I have always wondered how and why Bill Clinton selected the neo-conservative warmonger James Woolsey to be his first Director of Central Intelligence. Now Steve Coll’s Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 provides my answer.
The CIA quickly became the only department in the federal government whose senior officers were seeing the president-elect face-to-face every day. [Robert] Gates became optimistic that President Clinton and the CIA would get along exceptionally well.
He was wrong. The problems began with the selection of a new director. The choice was postponed until late in the transition process. Conservative Democrats on Capitol Hill urged Clinton to appoint someone with a right-leaning reputation to balance the liberals in his cabinet. The Clinton team telephoned James Woolsey, a fifty-one-year-old Oklahoman, and told him to fly immediately to Little Rock. Woolsey was a lean, dome-headed man with soft gray eyes and a sharp, insistent voice. He had met Clinton only once, at a campaign fund-raiser held at the home of Washington socialite Pamela Harriman. But Clinton and Woolsey had common roots. Like the president-elect, Woolsey had risen from the rural southwest to win a Rhodes scholarship and graduate from Yale Law School. As a young army reserve lieutenant Woolsey had campaigned against the Vietnam War. Later, he had drifted to the political right, aligning himself with hard-line anticommunist Democrats such as Henry “Scoop” Jackson.
Woolsey spent several hours with Clinton at the Governor’s Mansion. They talked at length about University of Arkansas and University of Oklahoma football, good places to fish in the Ozarks, and, at less length, their visions for the future of the CIA. At one point Clinton said that he really did not think that the CIA director should be a policy adviser to the president. Woolsey agreed that the director “ought to just call the intelligence straight.”
Their meeting ended with no mention of a job offer, but the next day Warren Christopher called Woolsey at his hotel and summoned him to a press conference.
“Does the president want me to be the director of the CIA?”, Woolsey asked.
“Sure. Just come over to the press conference, and we’ll get it sorted out.”
Woolsey asked Christopher to be certain about the job offer. Christopher stuck his head in Clinton’s office, came back on the phone, and said, “Yeah, that’s what he wants.”
In the living room of the mansion Woolsey found the Clintons, the Gores, Secretary of Defense nominee Les Aspin, Secretary of State nominee Warren Christopher, Tony Lake, Samuel L. “Sandy” Berger, and several political aides trying to anticipate questions they would hear from the press when Clinton introduced his national security team. The president-elect’s media specialists worried that reporters would accuse Clinton of appointing a bunch of Carter administration retreads. Woolsey could understand why, since “we were, in fact, a bunch of Carter administration retreads.” Trying to be helpful, Woolsey mentioned that he had served in the Bush administration, leading a team that negotiated a reduction of conventional armed forces in Europe.
Clinton’s press aide looked at Woolsey, “Admiral, I didn’t know you served in the Bush administration.” Dumbfounded, Woolsey pointed out that he had never been an admiral, only an army captain.
Then Clinton refused to meet with Woolsey for the first year of his presidency. It’s hard to believe that Clinton could have taken any less care in selecting his DCI. I guess he wasn’t ready on Day One.
Considering his history and what was raining down on Mena, I suspect Clinton had a long history with CIA operatives for a long time. He probably appointed who they told him to appoint.
did you read it? He appointed who the Blue Dogs wanted him to appoint.
Stephen Graubard in The Financial Times, UK – US Edition– calls on Hillary to step aside today – Time for Hillary to quit before the March 4 and Pennsylvania primaries today.
I’m looking for US papers to follow…but not likely.
kind of o/t, idredit.
Are we in disagreement?
Didn’t Warren Christopher help run COINTELPRO for J. Edgar Hoover earlier in his career? Is Pamela Harriman spawn of the same Harriman clan of Averill’s Brown Brothers Harriman where Prescott Bush toiled to hide and grow Nazi money?
These people aren’t just blue. Some of them are fascists.
I just think that Clinton was already beholden to elements in the CIA before he ever ran for President.
