[Crossposted from my Real History blog.]
It’s Labor Day. But how much do we really know about the history of labor in this country? I decided to give myself a crash course. I could study this topic for years, it is so inspiring.
It’s not surprising to me that the birthplace of our nation and the birthplace of unions in America were the same place: Philadelphia. [BooMan – maybe that’s why there are so many great bloggers in Philly.]
In 1724, carpenters in Philadelphia joined together to form the Carpenters Company, a loose union designed to educate its members in architectural sciences and to support those who fell upon unfortunate circumstances, becoming the first guild in America.
In 1768, the lot was purchased upon which Carpenters Hall would soon be built. Designed by a company member in 1770, Carpenters Hall was to take on extraordinary significance for our country. The first Continental Congress met there. The Declaration of Independence was signed there. Ben Franklin set up what functioned as the first Library of Congress on the 2nd floor of the Hall.
While the Carpenters Company was the first guild, the first union to collect dues and meet regularly was also formed in Philadelphia, by shoemakers.
Workers soon organized in Boston, and New York. According to this page:
The eighteen-hundreds ushered in the age of factories. And with factories, the link between employer and employee was effectively severed. Whereas before, employers and workers labored together in small spaces, talking to each other, learning about each others lives, becoming friends and sharing political views, factories allowed the employer to hire hundreds and in some cases thousands or workers. With distance came disregard. The workers were upset because where they had once handcrafted items, now they were reduced to cogs in a machine, cranking out carbon copies of items. It was dehumanizing. It was only natural that this led people to bond more closely to their co-workers, and to organize together to fight their working conditions.
Early unions were considered dangerous conspiracies by employers and by the courts:
In the early days of our country, it was common for people to work 12-13 hours a day, to work six days a week, and for children to work as well as adults. Many of them lived in company housing facilities, and were paid with company script, redeemable only at company shops for overpriced goods.
In 1825, carpenters in Boston struck for a 10-hour workday, a relief from the longer hours they were expected to work.
Concurrent with the Civil War came the cry from workers for an eight-hour day. In Chicago, these cries became particularly effective, for a time:
The first major nationwide strike was The Great Railroad Strike of 1877. Before the “Great Depression” of the 1920s, there were a series of smaller periods of depression.
A bank panic in September of 1873 triggered a depression across America. Layoffs, wage cuts, breadlines and other misery forced the desperate workers to take collective action. But the trigger point came in 1877, when many Americans felt that the Republican candidate, Rutherford Hayes, won the presidency through fraud! Does this sound familiar?
Thomas Scott of the Pennsylvania Railroad reached a deal with Hayes: in exchange for a federal bailout of his troubled investment in the Texas and Pacific Railroad, the millionaire industrialist would deliver Congressional votes to Hayes. As a further inducement, the Republicans promised to end Reconstruction, a blatant betrayal of African Americans. Southern Congressmen deserted Tilden, handing the election to Hayes.
President Hayes withdrew federal troops from the South, ending Reconstruction and its promise of political equality for former slaves.
The final straw came when the Pennsylvania Railroad cut wages by 10% for a second time, in June of 1877, followed by a July announcement that the numbers of trains to be serviced would double, while the workforce would not. Another railroad, the Baltimore & Ohio, cut it’s already too short workweek from three days to two, further starving the workers. On July 16, firemen and brakemen refused to work, and refused to let replacements be sent in. They managed to halt all railroad traffic at the Camden Junction just outside of Baltimore.
Word of the strike reached workers in Martinsburg, West Virginia, who stopped working on the trains. These protests fanned out like a ripple in water, reaching Chicago and places beyond. With nearly half the train’s in the country halted, President Hayes sent in the National Guard and other federal troops to force the workers back into action. Curiously, the local police and militia sided with the workers. Although the workers were promised an eight hour week and a rise in pay, as soon as the military arrived, all promises went out the window. As one worker put it, “we were shot back to work.” This event solidified both the union movement and the class of business owners who opposed it.
in 1882, a thirty year-old Irish Catholic man named Peter J. McGuire, who already had over ten years experience organizing workers from all over the growing United States, introduced a resolution to the United Brotherhood of Carpenters (UBC)proposing a “festive parade through the streets of the city” of New York, on the first Monday in September. The parade was done to bring attention to the effort towards the eight-hour workday. But the parade was also a shrewd reminder of the power of the people when united. McGuire’s efforts were so successful that other cities followed suit. In 1887, the state of Oregon was the first to declare the first Monday in September a holiday. As celebrations grew, Congress declared the creation of Labor Day, in 1894.
