President Barack Hussein Obama on bi-partisanship and the stimulus bill:
“So, you know, we can differ on some of the particulars, but again, the question I think that the American people are asking is: Do you just want government to do nothing, or do you want it to do something? If you want it to do something, then we can have a conversation,” he said. “But doing nothing — that’s not an option, from my perspective.” Obama defended the role of government in the recovery process, saying that “with the private sector so weakened by this recession, the federal government is the only entity left with the resources to jolt our economy back to life.”
I wish he’d said this forcefully 2 weeks ago. I sure as hell hope that in the future he has learned his lesson about how the Republicans in Congress will treat his administration, and he doesn’t expect them to put their country before their party. On. Any. Issue. Because they don’t. They know only one way to operate whether they are in the majority or the minority: demonize and denigrate Democrats. Polarize public opinion. Blame Dems for everything and anything that goes wrong from the bursting of the real estate bubble to the failures in the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How often did we hear Bush blame Clinton for everything that went wrong during his administration? How often did Republican talking points slam the Democrats for their lack of bi-partisanship even when they were rolling over and cowering like whipped dogs? This is the party that ran ads comparing a Democratic war hero in the Senate to Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin. The same group that wore purple band aids to mock Senator John Kerry’s war record at the height of the Swift Boat lies. The same people who labeled Democrats appeasers of the “Islamofascists” because they wouldn’t get on board with Cheney’s plan to bomb Iran with tactical nukes. The same people who tossed around epithets against Democrats claiming they were “the far left fringe,” a “fifth column,” “traitors,” “terrorist lovers” “Fascists,” and “Communists, Marxists and/or Socialists.” They have had their long knives out slicing and dicing Democrats and Liberals with lies and slanders since before Reagan became President, and nothing has changed in their tactics since that time.
Republicans have only become more and more audacious and outrageous as the media, talk radio and Fox’s News’ televised version of conservative propaganda have faithfully regurgitated their “talking points” day after day for decades with no filter, no fact checking and no analysis about whether their criticisms were valid and the falsehoods they spread true. If anyone in Obama’s camp seriously thought that they could drive a wedge between the “moderate” Republicans and the “batshit crazy loons” who dominate the Republican Caucus by playing nice and having them over for tea and cookies at the White House, the last few weeks should have disabused them of that notion. That’s not how they play the game.
This is the party of people who cheered at the openly racist and xenophobic speeches of Sarah Palin. The people who exploited the 9/11 attacks at every opportunity to justify retaining the reins of power. Who think torture is a great idea because it works for Jack Bauer, a character in a fictional television program. Who saw nothing wrong with calling African Americans abandoned by the Bush administration “looters” and “thugs” who deserved what they got as they died by the thousands in the wake of Katrina. Who voted for legal discrimination against Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Transgendered people. Who want to ship every Hispanic person back to Mexico even if they have lived in this country for decades, or in some cases, centuries. Who think calls for the poisoning of Supreme Court Justices and bumper stickers entitled “Liberal Hunting License” are the height of hilarity.
This is the party of Rush “Abu Ghraib was nothing more than guards blowing off a little steam” Limbaugh. Sean Hannity. Bill O’Reilly. Glenn Beck. Ann Coulter. Jack Abramoff. Duke Cunningham. Pat “Assassination of Foreign Leaders is Jesus approved” Robertson. David “I did have sex with that prostitute, but so what?” Vitter. James “Global Warming is a Hoax” Inhofe. Tom “Let’s sterilize the Nigras and charge Medicaid for it” Coburn. Bill “I can diagnose people over the TV” Frist. Dick “Terrorists will Nuke us because Obama is President” Cheney. John “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” McCain. Sarah “I only like the small town, patriotic, Pro-American parts of America” Palin. George W. “Mission Accomplished” Bush.
