Reno, Nevada
Tuesday, September 30th, 2008
This morning – like so many others over the last few months – we woke up to some very sobering news about our economy. Over the course of a few hours, the failure to pass the economic rescue plan in Washington led to the single largest decline of the stock market in two decades.
Over one trillion dollars of wealth was lost by the time the markets closed on Monday. And it wasn’t just the wealth of a few CEOs or Wall Street executives. The 401Ks and retirement accounts that millions count on for their family’s future are now smaller. The state pension funds of teachers and government employees lost billions upon billions of dollars. Hardworking Americans who invested their nest egg to watch it grow are now watching it disappear.
But while the decline of the stock market is devastating, the consequences of the credit crisis that caused it will be even worse if we do not act and act immediately.
Because of the housing crisis, we are now in a very dangerous situation where financial institutions across this country are afraid to lend money. If all that meant was the failure of a few big banks on Wall Street, it would be one thing.
But that’s not what it means. What it means is that if we do not act, it will be harder for you to get a mortgage for your home or the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. What it means is that businesses won’t be able to get the loans they need to open new factories, or hire more workers, or make payroll for the workers they have. What it means is that thousands of businesses could close. Millions of jobs could be lost. A long and painful recession could follow.
Let me be perfectly clear. The fact that we are in this mess is an outrage. It’s an outrage because we did not get here by accident. This was not a normal part of the business cycle. This was not the actions of a few bad apples.
This financial crisis is a direct result of the greed and irresponsibility that has dominated Washington and Wall Street for years. It’s the result of speculators who gamed the system, regulators who looked the other way, and lobbyists who bought their way into our government. It’s the result of an economic philosophy that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else; a philosophy that views even the most common-sense regulations as unwise and unnecessary. And this economic catastrophe is the final verdict on this failed philosophy – a philosophy that we cannot afford to continue.
But while there is plenty of blame to go around and many in Washington and on Wall Street who deserve it, all of us now have a responsibility to solve this crisis because it affects the financial well-being of every single American. There will be time to punish those who set this fire, but now is the moment for us to come together and put the fire out.
This is one of those defining moments when the American people are looking to Washington for leadership. It is not a time for politics. It is not a time for partisanship. It is not a time to figure out how to take credit or where to lay blame. It is not a time for politicians to concern themselves with the next election. It is a time for all of us to concern ourselves with the future of the country we love. This is a time for action.
I know that many of you are feeling anxiety right now – about your jobs, about your homes, about your life savings. But I also know this – I know that we can steer ourselves out of this crisis. Because that’s who we are. Because this is the United States of America. This is a nation that has faced down war and depression; great challenges and great threats. And at each and every moment, we have risen to meet these challenges – not as Democrats, not as Republicans, but as Americans. With resolve. With confidence. With that fundamental belief that here in America, our destiny is not written for us, but by us. That’s who we are, and that’s the country we need to be right now.
This is no longer just a Wall Street crisis – it’s an American crisis, and it’s the American economy that needs this rescue plan. I understand why people would be skeptical when this President asks for a blank check to solve a problem. I’ve spent most of my time in Washington being skeptical of this Administration, and this time was no different. That’s why over a week ago, I demanded that this plan include specific proposals to protect American taxpayer – protections that the Administration eventually agreed to, as well as Democrats and Republicans in Congress.
First, I said we needed an independent board to provide oversight and accountability for how and where this money is spent at every step of the way.
Second, I said that we cannot help banks on Wall Street without helping the millions of innocent homeowners who are struggling to stay in their homes. They deserve a plan too.
Third, I said that I would not allow this plan to become a welfare program for the Wall Street executives whose greed and irresponsibility got us into this mess.
And finally, I said that if American taxpayers are financing this solution, then you should be treated like investors – you should get every penny of your tax dollars back once this economy recovers.
This last part is important, because it’s been the most misunderstood and poorly communicated aspect of this entire plan. This is not a plan to just hand over $700 billion of your money to a few banks on Wall Street. If this is executed the right way, then the government will temporarily purchase the bad assets of our financial institutions so that they can start lending again, and then sell those assets once the markets settle down and the economy recovers. If this is managed correctly, we will hopefully get most or all of our money back, or possibly even turn a profit on the government’s investment – every penny of which will go directly back to you, the investor. And if we do have losses, I’ve proposed to institute a Financial Stability Fee on the entire financial services industry so that Wall Street foots the bill – not the American taxpayer. I’ve also said that if I’m President, I will review the entire plan on the day I take office to make sure that it is working to save our economy and that you are getting your money back.
