If I were the editor of USA Today or McClatchy or the Associated Press or the New York Times, I’d tell all my writers that they must append the following blockquote to every mention of Mitt Romney from now until twenty years after he passes on. It was written by Steve Benen on November 2nd, 2012.
In a way, I blame my friend Greg Sargent. In the first week in January, he noted, almost in passing, that Mitt Romney seemed to be making a lot of false claims, and someone “really should document them all.” That struck me as a good idea, so I decided to tackle this on my own.
After all, I thought at the time, how hard could this be? Once a week, I’d let readers know about Romney’s whoppers, which I assumed would total about a half-dozen a week, and maybe after the election, I’d do a top 20 list of my favorites. The project would be a nice little Friday-afternoon feature.
Little did I know at the time that Romney would become an ambitious prevaricator, whose rhetoric would come to define post-truth politics. Nearly 11 months after Greg Sargent’s harmless suggestion, I’ve published 40 installments in this series, which, before today, featured 884 falsehoods. (If you include today’s edition, the new total is 917 falsehoods for the year.)
I wish that were a typo. It’s not.
Steve is only human and he missed a lot of lies. What he produced was monumental but still only the result of triage. Romney produced such a highly pressurized hydrant of bullshit that most of it didn’t even make the cut. Never in my life have I seen a man lie so easily and so shamelessly as Mitt Romney did in the 2012 election. Donald Trump?
Not even close.
And let’s be honest. The lies these two men tell are usually different in kind. It’s never easy to tell whether Trump believes what he’s saying or if he’s just repeating what he’s read off his eccentric list of website bookmarks. While some of his lies are witting and cunning and strategic, many of them are simply the ravings of a half-mad moron.
Mitt Romney was susceptible to groupthink, too, but most of his lies were consciously and deliberately made for no other reason than it seemed advantageous at the time to say something factually untrue. His voice and mannerisms never betrayed that he was bullshitting you, while Trump has many tells that help us differentiate between his prevarications. There’s a whole category, for example, which is simple defensiveness and which arises from personal insecurity. There’s another that is obvious vindictiveness. For Romney, he looked the same telling you it was raining on a sunny day as he did lying about the Social Security Trust Fund. Trump is a world-class liar, but it’s actually spite and malice and vanity that animate him. He will never be in Romney’s class because he a has some kind of (admittedly deformed) conscience about the truth. Romney has no conscience that I can detect whatsoever.
I bring this up because there has been an unfortunate and widespread rehabilitation of Mitt Romney ever since he lost and his party followed his queue into full-blown post-fact America.
Trump is so bad, particularly on foreign policy and national security issues, that liberals were pining for Romney to get the job as Secretary of State. For me, this was ludicrous. A man who lies like Mitt Romney cannot be trusted by anyone, including his family and friends. He’s uniquely unsuited to the job of diplomacy where part of the job is to make commitments that allies can trust.
I don’t know why Mitt Romney decided to tell the truth about Donald Trump, but it doesn’t count for anything because he effectively took it all back when he humiliated himself by going to Trump Tower and begging for a job. Anyone could see that Trump was leading him on only so he could deepen Romney’s embarrassment. We didn’t need Roger Stone to tell us this. The second he told Chris Christie to bring him some fries with that shake, we knew that Trump would revel in torturing Romney and make it as painful as possible.
And it was fully justified. Remember, Romney said “the country would sink into a prolonged recession” if Trump’s economic plan was attempted, that Trump is a business failure whose “bankruptcies have crushed small businesses and the men and women who worked for them.” Romney blasted Trump’s foreign policy, his Muslim ban, and said “dishonesty is Trump’s hallmark.” He said Trump’s personal qualities were bullying, greed, showing off, misogyny, and “absurd third grade theatrics.” He said that there is evidence that Trump is a con man and a fake. And he concluded with this:
Here’s what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He’s playing the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat.
His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the temperament nor the judgment to be president. And his personal qualities would mean that America would cease to be a shining city on a hill.
Why would Mitt Romney think for one moment that anyone, let alone a man as thin-skinned and vindictive as Donald Trump, would not only forgive him for making those personal attacks but give him the single most important job in his cabinet?