McGuire was equally responsible for the first May Day parade, also intended to show the power of Labor, and to advocate for the eight-hour day. After 80,000 people marched in Chicago, 350,000 workers in other cities made a similar march.
In Chicago, a peaceful meeting at Chicago’s Haymarket Square was broken up by police. But a man named Schnaubelt threw a bomb into the crowd, killing several police officers, and launching what became known as the “Haymarket Riot.” The violence put an end, for a while, to the calls for an eight-hour workday.
In 1893, another depression led to another strike, this time against the Pullman Palace Car Company. Management slashed workers pay but did not cut the pay of management; predictably, the workers rebelled. They were led by Eugene V. Debs, who initially opposed the strike, fearing the mood in the country was not well suited to support their needs at this time. The Pullman railroad cars were created in the city of Pullman, in a near-feudal setting:
When the Pullman company started laying off workers, cutting wages, but not cutting rents, employees, led by the American Railway Union under Eugene Debs, walked out. Railroad workers in other cities started boycotting trains carrying Pullman cars. And the President, Grover Cleveland, stepped in. He claimed the strike interfered with the ability of the federal government to deliver mail, and therefore declared the strike a federal crime. (As a side note, Debs was not a Socialist at the time of his arrest. He became one while jailed, where he started reading Karl Marx.)
Miners were having the least success with their protests. Coal was known as black gold then in the same way oil is called black gold now. Coal powered industry. Without coal, there was no market growth. Federal troops were frequently brought in to break up coal miner strikes.
The first major miners’ strike came in the same state where the most tragic strike would also take place: Colorado.
These events also introduce us to one of the most extraordinary women of the labor movement, one who would not live to see a magazine named after her: Mary Harris Jones, AKA Mother Jones. Born poor in Ireland, she came to America when her father established himself as an American citizen and sent home for his family. She married a union man, who died in a fever epidemic when she was only in her mid thirties. She worked for a time for the very wealthy in Chicago, and was struck by the gap between their outrageous fortune and the extreme poverty of the workers she could see through the window.
Mother Jones became more and more involved in the labor movement, and found herself in demand. Nearly every major movement in the country wanted her. Could she come help them? She traveled far and wide, well into old age, to help the poor workers across America.
In her autobiography, she describes the problem in Colorado at the time of the 1903 strike against the John D. Rockefeller owned Colorado Fuel and Iron Company at Cripple Creek:
The people of Colorado had voted overwhelmingly for an eight-hour day. The legislature passed an eight hour law but the courts had declared it unconstitutional. Then when the measure was submitted directly to the people, they voted for it with 40,000 votes majority. But the next legislature, which was controlled by the mining interests, failed to pass the bill.
The miners saw that they could not get their demands through peaceful legislation. That they must fight. That they must strike. All the metal miners struck first. The strike extended into New Mexico and Utah. It became an ugly war. The metal miners were anxious to have the coal miners join them in their struggle.
The workers appealed to the United Mine Workers union for help. The executive board of the union sent Mother Jones to look into the matter, and report back. She put on an old calico dress and sunbonnet, and went down to the coal fields of the Colorado Fuel and Iron Company.
Mother Jones reported back to the UMW, and they authorized a strike to press for an eight-hour day, and money rather than company scrip. The strike shut down the state of Colorado, which badly needed the coal in the cruel November temperatures. Under intense pressure, the union caved in, and ordered the workers in the northern part of the state to stop their strike.
The union also asked Mother Jones not to raise a fuss, and to come home, because the union was paying her wages. But this was not any woman! This was Mother Jones:
He nodded.
“Then I am going to tell you that if God Almighty wants this strike called off for his benefit and not for the miners, I am going to raise my voice against it. And as to President John paying me, … he never paid me a penny in his life. It is the hard earned nickels and dimes of the miners that pay me, and it is their interests that I am going to serve.”
She went to the convention set up to discuss this issue, and addressed the workers:
The delegates gave her a standing ovation. They took a vote. The majority of the membership voted to support their southern brothers, against the union president’s wishes. Sadly, this incident then pitted the union president against Mother Jones. He wanted her out, and asked the Governor to evict her from Colorado.
