Don’t shoot the messenger, folks.
A recent research article published in the online journal Science Advances says that by 2050 major portions of the Southwestern and Great Plains states will suffer from droughts much, much worse than the ones we have seen over the last 15 years. If you think things are at a crisis point, now, just wait. According to the researchers:
[A]n empirical drought reconstruction and three soil moisture metrics from 17 state-of-the-art general circulation models to show that these models project significantly drier conditions in the later half of the 21st century compared to the 20th century and earlier paleoclimatic intervals. This desiccation is consistent across most of the models and moisture balance variables, indicating a coherent and robust drying response to warming despite the diversity of models and metrics analyzed. Notably, future drought risk will likely exceed even the driest centuries of the Medieval Climate Anomaly (1100–1300 CE) in both moderate (RCP 4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) future emissions scenarios, leading to unprecedented drought conditions during the last millennium.
Let’s put that in non-specialist terms, shall we.
The coming drought age – caused by higher temperatures under climate change – will make it nearly impossible to carry on with current life-as-normal conditions across a vast swathe of the country.
The droughts will be far worse than the one in California – or those seen in ancient times, such as the calamity that led to the decline of the Anasazi civilizations in the 13th century, the researchers said.
“The 21st-century projections make the [previous] mega-droughts seem like quaint walks through the garden of Eden,” said Jason Smerdon, a co-author and climate scientist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.
(cont.)
When someone starts talking about mega droughts that would dwarf any ever experienced in the region in nearly a thousand years, I sit up and take notice. And just to be clear, the droughts in the region during the Medieval era were significant, and likely were a major contributor to the end of one of the longest lasting Pre-Columbian civilizations in the Americas, the Anasazi.
For those of you unfamiliar with the Anasazi, its civilization in what is now the Southwestern United States lasted for over a thousand years, from at least 100 B.C.E. (some scholars place them in the area as early as 1500 B.C.E.) until roughly 1300 C.E. Their pueblo communities extended throughout the mountains, mesas and grasslands of Southwestern Colorado, Southeastern Utah, Northern New Mexico and Arizona. The most famous of their cliff dwelling sites are ruins found in Mesa Verde National Park.
Their civilization, based on a mix of dry land farming, hunting and trade in pottery goods collapsed sometime around 1300 C.E. in part due to a series of severe droughts that hit the region following a large increase in their population between 700 B.C.E. and 1100 B.C.E. when rainfall patterns were above average for an extended period of time. The loss of water resources was a major factor in their abandonment of their pueblo communities, along with other stresses believed to include competition from peoples migrating into their traditional range, and increased warfare among various groups of Anasazi themselves.
Nonetheless, there is little doubt of the severity of the droughts the region endured during that time.
New tree-ring records of ring-width from remnant preserved wood are analyzed to extend the record of reconstructed annual flows of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry into the Medieval Climate Anomaly, when epic droughts are hypothesized from other paleoclimatic evidence to have affected various parts of western North America. The most extreme low-frequency feature of the new reconstruction, covering A. D. 762-2005, is a hydrologic drought in the mid-1100s. The drought is characterized by a decrease of more than 15% in mean annual flow averaged over 25 years, and by the absence of high annual flows over a longer period of about six decades. The drought is consistent in timing with dry conditions inferred from tree-ring data in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau
So, how extreme will be these mega droughts that are being predicted for much of the Western United States, including the regions that provide most of the crops we produce? Pretty damn severe, in the nature of apocalyptic severity. That is not hyperbole from me. It’s what the scientists are saying about our future prospects:
Eugene Wahl, a paleoclimatologist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Co., called the results “stunning.”
“It is clear that they are seeing drought, especially in the Southwest, as being greater than any time in the past,” Wahl said. “It is also clear that it is the higher temperatures in the future that is driving it.” […]
According to the new research, droughts in the Southwest and Central Plains will only worsen during the second half of this century. The closest comparison is to the 1930s Dust Bowl or 1950s drought, but lasting 35 years instead of just a few.
“Our results point to a markedly drier future that falls far outside the contemporary experience of natural and human systems in Western North America, conditions that may present a substantial challenge to adaptation,” the authors write.
We are talking about extreme drought conditions that will extend from the Mississippi River to California that will last for thirty, forty or more years, literally leave our highly populated, water dependent society in uncharted territory, threatening our civilization’s ability to adapt to what will be a radically altered future environment.
No one knows what megadroughts, which can last from 30-50 years, look like. So researchers from NASA and Columbia and Cornell Universities went back 1,000 years to peer confidently into our drier future.