This is the party that supported torture. Warrantless electronic surveillance of every American. Show trials at Guantanamo Bay. Tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of of Americans. Tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. That opposed giving uninsured children health coverage under SCHIP. That deregulated the Banks, mortgage lenders and Wall Street Investment firms. That reduced funding for EPA environmental enforcement, mine safety inspections, OSHA, Food and Drug Inspectors, SEC investigations of fraud, etc. That fired US Attorneys if they didn’t file frivolous voter fraud cases against Democrats. That railroaded former Democratic Alabama Governor Don Siegelman into prison using unethical tactics and tainted evidence. That wasted billions of dollars privatizing the military, prisons and other parts of the government with contracts to Blackwater, Halliburton, KBR, and [fill in the name of Republican campaign contributor here]. That turned the largest Federal budget surplus in our history into the largest Federal budget deficits. That increased the National Debt by FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS (an increase of over 70%) in just 8 years, not counting the TARP money Secretary Treasury handed out like lollipops to his buddies. The party that supports eliminating Social Security Insurance for retirees and disabled people. That still believes in trickle down economics.
You can’t bargain with these people. They are stubborn, faith based ideologues who do not so compromise. President Obama you tried offering the hand of friendship to these people and they spit in your face. You tried including Republicans in the discussion regarding the economic stimulus and they lied to you about their support. You tried being the good guy and they stabbed you in the back. Don’t do it again. If it didn’t work this time during the greatest economic crisis our republic has faced since the Great Depression it will never work.
I suggest that from here on out you take your case directly to the American people every chance you get and avoid the American media filter which is dedicated to opposing you and promoting the failed policies of the Republicans. And don’t hold your punches. Hey, if it worked for FDR . . .
Excellently said. Bravo.
If bipartisanship wasn’t part of the picture when the GOP held the majority, why would the picture change with a reversal?
(BTW, there’s a link you might want to fix in the 5th graf.)
Thanks. I think I got it.
“I wish he’d said this forcefully 2 weeks ago. I sure as hell hope that in the future he has learned his lesson about how the Republicans in Congress will treat his administration, and he doesn’t expect them to put their country before their party. On. Any. Issue. Because they don’t.”
Excuse me. Look at the polls. Obama is perceived by a great majority as having been fair and reasonable and having tried to compromise. And the Republicans are perceived by a big majority as having not done so. Obama managed to get the bill through the Senate because of those numbers. And he got those numbers despite the frantic efforts of the Press to sell the Puker story.
The theory that all Obama has to do is be forceful in order to overcome an entrenched and unscrupulous Republican/Winger/Corporate power structure seems to me to be based entirely on wishful thinking.
And we got a lousy bill that has yet to pass.
He tried Plan A. Now it’s time for Plan B.
How the fuck do you think he got those 3 Puke votes?
It looks like Obama agrees with me.
LINK
Not what he is saying.
If he had followed that strategy, the GOP would have looked like it won. Now it lost and looks like it lost.
If Obama had followed that strategy, he would have been forced to give up a lot more.
Well said, Steven, especially the part about avoiding the media filter. For the most part the media is complicit in Operation Destroy Country, reflexively helping the GOP talking points along at every given opportunity.
Yesterday on Shuster’s MSNBC show, Politico hack Josh Gerstein was complaining about how this press conference represented the first real opportunity to talk to Obama and how he was “not accessible” to the press corps. But Obama’s not playing small ball with these idiots anymore. He’s talking to the people, not the press.
More of that, please. The Village Idiots have to be neutralized for Obama to have any chance.
As far as I can tell, corporate entities like those supporting the MSM don’t actually recognize ‘country’; they see markets.
They’re operating on an entirely alien level than Obama is. They don’t actually communicate (which is a reciprocal thing, after all); they dictate.
The Great Communicator may just be the pol who can exploit the available channels most efficiently.
I’ve called this the new “Rocky Horror Picture Show.” These folks are told how to react and what to say, and just repeat it. The lockstep House vote on the stimulus said it all.
Makes you wonder how much of the domestic wiretapping was directed at the Rethugs. The Rover must have something on each of them to keep them all in line.
…In general towing the line is their mindset.
steven d.,
“This is the party that supported torture.”
Unlike Obama, who just wants to protect those poor little torturers through “state secrets”.
or the democratic leadership:
“Warrantless electronic surveillance of every American.”
the democrats would never in a million years support that:
Changey McHopesalot wouldn’t have anything to do with that, right:
The democratic party, including Changey McHopesalot, is complicit in torture and wiretapping. they’re also complicit in the economic crisis, because both parties were gleefully ripping down all that new deal legislation during the 1990s and the early part of this century, because there was money to be made.
