There is already an entry on this topic, but the discussion in that diary has turned into something different entirely. So please forgive this repeat entry – I’ll try to add some substance.
The Nobel Prizes were instituted by the Swedish inventor and industrialist Alfred Nobel. You can read a succinct bio on him in this link. Two of his most important inventions were the blasting cap and dynamite, which established his fame and wealth.
At his death his worldwide business empire consisted of more than 90 factories manufacturing explosives and ammunition. The opening of his will, which he had drawn up in Paris on Nov. 27, 1895, and had deposited in a bank in Stockholm, contained a great surprise for his family, friends, and the general public. He had always been generous in humanitarian and scientific philanthropies, and he left the bulk of his fortune in trust to establish what came to be the most highly regarded of international awards, the Nobel Prizes.
We can only speculate about the reasons for Nobel’s establishment of the prizes that bear his name. He was reticent about himself, and he confided in no one about his decision in the months preceding his death. The most plausible assumption is that a bizarre incident in 1888 may have triggered the train of reflection that culminated in his bequest for the Nobel Prizes. That year Alfred’s brother Ludvig had died while staying in Cannes, France. The French newspapers reported Ludvig’s death but confused him with Alfred, and one paper sported the headline “Le marchand de la mort est mort” (“The merchant of death is dead.”) Perhaps Alfred Nobel established the prizes to avoid precisely the sort of posthumous reputation suggested by this premature obituary. It is certain that the actual awards he instituted reflect his lifelong interest in the fields of physics, chemistry, physiology, and literature. There is also abundant evidence that his friendship with the prominent Austrian pacifist Bertha von Suttner inspired him to establish the prize for peace.
Since 1901, the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm has awarded the prizes for achievements in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine and for literature. The Nobel Peace Prize is administered by the Norwegian Nobel Institute and is awarded by a Committee of 5 appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. Why a Norwegian Nobel Committee? Check the link.
Finally, who can nominate:
Any one of the following persons is entitled to submit proposals:
· members of national assemblies and governments;
· members of international courts of law;
· university chancellors; university professors of social science, history, philosophy, law and theology;
· leaders of peace research institutes and institutes of foreign affairs;
· former Nobel Peace Prize laureates;
· board members of organisations that have received the Nobel Peace Prize;
· present and past members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (committee members must present their nomination at the latest at the first committee meeting after February 1);
· former advisers at the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
Observing the rules given in the statutes of the Nobel Foundation, the Committee does not publish the names of candidates. However, those making nominations are free to publish.
Yesterday saw the news that two Norwegian parliamentarians have nominated Al Gore and Sheila Watt-Cloutier for the Nobel Peace Prize. They are from opposite sides of the political spectrum; Brende is an MP from the Conservative Party, while Sørensen is of the Socialist Left Party.
The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say members of parliament Børge Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.
The two green-thinking MPs suggest that Gore share the prize with Inuit Sheila Watt-Cloutier, in recognition for their efforts to put the danger posed by climate change on the global political agenda.
“This is clearly, absolutely, one of the important efforts to achieve conflict prevention. Climate change can lead to enormous flows of refugees on a scale the world has never seen before. Fighting climate change is immensely important work for global peace,” Heidi Sørensen, member of parliament for the Socialist Left Party (SV), told Aftenposten.
A worthy nomination in my opinion – it is imperative to continue the focus on global warming – the greatest threat to us and future generations. That the nomination more or less coincided with the release of the UN sponsored report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is an added advantage.
Al Gore is a transformed person since 2000, he’d be a great candidate in 2008 and I would be glad to see him run.
[Ed] Fixed silly spelling error.
I know there are lots of opinions on Gore. Would he be a worthy winner of what he has been nominated for lately?
And with Feinstein out, isn’t he our best (potential) candidate?
I actually really like John Edwards and think he has grown a lot since the ’04 election and has attained some well-needed weight on the issues. I also think he’s more electable in the south than the other potential nominees.
But, golly, I’d be happy with Gore, or Obama or Clinton as well.
I like Edwards too (over the two others you mention), but somehow, he appears to me a bit more lightweight (no pun) than Gore.
I think that was true of him in ’04 – people had this view of him as a lightweight and a pretty boy with a phoney smile, but his work with the poverty center at UNC and his willingness to speak out more forcefully against the Iraq war (and the first to admit it was a mistake to vote for it) have increased his gravitas – at least with me and the people I talk to.
He’s hired two very dynamic and very left women bloggers, Amanda Marcotte of Pandagon and Melissa McEwan of Shakespeare’s Sister). Marcotte will be running his blog and McEwan is his Netroots Coordinator. This suggests that there’s some depth and some interesting political moves to the man.
Very interesting and a good catch, Andi. I knew I liked the man. But I really loooove his wife.
You both convince me to read up some more on Edwards.
He delivered a barnstormer speech at the DNC meeting this morning.
You can tell ask has had a tough week – evidence his poor spelling and erroneous reference to Russ Feingold as Feinstein.
Too much “sauce” and starting the weekend early!
thanks ask!
I believed Gore won the presidency in 2000, and have not been given reason to believe otherwise. that aside, he has grown a great deal since that time, in large part imo, because he has distanced himself from the party apparatus, at least on the surface.
I, also, would like to see him run in 08, but am not optimistic of him doing so. if he were to receive the Nobel Peace Prize and/or an Oscar, both of which are clearly deserved, that would strengthen and elevate his position both here and abroad. Additionally, it would elevate his ability to come into the race as late as next fall, in a position to become a front runner almost immediately. Were he to run, or assent to being drafted, I think he would be unbeatable….if the new Al Gore shows up…and like it or not, the bully pulpit of the POTUS, combined with a democratically controlled congress, would give him tremendous status, power and influence here and abroad on many other issues as well.
As for Andrews; after Feingold took himself out of the race, wisely in my estimation, I liked him a lot. His recent speech and comments at the Herzliya Conference has tempered my enthusiasm significantly. His comments regarding Syria and Iran are troubling to say the least.
march on the pentagon: 3.17.07
“..would strengthen and elevate his position both here and abroad.”
A very important point, there are many fences to mend. With such fame, Gore would have the stature to rebuild relationships.
it’s a critical point.
we are well beyond the mending phase. we, the US, are going to have to rebuild everything from the ground up.
when our closest alley and neighbours think that GW is “the biggest threat to world peace”, there’s nobody else suitable, let alone qualified, for the task.
march on the pentagon: 3/17.07
I believed Gore won the presidency in 2000
I believe that as well. I’d be equally happy with a Gore/Edwards or an Edwards/Gore ticket;-)