On Thursday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi felt compelled to the capitulate to the White House on the border supplemental spending bill. A revolt from within her own caucus was the cause. With the Senate insisting on their own bill and the July 4 recess looming, moderates and “problem-solvers” on the Democratic side were unwilling to engage in a game of chicken or go home without emergency funding having been appropriated.
Pelosi announced that she will pass the Senate bill without amendments and then had a preliminary vote on the rule.
A sign of the dissatisfaction on the left: More than 70 House Democrats voting against the rule governing floor debate on the Senate-passed border spending bill. Majority party typically votes in unison for a rule
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) June 27, 2019
This exposed a massive division on the left, as liberals and progressives strongly objected to giving the White House this money without more strings attached to assure that it is spent on people in need rather than on more brutal enforcement practices.
I'm told that @RepDebDingell is resigning from the Problem Solvers Caucus in the wake of its co-chair @RepJoshG organizing opposition to the House border bill that would have mandated improved conditions for children in detention
— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) June 27, 2019
That’s a reference to Reps Debbie Dingell of Michigan and Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey. Gottheimer represents an historically Republican district in the affluent New York City suburbs. Evidently, he didn’t like the politics of withholding funding in an effort to force compromise. He was speaking for a good number of other Democrats in similarly precarious districts.
This blowup is a good indicator of the divide on immigration that exists in this country, as there are Democrat-held districts where Trump’s policies are popular and others where they’re considered an abomination. Pelosi was caught in a vise between them, which is exactly where the Republicans want her to be. In this case, she sided with the people most likely to lose and cost her the majority, but it caused seventy members to defy her rule, which is a punishable offense.
This was definitely a good day for the GOP, as they got what they wanted an did some real damage to the unity of their opponents. It’ll be interesting to see who, if anyone, defends Pelosi’s decision in the debate on Thursday night.
This is exactly what I mean with the suburban stuff. Do you think this is popular in Josh Gottheimer’s district? You live nearer to the area than me and are more familiar. But I can’t imagine that it is. This is the exact issue that has lots of college educated voters against Trump in the first place. Has nothing to do with raising taxes. Yet here this asshole is, leading the charge, after he wins in 2016 by 4 and 2018 by 14.
I think you mean vise.
Boo:
Your Congresswoman voted to give Cheeto Mussolini a blank check ans further abuse migrants. Her district isn’t that much different from Gottheimer’s, is it? They’re not walking a tightrope. They’re just assholes(which we know Gottheimer truly is). I notice you don’t mention Schumer. He’s didn’t do Pelosi any favors. He’s more worried about getting home for the break then he is about stopping Trump.
If additional funding was given to the sadistic National Trumpalists without conditions reining in at least some of their sadism, then this is a cave of incredible proportions. Exactly how the Dems failed to confront Bushco’s War to Liberate Iraq’s Oil after they won the Congress in 2006.
Filth! That is the condition of a Texas holding facility described today in the Times. I feel like I am witness to the return of Nazism.
Story today in NYTimes about the utter filth and horrible conditions in a Texas holding facility for children. It is overcrowded and understaffed. And it stinks, the guards take the stench home with them. Surely we can do better than this?