It can only be because for Romney words have no meaning. You can just say anything and no one should ever think of holding you accountable if you’re wrong or if it’s demonstrated that you were trying to deceive people. This expectation is evidently so ingrained in Romney’s character that he certainly can’t imagine being held accountable for telling the truth.
Even Mitt Romney’s Facebook post announcing that he didn’t get the job is a lie.
“My discussions with President-elect Trump have been both enjoyable and enlightening. I have very high hopes that the new administration will lead the nation to greater strength, prosperity and peace.”
We all know that’s the rankest bullshit. He didn’t enjoy sitting down with Trump and the only way it could possibly have been enlightening is by confirming his worst fears. Romney has no hope. That was extinguished the second he was passed over for the job.
Trump called Romney a choker, which I never thought was fair. But Romney is worse than a choker. He might as well have left his dignity at the front door of Trump Tower and lit it on fire.
He would have been a terrible Secretary of State and it would have given people a false confidence that disaster can be averted. I’m glad he didn’t get the job. I’ve listened to enough of his lies for this lifetime.
Perfect!!!
But…it ain’t over ’til it’s over.
If the last ditch attempt(s) to ditch Trump are unsuccssful…”attempts” in the plural because if this Electoral College/”The Russkies Did It!!!” hustle doesn’t work they’ll just keep on trying until they either…one way or another… win or find a compromise “Art Of The Deal”-style position mit der Trumpenfuhrer.
And there Romney will be, in all his robotic, lying grandeur. An indispensable part of the PermaGov Machine.
Fucked if we don’t, fucked if we do. Here we are, stuck in the middle with you.
In Scylla/Charybdisville.
Bet on it.
AG
So you’re not concerned that the Russians likely hacked our election?
I am not convinced of any number of things regarding this, Parallax.
First and foremost, I do not support anything that brands another country as the arch-enemy if it comes from the WAPO/NY Times sisters and their fellow PermaGov mouthpieces. Never again. Not after the Iraq War buildup. Never, not as long as they remain propaganda outlets for the CIA.
Secondly, this whole thing smacks of the same “It wasn’t US that fucked up!!!” gobbledgook that the DemRats have been mooing since well the before the election. Their leaders were plainly incompetent and should be removed from power immediately.
This all has morphed from “It’s alla them deplorables, milliennials and other socialist, populists and whatnot!!!” to “Them dirty Russkies did it!!!” in a matter of weeks, and the same PermaGov frontmen and frontwomen are playing the tune. I trust none of them as far as I could throw the Iraq War or the Big Money-caused economic collapse of the Clinton I/Bush II/Obama years. They are now a criminal class in my eyes.
The vast centrist conspiracy.
Is another criminal class trying to stage a coup on the current Controllers? Probably. Let them fight one another to the death as far as I am concerned. I’m through with alla that bullshit.
AG
P.S. By the way…I’ve been in Russia fairly recently and I don’t really think that they have their shit together enough to pose a real threat to the U.S. on any level. Dig down past a very superficial layer of Nuevo Russian-style glitz and it is a very unhappy, quite challenged country. It’s one thing to push around U.S.-supported Ukrainian neo-Nazis, but take on NATO? I don’t think so. Would it be a good idea if the U.S. and Russia formed some sort of “My enemy is your enemy” detante against the various jihadist terrorists that have managed to put the U.S. and Europe into a continual state of unrelieved, pretty near constant fear and arousal? I think so, myself. Maybe it’s selfish of me, but I have not been able to go into my beloved Manhattan midtown for about 20 years…since bin Laden first came to our attention in Afghanistan in he mid-’90s…without a vague fear gnawing at me that I was walking into Ground Zero without a chance of escaping if something serious went down. That fear ratcheted way up after 9/11. I work in midtown every New Year’s Eve and have for decades. Every time I leave fort that gig I tell my significant other goodbye…maybe. I deal with it, but I’d rather not.
The terrorism stems from the activities of the U.S….and the other NATO powers plus Russia as well…in trying to keep the Middle East destabilized for over 100 years, since at least the Lawrence of Arabia times. If we’re not going to stop fucking around down there…and it is clear that we are not or we would have done so already…maybe it’s time to stop pussyfooting around and really do something. An ineffective bully is even worse than an effective one.