+++
http://www.namebase.org/ppost08.html
If the Clintons need a conspiracy theory, why not blame their problems on the intelligence community? Oops, there’s a tiny problem here: the official line is that the intelligence community is controlled by the President. Such blame from the Clintons would raise ugly issues about whether the intelligence community is really a “rogue elephant,” as Frank Church charged 22 years ago. It would quickly become awkward for all concerned. Nevertheless, we can find as much evidence of an intelligence connection, as we can of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
+++
I agree with Frank Church, although “rogue elephant” would suggest violence and damage without control. I think that the CIA and its allies know very much what they want and how to go about getting it. And they know how to control people. My world view is that the CIA has more say about who gets to be DCI than the President does.
A lot of books which reveal behind-the-scene machinations are fascinating, but they often tend to ignore the real lines of power. Sorry to be so cynical.
I think the obvious lesson to learn from this is that when HRC says she will be ready on day one, she means, mindful of this history, that she will be ready on 20 January 1992. That day one.
That got a chuckle out of me.
Happy to be of service. : ) (I remember you from DK loooong ago).
My recollection is that the Clinton transition was not all that smooth and that it took a long time to fill all the positions.
We were talking about that the other day in R/L. How anyone remembering Bill’s first months in office wouldn’t necessarily be reassured at the idea of another Clinton transition.
Of course part of Bill’s problem was that there hadn’t been a Democratic administration in 12 years and the Carter administration hadn’t been popular. So he didn’t have a stable to draw on quickly to fill positions. But part of the problem was simple disorganization.
If you read Jeffrey Toobin’s book on the Supreme Court you’ll find a similar lack of organization in choosing his two Supreme Court judges. In the end his choices were fine, but the process was messy.
It was rocky and I remember those first few months when names were being floated I kept thinking that one they all seem to be Carter retreads, but whatever and two, how the hell did they not have names before the election, if not immediately aftewards? Between the election and Jan. there were two months to get names floated, let alone settled upon. That also showed me how insulated the DLC was from the governing process. They spent too much time and energy creating the club, but when it got down to it, they didn’t really have Leaders or any outstanding anyone’s they could turn to.
Part of the problem with Clinton, at least according to Toobin, was that he never wanted to appoint anybody that he didn’t “bond” with.
So this, from BooMan’s excerpt:
seems symbolic about how Clinton made decisions about people.
Stephen Breyer didn’t get the nod the first go round on the supreme court partly because his tax records etc. weren’t in good enough shape to send them up to the Hill right away but also because his meeting with Clinton didn’t go well. Breyer had broken his arm riding his bike and was in pain.
It’s really outrageous when you think about it that Clinton would ok someone like Woolsey. But hey, I bet he talked good football.
I suspect that’s the woman in me talking because that’s how all the men I work with do business. As I was forced to say at one hiring meeting: just because the guy brews his own beer doesn’t mean he’s qualified for this position.
On men hiring men…qualifications is usually bottom on the list. But that does make so much more sense when I think about all the inept politicians we have and how they got where they are.
Hmmmmm, maybe I will vote for Clinton just because she’s a woman.
“I suspect that’s the woman in me talking because that’s how all the men I work with do business. As I was forced to say at one hiring meeting: just because the guy brews his own beer doesn’t mean he’s qualified for this position.”
Everyone knows that football– possibly, basketball– are the key indicators of a man’s work qualifications.
If you’re in the South, a solid knowledge of hunting might also be a prime indicator of a good job applicant.
Helicopter carrying Kerry, Biden, Hagel makes emergency landing in Afghanistan..they’re reported safe” -Bloomber News
Interesting. Thanks for that info, Booman. I kind of wondered why Woolsey myself.
I talked to Woolsey once – had a one sentence exchange with him about something as we passed each other in a hallway outside one of those Oil Shockwave events, where Woolsey was playing president.
He does drive a Prius though. So he’s not entirely a neocon. 😉