Even with all these taxpayer protections, I know that this plan is not perfect or fool-proof. No matter how well we manage the government’s investments under this plan, we are still putting taxpayer dollars at risk. I know that there are Democrats and Republicans in Congress who have legitimate concerns about this, and I know there are many Americans who share those concerns.
But I also know that we can’t afford not to act. Both parties are close to accepting this plan, and over the next few hours and days, we should seek out any new ideas that might get this done. This morning, I proposed one such idea that might increase bipartisan support for this plan and shore up our economy at the same time: expanding federal deposit insurance for families and small businesses across America who have invested their money in our banks.
The majority of American families should rest assured that the deposits they have in our banks of up to $100,000 are still guaranteed by the federal government. That guarantee is more than adequate for most families, but it is insufficient for many small businesses to meet their payroll, buy their supplies, and create new jobs. The current insurance limit of $100,000 was set 28 years ago and has not been adjusted for inflation. I’ve proposed raising the FDIC limit to $250,000 – a step that would boost small businesses, make our banking system more secure, and help restore confidence by reassuring families that their money is safe.
That’s one idea. If there are others that can help shore up support for this plan and shore up our economy, I encourage Democrats and Republicans to offer them. But we must act and we must act now. We cannot have another day like yesterday. We cannot risk another week or another month where American businesses are afraid to extend credit and lend money. That is not an option for this country.
For the rest of today and as long as it takes, I will continue to reach out to leaders in both parties and do whatever I can to help pass a rescue plan. To the Democrats and Republicans who opposed this plan yesterday, I say – step up to the plate and do what’s right for this country. And to all Americans, I say this – if I am President of the United States, this rescue plan will not be the end of what we do to strengthen this economy – it will only be the beginning.
People have asked whether the size of this plan, together with the weakening economy, means that the next President will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals. The answer is both yes and no. With less money flowing into the Treasury, it is likely that some useful programs or policies that I’ve proposed on the campaign trail may need to be delayed. And I’ve said that as President, I will go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less.
But there are certain investments in our future that we cannot delay precisely because our economy is in turmoil. You can always put off giving your house a new paint job or renovating your kitchen, but when your roof is crumbling or your heater goes, you realize that these are long-term investments you need to make right away.
The same is true of our economy. We cannot wait to help Americans keep up with rising costs and shrinking paychecks by giving our workers a middle-class tax cut. We cannot wait to relieve the burden of crushing health care costs on families, businesses, and our entire economy. We cannot wait to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our roads and our bridges and investing in the renewable sources of energy that will stop us from sending $700 billion a year to tyrants and dictators for their oil. And we cannot wait to educate the next generation of Americans with the skills and knowledge they need to compete with any workers, anywhere in the world. Those are the priorities we cannot delay.
As soon as we pass this rescue plan, we need to move with the same sense of urgency to rescue the families on Main Street who are struggling every day to pay their bills and keep their jobs. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we need to pass an economic stimulus plan that will help folks cope with rising food and gas prices, save one million jobs by rebuilding our schools and roads, and help states and cities avoid budget cuts and tax increases. A plan that would extend expiring unemployment benefits for those Americans who’ve lost their jobs and cannot find new ones.
Beyond this immediate stimulus that I’ve called on both parties and the President to pass, we need an economic agenda to restore opportunity for Americans and prosperity to America. We need policies that will grow this economy from Main Street to Wall Street and everywhere in between – so that the 21st century is another American century. So that we’re not borrowing debt from China and buying oil from Saudi Arabia. So that the jobs of the future don’t go to better-educated workers in India and the cars of the future aren’t made in Japan. So that we can leave a legacy of greater opportunity to our children and their children. That is how we will emerge from this crisis stronger and more prosperous than we were before, and that is what I will do as President of the United States.
I will begin by reforming our tax code so that it doesn’t reward the lobbyists who wrote it, but the American workers and small businesses who deserve it. I will eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses and start-ups, so that we can grow our economy and create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.
I will cut taxes – cut taxes – for 95% of all workers and their families. And if you make less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increase one single dime – because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.