“Our results show it’s very likely, if we continue on our current trajectory of greenhouse gas emission and warming, that regions in the west will be drier at the end of the 21st century than the driest centuries during the Medieval era,” Cook told Quartz.
But just how likely is very likely? The study puts the chances of a megadrought in the central plains and southwest sometime between 2050-2099 at above 80%. That’s compared with just a 5-10% risk from 1950-2000. Even the milder emissions scenario predicts drying comparable to a Medieval-style megadrought in many locations. “This really represents a fundamental shift in the climate in western North America forced by these greenhouse gases—it’s a shift towards a much drier baseline than anything that anyone alive today has experienced,” said Cook. […]
When asked how a megadrought, if it started today, would affect in the West, Famiglietti said that public water, aquifers, agriculture, rangelands, wildlife and forests would all be at risk. He added: “In California, we’re already in deep trouble. Imagine what the water situation will look like in 2075? Depleted groundwater, decimated agriculture, irreparable damage to ecological habitat. Think apocalypse.”
He’s recently written about the water crisis in California, where he imagined the state as a “disaster movie waiting to happen.” After reading the new study, he told Quartz that it “presents a real doomsday scenario and a situation that is far worse than anything that I had been thinking about.”
That is a very frightening thought, particularly since our political and business leaders seemed to be doing their best to ignore or deny the existence of this threat. If we want our children and grandchildren to have any kind of hope for a sustainable future, one that does not risk total societal collapse, we need to change the way in which our nation currently functions at all levels. Political goals, economic policy and cultural valuers all must change, and that change cannot come soon enough. The current devastation and economic disruption caused by the droughts out West are just a taste of what is to come.
“We need to be thinking about intensifying drought and bringing it into our planning, but I think there are also a lot of opportunities, but it’s going to take more cooperation and more coordination to face the uncertainty of the future,” he told Quartz. “We can’t continue the status quo.”
ZOINKS!!!
One, not trying to be a wiseass, but where will the coming multi-state Oakies go?
Not CA!
Second, if that model includes the NE getting blizzard after blizzard like we’ve had the last couple of years, maybe what we’ll need is a “Keystone Pipeline” to ship our melted snow – instead of dirty oil – to the rest of the country.
The snow piled-up in my backyard over the past few years in the winter, would probably keep many, many families in drought areas in drinking and bathing water.
From what I’ve read your snow is coming from the polar melting which likely will end as soon as the ice caps are gone. But it the ratio of snow volume to water volume is sort of substantial as I remember, depending on the density of the snow pack.
From what you describe, the multi-state Okies will be coming to your house. 🙂
Yes, I’ve been asking why we can’t build pipelines to take the extra water from the Northeast and send it to the drought stricken states. It seems like an obvious first step.
CA did that. Created a mega-populous region that the fragile, dry ecosystem can’t support.
DIng ding ding! This was what the Hoover dam wrought. They parceled out the Colorado RIver based on what we now know to be historically high water levels.
The drought in the 1100’s wiped out the Anasazi.
The one in the 2060’s are gonna wipe out a lot more: Vegas, Phoenix, LA account for tens of millions of people. Where are they gonna go?
What are they gonna eat when CA’s central valley and the Plains turn to dust?
One can only imagine the revulsion and horror in which the survivors among our descendants will hold us for making this happen to them. Enough will die to make the Holocaust look like a skirmish.
California State Water Project:
But must confess to an admiration for the engineering and construction of dams.
Sounds like socialistic “infrastructure” porkulus spending, which always destroys liberty!!
Our civilization is organized around cheap (basically free) water. Attempting to pipe water around like electricity ain’t gonna be cheap, let alone free. Nor will we be certain of where the “excess” water will be landing/accumulating year by year as the world’s climate goes into severe disequilibrium.
But this is the sort of attempted solution that very likely will be proposed, as opposed to doing anything to ameliorate the ongoing environmental destruction now—not that I am saying that you personally oppose doing something now.
And of course most wildlife and plant species in the affected areas will be extincted–meaningless collateral damage! “National forests” will be an oxymoron…
It seems the Westies will be coming east of the Mississippi and most likely to the Southeast — what folks these days call the South in order to beat the drought. During that medieval event there was a major kingdom that regulated the Mississippi valley from Cahokia, another one that did the same from Ocmulgee and lots of others in river valleys of the major rivers of the Southeast up to what is now the NC-SC line. Once thought to be derivative of the Maya or other Central American cultures, current scholarly opinion is that they were independent cultures that built their man-made mountains just as the water-regulating civilizations of the Middle East did.
