deposed Saddam and his regime, we have certified that there are no WMD’s in Iraq, and have helped the Iraqi Shia create a fledgling Shia-led government. Go get that “Mission Accomplished” banner and let’s start the celebration. It is time to send our combat forces home.
That does not mean we will leave Iraq in peace. Far from it. A sectarian civil war is underway and will probably worsen. But this is a war we cannot win. We might have a chance if we were fighting one insurgency–let’s say Zarqawi’s Al Qaeda. But we are not. We are in the middle of a hydra headed civil war. We have helped create a lethal version of an Animal House food fight. There are no clear discernible sides. There are multiple Sunni insurgent groups and there are multiple Shia insurgent groups. The most extreme Sunni groups believe their ultimate mission is to kill Shia. Some Shia groups are willing to collaborate with some Sunnis. There is only thing these groups agree on–all see the United States as an intruder and want it expelled.
There is not much we can do to quell the violence in Iraq. In the face of our conventional military force the various insurgent groups refuse to stand and fight and melt into the populace. They hide out until we go away and then filter back in. We can surround the various Baghdad neighborhoods and embed our troops with Iraq police. And our troops will search fruitlessly for the insurgents as we invade homes and, more often than not, roust unsuspecting Iraqis. God help us if we do a Fallujah style clear and hold. It will be a human tidal wave spilling out of the city.
And when all is said and done these tactics simply antagonize the Iraqi populace–sunni and shia–and spur recruits for the various insurgents. Until we come to grips with this reality we will continue to fail to get a handle on the Iraq of our dreams. Lawrence of Arabia described this frustration as trying to eat soup with a knife.
The United States needs to redefine its mission and goals in Iraq. Like it or not we have created a Shia majority country that is favorably disposed towards Iran. We also have created regions of the former Iraq that are defacto independent regions–one Kurdish and one Sunni. We lack the power and the resources to impose our will on the region. We cannot make the Iraqis nor the Iranians nor the Syrians nor the Saudis act like we want them to act. If we persist in that madness we will destroy ourselves as a great power.
So, if everything is coming up lemons we need to consider making lemonade. What should we do?
1. Negotiate an immediate agreement with the Maliki Government for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. This agreement should include permission for the United States to maintain a joint military/law enforcement base in Iraq dedicated to combating terrorist threats. We should also be willing to offer to commit to a longterm program for training and equiping the Iraqi Army and the Iraqi National Police. But this will require employing U.S. personnel who speak Arabic and will accpet longterm assignments in Iraq. And we should not be surprised if our offer is rejected.
2. Working through the Arab League, recruit and deploy a genuine multi-national peacekeeping force to police Baghdad.
3. There is a lot of diplomatic work to do on the periphery of Iraq. We have damaged our credibility with Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Turkey. We have all but declared war on Syria and Iran. We need to cool things down and work towards some broad-based agreements. The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group offers an excellent guide in this regard.
We need to step back and refocus on the issues that are important, not only to us, but to all countries in the region. We must combat religious extremism and ensure that all countermeasures possible are employed to detect and defeat terrorist threats from these various groups. We must prevent nuclear proliferation. We found a way to live with Pakistan, who has been the biggest proliferator in the world, surely we can find a way to contain Iran.
The neo-cons continue to try to foist their vision of terror on the people of the United States. They insist we must stay and fight in Iraq or else the Islamofascists–militant muslims keen on building a worldwide Caliphate (think of International Communism with God at the center)–will take over. A scary vision but it is nonsense. Ignore for a moment the gulf separating the aspiring Sunni Caliphs from the aspiring Shia Caliphs, there are 800 million muslims who have not bought into this craziness. We need to stop acting out of fear and concentrate on what is in our national interest. That’s where the debate needs to be. But one thing is clear–continuing to kill Iraqis with U.S. troops is not in our interest or theirs. Accepting that fact is the first step on the road towards peace.
There. Now that wasn’t so hard, was it? Why, even a numbskull like myself can understand what you’re saying, Mr. Johnson. Sounds like a reasonable and well thought out plan to me.
Ha! Therein lies the rub, I fear. There is NO mission, there is NO goal, other than running out the clock on the presidency and running up the profits for the war profiteers.
(And what is it with Pakistan. Some sort of creepy, backroom, sell- your-soul deal was made with them way back when. Not even a peep when AQ Kahn was let off relatively scott-free. That whole Pakistan-US relationship has always confounded me.)