I will reform our health care system to relieve families, businesses, and the entire economy from the crushing cost of health care by investing in new technology and preventative care. If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don’t, you’ll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves. And I will stop insurance companies from discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.
To create new jobs, I’ll invest in rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure – our roads, schools, and bridges. We’ll rebuild our outdated electricity grid and build new broadband lines to connect America. And I’ll create the jobs of the future by transforming our energy economy. We’ll tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto companies re-tool so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here the United States of America. I’ll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I’ll invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy – wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be outsourced
And if I am President, I will meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, because it will take nothing less to compete in the global economy. I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. But in exchange, I will ask for higher standards and more accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American – if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.
Finally, I will modernize our outdated financial regulations and put in the place the common-sense rules of the road I’ve been calling for since March – rules that will keep our market free, fair, and honest; rules that will make sure Wall Street can never get away with the stunts that caused this crisis again. And I will take power away from the corporate lobbyists who think they can stand in the way of these reforms. I’ve done it in Illinois, I’ve done it Washington, and I will do it again as President.
These are the changes and reforms that we need. Bottom-up growth that will create opportunity for every American. Investments in the technology and innovation that will restore prosperity and lead to new jobs and a new economy for the 21st century. Common-sense regulations for our financial system that will prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again.
I won’t pretend this will be easy or come without cost. We will all need to sacrifice and we will all need to pull our weight because now more than ever, we are all in this together. What this crisis has taught us is that at the end of the day, there is no real separation between Main Street and Wall Street. There is only the road we’re traveling on as Americans – and we will rise or fall on that journey as one nation; as one people.
This country and the dream it represents are being tested in a way that we haven’t seen in nearly a century. And future generations will judge ours by how we respond to this test. Will they say that this was a time when America lost its way and its purpose? When we allowed our own petty differences and broken politics to plunge this country into a dark and painful recession?
Or will they say that this was another one of those moments when America overcame? When we battled back from adversity by recognizing that common stake that we have in each other’s success?
I believe that this is one of those moments. I know that many of you are anxious about your future and the future of this country. I realize that you are cynical and fed up with politics. I understand that you are disappointed and even angry with your leaders. You have every right to be. But despite all of this, I ask you to believe – believe in this country and your ability to change it. I ask you what has been asked of the American people in times of trial and turmoil throughout our history – what was asked at the beginning of the greatest financial crisis this nation has ever endured. In his first fireside chat, Franklin Roosevelt told his fellow Americans that “..there is an element in the readjustment of our financial system more important than currency, more important than gold, and that is the confidence of the people themselves. Confidence and courage are the essentials of success in carrying out our plan. Let us unite in banishing fear. Together, we cannot fail.”
America, together, we cannot fail. Not now. Not when we have a crisis to solve and an economy to save. Not when there are so many Americans without jobs and without homes. Not when there are families who can’t afford to see a doctor, or send their child to college, or pay their bills at the end of the month. Not when there is a generation that is counting on us to give them the same opportunities and the same chances that we had for ourselves. Now is the time to make them proud of what we did here. Let’s give our children the future they deserve, and let’s act with confidence and courage to show the world that at this moment, in this election, the United States of America is still the last, best hope of Earth. Thank you Nevada, God bless you, and may God bless America.
Can he afford to do all he says if the bailout passes? The pessimist in me wants to say, we cannot fail? We are failing before your eyes Senator. You are seeing how dysfunctional this country is.
Frankly I think supporting the bill is the right thing to do, but I hate every second of it.
Yeah, now that Bush AND Obama are pointing guns to our heads there will be a lot of people jumping on board. Fear is a very effective weapon.
But guess who won’t be jumping on board? Congressional Republicans. Guess who now owns this bad economy? The conservative Democrats and Bush.
Pointing guns? Why do you have to use this kind of rhetoric? If there is a gun it’s been pointing for a long time. Obama is proposing a choice. How is that pointing a gun? Is he saying if you don’t do what I want I’ll punish you? If so, please point that out.
I hope you’re right — that the Dems and Obama go all in on their answer to the crisis. That they take exclusive ownership. Obama has just offered the first real leadership on the economic threat since the current uproar began. That’s what Americans have been looking for and what they will reward.