Damn, we actually agree on Romney!
Guess that talent came in handy when he made his millions stealing workers pensions as a PE raider.
I agree too, to a point, but think it’s ridiculous to say Trump has a conscience when it comes to lying. That’s not at all the same as being easy to read. Romney was a total bullshit artist, the consummate Joe Isuzu con man who made a fortune doing just that. It says so much about our society that a man like this who represents the very worst caricature of what it is to be a salesperson, could make a fortune in business today.
On that score, Trump is no different. In fact, at least when it comes to presidential politics, Trump has proven himself the more effective practitioner of the art of bullshitting. That’s unfair to an extent because Romney ran against the far better candidate, but it shows up in the differential in support the two men received among the most easily misled, the most gullible, the most fact-adverse voters. Trump was their hero whereas Romney was a kind of warmed over milquetoast.
One could argue the Clinton campaign screwed up in failing to go after Trump in the ways Obama’s people went after Romney. Perhaps it would have made a difference. But no one takes a back seat to Trump when it comes to prevarication. Trump may have told fewer lies, though I doubt it. Both men lied every time their mouths moved. The main difference in my view is that Trump was not afraid of the biggest of lies. What we’ve witnessed is a complete and total descent into the realm of post-fact, post-truth presidential politics. Both of these men are symptoms of a larger phenomenon.
Where I agree with Booman is in holding someone like Mitt more accountable for his misdeeds. Trump is evil but in the mold of a lunatic. He’s the fool, the clown, who thinks he’s a prince. He’s the rump of the joke (except the joke is also on us).
Romney is more like McConnell, Ryan et. al. in the sense of being the embodiment of deeply cynical evil. If there is a God, and if there is a past-life review, Trump may have a defense in that his emotional defects rendered him unable to behave like a moral person. More typical Republican types, those who quote the likes of Ayn Rand, just freely choose darkness again and again. It’s hard to imagine any defense for them.
You make a distinction between the lies of Romney and the lies of Trump. For the most part, I think you are correct.
The lies of Romney are designed and coordinated, useful to whatever the current goal may be. The man has no strategic sense at all. All is tactics.
The lies of Trump are to aggrandize Trump or conversly, to avoid Trump being dragged down. Once again, there is no strategic sense in these lies, but there also is no tactical sense to them.
But the end result is the same. You can’t trust either of them. To quote my mother “he’d lie when the truth would serve”.
It doesn’t make any difference. In fact, I think the distinction being drawn — effete Romney/Bush/William Kristol “strategic” top-down disinformation campaigns vs. Trump/Brietbart style total crazy nonsense — was, ultimately, very dangerous for Republicans, for all Conservatives, and for the Nation.
As long as Conservative operatives were able to tell themselves they were doing a certain kind of special, strategic (“Platonic”) lying — weren’t getting their hands dirty — they started pushing us into this mess. They thought they could corral the resulting angry, deluded mob who’d been trained to hate liberals and hate the press and hate Muslims and lock up Hillary, but they couldn’t. The entire Republican primary was an extended morality play wherein they learned that: they thought they could “draw the line” between lies and damned lies (or whatever) and learned to their horror that it was impossible.
Right at this point, were I talking to a conservative, I would be sagely instructed that “everybody does it” and “Democrats lie too” but I trust I’m in intelligent enough company here that I don’t have to make the usual disingenous, self-protective journalistic feint in that direction
It appears to have made a difference to a number of Obama voters though.
That’s not what made the difference.
“Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” — Sun Tzu
exactly. But you won’t lose all the battles before you are thru.
Hopefully, Susan Sarandon and the mythical Trotskyist crew were not wrong (I’ll never say they were right, but right and wrong are not absolute statements). If that is the case the 2018 will be instructive and 2020 will be liberating.
Maybe we could get Medicare for all once the Rethugs get done screwing with it? How about a saner way to finance Social Security?
The
Foreign Service is mainly made up of thousands of dedicated, professional workers who do the day to day grunt work helping Americans overseas, and processing things like visas. They build relationships to do their jobs properly.
