I can only hope this article serious. Excuse the long quotes, please if you are at all interested in the subject, go read the whole thing. Gravy train might just be over!
Barack Obama is to deliver a blunt warning to Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, that the era of the blank US cheque is over.
So about time:
The President will use a meeting with Mr Netanyahu in Washington on Monday to tell him that from now on Israel must earn its privileged relationship with America.
Mr Obama will make clear that he will not allow his foreign policy objectives to be dictated by the Jewish state’s interests, and that its leaders must resume working for peace with the Palestinians.
The President has already fired warning shots across the bows of the Israeli government to signal that he will not be pushed around by Mr Netanyahu’s newly elected right-wing coalition. Many within Israel’s government are openly hostile to two key aspects of American policy on the Middle East: statehood for the Palestinians and engagement with Iran.
Martin Indyk, a former US ambassador to Israel, said: “Netanyahu is caught between a rock and a hard place, the rock being the president’s determination to achieve a two-state solution and the hard place being his political base which opposes it. He’s inching toward the Obama position but trying to avoid saying the words, ‘two-state solution.'”
snip
But Mr Obama’s hand in confronting Mr Netanyahu was strengthened last week by a new Zogby poll revealing that voters who backed him in the election overwhelmingly support a policy which amounts to “get tough with Israel” – ending illegal Israeli settlements within Palestinian territory and establishing a Palestinian state. Jewish voters, 78 per cent of whom voted for Mr Obama, are among the strongest supporters of the plan.
Mr Obama has already shocked Israeli officials by publicly declaring that a two state solution was in America’s national interest – a clear sign that Washington will no longer automatically leap to support Israel regardless of the impact on the US.
The Obama administration has also broken a long-standing taboo against discussing Israel’s nuclear weapons, by calling for Israel to declare and give up its weapons arsenal, said to number around 50 warheads. A senior State Department official said the US wants Israel to sign the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and commit to disarmament. What he has not done yet, is query the $3 billion in military aid which US taxpayers send Israel every year, although that could yet happen given the straitened times.
But Israel is meanwhile rattled by Mr Obama’s willingness to attempt dialogue with Iran, seen by Mr Netanyahu and Mr Lieberman as the biggest threat to the Jewish state.
snip
But alarm bells rang in Jerusalem earlier this month when it was reported that he had warned that efforts to stop Iran would depend on peace talks with the Palestinians.Though protective towards Israel, both advisers are said to consider that for many years American policy has been skewed by hard-line allies of Israel who do not represent the majority Jewish American viewpoint. Both spent months during the presidential election campaign trail helping to brief Mr Obama on the intricacies of Israeli-Palestinian affairs, and both are convinced of the need for a two-state solution.
snip
But there was concern in Israel when Mr Obama moved to allow US aid to flow to members of the Palestinian unity government who were backed by Hamas – a sign that the Obama administration may be prepared to talk to enemies it considers terrorists, if circumstances change.
Mr Obama also sent his CIA chief, Leon Panetta, on a discreet mission to Israel two weeks ago to warn Mr Netanyahu not to lose patience over Iran’s progress to nuclear weapons – and above all, not to launch preemptive air strikes against suspected nuclear enrichment facilities.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/5335620/Obama-to-warn-Israels-PM-Benjami
n-Netanyahu-No-more-blank-cheques.html
What can I say. If I thought praying could help….I’d pray.
This is the right thing.
.
I do believe AIPAC’s acts will backfire on the Obama administration. The ousting of Chas Freeman as candidate for US Intelligence czar may well have sealed Obama’s hard stance on Israeli interference on U.S. policy.
The new Arab peace initiative version presented by Abdullah simply spells out some of the provisions of the original text, such the nature of the “normal relations” on offer by Arab governments. This and other gestures would reward Israel for its withdrawal to the pre-1967 war lines, i.e. its pullback from the West Bank, Golan Heights and historic Jerusalem, its acceptance of Palestinian statehood and the return of the refugees to their former homes.
…
The goals include “an immediate renewal of U.S.-mediated Israeli-Palestinian negotiations toward the establishment of a Palestinian state”; the “cessation of Palestinian terror attacks on Israelis and of weapons smuggling into Gaza“; a freeze on West Bank settlement construction and a halt to demolitions of Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem; the “immediate reconstruction of Gaza”; and the “pursuit of a comprehensive peace between Israel and its neighbors, including Syria, using the Arab Peace Initiative as a basis for negotiations.”
More signs of trouble for Likudniks:
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
I’ll believe it when I see it.
Me too. Congress is still so fearful of AIPAC that is doubtful if it will follow polls or constituencies to confront the right wing Israeli dictates.
“when it was reported that he had warned that efforts to stop Iran would depend on peace talks with the Palestinians.”
Since there is no conceivable relationship between Palestinian statehood and Iran’s nuclear program, this concocted association is just a weak form of blackmail that Obama should be able to dismiss. But will he?
We all know where Israel is coming from. But we don’t really know how serious Obama is.
assuming this is a reliable report…always rather iffy given the source…
Obama warns Netanyahu: Don’t surprise me with Iran strike [5.14.09]
if true, it would appear that the open door policy vis-a-vis israel’s desire to control u.s. policy in the ME, may be in jeopardy. it’s also likely, that this hard line approach, that appears to be coming with netanyahu’s visit, may not be suffered gladly:
Netanyahu to tell Obama: Time ‘running out’ on Iran [5.18.09]
l have to agree with Hurria and shergald, above, on this one: “I’ll believe it when I see it.”
Ditto. I’ll only believe it when I see it. The rest is propaganda and self-serving deception. I’m talking to you Mr. O. The last thing the world needs is another ‘fine speech’.
Netanyahu
From the clips on NPR, Bibi did not sound very happy. (Perhaps that’s how he normally sounds.) Obama sounded a bit frustrated. I wonder what was said in private.
doesn’t sound like the little tête-à-tête that bibi and the o-man had today went all that well:
Despite smiles and nods, Obama and Netanyahu are miles apart on policy
what we used to call a mexican standoff, imnsho.
I call bullshit.
Israel begins new settlement, Despite U.S. opposition
Barack Obama can say anything he wants to. It’s actions that count, and these actions clearly say Bibi wears the pants in this relationship.
This is more than payback, but letès not forget that AIPAC killed off one of Obamaès national security picks two months ago. As the saying goes, don’t get mad, get even. Ogama just showed that he knows how to get even. It will take a while for the likudniks to get their heads around that, and they don’t try to mount an assassination.
Obama will genuinely “get tough with Israel” on the same day he ends the occupation of Iraq and closes the imperial citadel (risibly called an embassy) in Baghdad – in other words, don’t hold your breath.
.
(Haaretz) – The Israel Defense Forces says it has “severely reprimanded” an officer for distributing a religious booklet urging soldiers to show no mercy to their enemies. The unidentified officer handed out the booklet to troops during Israel’s fierce three-week military incursion in the Gaza Strip.
The army says the booklet was based on the writings of an ultranationalist rabbi identified with the Jewish settler movement in the West Bank. It says the chief military rabbi, Brig. Gen. Avichay Rontzki, did not see or approve the booklet before publication.
Some passages compared Palestinians to the biblical Philistines and suggested they had no right to land claimed by Israel. An Israeli rights group has said the passages bordered on “incitement to racism.”
An overview of some of the army rabbinate’s publications made available during the fighting reflects the tone of nationalist propaganda that steps blatantly into politics, sounds racist and can be interpreted as a call to challenge international law when it comes to dealing with enemy civilians.
Haaretz has received some of the publications through Breaking the Silence.
Religious IDF troops walk out of event featuring woman singer
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."