“But while the decline of the stock market is devastating, the consequences of the credit crisis that caused it will be even worse if we do not act and act immediately.”
“What it means is that if we do not act, it will be harder for you to get a mortgage for your home or the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. What it means is that businesses won’t be able to get the loans they need to open new factories, or hire more workers, or make payroll for the workers they have. What it means is that thousands of businesses could close. Millions of jobs could be lost. A long and painful recession could follow.”
“all of us now have a responsibility to solve this crisis because it affects the financial well-being of every single American. There will be time to punish those who set this fire, but now is the moment for us to come together and put the fire out.”
“But I also know that we can’t afford not to act. “
“We cannot have another day like yesterday. We cannot risk another week or another month where American businesses are afraid to extend credit and lend money. That is not an option for this country.”
Obama has ignored these problems for a year and now he follows George W. Bush, the Worst President in the History of these United States, in putting a gun to America’s head.
I don’t take kindly to acts of financial terrorism.
You don’t answer the question. If I say “If you don’t quit walking in the middle of the interstate you’re gonna get run down”, am I being a terrorist? Am I pointing a gun or threatening to run you down?
I’ve often said stuff to the effect that if McCain wins America probably won’t recover. Am I holding a gun to your head?
Your broken logic leaves me gasping for air. You’re against doing anything, fine — but you sure don’t do your cause any good with Bushian rhetoric like this.
We are having a breakdown in logic here. What do you call threatening dire consequences unless the United States Treasury writes a very big check in a very hasty manner without thinking about it too much?
We have been watching the same play, right? Bush and the government denied there was a problem for years but secretly planned a “rescue” these last few months and then abruptly reversed course at the most politically sensitive time, 40 days before an election, and said all these bad things will happen if you don’t do what I say.
Now Obama, after basically ignoring these issues for a year, is following Bush’s lead and saying, “if you don’t do what Bush and I say, the sky will fall.”
Even if this is the most substantively sound bill ever, the manner it will be enacted in more closely resembles armed robbery than it does a reasoned legislative decision.
And some have the audacity to blow smoke up my ass and tell me that Obama is leading and actually acting responsibly? He’s promising to “save” the economy. He’s just as foolish as Bush. He can’t save the economy. Certainly not with this bill done in this manner.
Logic has indeed been the true victim in all of this. You guys will go around and enforce the party line . . . now that your savior Obama has spoken (the savior to “save” the economy through the biggest act of socialism in this country’s history–good luck running on that if he fails in his mission).
But America won’t forget. The Democrats and Obama have promised to “fix” and “save” the economy through the biggest socialist bailout in the history of the World (and in a perverse twist, the “socialism” will go to the biggest proponents of “capitalism”).
Obama now owns this mess. He’s promised to “save” us all.
He should own this mess, as well as the best solution he can come up with. That’s what politicians are for, and what leaders do.
Again you substitute rhetoric for logic. If you really think warning people that if they smoke while pumping as they might blow up is “holding a gun to their head” or a terrorist act, I give up; you win. To put it as simply as possible, Obama is not threatening he will wreck the economy if he doesn’t get his way. That would be holding a gun. If you can’t see that there’s just no ground for trying to communicate.
Nor did Obama claim he was going to “save” the economy as far as I recall. Here’s what he did say, since it looks like you didn’t even read the speech:
Hey if they’ll allow him to cut where he should start Imho,
the Pentagon.
In a 392-39 vote, CONgress just gave the Pentagon over a trillion dollars. With a deficit, where is this money coming from?
Created from thin air. That’s the outrage. Where were the protests?
So let me not hear we can’t afford Obama’s program of universal health care or investments in infrastructure:
Looks like a great speech. I notice that toward the end he talked about sacrifice, but I saw nothing sacrificial in the programs he was touting. All great programs i can get behind.
I’ll be voting for Obama, but before I become a “believer” someone’s going to have to explain to me how in the Hell any of this works–financially.
Oh, he says we’ll sacrifice:
“With less money flowing into the Treasury, it is likely that some useful programs or policies that I’ve proposed on the campaign trail may need to be delayed. And I’ve said that as President, I will go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less. “
But we’ll work out all those details once Obama is elected and we tally up the total bill for our bailouts of financial firms. Like Obama says, there’s a gun pointed to our heads and we should just trust him and Bush and Paulson and Pelosi to do the right thing now and worry about the details later.
