The only avowed atheist in Congress is Rep. Pete Stark of California. He’s known for making intemperate remarks like this:
He later apologized for that one. But he’s got a record.
He once called the American Medical Assn. a bunch of “greedy troglodytes.” He assailed one Republican colleague as “a whore for the insurance industry,” called another a “fascist” and a third a “fruitcake.” Recently, when a pesky journalist asked the same question too many times, Stark threatened to throw him out the window.
I’m all for candor, and the Republicans don’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to calls for comity. But it’s fair to say that Stark has a way of making enemies, which is the main reason that the Democratic Caucus only reluctantly handed Charlie Rangel’s Ways & Means gavel to him.
Picking Stark, an atheist, was “not without problems” for leaders and potentially for the caucus, according to a Democratic leadership aide.
But every scenario that involved anything other than a direct passing of the gavel to Stark — in accordance with standing House rules — would have brought the Steering and Policy Committee and very likely the full caucus into the mix, potentially for votes for and against certain members. This was exactly the situation that House leaders wanted to avoid heading into Wednesday, aides indicated.
The House Ways & Means Committee has jurisdiction over all “taxation, tariffs and other revenue-raising measures,” and also deals with entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. It’s the worst committee to sit on if you don’t pay your taxes. But it’s a great committee to sit on if you want business lobbyists to shower you with cash. It goes without saying that the business community isn’t going to be happy to deal with a chairman who calls business-friendly representatives ‘whores.’ And an unhappy business community means a lot more money for Republicans, even in the minority, so it makes Democrats nervous.
I just hope some of his calling businesspeople out gets aired on conservative shows. There are a lot of Republicans who feel the same way, and he might win some fans. You never know. 😉
I kind of doubt that Pete Stark is going to be an asset on conservative political shows. He’ll be their new poster-boy.
I’d want to have my back, in Congress…
Don’t think I’d want him to have my Front, tho’
Crap. Eric Massa has a recurrence of cancer and will retire. Sad news,
Cancer, or Ethics issues (which I’d view as a different form of cancer, save for the Representative and his past)
in any case, it means a scramble to work up a decent Progressive replacement for the November run….
How many different ways can you say, “ski-rooed no matter what.” Bummer.
“Business-friendly” is a clever euphemism for “whore.” I don’t know when being business-friendly became a lofty value. When a street-walker (of either sex) decides to lie down for currency, that makes them “business-friendly.”
During Obama and his fearful, timid, craven term, I have become disgusted by all of these whores. I remember that “intemperate” comment from Stark some years ago. I like it now thrice as much as I liked it then. When did all these politicians become so soft-hearted and thin-skinned? If these politicians want friends, they should get dogs. Truman was right in that regard. Stark knows what he is dealing with, and no amounts of Obama begging, cajoling, pleading, and soliciting will make the Republicans like him or cooperate with he and the Dems. Is the point of politics to make friends or to fight for principles? You can’t do both. Obama has proven that again and again because he cannot find a friend to save his life but he sure does have a lot of girlfriends.
Picking Stark, an atheist, was “not without problems”
This is a wee bit annoying. What does his atheism have to do with his problems? Nothing, as far as I can see. Why even mention it, especially in that way. Would “Picking Weiner, a Jew, was not …” be accepted? I don’t think so.
Booman engaging in some hippie punching of his own.
wouldn’t that have to involve a hippy?
I think he meant it metaphorically.
as in, when I think about mean old men, I think of hippies?
The point is Pete Stark is a great progressive. He is a fighter for the right causes and takes no prisoners. He is not perfect. But your entire post seemed to be about the negative. He makes enemies, business hates him.
It’s about damn time someone made enemies with the Republicans and had it in for greedy corporations.
Hence the punching of progressive (i.e. a hippy).
May his tribe increase.
According to the Washington Post this morning, Stark has been passed by & Sander Levin of Michigan is the new committee chairman.