IIRC that medieval period is also when the Maya civilizaitons began to fall apart.
Independent cultures — which just coincidentally happened to build massive earthen structures in flood plains using ingenious engineering methods to prevent a washaway over the centuries. I don’t buy it. More inclined to believe they were one group that had migrated from the Central America region, then spread out.
Interesting to speculate, regardless. And I’d never heard of Ocmulgee. But can claim to have known about Cahokia for the past quarter century, putting me in that elite 0.1% of the US population who’s aware of it.
It’s like our codfish.
Yeah, when it goes, it’ll be gone.
But the guy with the last boat will make a frickin’ fortune.
I’ve been trying to convince people for a while that crop failure will be a reality in our lives or our children’s. Ora an uphill climb. I thought “Interstellar” did a good job. Desertification is one of the scariest words in the English language.
But, but, but, increased CO2 is positively BENEFICIAL to plant life!! KKKarl Rover and Boss Rushbo have proved this a hundred times over!
On the plus side, a mega-drought will significantly cut US consumption of meat and HFCS and bring an end to the obesity epidemic. Bye-bye CA fruits and nuts and midwest flakes.
Or will it just cause massive tropical deforestation to supply meat and maize to the US market?
A very short-term “solution” that in the long-term were speed up the arrival of massive famine.
Of course, but the rich will make gigabucks from it.
“If we want our children and grandchildren to have any kind of hope for a sustainable future…”
I am childless and although I have young relatives, I am not so sure I am willing to concern myself with the well being of people not yet born. I don’t believe I have any obligation to facilitate their birth or to sacrifice now such that non-existent people might have a “sustainable future” – whatever that means.
There are some 7 billion humans on earth today. As recently as 70 years ago there were barely 2 billion. At this point it is rather difficult to believe that there isn’t some cause and effect. It’s likely true that areas of the world with higher standards of living have slowed in population growth while still increasing their carbon footprint so there are some other factors at work. It’s a sure bet, though, that countries with high emissions and fast population growth would do well to reduce both. For these high emission areas to accept immigrants from low emission areas of the world would seem foolish if one cared about the impact of climate change on the as yet unborn.
I cannot imagine a world with a human population of 15 or 20 billion people will meet anyone’s definition of sustainable. So what combination of personal well-being, material comfort, and world population does meet that definition?
Shall we bring 5 billion people out of abject poverty and lower American consumption of resources to compensate? Good luck with that!
Wonderful work by our scientists here, a shame that not 1% of the population will even be apprised of it.
Yes, the “water wars” of the Old West will be quite mild with what is coming. Mega cities are not possible without water, so the absurdly overpopulated SW and the Western end of the New Confederacy are doomed, perhaps even the bulk of Southern CA, and their populations will begin migrating in the next 50 years, as the writing on the wall will become quite legible to even the self-retarded. The informed will strive to get out even sooner, the fleeing game always works best for the early adopters, haha.
Massive population transfers will not be able to be managed by a flat-on-its-back federal gub’mint, so it will either be taken over by rightwing authoritarian forces and martial law declared (thus giving the lie to the “conservative” big gub’mint blabber) or federal/state authority will collapse and we will have severe violence and property destruction fueled by our ocean of automatic firearms and hoarded ammo—now is the time to buy even more, gun nuts! It’s always the right time to stock pile ammo!
None of this will be too good for “the economy” or “economic growth” haha, but the plutocrats will have long decamped from the foolish nation they have destroyed and set up shop somewhere more promising than the collapsing US of A.
If this is seen as too apocalyptic, then at a bare minimum, we will see some major changes in retirement plans and real estate valuations, even in the near term future. The water is going to run out very quickly in the SW as the climate builds to these projected mega-droughts—the current 2-3 year ones ala what we have already seen in Texas and OK will be more than enough.
So desertification across the American SW, Midwest and CA, rising seas and mega storms across the Eastern seaboard and SE, doesn’t sound like there’s going to be an obvious place to run to as the world’s great ecosystems fall into chaos and disequilibrium. Canada, and perhaps the old Rust Belt?
Canada better start planning a major increase in military power to deal with the coming civil strife on its massive southern border. Or will Conservative America simply attempt to invade and conquer Canada for its own purposes? I’d love to see some of the plans on the drawing board of the Canadian General Staff these days…
Time to crash Keystone for good and start thinking about water pipelines instead.
Good example of the effects of drought in a major metro area is Sao Paulo, Brazil. Modern city of 11 million where the drought requires households only receive water for a few hours each day.
Australia has responded to their continuing droughts by building deslaination plants. See WIKI for list and description of the program.