I’m sure they will be more than fair when they figure out what programs to cut once they “fix” the economy by giving Wall Street a couple of trillion dollars.
I’d like to see them deep six the SDI (“Star Wars”) research we’ve been wasting billions on for the last 30 years.
I’m not quite that cynical, but I still don’t understand how this is supposed to work.
The government will be in debt to the tune of about 11 Trillion by the time the next President takes office (that includes the bailout). The programs that are deemed “necessary” will inevitably be constructed with more borrowed money–unless there are some severe cuts to the military budget (good luck with that).
The entire American economy is constructed on the willingness of foreigners to keep shoveling money into the US with a guarantee that they will realize a net loss. If they ever start to demand a real return on their investments (or they can no longer buy our debt), the game is up.
That ‘s why Obama warned that this plan is not enough. I don’t understand why people expect a whole economic reform package to be hung off of this specific bill. And why would you even want to try it as long as Bush is in office? If you don’t trust Obama to do anything right as president, that’s your prerogative. But what does it have to do with the emergency measures at hand, unless you really believe that there’s no economic problem going on at all.
You miss the point. I’m talking about the programs he identified as immediately necessary. How does he pay for them? With more debt? Debt is the core of the economic problem. Sure I think the economy needs restructuring and I believe he’ll at least try to do that, but that won’t pay for the programs.
I don’t know how he’ll find the money or if he will. Stuff that comes immediately to mind are cutting the military, leaving Iraq, raising taxes on the highest brackets, shifting funding from road building to energy and public transport, deep-sixing SDI, reforming medicare and medicaid, ending most corporate subsidies, reviving the inheritance tax, rewriting corporate taxes, among others. If the economy regains its strength the money and credit will be there. Some of the cuts he makes will piss me off like crazy. That’s a given.
Will he manage to do what he’s promising? I hope so. It can be done, expecially if he keeps ownership of this recovery plan and the Dems back him to the hilt — which will result in a blowout win for him and a strong Dem majority in Congress. He gets the problem. That’s a breath of fresh air so long in coming that I’m not gonna get into a sweat on the details right now.
I’m sorry. I just see a lot of progressives getting suckered.
Obama does not agree with you on your cuts. He WILL NOT cut the military. He will cut social services.
Now is the time to worry about it (sweat the details) because this bill will limit our future choices.
Everyone wants to capitulate because so many are pinning their hopes on Obama. Do you really think taking ownership over the economy right at the time things are spiraling downward is wise?
Bush and his government will have no incentive to hide things or paper over things (as they have been doing the last year) once Obama signs on to “save” the economy.
Obama cannot save the economy. He is not a savior. Far from it. This is utter foolishness.
So your answer is to let the depression come without lifting a finger. You could turn out to be right. In the meantime I’ll go with Obama as the best hope I’ve seen.
Frankly it’s looking clearer that you’d be spewing pretty much the same lines no matter what Obama did. I don’t know if you’re a Clinton diehard or a Libertarian believer or have a big short position in the market or what, but it’s getting tiresome. You’re the only one who seems to think Obama being a “savior” is an issue. Most other folks have more important things to think about.
Ok, here you come with the insults . . . a sure sign of desperation.
I don’t want a depression. I don’t want the government to “do nothing”. I am most certainly not a Clinton partisan. I do have some libertarian leanings and I do have a small short interest in the stock market but I am much more of a progressive liberal than anything else. Thanks for caring. I’m sure your knee-jerk Democratic centrism is an awesome belief system too–it must reassuring to be one of the lemmings following Obama over the cliff.
I raised the “savior” issue mostly because that’s my political analysis of all this (as opposed to the policy considerations). In my mind, the Democrats are stupid for taking responsibility for “saving” the economy. And I’m sorry you don’t see those political ramifications and are resisting these characterizations (and even you admit Obama is taking “responsibility” for the economy–like a grown up). I don’t agree with republicans and when they call Obama a socialist savior they will be low-down jerks. But I think I know enough about American politics to know that the Republicans will SUCCESSFULLY run against Democrats if they stand alone with Bush and take responsibility to “save” the economy by enacting the biggest socialist bailout in history and it doesn’t work.