They never supported Trump. While the resignations probably won’t come it is almost certain Trump will go after any group that he feels is not completely loyal. Certainly that will include the professionals in East Asia, where Trump has already signaled a change in policies.
Think about the letter to the Energy Dept
The same thing is about to happen to the Foreign Service. Loyalty purges are coming, Trump needs someone loyal to do the job.
That made Romney completely unqualified for SOS, and he had no chance of ever getting the job. It’s amazing he even thought it was possible.
Trump will pick someone who will do his bidding for a piece of the pie. And chop off any disloyal limbs.
.
Needless to say there will be a thorough purge of any political appointees at State. But Foreign Service employees cannot be fired for political reasons; that’s against the law. And Trump would be sued and would lose if he tried. Same for the DOE employees (civil service). Arbitrary harassment is also illegal. To a limited extent, people can be forcefully moved around within an agency but it is much simpler to just starve the targeted function or program of any funding whatsoever. Then the associated employees will either shift into another program or they will resign. In any event, I don’t see Tillerson doing all this purging and ratfcking. If Bolton gets appointed Deputy SoS, he’ll be the guy and he will delight in the job because he is a truly nasty PoS.
Ah, but remember the talk about making it easier to fire government workers.
Quite aside from republican anti-government buy in, it’s the same mentality that created public support for destroying unions. “I don’t have those protections! Those lazy fuckers shouldn’t either!”
You harass them, reassign them, demote them. Have congress lower their pay, or change their pension. You take an already tough job and make it unbearable.
I’m reminded of the TV show ‘The Wire’ where one cop explains to another;
‘One day the bosses will say they want you to ‘land right’, so they will ask you where DON’T you want to go?.”
Then they send you there, so you will quit.
.
It was mildly amusing to see Mittens suck up to the new power of the loathsome Trump and then get rejected. But he’s had lots of experience doing that and likely more often than not, it’s served him well.
Didn’t we see several wannabe presidential candidates groveling before Adelson to get his bucks in the past two election cycles? Sheldon does seem to enjoy having that seen by the public. Whereas the Kochs prefer that such groveling remain private.
There was a certain fascination to that photo of Romney looking so cowed before the craven Donald. ‘Twas the look of a man who had just inked the deal with Satin except that, in this case the devil rejected the offer. Talk about gift wrapping your balls and having them delivered to Trump Tower for bronzing. Could not have happened to a nicer or more deserving guy.
The Intercept — Trump Homeland Security Advisor Helped Contractors Profit Off Harsh Deportations
One Lora Ries client:
I never understood why Mittens chose to embarrass himself, losing all self-respect & dignity, by groveling before Trump for the SoS position. Given what Mittens had said about Trump previously, any moron could figure out that Trump wouldn’t give him the job. Nay, verily, the exercise was meant solely to schtup RMoney. That photo was definitely worth more than a 1000 words.
What. A. Fool.
And yes, both RMoney & Trump lie bigly and almost constantly but in different ways. The end result, however, is much the same.
He thought something might be in it for Trump. I don’t think the result was predictable. Of course it looks like it was looking back with perfect 20/20.
Ben White is an obvious stooge. Why? To wit:
Just because Stone is a nut doesn’t mean he’s wrong about Willard.
There was a contingent that was considering getting in to mitigate the damage but I think they abandoned that effort after seeing how it was going to shake out.
There was a contingent that was considering getting in to mitigate the damage …
Which shows they know nothing about Trump or are totally clueless. What damage would Willard as SoS mitigated, exactly?
Your question would force me to defend Romney, which in itself explains our predicament.
So….Romney would not be as big a stooge towards Russia as what is coming. He would not likely want to blow up the world on his watch. He would probably listen to State briefings before meetings with his counter parts, which now seems to be an expectation to far.
.
Sorry, Nalbar, but the SoS does not control the bomb, the DoD or even the fucking Coast Guard (that’s Treasury).
Emasculating the SoS would be easy. Stupid, but easy.
The State Department can make the use of the bomb more or less likely.
Only if you pay any attention at all to State.
Trump has already said (often) that he’ll not “telegraph his punches”. If you believe him that means he won’t tell anyone in the liberal hothouse of state before he pulls the trigger.
The Coast Guard is under control of the Dept. of Homeland Security.