I understand your point, that you can’t make deals with unreasonable people, but none of these score points on the GOP because the Democrats are just as fucking guilty.
sorry man, not feeling the democratic part or Changey Mchopesalot right now. not at all.
Yes. The Dems are absolutely complicit & Obama is the party leader.
However: if the discussion involves bi-partisanship, there’s got to be an assumption that there are actually two parties. There’s no discussion without differentiation.
all of the bills mentioned were passed on a bipartisan basis.
there is differentiation, but not a lot. as my grandma used to say, “the difference is that the democrats leave a little for you to steal too.”
the point is that there’s no change here. In fact, as greenwald pointed out using visual aids, Obama is openly breaking his promise.
Change.
Hope.
Ha.
Ha.
Ha.
ps: i wonder if i’m still a cynic.
you wonder?
it’s a friendly tweak at our host, who recently wrote the four lethal cynicisms for me. I couldn’t help thinking about it as i watch Changey McHopesalot morph into Newboss Oldboss.
And you can add Obama’s empty bullshit promises on transparency and ending Bush-era abuses of state secrets “as a tool to force courts to dismiss entire lawsuits from the start without any proceedings being held, rather than as a focused instrument for protecting specific pieces of classified information from disclosure” to the pile of lies and government abuse.
This makes me so mad i could shit Phillips head screwdrivers.
I was very disappointed in that as well. It’s the wrong road to be heading down. It makes you wonder if he really is scared of the Intelligence community, or if he has succumbed to the pressure of conservative Dems.
That’s what i think. I think he decided to campaign as the anti-bush, as booman pointed out.
but just because a politician SAYS something doesn’t mean he actually BELIEVES it himself. A lot of times politicians say things they know will make people like and support them. just look at Chris Carney, who pretended to be a progressive and fooled Howie Klein. Or jerry Mcnerney, who said one thiNG about Iraq when campaigning, and promptly did the opposite when elected.
Actions speak a lot louder than words. Obama said all the right things about transparency, but given his lies on FISA, who could actually be surprised that he lied about transparency too?
Don’t be surprised when the troops don’t come home either. Or when you don’t get health care.
people say all sorts of bullshit when they want a job bad enough.
If he’d said it two weeks ago it wouldn’t have the impact it has now after the Rethugs demonstrated their obstrucionist tactics.
I’m amazed at how few people understand this simple fact.
It’s almost as though Obama knew that the Thugs would overplay their hand. I wonder how he possibly could have predicted that!
This reminds me so much of last year, substituting the Clinton machine for the Republicans. We kept urging Obama to hit back hard, but he stayed patient and true to his strategy. And it worked.
I think that’s just who the guy is: a chess player in a world of coin flippers. To borrow a phrase, maybe we should just let Bartlet be Bartlet and see how this plays out over the course of this Congress. I think he’s driving a wedge deep into what remains of their coalition and redefining the political landscape in a way that makes their tactics woefully inadequate. We’re not getting what we want out of this bill, but this approach will likely pay big dividends down the line, I think.
You can win the election – and lose the war.
http://www3.sympatico.ca/goweezer/canada/campbell.htm
She ran supporting NAFTA : the party virtually disappeared.
Here’s one example of how a country then loses its independence.
http://www.straightgoods.com/McQuaig/010618.shtml
Most Canadians don’t realize that the first 40 years of our country’s history – 1867 to 1907 – was spent fighting the battle for an independent tariff wall. The reason why isn’t because we are unneighbourly shitheads who like protectionism : in fact we are a trading nation. However, our physical layout is a thin band of population concentrated near the international border.Distance is then the defining consideration of domestic trade. If no offset exists for the cost of transportation, it goes north-south rather than east-west.
Being at the far end of the distribution network and losing in the natural growing cycle because growing season is truncated, our farmers do not compete on a ‘level playing field’ either. Consequently, international agreements which do not allow for ‘balancing’ measures kill domestic agriculture.
There are other reasons I’m sure – but those are ones which were taught to every schoolkid.
15 years in – after repeated softwood lumber revenue seizures, boycott of our beef ( the health of yours isn’t even tested ), and God knows what all else…the discontent up here is surely no less than yours.
Yet…the ‘will of the people’ is not even close to being implemented.
Try this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy
http://www.needlenose.com/node/view/3905