Penniless, without food or shelter, she waited at the train station for the train to Denver. She asked the conductor to take her to Denver, and he said she would. Honest to the core, Mother Jones showed him the letter from the Governor, saying she wouldn’t want him to lose his job. He said to hell with his job – he would take her there.
When she got to Denver, she wrote the following note:
She called a messenger and asked him to deliver it. When the Governor heard it, his face grew red. He asked a reporter who had just heard the note read, “what shall I do?” “Leave her alone,” the reporter answered. “There is no more patriotic citizen in America.”
The northern workers were eventually pressured into resuming work, which brought the strike to an end. Tired, hungry, and without support, the southern workers returned to the mines.
Ten years later, the festering wounds from Cripple Creek erupted anew. Company men wielding guns were routinely breaking streaks, killing indiscriminately, and torturing the workers and their families in horrific ways. Try as she might, Mother Jones and other union workers could not bring attention to their cause.
Until Ludlow happened. As Mother Jones wrote:
John D. Rockefeller hired essentially a private army to put down the strikers who threatened his interests at Ludlow. Mother Jones described the horrific scene:
On the 19th of April, 1914, machine guns, used on the strikers in the Paint Creek strike, were placed in position above the tent colony of Ludlow. Major Pat Hamrock and Lieutenant K. E. Linderfelt were in charge of the militia, the majority of whom were, company gun-men sworn in as soldiers.
Early in the morning soldiers approached the colony with a demand from headquarters that Louis Tikas, leader of the Greeks, surrender two Italians. Tikas demanded a warrant for their arrest. They had none. Tikas refused to surrender them. The soldiers returned to quarters. A signal bomb was fired. Then another.
Immediately the machine guns began spraying the flimsy tent colony, the only home the wretched families of the miners had, riddling it with bullets. Like iron rain, bullets’ upon men, women and children.
The women and children fled to the hills. Others tarried. The men defended their home with their guns. All day long the firing continued. Men fell dead, their faces to the ground. Women dropped. The little Snyder boy was shot through the head, trying to save his kitten. A child carrying water to his dying mother was killed.
By five o’clock in the afternoon, the miners had no more food, nor water, nor ammunition. They had to retreat with their wives and little ones into the hills. Louis Tikas was riddled with shots while he tried to lead women and children to safety. They perished with him.
Night came. A raw wind blew down the canyons where men, women and children shivered and wept. Then a blaze lighted the sky. The soldiers, drunk with blood and with the liquor they had looted from the saloon, set fire to the tents of Ludlow with oil-soaked torches. The tents, all the poor furnishings, the clothes and bedding of the
miners’ families burned. Coils of barbed wire were stuffed into the well, the miners’ only water supply.
After it was over, the wretched people crept back to bury their dead. In a dugout under a burned tent, the charred bodies of eleven little children and two women were found-unrecognizable. Everything lay in ruins. The wires of bed springs writhed on the ground as if they, too, had tried to flee the horror.
By the end of the day, at least 24 miners, and 11 children had been murdered.
As both sides armed for a full-out war, a delegation went from Ludlow to talk to President Wilson. Wilson ordered a three-year truce, which the mine operators refused. John D. Rockfeller denied any responsibility for the massacre at Ludlow. Wilson sent out the United States cavalry to stop the gunmen on both sides. And writer Upton Sinclair staged anti-Rockefeller demonstrations.
After the massacre, the United Mine Workers called off the strike. The union had lost, but this time, so had the establishment. Rockefeller’s image was forever tarnished, and no amount of philanthropy was ever going to wash that blood away. And the union movement was now a lit fire, poised to sweep across the nation. Out of the embers of Ludlow came the recognition that collective action is the only way to protect the rights of the individual, because no individual is powerful enough to fight on his own.
Mother Jones is hardly remembered today. And that’s a tragedy, since her voice showed us that passion begets action, and that we have to be willing to stand up and make a difference. The chapter in her autobiography devoted to the Ludlow incident is titled, “You don’t need a vote to raise hell.”
As for the eight-hour workday, it would take 74 years from the 1864 demand before workers would have a reasonable work day. It took the passage of President Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation in 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act, before eight hours became the legal workday in America.
