We know the “Johnny Mac” McCain lusts after all those women who feel spurned by the by the Democratic Party because Hillary Clinton lost the nomination to Barack Obama. We know that there is a sincere belief among many of her supporters that she lost the race due to sexist attacks directed towards her by the Obama campaign, the media and the even the Democratic leadership. While I don’t think sexism was the deciding factor in her loss, there’s no question that, like race for Obama, it played a major role in how some voters perceived her candidacy, and there can be no argument that sexist, misogynistic attitudes toward her by some in the media (and here Chris Matthews and his MsNBC colleagues are the biggest culprits) were often on display nightly on cable television.
So, is the McCain camp looking seriously at a woman for the Vice Presidential slot? You’d have to think they would be crazy not to do so. Certainly many Republicans are pushing the idea, and a new name has started to receive a lot of buzz in conservative circles: Sarah Palin, Alaska’s Republican governor.
(cont.)
Draft Sarah Palin!
… Three weeks ago, I had no idea who Sarah Palin was or what she was about.
Then, I started researching running-mate possibilities for presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and noticed a grassroots effort to get the Alaska governor on the ballot. Her name seemed to be everywhere, and I started to wonder if it was a horrible trick, dreamed up by some lovestruck, basement-dwelling teenager with raging hormones and a vivid imagination.
The more I learned, the more I was amazed by this tundra spitfire. I checked with a friend who works on The Hill in DC, and sure enough, she was everything the Internet machine said she was and then some. My friend called Palin the GOP’s “secret weapon,” and said she’s got the looks, the substance and the pinache to change the election for McCain … if only he’d consider her.
Gotta love conservatives. “Tundra spitfire” isn’t exactly the most politically correct term I’d choose to describe a woman these days. Indeed, my daughter was called a “spitfire” by one of her uncles once, and she still won’t let him forget it — and she was six at the time! But clearly, enthusiasm among some Republicans for her candidacy is building, even if some of it may be generated by her own efforts. And she has the kind of personal history that many people will find appealing:
I later discovered that one of the bigger items on her plate was the recent birth of her son Trig, who was diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome. The newborn is Todd and Sarah Palin’s fifth child. Their oldest, Track Palin, recently enlisted in the military. […]
Three days later, Gov. Palin was back at work.
One son in the military. The challenge of dealing with a newborn with down’s syndrome. And back to work three days after giving birth? Obviously a dedicated public servant. These are the types of personal details that would make her a very appealing addition to the Republican ticket. But would Johnny Mac pick a woman from a small state that is already likely to go in the Republican column this Fall? Well, he will if her supporters have anything to say about it. Some of them have even set up their own website called (big surprise) Draft Sarah Palin, where you can watch a You Tube video promoting her candidacy as an outsider who’ll help clean up corrupt Washington.
A pretty slick effort for a supposedly grassroots effort to put her on the ticket with McCain. In fact it looks like it was crafted by a fairly sophisticated PR firm, one that has experience in creating political ads, and not merely by a bunch of internet enthusiasts, S it’s a reasonable assumption to make that people with some money and influence in the GOP are behind this campaign to enlist her in Johnny Mac’s crusade. And the internet buzz isn’t just restricted to one possibly astroturf operation. She’s has had her supporters on the web touting her for Veep since before she gave birth to her new son.
What better way for my beloved GOP to show how beautifully modern and progressive we truly are than to facilitate and encourage John McCain, our nominee, to select Sarah Palin as his choice for Vice President? Baby Palin is not expected to make an appearance until mid-May, which is plenty of time for Mommy and baby to bond.
Proclaimed “America’s Hottest Governor” by an understandably prejudiced Alaska Magazine, Palin is the perfect choice for VP. Not only is she conservative, she is considered a “maverick” which would make her and GOP nominee John McCain a highly compatible duo. She was born in 1964 which would add just the right May/December touch to McCain’s seasoned 71. Not only would she bring a much needed bundle of joy to the ticket, she would also bring her 90% approval rating along with her!