Now maybe you’re right and this gamble to save the economy will pay off. I would rather be wrong and have the economy rebound. But I’m a realist and I don’t see that happening.
If you don’t see the gamble paying off, it follows that you want to do nothing. Why would you want to do something if you already know it won’t work?
Did you actually read Obama’s speech? Do you really think he’s channeling Bush? That’s just mind blowing.
Politically, if things go my way, Obama and the Dems won’t be standing with Bush. They’ll be standing with a plan of their own to replace Bush/McCain’s failed one. That’s what Americans want, and the Dems are the last ones with the cred and the relevance to give it to them. If you ever do get around to actually reading Obama’s speech you’ll see that he’s not promising anything like saving the economy. He’s saying it will be hard and painful, but he’s presenting what he believes is the best option we’ve got. He’s telling the truth, in other words. As long as he keeps on doing that, the American people will stay with him. You want to talk gambles, that’s mine.
Well, we’re going to have to wait and see what happens. Good luck.
And I’ve not only read Obama’s speech I quoted it extensively in this very thread! He’s buying into Bush’s faulty logic: that we can “fix” this crisis through this bill. It’s not that the government has no role, it’s that the government’s ability to do very much is limited.
I’m sorry but you’re going to have to accept that the government can’t fix everything. And sometimes trying to fix things makes it worse (e.g. fighting evil throughout the world with the U.S. military).
Plus, I don’t think the government should do nothing.
In fact, I’ve been arguing these last few days that the government should act–but act by getting back to basic economic principles the Democrats used to stand up for. Let’s nationalize the banking industry if we need to. Let’s shore up social security and ensure that corporations honor pension promises. Let’s extend unemployment insurance and if we are going to spend from the treasury to inject liquidity into the economy let’s invest in infrastructure and other things that create jobs (I think Obama has some good ideas here). Let’s fix our bankruptcy laws the Democrats caved-in on in 2005 so that average Americans that are insolvent can start their lives over and not remain debt slaves forever. Let’s let judges rework mortgages in bankruptcy. Let’s get a a living wage.
And most important let’s have socialized health care. Talk about giving some relief to small businesses! And big businesses as well.
We won’t be able to do those things next year if this bill passes because we will have blown our wad on this bailout.
Plus, we should cut our military spending by about 1/4, to start, end our war in Iraq, and raise tax rates on the richest Americans. We should also start decriminalizing drugs and stop the prison industrial complex. But these very sane ideas will be presented as crazy because my fellow allies (unfortunately you guys are all I got) will not stand up for this.
In short, we’re all being sold out because of a political bomb George Bush threw into the process. There is no way that a good bill can come out of a process like this. Period. So in the short term I would rather the government not act. Doing something for the sake of doing something is not always wise http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/why-bailout-bill-will-not-solve-credit.html. You can’t have Mr. 28% and his 18% Congress legislatin’ in this way. It’s doomed to fail.
I’m only sorry I can’t rate your comment higher!
Well said.
Obama and the Dems won’t be standing with Bush. They’ll be standing with a plan of their own to replace Bush/McCain’s failed one.
Doesn’t look like that’s going to happen:
Calls to Congressmen Running in Favor of Bailout Bill
IT’S NOT SUPPOSED TO WORK! It is a giveaway.
The immediate problem is undercapitalization, and this plan can actually lead to reduced capitalization:
The writers of the bill must have understood that, because the bill incredibly reduces reserve requirements to zero. Wall Street just wants to continue its party a little longer.
Contrast this well-written and accessible appeal to the mindless, detail-free and unlistenable speaches from Mr. Bush the last 2 mornings and last night.
Today they’d be selling you the monkey shit.
The Obama program can’t work without a massive increase in borrowing to fund a big increase in spending – offset to some extent by a reduction in the costs of military adventures abroad. It also requires a big shift in the burden of taxation from middle class individuals to large corporations and top earners. This can only be done if the power of big business in Washington and the electoral process is broken – and the ideological monopoly created by the MSM and think tanks is broken.
Good look guys, its a big ask, but it’s nothing that hasn’t been done in some measure in Europe before.
I have a saying that I probably ripped off someone else, “don’t ask, don’t get.”
dunno. See my comment upthread. We seem to be able to fund a trillion dollars for the Pentagon, without any protest whatsoever.