The battle of labor has been a long and arduous uphill battle, and one that has claimed as many lives as some of our military engagements. Just as we honor soldiers who give their lives for us, we must also honor those who put their lives on the line to strike for better wages, better living conditions, more equality. Union wages made possible the middle class in America. And as unions have become weaker, we’ve seen the middle class shrink.
On this Labor Day, I hope you’ll join me in a moment of deep gratitude to all those with the courage to stand up and fight for what they deserve. And after Labor Day, think about how all these events happened not from electing the right people, but telling the elected officials what to do, by making their choice inevitable. That’s what we need to do. We keep trying to elect leaders. But we need to BE the leaders.
Thanks for this great diary, RHL. I knew something of Mother Jones, but I am inspired now to read more about her. I’ve been on a biography kick for several years and I’ve exhausted all the usual suspects… Now I know what to put on my Christmas wish list!
We need a new revival of labor. It will happen, but we need it sooner rather than later.
Thanks again, and I wish you and all the BooTribe a hoppy holiday!
Thanks so much, Blueneck. She was an amazing, and FUNNY, woman. I was just lost in her autobiography today, which you can find online (and at some of the links above.) There needs to be a movie about her, to remind people that no matter how horrible life gets, you always have dignity, and have the ability to stand up for who you are and what you deserve. What a lesson!
Happy Labor Day to you and all the BT’ers here!
My journey to activism began with my union involvement. We owe a great debt to those who struggled and died for a little justice so many years ago. It’s very sad to see the gains we made slipping away today. Time to make our voices heard loud and clear once more.
Thanks for making these stories come alive for us.
Thanks for your comments. And I wonder, do you have any war stories from your union days you’d care to share? Inspirational or otherwise?
It was in the early 1970’s and I was a young firefighter in south Florida. Ceasar Chavez was nearby organizing the farm workers and tensions were high. I was making 1.99 per hour and discovered the city trash collectors were getting well over 3.00. Since we were risking our lives daily on the job, we thought there might be some disparity (not to denigrate the trash people, but the occasional dog bite threat was probably all they were going to face at that time).
My Lt. and I decided to contact the IAFF to see if we could get some help from them and they turned out to be wonderful people to work with. We were a city department, but we also covered about 2/3 of the county through a contract for services, so we were pretty busy. The mayor and city council, of course, were quite dismayed when they heard we were seeking representation, so they hired a top gun from Stamford, Connecticut to come down to try and suppress our organizing. They thought we were just a bunch of dumb firefighters, so no problem, but the IAFF turned us on to a financial wiz who analyzed the city books and turned up a pile of cash in a hidden fund that the city had been sitting on. It was in a local bank, drawing zero interest. Since the city had taken the position that “Hey, we love you guys, but there’s just no money for salary increases”, all we had to do was go public with the hidden cash fund and it was all over for them.
It helped a lot that my best friend at that time was a bureau chief for the Miami Herald. He brought all the other local media into the story. The day after the story broke, the city comptroller headed to Mexico and wasn’t heard from again.
It took about two years to settle on the first contract, but after it was signed, the firefighters had a 40% wage increase. The police followed along on our coattails. It was a great feeling of solidarity and accomplishment.
My Lt. wound up being the first president of the local and I was the first secretary.
Oops, forgot to include the link to the IAFF.
Wow. That’s a great story. And of course, it shows not only the power of collective action, but again, what one person can do – one bureau chief, one financial whiz – without those individuals, the battle might have been much longer. Thanks for that!
One of the most memorable people I ever met was IAFF General President, Howie McClennan, a retired Boston firefighter and labor activist. I had dinner with him and his wife one evening after our local was chartered. He was a wonderful human being and just a “regular guy” to the members.
Always glad to see labor history in the forefront. I just wish you had participated in the Boomant Tribune history of labor project; there were a number of stories left uncovered and several other members have commited to diaries about subjects you touched on.
I don’t know if I was here then. And my schedule is sporadic so it’s hard to commit to projects when I’m never sure when I’ll have the next free moment. I spent way too much time on this as it was! I have to pay for that time today. But I don’t regret it.
I sent this post to a bunch of people, and got one incredibly negative response:
I’d love to hear how others would have responded. I basically said my answer was to unionize the poor in other countries so they could no longer be exploited. I don’t imagine he’ll agree. How do we change this perception? And is there any truth to this? I think there’s graft and greed everywhere, and certainly union management would not escape that to some degree. I think the benefits outweigh the detriments, but what do you think?