Ann Althouse has a crush on her, and so does Jack Kelly at Real Clear Politics. So do many other conservative bloggers, for that matter, even if she is considered a “moderate,” (though for a moderate she seems to fall right in line with the traditional family values crowd – “Pro Life,” Anti-Gay Marriage, Pro Death Penalty – and she also talks a good conservative game on “tax cuts” and opening ANWR for oil and gas development). Even comic savant Jonah “The Doughy Pantload” Goldberg of Liberal Fascism infamy, thinks she’d make a good choice for Johnny Mac’s running mate, and Patterico calls her “easy on the eyes.” If that doesn’t cinch it for her what will? (And yes, that’s snark folks)
Still, would McCain put a younger woman on the ticket, one whose personal story and energy could easily upstage him? It would be the smart thing to do, I think, unless she has skeletons in her closet no one knows about. And by GOP standards it would definitely be outside the box. The other possible female candidates either don’t want the job (Condoleezza Rice) or seem no more charismatic than Johnny Mac himself (i.e., Senator Kay Baily Hutchinson of Texas). At the least, Palin would offer a fresh face, and if its one thing the McCain campaign desperately needs, it’s a thorough freshening up. Anyone who saw his lime green jello speech last Tuesday can attest to that.
Ps. For a look at Palin’s “maverick” credentials see this diary posted last November by AliceDem here at the Pond.
How about Ann Coulter for McVP? Show the true face of Bush Republicanism…dumb and nasty.
I’m sure there are a lot of little green foofs who would love to see Annie on the ticket, but probably as the top, not the bottom.
That just might be too much for McCain’s poor heart.
Didn’t Coulter say she’d rather vote for Hillary than McCain?
Yeah, a McCain/Coulter would be quite the dream ticket!
I think with two to four more years as Gov she’d be a shoo-in (same goes for Jindal, too). McCain’s most interesting prospects, as far as thinking outside the box goes, have only one problem: lack of experience. Of course, if the Obama campaign will throw that at Palin (or Jindal) they’ll throw it right back at Obama for having been a Senator for less than four years. In that sense it could actually happen.
But when you dig a little deeper, you’ll see that just two years ago Palin was mayor of a town of 8,000 people. Would McCain really choose a running mate whose experience was less than two years as Gov. of one of the smallest states and was a small town mayor prior to that? Doubtful. But he may be desperate.
The problem for him is that there are not a whole lot of relatively young experienced women out there who might fit the bill. The Senators and Governors are either too old or too moderate.
The other (relatively) young and moderate to conservative women that come to mind are three term Rep. Marsha Blackburn (56, TN), fmr. Lt. Gov and freshman Rep. Mary Fallin (53, OK), and two term Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (39, WA). And if these names are news to you, well, that just goes to show how thin their bench is.
Compare these women to Kathleen Sebelius, Janet Napolitano, Christine Gregoire, Hillary Clinton, Patty Murray, Maria Cantwell… well you get the picture.
As for Sarah Palin, whether she’ll be McCain’s runnig mate or not, I definitely see her running for President in 2012.
I grew up in Alaska, and my parents still live there. We’re all amused by all the speculation about Sarah Palin as VP candidate. First of all, I think McCain is badly miscalculating if he thinks adding a woman to his ticket will be enough to woo Hillary’s supporters. It’s frankly a little insulting to their intelligence to assume that they’ll vote for him on that basis when Palin, while in some ways moderate, has political positions that I suspect would be difficult for most Hillary supporters to get behind (anti-abortion, etc). I really doubt Hillary supporters are going to be willing to accept just any substitute for their accomplished, strong, and principled former candidate.