I dunno either. Maybe you can’t fix this mess without taking on the Pentagon and the MI complex. That might require a revolution.
Obama has proposed an increase in military spending and proposed expanding our wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Just ask him. I would bet my life savings that he will say we cannot afford to cut the military.
He has consistently called to enforce corporate taxation.
It’s not like the bastards won’t fight back and still try to cheat–that’s what they do, after all–but even mentioning it is a pretty big deal. And Obama has shown a remarkable seriousness in his approach, too.
He may even follow through some. I will be amazed, but I’ve been pretty amazed so far.
A remarkable seriousness? Because he agreed with Bush he’s serious?
Where was Obama a month ago when these problems were known? He waited until Bush reversed course and dropped a political bomb on the process. Then he let Bush lead the charge to “fix” the economy.
That’s not seriousness. That’s bad judgment and more of the same. Obama has clearly signaled that his Democratic party will be the same loser Democratic party we’ve all known too well these last 8 years.
in all kindness,
You appear too eager to put down Obama at every opportunity.
Obama is not the president, yet.
You overlook that Bush and McCain have been following Obama’s lead on foreign and domestic policy. Only today Obama called for raising the limit for FDIC insurance on accounts from $100,000 to $250,000 per. FDIC promptly requested the authority.
SO
Where was Bush? Less than two weeks ago he and McCain were telling us the economic fundamentals are sound? It would seem to me that if the banking system is frozen, failing and or broke (which at that time they were) that’s pretty fundamental to a sound economy. So much for an MBA.
Where was Paulson? Last year he said the problem was contained. Ten days ago he nationalized AIG, a non-banking entity but too big to fail, sold Merrill, converted Goldman and Morgan Stanley to bank holding companies, allowed Lehman to declare bankruptcy.
Seems to me you’ve conveniently missed Obama’s statement from last March in which he alerted to some of these very issues. And again at his summit with Volcker, ex Fed chairman and Buffett among others.
Give Obama some slack. Bush and Paulson are in charge.
Your criticism and alternative proposals are interesting and intriguing in an alternative universe– one where progressive Democrats ran the world, without inconvenient things like Congressional elections and public opinion and Presidential elections in just over a month didn’t exist. The problem is, we could ALL come up with a laundry list of wishful thinking and improvements/replacements for features of the bailout proposals currently under consideration. However, the prolonged discussion is an exercise in mental masturbation without taking into consideration the REALITY of the American political system, the impending elections, and the reality of vote-bartering and deal-making that is going on right now in the Capital. How about an entirely different thread/diary: my wishlist for how to fix the economy and country if reality and politics weren’t a factor? I would be happy to chip in with my $.02 at that time, and in that place, too, but this is (I thought) a more pragmatic discussion of what can and should be done within the parameters of reality.
My proposals are much more closely tailored to “fix” the economy that the current bailout bill. At least I focus on the basic safety net underpinning our society–social security, retirement security, health security. This helps all of society and allows us to get back to fundamental economic health.
But I see your point. We are a retarded country. Which is why I would rather have the government do nothing at this point rather than making things worse.
This speech is what I’ve been waiting and hoping for. Excellent in every way — and I’ve become an Obama skeptic lately in some respects. He’s managed to be specific enough to let people judge the proposal on its merits, and at the same time connect it to the bigger picture. He has laid the groundwork to take ownership of what will now be the last plan standing.
What remains is for the rest of the party to get behind this 100% and sell it to their constituents. Obama showed real political courage with this speech. I hope his Dem colleagues do the same. This crisis (or talk of crisis, if you prefer) has been going on for a week or more now and this is the first coherent leadership we’ve seen. If the Dems join Obama in standing for something they will both serve the country well and usher in a new progressive majority in America.
I love this:
And he goes on to show how the assumption provided by Jim Lehrer is false.
And he talks about “punishment for those who set the fire.” Oh be still my heart, he’s talking about accountability.
I’ve proposed raising the FDIC limit to $250,000
That’s a good idea.
But I also know that we can’t afford not to act. Both parties are close to accepting this plan, and over the next few hours and days, we should seek out any new ideas that might get this done.
Here‘s an idea:
Among Bailout Supporters, Wall St. Donations Ran High
Hey he is talking about a Securities Turnover Excise Tax. Its a good idea and worth reading about.
We had one until 1966. We need revenue.