Having had a very positive experience with the union I was involved in, my first reaction to an outlook such as this would be, “Well screw you too, buddy”, but I don’t think that’s at all helpful, so I usually keep that opinion to myself. I’ve heard this POV many times over the years and usually try to relate my personal circumstances if I think there is any chance at opening a crack in their thinking to let a little reason shine through. Sometimes though, there’s just no hope changing old ideas.
IMHO, one big reason US manufacturers are increasingly vulnerable is because they’re trying to compete with an industrialized world that has government-provided health care for its citizens. In the case of the automakers, they’re still trying to push those fuel-guzzling behemoths several years after their foreign competitors came out with hybrids.
Yeah – that was the most surprising fact from Al Gore’s presentation in “An Inconvenient Truth” – how China and other countries benefitted from far more efficient cars, while America suffers under the weight of SUVs.
I wish people realized how ugly they look in an SUV. Or a Hummer, for that matter, such as the one our dear (NOT) Governor drives….
How I always respond to this BS attitude is thus:
So what do you like about your 8 hour work day?
Do you like being able to take a vacation of whatever length your employer offers?
What do you think about being able to take a day or days off when you are really sick without fear of losing your job?
Do you enjoy having a day off for Christmas and a few other holidays like July 4th?
If you are able to purchase health Insurance through your employers group plan, does it help you with medical needs?
Do you kinda like having Saturday and Sunday or other days off every week?
Does it help your sense of security to know you have a full 40 hours to work every week?
Do you like having a 401K plan offered (if you do) or some sort of retirement plan through your work?
Are you fond of having a lunch hour?
Do you like having a break periodically through the day so that you can go to the restroom?
These are just the starter questions, because there are many, many more of them. . .but if your complainer likes any of these things, then he better damn well understand that NONE OF THEM came about through the kind hearts of the Company, but everyone of them were fought for and often with loss of life and personal sacrifice by determined union members. Without the unions there would be none of these. Without the unions there would be no Labor Laws.
Their answers are always a mumbled jumble of denial etc. But I just tell them to go look it up. Go search it out. Unions gave them everything they so take for granted and expect from employment.
And believe me, many, many companies are salivating over the idea of all part time workers with no benefits, no insurance, no retirement, no overtime, no sick days, no vacation days, no holidays and all at MINIMUM WAGE. The US Postal service has been attempting to do just that for the past 15 years. So far they have not been able to break their 650,000 member strong union. . .but someday. . .who knows.
Scary, re the postal union. I had not heard that the Post Office was trying to take all that away.
When I was on the Dean campaign, one of the workers there said to counter the meme of “tax and spend liberals” we should use the label “cheap labor conservatives.” It is pretty apt. That’s the bottom line. The same guy wrote me again and said even nastier things I won’t repeat, as I don’t want to ruin anyone’s day. But what you say is dead on. He basically said unions of the 1800s were good, but unions of the 1900s were bad. BS!!!!
Actually what they really want to do is PRIVATIZE the postal service. Sell it off to 5 or 6 of their favorite Corporate buddies. So there will be the Western US postal service, the Midwest postal service, the Southwest postal service, the New England Postal service, the New York Postal service, and the Southeastern postal service.
They will run it how they want to. They may get along with the other Regional Services or not. They can charge whatever they want, and what they really want is only the major cities and all small town and outlying areas would have to drive to some sort of central mail warehouse to pick up their mail, if they want it. All small town post offices would be closed.
Stamps and mailing to be done by vending machines wherever they want to put them. Mail delivery only in Big cities (250,000 or larger). You think .39 cents is pricey for a letter, you’ll love from $1.50 to $5.00 a letter depending upon how far it is going in the US. Yeah, let’s privatize that sucker. Haliburton and their ilk need more free money from the government.
But we all know BIG BUSINESS can do it better! Why, just look at Medicare RX drug program and you can see how well it works.
I went to a seminar in town several years ago – a group had just completed a study of how government services did when privatized as compared to the same services when government-run. No surprise, in all cases, costs were lower and service was better when the service was supplied directly by the government. That’s one of the most successful lies ever sold the right – that private business can do it better. There may have been a time when that was true, but it’s not the present reality. Whenever I hear some right-winger go off on this topic, I say three words they all seem to understand: “economies of scale.” They have no comeback for that.