Second, Palin has been governor of AK since 2006, and before that she was mayor of Wasilla. I’ve been to Wasilla. It’s a pissant little burg not too far from Anchorage. In no way, based on her time in these two offices, is she ready for the national spotlight. I voted for Obama, so I’m sensitive to unfair charges of “lack of experience,” but in Palin’s case I truly believe it’s a problem. Being mayor of Wasilla is in no way an adequate preparation for the national stage. Her two years as governor are more helpful to her case, but it still leaves her resume pretty thin. The national spotlight has never really been shined on Palin, and when it is, I expect her to look a lot less appealing. Her boosters, it seems to me, have been vastly overstating her effectiveness as governor, her polish and charisma, and her qualifications. My sense is that she’s regarded as an “okay” governor in AK, especially after that ass Murkowski, but not as the political wizard that some are depicting her to be.
There are several reasons she’s clearly an appealing running mate for McCain, but I think McCain is dreaming if he thinks she’ll help him woo Hillary’s supporters, and I also think she’s too big a risk…who knows if she’ll be so appealing once removed from the small pond and dumped in the lake?
So I hope he picks her!
Well, she is getting a lot of attention all of a sudden, which makes me think someone in the GOP has decided she ought to be the second banana. But I’m not sure anyone could help McCain this year.
agreed. I’m a little mystified by all the attention she’s getting…not sure why she’s regarded as such a promising prospect.
Well, Republicans are known for picking relative unknowns for the veep. Dan Quayle comes to mind. Spiro Agnew, too. And Nixon himself was a relative non-entity when Eisenhower put him on the ticket.
No indictments!!!
They could be propping her up for a run in 2012 or 2016. I strongly beleive the republicans now have a short list of younger, attractive women candidates who align fairly well with core christian and corporatist platforms for the national spotlight. With of a course a strong moderate or maverick streak. Think Mike Huckabee in heels.
I think we will also see the R’s transform themselves into the party of women as well as the party of family values as a way to tap into many womens discontent with the emergence of democrats like Jim Webb and Al Franken as populist heros for the democrats.
something’s up.
“Tundra Spitfire”? Weren’t they a band back in the eighties?
By the way, I think that sexism and misogyny were more organizational tools for the Clinton campaign than weapons used against her campaign. Not saying that sexism wasn’t a factor. It’s always a factor. But when David Shuster used the “p” word or Chris Matthews said something inane, it was like a 75 mph fastball over the center of the plate. The question is whether the MSM, blessed with billions by that Clinton legislating fifteen years ago, made these intentionally lame comments in a careless or intentional sexism. I remember getting pulled into a heated debate about whether or not Shuster actually meant that the Clintons were selling Chelsea for sex. It was weird.
If McCain does choose a woman as a running mate I suspect you won’t see the same hijinks on cable. I don’t think that Palin will work as a summer replacement for H. Clinton among her supporters, though.
Wonder if Tracy Chapman is getting royalties for this. I suspect she would not approve this message.
You mean the closing song on the vid?
When Mondale chose Ferraro back in 1984, I felt then that it was a symbolic gesture more than a substantive choice. The choice gave him a little boost but we know how that election actually turned out.
I expect the same would happen for McCain in 2008. If Palin is picked, I reckon the GOP isn’t doing it to help McCain in 2008 to give her national exposure for the future. My bet: She won’t be on the ticket anyway but she will give the convention nominating speech for McCain.
That said, are there any notable black GOP candidates who might be on McCain’s ticket? Colin Powell? J. C. Watts? It would seem that there are fewer potential candidates in this realm than GOP women. Check out this list: Black Republican Elected Officials – As of April 2007 It’s pathetically short.
Oh yeah, my old Republican leaning are just calling to me to vote for a woman who doesn’t know how to cross her legs.
some lovestruck, basement-dwelling teenager with raging hormones
Jesus, they just can’t stop projecting, can they? I’m reminded of William Heirens — the serial killer who scrawled “For Heaven’s sake catch me before I kill more I cannot control myself” in lipstick on the bathroom mirror of one of his victims.