Thanks for your contributions here. Your insight is appreciated.
imho, neither will we pull off a “political” victory. That window has closed. Iraqis: Kurds, Sunnis and Shias are each marching to different drummers – each going their own way; irrespective of what the U.S.wants.
1.Sunnis ‘The jihad now is against the Shias, not the Americans’
“The conflict into which 20,000 more American troops will be catapulted over the next few weeks is very different to the one their comrades experienced even a year ago.[.]
These days Rami gets most of his supplies from the new American-equipped Iraqi army. “We buy ammunition from officers in charge of warehouses, a small box of AK-47 bullets is $450 (£230). If the guy sells a thousand boxes he can become rich and leave the country.” But as the security situation deteriorates, Rami finds it increasingly difficult to travel across Baghdad. “Now I have to pay a Shia taxi driver to bring the ammo to me. He gets $50 for each shipment.”
The box of 700 bullets that Rami buys for $450 today would have cost between $150 and $175 a year ago. The price of a Kalashnikov has risen from $300 to $400 in the same period. The inflation in arms prices reflects Iraq’s plunge toward civil war but, largely unnoticed by the outside world, the Sunni insurgency has also changed.”
2. Iraqi President Talabani to Visit Syria on Sunday– a five day visit.
“Days after President Bush accused Syria of encouraging the violence in Iraq,President Jalal Talabani on Sunday will become the highest-level Iraqi official to visit this country in more than 24 years.
His visit, announced on Iraqi television and confirmed by a Talabani spokesman Friday, aims to seal the ties between the two neighbors after they restored diplomatic relations in December, cut in 1982 amid ideological disputes between the Syrian government and Saddam Hussein’s regime.”
3. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki goes own way to fill top post over objections of U.S.
“Maliki’s decision to push through his own choice for one of the country’s most sensitive military posts — and to reject another officer who was considered more qualified by the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey — has renewed questions about the prime minister’s intentions.
“It’s a delicate situation,” said Mahmoud Othman, a Kurdish lawmaker who questioned the choice of Qanbar. “It’s very dangerous if it turns out that he has affiliations,” he said, naming Maliki’s political party and the anti-American Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada Sadr.”
respectfully, any plan for the middle east that doesn’t start with the removal of bush and cheney will be treated, as was the isg report and all of the rest of the thoughtful alternatives we have heard over the years, as so much toilet paper. “thanks, but no thanks.”
spot on but, until Bush/Cheney’s hands are lifted from the steering wheel, our national treasures are being wasted. This so-called ‘new way forward’ is not a last try to get things right. Imho this is the ladder into the next phase – attack Iran.
The recent air-strikes in Somalia provide the blueprint And before, that we’ll have the rationale – it will get bloody in Baghdad.
In Bush’s last stand, like Truman, the attack on Iran will be spun as saving lives. Here’s what’s ahead. It is said we’re only sending in up to 20,000 troops.
The Iranians have very good linkd to the government of Iraq. The Shia groups in the government are quite close to Iran. Even Talabani’s Kurds are not exactly distant from the Iranians.
The Shia leader who is not beholden to Iran is al-Sadr although already some of our media are suggesting the link as if it exists. This misinformation and disinformation is becoming as dangerous as that before the Iraq invasion.
Imagine the scenario: We attack the Mehdi army. we take some casualties. Our propoganda apparatus alternatively known as the MSM pushes the imaginary link between al-Sadr and Iran on a daily basis at the top of the news implying if not overtly stating that the Mehdi army is armed, funded and even led by the Iranians. King George has the rationale to attack to Iran, and it is not even based on something that can later be disproved like failing to find WMDs. The useless media can so easily do George’s work again.
Dangerous times indeed.
.
You Own It (interpretation by Bush 45):
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. senators grilled U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice over a yet-unpublished Iraqi oil law that is expected to set terms for investment and revenue-sharing in the war-torn nation’s battered hydrocarbon sector.
(KurdishMedia.com) A Short history, this is not the first time that USA forces, without consulting with the Kurdistan regional government (KRG), violate South Kurdistan land and air space. Not long ago, the US forces, by aim of helicopter gunships, bombarded a student residential house in the middle of night and set the house on fire for no lawful reason. This was a gift from the Bush administration to those poor students who lack basic living standards.
U.S. Raid Iranian Consulate in Kurdish Arbil
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."